A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients
Chronic indwelling central venous access devices (CICVAD) generally are placed by the percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The cephalic vein cutdown approach is used only infrequently. Although the technique has been well described, few prospective data are available on the cephalic vein cutdown a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2000-08, Vol.7 (7), p.496-502 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 502 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 496 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Povoski, S P |
description | Chronic indwelling central venous access devices (CICVAD) generally are placed by the percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The cephalic vein cutdown approach is used only infrequently. Although the technique has been well described, few prospective data are available on the cephalic vein cutdown approach.
From September 9, 1998, to July 20, 1999, the cephalic vein cutdown approach was attempted in 100 consecutive cancer patients taken to the operating room with the intention of placing CICVAD. Median patient age was 54.5 years (range 18-88), with 46 men and 54 women. Twenty-five patients had gastrointestinal malignancies, 17 had breast cancer, 15 had lymphoma, 13 had lung cancer, 12 had leukemia, 5 had multiple myeloma, and 13 had other malignancies. Patients were followed prospectively for immediate and long-term outcome.
CICVAD placement via the cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82 patients; the remaining 18 patients required conversion to a percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The reasons for inability to place CICVAD via cephalic vein cutdown approach were a cephalic vein that was too small (10 patients), an absent cephalic vein (7 patients), and inability to traverse the angle of insertion of the cephalic vein into the subclavian vein (1 patient). There were 56 subcutaneous ports and 26 tunneled catheters. Median operating time was 44 minutes (range, 26-79 minutes). No postoperative pneumothorax occurred. Median catheter duration was 198 days (range, 0-513 days). Long-term complications included catheter-related bacteremia (6%), site infection (2%), deep venous thrombosis (5%), port pocket hematoma (1%), and superior vena cava stricture (1%). Thirty-seven percent of patients have died since CICVAD placement. Twenty-nine percent of the CICVADs have been removed.
The cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82% of patients. This approach is a safe and useful alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10434-000-0496-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71785786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2415574996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59ebc46472019b15746eeb26345f7130f70ff74446784ed59548bec33a2a8e0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1q3TAQhUVIaf76ANkEQaE7tyPrz1qGkDaFQDfNWsi641wFX9mV7IS8Qx-6c7lZlKwkDeebOZrD2KWArwLAfqsClFQNADSgnGncETsVmirKdOKY7mC6xrVGn7CzWp8AhJWgP7ITAU5Zep2yv9d8LlOdMS7pGXnIYXytqfJp4MsWecR5G8YU-TOmzOO6bKaXzMNMTIhbPkyFx22ZMilS3rzgOKb8SFReShgJytNaeYgRayUBJ9c8TrkiddqPiyFHLHwOSyKkXrAPQxgrfno7z9nD99vfN3fN_a8fP2-u75sonVga7bCPyijbgnC90FYZxL41UunBCgmDhWGwSiljO4Ub7bTqeoxShjZ0CCjP2ZdDX_rGnxXr4nepRjIfMpJhb4XttO0MCT-_Ez5Na6EdVd8qoWmyc3uVOKgibbIWHPxc0i6UVy_A74Pyh6A8BeX3QXlHzNVb57Xf4eY_4pCM_AfIwI9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415574996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Povoski, S P</creator><creatorcontrib>Povoski, S P</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic indwelling central venous access devices (CICVAD) generally are placed by the percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The cephalic vein cutdown approach is used only infrequently. Although the technique has been well described, few prospective data are available on the cephalic vein cutdown approach.
From September 9, 1998, to July 20, 1999, the cephalic vein cutdown approach was attempted in 100 consecutive cancer patients taken to the operating room with the intention of placing CICVAD. Median patient age was 54.5 years (range 18-88), with 46 men and 54 women. Twenty-five patients had gastrointestinal malignancies, 17 had breast cancer, 15 had lymphoma, 13 had lung cancer, 12 had leukemia, 5 had multiple myeloma, and 13 had other malignancies. Patients were followed prospectively for immediate and long-term outcome.
CICVAD placement via the cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82 patients; the remaining 18 patients required conversion to a percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The reasons for inability to place CICVAD via cephalic vein cutdown approach were a cephalic vein that was too small (10 patients), an absent cephalic vein (7 patients), and inability to traverse the angle of insertion of the cephalic vein into the subclavian vein (1 patient). There were 56 subcutaneous ports and 26 tunneled catheters. Median operating time was 44 minutes (range, 26-79 minutes). No postoperative pneumothorax occurred. Median catheter duration was 198 days (range, 0-513 days). Long-term complications included catheter-related bacteremia (6%), site infection (2%), deep venous thrombosis (5%), port pocket hematoma (1%), and superior vena cava stricture (1%). Thirty-seven percent of patients have died since CICVAD placement. Twenty-nine percent of the CICVADs have been removed.
The cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82% of patients. This approach is a safe and useful alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0496-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10947017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage ; Bacteremia ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheters ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Female ; Hematoma ; Humans ; Lung cancer ; Lymphoma ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Patients ; Pneumothorax ; Prospective Studies ; Stricture ; Subclavian Vein ; Thrombosis ; Veins & arteries ; Venous access</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2000-08, Vol.7 (7), p.496-502</ispartof><rights>The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2000.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59ebc46472019b15746eeb26345f7130f70ff74446784ed59548bec33a2a8e0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59ebc46472019b15746eeb26345f7130f70ff74446784ed59548bec33a2a8e0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10947017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Povoski, S P</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Chronic indwelling central venous access devices (CICVAD) generally are placed by the percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The cephalic vein cutdown approach is used only infrequently. Although the technique has been well described, few prospective data are available on the cephalic vein cutdown approach.
From September 9, 1998, to July 20, 1999, the cephalic vein cutdown approach was attempted in 100 consecutive cancer patients taken to the operating room with the intention of placing CICVAD. Median patient age was 54.5 years (range 18-88), with 46 men and 54 women. Twenty-five patients had gastrointestinal malignancies, 17 had breast cancer, 15 had lymphoma, 13 had lung cancer, 12 had leukemia, 5 had multiple myeloma, and 13 had other malignancies. Patients were followed prospectively for immediate and long-term outcome.
CICVAD placement via the cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82 patients; the remaining 18 patients required conversion to a percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The reasons for inability to place CICVAD via cephalic vein cutdown approach were a cephalic vein that was too small (10 patients), an absent cephalic vein (7 patients), and inability to traverse the angle of insertion of the cephalic vein into the subclavian vein (1 patient). There were 56 subcutaneous ports and 26 tunneled catheters. Median operating time was 44 minutes (range, 26-79 minutes). No postoperative pneumothorax occurred. Median catheter duration was 198 days (range, 0-513 days). Long-term complications included catheter-related bacteremia (6%), site infection (2%), deep venous thrombosis (5%), port pocket hematoma (1%), and superior vena cava stricture (1%). Thirty-seven percent of patients have died since CICVAD placement. Twenty-nine percent of the CICVADs have been removed.
The cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82% of patients. This approach is a safe and useful alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bacteremia</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumothorax</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stricture</subject><subject>Subclavian Vein</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><subject>Venous access</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1q3TAQhUVIaf76ANkEQaE7tyPrz1qGkDaFQDfNWsi641wFX9mV7IS8Qx-6c7lZlKwkDeebOZrD2KWArwLAfqsClFQNADSgnGncETsVmirKdOKY7mC6xrVGn7CzWp8AhJWgP7ITAU5Zep2yv9d8LlOdMS7pGXnIYXytqfJp4MsWecR5G8YU-TOmzOO6bKaXzMNMTIhbPkyFx22ZMilS3rzgOKb8SFReShgJytNaeYgRayUBJ9c8TrkiddqPiyFHLHwOSyKkXrAPQxgrfno7z9nD99vfN3fN_a8fP2-u75sonVga7bCPyijbgnC90FYZxL41UunBCgmDhWGwSiljO4Ub7bTqeoxShjZ0CCjP2ZdDX_rGnxXr4nepRjIfMpJhb4XttO0MCT-_Ez5Na6EdVd8qoWmyc3uVOKgibbIWHPxc0i6UVy_A74Pyh6A8BeX3QXlHzNVb57Xf4eY_4pCM_AfIwI9c</recordid><startdate>20000801</startdate><enddate>20000801</enddate><creator>Povoski, S P</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000801</creationdate><title>A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients</title><author>Povoski, S P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59ebc46472019b15746eeb26345f7130f70ff74446784ed59548bec33a2a8e0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bacteremia</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumothorax</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stricture</topic><topic>Subclavian Vein</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><topic>Venous access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Povoski, S P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Povoski, S P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2000-08-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>496-502</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Chronic indwelling central venous access devices (CICVAD) generally are placed by the percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The cephalic vein cutdown approach is used only infrequently. Although the technique has been well described, few prospective data are available on the cephalic vein cutdown approach.
From September 9, 1998, to July 20, 1999, the cephalic vein cutdown approach was attempted in 100 consecutive cancer patients taken to the operating room with the intention of placing CICVAD. Median patient age was 54.5 years (range 18-88), with 46 men and 54 women. Twenty-five patients had gastrointestinal malignancies, 17 had breast cancer, 15 had lymphoma, 13 had lung cancer, 12 had leukemia, 5 had multiple myeloma, and 13 had other malignancies. Patients were followed prospectively for immediate and long-term outcome.
CICVAD placement via the cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82 patients; the remaining 18 patients required conversion to a percutaneous subclavian vein approach. The reasons for inability to place CICVAD via cephalic vein cutdown approach were a cephalic vein that was too small (10 patients), an absent cephalic vein (7 patients), and inability to traverse the angle of insertion of the cephalic vein into the subclavian vein (1 patient). There were 56 subcutaneous ports and 26 tunneled catheters. Median operating time was 44 minutes (range, 26-79 minutes). No postoperative pneumothorax occurred. Median catheter duration was 198 days (range, 0-513 days). Long-term complications included catheter-related bacteremia (6%), site infection (2%), deep venous thrombosis (5%), port pocket hematoma (1%), and superior vena cava stricture (1%). Thirty-seven percent of patients have died since CICVAD placement. Twenty-nine percent of the CICVADs have been removed.
The cephalic vein cutdown approach was successful in 82% of patients. This approach is a safe and useful alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>10947017</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10434-000-0496-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2000-08, Vol.7 (7), p.496-502 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71785786 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage Bacteremia Breast cancer Cancer Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation Catheterization, Central Venous - methods Catheters Catheters, Indwelling Female Hematoma Humans Lung cancer Lymphoma Male Middle Aged Multiple myeloma Neoplasms - drug therapy Patients Pneumothorax Prospective Studies Stricture Subclavian Vein Thrombosis Veins & arteries Venous access |
title | A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T04%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20cephalic%20vein%20cutdown%20approach%20for%20chronic%20indwelling%20central%20venous%20access%20in%20100%20consecutive%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Povoski,%20S%20P&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=496-502&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10434-000-0496-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415574996%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415574996&rft_id=info:pmid/10947017&rfr_iscdi=true |