Comparison of Superficial and Deep Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Myofascial Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
OBJECTIVEThe aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effect of the superficial and in-depth insertion of acupuncture needles in the treatment of patients with chronic lumbar myofascial pain. DESIGNA prospective randomized double-blind study of superficial and deep acupuncture was conducted....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Clinical journal of pain 2002-05, Vol.18 (3), p.149-153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | The Clinical journal of pain |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Ceccherelli, Francesco Rigoni, Maria Teresa Gagliardi, Giuseppe Ruzzante, Leonardo |
description | OBJECTIVEThe aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effect of the superficial and in-depth insertion of acupuncture needles in the treatment of patients with chronic lumbar myofascial pain.
DESIGNA prospective randomized double-blind study of superficial and deep acupuncture was conducted.
SETTINGThe study was conducted in the Pain Service Unit of the University of Padova.
PATIENTSThe study comprised 42 patients with lumbar myofascial pain who were divided into two equal groups (A and B).
INTERVENTIONIn group A, the needle was introduced in the skin at a depth of 2 mm, whereas in group B the needle was placed deeply into muscular tissue. The treatment was planned for a cycle of eight sessions.
OUTCOME MEASURESThe intensity of pain was evaluated with the McGill Pain Questionnaire before and after treatment and at the 3-month follow-up examination.
RESULTSAlthough at the end of the treatment there was no evidence of significant statistical differences between the two different groups, pain reduction was greater in the group treated with deep acupuncture. A statistical difference existed between the two groups at the 3-month follow up, with a better result in the deeply stimulated group.
CONCLUSIONSClinical results show that deep stimulation has a better analgesic effect when compared with superficial stimulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00002508-200205000-00003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71781066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71781066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-a588294afa356d7844ca7aa06830eae15c99a01c23c25ec820018cced050d5d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkFv1DAQhS1ERZfCX0C-wC3Uju3E4bZsC0Va1IqWczTrTLQGJw52rGq593_j7S70hC9jj773RnpjQihn7zlr6nOWT6mYLspcmcqvYt8Sz8iCK1EVSrLmOVmwWjaFZrI-JS9j_MEYV6VmL8gpL5nUklcL8rDywwTBRj9S39PbNGHorbHgKIwdvUCc6NKkKY1mTgGpHem8RXoXEOYBx3kvWqdhA4F-3fke4qP0Buz4gS7phU8bh8VHZ7PXt2zoB_sbO7ry4xy8c_l6O6du94qc9OAivj7WM_L90-Xd6qpYX3_-slquCyNVKQpQWpeNhB6EqrpaS2mgBmCVFgwBuTJNA4ybUphSodE5Ha6NwS5H1KmuFmfk3cF3Cv5Xwji3g40GnYMRfYptzWvNWVVlUB9AE3yMAft2CnaAsGs5a_craP-uoP23gseWyNI3xxlpM2D3JDxmnoG3RyCnBa4PMBobnzhRyUo2eyN54O69mzHEny7dY2i3CG7etv_7AuIP_uKeSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71781066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Superficial and Deep Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Myofascial Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ceccherelli, Francesco ; Rigoni, Maria Teresa ; Gagliardi, Giuseppe ; Ruzzante, Leonardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ceccherelli, Francesco ; Rigoni, Maria Teresa ; Gagliardi, Giuseppe ; Ruzzante, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEThe aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effect of the superficial and in-depth insertion of acupuncture needles in the treatment of patients with chronic lumbar myofascial pain.
DESIGNA prospective randomized double-blind study of superficial and deep acupuncture was conducted.
SETTINGThe study was conducted in the Pain Service Unit of the University of Padova.
PATIENTSThe study comprised 42 patients with lumbar myofascial pain who were divided into two equal groups (A and B).
INTERVENTIONIn group A, the needle was introduced in the skin at a depth of 2 mm, whereas in group B the needle was placed deeply into muscular tissue. The treatment was planned for a cycle of eight sessions.
OUTCOME MEASURESThe intensity of pain was evaluated with the McGill Pain Questionnaire before and after treatment and at the 3-month follow-up examination.
RESULTSAlthough at the end of the treatment there was no evidence of significant statistical differences between the two different groups, pain reduction was greater in the group treated with deep acupuncture. A statistical difference existed between the two groups at the 3-month follow up, with a better result in the deeply stimulated group.
CONCLUSIONSClinical results show that deep stimulation has a better analgesic effect when compared with superficial stimulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200205000-00003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12048416</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPAEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Acupuncture Therapy - methods ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the nervous system ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lumbosacral Region ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myofascial Pain Syndromes - physiopathology ; Myofascial Pain Syndromes - therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Palliative Care ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><ispartof>The Clinical journal of pain, 2002-05, Vol.18 (3), p.149-153</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-a588294afa356d7844ca7aa06830eae15c99a01c23c25ec820018cced050d5d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-a588294afa356d7844ca7aa06830eae15c99a01c23c25ec820018cced050d5d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13646493$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12048416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ceccherelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigoni, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzzante, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Superficial and Deep Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Myofascial Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>The Clinical journal of pain</title><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVEThe aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effect of the superficial and in-depth insertion of acupuncture needles in the treatment of patients with chronic lumbar myofascial pain.
DESIGNA prospective randomized double-blind study of superficial and deep acupuncture was conducted.
SETTINGThe study was conducted in the Pain Service Unit of the University of Padova.
PATIENTSThe study comprised 42 patients with lumbar myofascial pain who were divided into two equal groups (A and B).
INTERVENTIONIn group A, the needle was introduced in the skin at a depth of 2 mm, whereas in group B the needle was placed deeply into muscular tissue. The treatment was planned for a cycle of eight sessions.
OUTCOME MEASURESThe intensity of pain was evaluated with the McGill Pain Questionnaire before and after treatment and at the 3-month follow-up examination.
RESULTSAlthough at the end of the treatment there was no evidence of significant statistical differences between the two different groups, pain reduction was greater in the group treated with deep acupuncture. A statistical difference existed between the two groups at the 3-month follow up, with a better result in the deeply stimulated group.
CONCLUSIONSClinical results show that deep stimulation has a better analgesic effect when compared with superficial stimulation.</description><subject>Acupuncture Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the nervous system</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myofascial Pain Syndromes - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myofascial Pain Syndromes - therapy</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><issn>0749-8047</issn><issn>1536-5409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkFv1DAQhS1ERZfCX0C-wC3Uju3E4bZsC0Va1IqWczTrTLQGJw52rGq593_j7S70hC9jj773RnpjQihn7zlr6nOWT6mYLspcmcqvYt8Sz8iCK1EVSrLmOVmwWjaFZrI-JS9j_MEYV6VmL8gpL5nUklcL8rDywwTBRj9S39PbNGHorbHgKIwdvUCc6NKkKY1mTgGpHem8RXoXEOYBx3kvWqdhA4F-3fke4qP0Buz4gS7phU8bh8VHZ7PXt2zoB_sbO7ry4xy8c_l6O6du94qc9OAivj7WM_L90-Xd6qpYX3_-slquCyNVKQpQWpeNhB6EqrpaS2mgBmCVFgwBuTJNA4ybUphSodE5Ha6NwS5H1KmuFmfk3cF3Cv5Xwji3g40GnYMRfYptzWvNWVVlUB9AE3yMAft2CnaAsGs5a_craP-uoP23gseWyNI3xxlpM2D3JDxmnoG3RyCnBa4PMBobnzhRyUo2eyN54O69mzHEny7dY2i3CG7etv_7AuIP_uKeSg</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Ceccherelli, Francesco</creator><creator>Rigoni, Maria Teresa</creator><creator>Gagliardi, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Ruzzante, Leonardo</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Comparison of Superficial and Deep Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Myofascial Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Ceccherelli, Francesco ; Rigoni, Maria Teresa ; Gagliardi, Giuseppe ; Ruzzante, Leonardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4523-a588294afa356d7844ca7aa06830eae15c99a01c23c25ec820018cced050d5d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acupuncture Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the nervous system</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myofascial Pain Syndromes - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myofascial Pain Syndromes - therapy</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ceccherelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigoni, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzzante, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ceccherelli, Francesco</au><au>Rigoni, Maria Teresa</au><au>Gagliardi, Giuseppe</au><au>Ruzzante, Leonardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Superficial and Deep Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Myofascial Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>149-153</pages><issn>0749-8047</issn><eissn>1536-5409</eissn><coden>CJPAEU</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVEThe aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effect of the superficial and in-depth insertion of acupuncture needles in the treatment of patients with chronic lumbar myofascial pain.
DESIGNA prospective randomized double-blind study of superficial and deep acupuncture was conducted.
SETTINGThe study was conducted in the Pain Service Unit of the University of Padova.
PATIENTSThe study comprised 42 patients with lumbar myofascial pain who were divided into two equal groups (A and B).
INTERVENTIONIn group A, the needle was introduced in the skin at a depth of 2 mm, whereas in group B the needle was placed deeply into muscular tissue. The treatment was planned for a cycle of eight sessions.
OUTCOME MEASURESThe intensity of pain was evaluated with the McGill Pain Questionnaire before and after treatment and at the 3-month follow-up examination.
RESULTSAlthough at the end of the treatment there was no evidence of significant statistical differences between the two different groups, pain reduction was greater in the group treated with deep acupuncture. A statistical difference existed between the two groups at the 3-month follow up, with a better result in the deeply stimulated group.
CONCLUSIONSClinical results show that deep stimulation has a better analgesic effect when compared with superficial stimulation.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12048416</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002508-200205000-00003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-8047 |
ispartof | The Clinical journal of pain, 2002-05, Vol.18 (3), p.149-153 |
issn | 0749-8047 1536-5409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71781066 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Acupuncture Therapy - methods Adult Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the nervous system Double-Blind Method Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Lumbosacral Region Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Myofascial Pain Syndromes - physiopathology Myofascial Pain Syndromes - therapy Pain Measurement Palliative Care Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) |
title | Comparison of Superficial and Deep Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Myofascial Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Superficial%20and%20Deep%20Acupuncture%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Lumbar%20Myofascial%20Pain:%20A%20Double-Blind%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Clinical%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Ceccherelli,%20Francesco&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=149-153&rft.issn=0749-8047&rft.eissn=1536-5409&rft.coden=CJPAEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002508-200205000-00003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71781066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71781066&rft_id=info:pmid/12048416&rfr_iscdi=true |