GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking

We have developed an evolutionary approach for flexible ligand docking. This approval, GEMDOCK, uses a Generic Evolutionary Method for molecular DOCKing and an empirical scoring function. The former combines both discrete and continuous global search strategies with local search strategies to speed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2004-05, Vol.55 (2), p.288-304
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Jinn-Moon, Chen, Chun-Chen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 304
container_issue 2
container_start_page 288
container_title Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics
container_volume 55
creator Yang, Jinn-Moon
Chen, Chun-Chen
description We have developed an evolutionary approach for flexible ligand docking. This approval, GEMDOCK, uses a Generic Evolutionary Method for molecular DOCKing and an empirical scoring function. The former combines both discrete and continuous global search strategies with local search strategies to speed up convergence, whereas the latter results in rapid recognition of potential ligands. GEMDOCK was tested on a diverse data set of 100 protein–ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank. In 79% of these complexes, the docked lowest energy ligand structures had root‐mean‐square derivations (RMSDs) below 2.0 Å with respect to the corresponding crystal structures. The success rate increased to 85% if the structure water molecules were retained. We evaluated GEMDOCK on two cross‐docking experiments in which each ligand of a protein ensemble was docked into each protein of the ensemble. Seventy‐six percent of the docked structures had RMSDs below 2.0 Å when the ligands were docked into foreign structures. We analyzed and validated GEMDOCK with respect to various search spaces and scoring functions, and found that if the scoring function was perfect, then the predicted accuracy was also essentially perfect. This study suggests that GEMDOCK is a useful tool for molecular recognition and may be used to systematically evaluate and thus improve scoring functions. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/prot.20035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71780734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71780734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-94f10c4cfe3d834bef658ee41279328798f9cbde7511e1fce446cd4166491a0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwkAURidGI4hufADTlQuT4vy1MzVuCCAaEYzBuJyU6S1W2w7OtCpvbxHUnau7Ofck30HomOAuwZieL62puhRjFuygNsGR8DFhfBe1sZTCZ4EMWujAuReMcRixcB-1SIC5lJS20eVoeDeY9m8vvJ63gBJspj14N3ldZaaM7coroHo2iZca6xUmB13nsfUSo1-zcnGI9tI4d3C0vR30eDWc9a_98XR00--Nfc1pFPgRTwnWXKfAEsn4HNIwkACcUBExKkUk00jPExABIUBSDZyHOuEkDHlEYgysg0433mbpWw2uUkXmNOR5XIKpnRJESCwYb8CzDaitcc5CqpY2K5oZimC1bqXWrdR3qwY-2VrreQHJH7qN0wBkA3xkOaz-Uan7h-nsR-pvfjJXwefvT2xfVSiYCNTTZKTogDI-GYzUmH0B2neCAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71780734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yang, Jinn-Moon ; Chen, Chun-Chen</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinn-Moon ; Chen, Chun-Chen</creatorcontrib><description>We have developed an evolutionary approach for flexible ligand docking. This approval, GEMDOCK, uses a Generic Evolutionary Method for molecular DOCKing and an empirical scoring function. The former combines both discrete and continuous global search strategies with local search strategies to speed up convergence, whereas the latter results in rapid recognition of potential ligands. GEMDOCK was tested on a diverse data set of 100 protein–ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank. In 79% of these complexes, the docked lowest energy ligand structures had root‐mean‐square derivations (RMSDs) below 2.0 Å with respect to the corresponding crystal structures. The success rate increased to 85% if the structure water molecules were retained. We evaluated GEMDOCK on two cross‐docking experiments in which each ligand of a protein ensemble was docked into each protein of the ensemble. Seventy‐six percent of the docked structures had RMSDs below 2.0 Å when the ligands were docked into foreign structures. We analyzed and validated GEMDOCK with respect to various search spaces and scoring functions, and found that if the scoring function was perfect, then the predicted accuracy was also essentially perfect. This study suggests that GEMDOCK is a useful tool for molecular recognition and may be used to systematically evaluate and thus improve scoring functions. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prot.20035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15048822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Binding Sites ; Computational Biology - methods ; cross-docking ; Databases, Protein ; Evolution, Molecular ; evolutionary algorithm ; HIV Protease - metabolism ; hybrid docking ; Hydrogen Bonding ; Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments - metabolism ; Internet ; Ligands ; Models, Molecular ; molecular recognition ; Mutation - genetics ; Probability ; Protein Binding ; protein-ligand docking ; Proteins - genetics ; Proteins - metabolism ; Recombination, Genetic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Software ; Static Electricity ; structure-based drug design ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2004-05, Vol.55 (2), p.288-304</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-94f10c4cfe3d834bef658ee41279328798f9cbde7511e1fce446cd4166491a0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-94f10c4cfe3d834bef658ee41279328798f9cbde7511e1fce446cd4166491a0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fprot.20035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fprot.20035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15048822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinn-Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Chen</creatorcontrib><title>GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking</title><title>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><description>We have developed an evolutionary approach for flexible ligand docking. This approval, GEMDOCK, uses a Generic Evolutionary Method for molecular DOCKing and an empirical scoring function. The former combines both discrete and continuous global search strategies with local search strategies to speed up convergence, whereas the latter results in rapid recognition of potential ligands. GEMDOCK was tested on a diverse data set of 100 protein–ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank. In 79% of these complexes, the docked lowest energy ligand structures had root‐mean‐square derivations (RMSDs) below 2.0 Å with respect to the corresponding crystal structures. The success rate increased to 85% if the structure water molecules were retained. We evaluated GEMDOCK on two cross‐docking experiments in which each ligand of a protein ensemble was docked into each protein of the ensemble. Seventy‐six percent of the docked structures had RMSDs below 2.0 Å when the ligands were docked into foreign structures. We analyzed and validated GEMDOCK with respect to various search spaces and scoring functions, and found that if the scoring function was perfect, then the predicted accuracy was also essentially perfect. This study suggests that GEMDOCK is a useful tool for molecular recognition and may be used to systematically evaluate and thus improve scoring functions. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>cross-docking</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>evolutionary algorithm</subject><subject>HIV Protease - metabolism</subject><subject>hybrid docking</subject><subject>Hydrogen Bonding</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments - metabolism</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>molecular recognition</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>protein-ligand docking</subject><subject>Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Recombination, Genetic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Static Electricity</subject><subject>structure-based drug design</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0887-3585</issn><issn>1097-0134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwkAURidGI4hufADTlQuT4vy1MzVuCCAaEYzBuJyU6S1W2w7OtCpvbxHUnau7Ofck30HomOAuwZieL62puhRjFuygNsGR8DFhfBe1sZTCZ4EMWujAuReMcRixcB-1SIC5lJS20eVoeDeY9m8vvJ63gBJspj14N3ldZaaM7coroHo2iZca6xUmB13nsfUSo1-zcnGI9tI4d3C0vR30eDWc9a_98XR00--Nfc1pFPgRTwnWXKfAEsn4HNIwkACcUBExKkUk00jPExABIUBSDZyHOuEkDHlEYgysg0433mbpWw2uUkXmNOR5XIKpnRJESCwYb8CzDaitcc5CqpY2K5oZimC1bqXWrdR3qwY-2VrreQHJH7qN0wBkA3xkOaz-Uan7h-nsR-pvfjJXwefvT2xfVSiYCNTTZKTogDI-GYzUmH0B2neCAw</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Yang, Jinn-Moon</creator><creator>Chen, Chun-Chen</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking</title><author>Yang, Jinn-Moon ; Chen, Chun-Chen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-94f10c4cfe3d834bef658ee41279328798f9cbde7511e1fce446cd4166491a0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>cross-docking</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>evolutionary algorithm</topic><topic>HIV Protease - metabolism</topic><topic>hybrid docking</topic><topic>Hydrogen Bonding</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments - metabolism</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>molecular recognition</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>protein-ligand docking</topic><topic>Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Recombination, Genetic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Static Electricity</topic><topic>structure-based drug design</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinn-Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Chen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Jinn-Moon</au><au>Chen, Chun-Chen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking</atitle><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>288-304</pages><issn>0887-3585</issn><eissn>1097-0134</eissn><abstract>We have developed an evolutionary approach for flexible ligand docking. This approval, GEMDOCK, uses a Generic Evolutionary Method for molecular DOCKing and an empirical scoring function. The former combines both discrete and continuous global search strategies with local search strategies to speed up convergence, whereas the latter results in rapid recognition of potential ligands. GEMDOCK was tested on a diverse data set of 100 protein–ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank. In 79% of these complexes, the docked lowest energy ligand structures had root‐mean‐square derivations (RMSDs) below 2.0 Å with respect to the corresponding crystal structures. The success rate increased to 85% if the structure water molecules were retained. We evaluated GEMDOCK on two cross‐docking experiments in which each ligand of a protein ensemble was docked into each protein of the ensemble. Seventy‐six percent of the docked structures had RMSDs below 2.0 Å when the ligands were docked into foreign structures. We analyzed and validated GEMDOCK with respect to various search spaces and scoring functions, and found that if the scoring function was perfect, then the predicted accuracy was also essentially perfect. This study suggests that GEMDOCK is a useful tool for molecular recognition and may be used to systematically evaluate and thus improve scoring functions. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15048822</pmid><doi>10.1002/prot.20035</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3585
ispartof Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2004-05, Vol.55 (2), p.288-304
issn 0887-3585
1097-0134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71780734
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Algorithms
Binding Sites
Computational Biology - methods
cross-docking
Databases, Protein
Evolution, Molecular
evolutionary algorithm
HIV Protease - metabolism
hybrid docking
Hydrogen Bonding
Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments - metabolism
Internet
Ligands
Models, Molecular
molecular recognition
Mutation - genetics
Probability
Protein Binding
protein-ligand docking
Proteins - genetics
Proteins - metabolism
Recombination, Genetic
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Static Electricity
structure-based drug design
Thermodynamics
title GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GEMDOCK:%20A%20generic%20evolutionary%20method%20for%20molecular%20docking&rft.jtitle=Proteins,%20structure,%20function,%20and%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Yang,%20Jinn-Moon&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=288-304&rft.issn=0887-3585&rft.eissn=1097-0134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prot.20035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71780734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71780734&rft_id=info:pmid/15048822&rfr_iscdi=true