Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial
To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT). Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2000-08, Vol.32 (8), p.1485-1490 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1490 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1485 |
| container_title | Medicine and science in sports and exercise |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | BALMER, J DAVISON, R. C. R BIRD, S. R |
| description | To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).
Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).
There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).
The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00018 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71777541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71777541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-802d9cb390f4a97b0511efe61cd59e44f145b5e85b0817895b9685be04bd06963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6FyQH8dY1s02a5CjiCxYU0XNJ06nUbZuatMj-e7Pu-rg5MEyG-WYCHyEU2ByYlhcshpCZShabl4qZxAS1R6Yg0tikIPbJlIEWiYYUJuQohLeIyDSFQzKJR7hmkE3J0yOaFe3dB3raeyxrOwTao6-cb01ncTcqR193r9R01I1D6ZynkM0hWbXUrm2zGQ11i3TwtWmOyUFlmoAnuzojLzfXz1d3yfLh9v7qcplYvoAhUWxRalukmlXcaFkwAYAVZmBLoZHzCrgoBCpRMAVSaVHoLDbIeFGyTGfpjJxv7_bevY8Yhrytg8WmMR26MeQSpJSCw78gKBAQNUZQbUHrXQgeq7z3dWv8OgeWb8Tn3-LzH_H5l_i4err7YyxaLP8sbk1H4GwHmGBNU_lotw6_nAAJiqefdqOJHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18151008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial</title><source>Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BALMER, J ; DAVISON, R. C. R ; BIRD, S. R</creator><creatorcontrib>BALMER, J ; DAVISON, R. C. R ; BIRD, S. R</creatorcontrib><description>To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).
Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).
There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).
The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10949016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MSPEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bicycling - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Space life sciences ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2000-08, Vol.32 (8), p.1485-1490</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-802d9cb390f4a97b0511efe61cd59e44f145b5e85b0817895b9685be04bd06963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-802d9cb390f4a97b0511efe61cd59e44f145b5e85b0817895b9685be04bd06963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1517184$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10949016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BALMER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVISON, R. C. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIRD, S. R</creatorcontrib><title>Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).
Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).
There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).
The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bicycling - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6FyQH8dY1s02a5CjiCxYU0XNJ06nUbZuatMj-e7Pu-rg5MEyG-WYCHyEU2ByYlhcshpCZShabl4qZxAS1R6Yg0tikIPbJlIEWiYYUJuQohLeIyDSFQzKJR7hmkE3J0yOaFe3dB3raeyxrOwTao6-cb01ncTcqR193r9R01I1D6ZynkM0hWbXUrm2zGQ11i3TwtWmOyUFlmoAnuzojLzfXz1d3yfLh9v7qcplYvoAhUWxRalukmlXcaFkwAYAVZmBLoZHzCrgoBCpRMAVSaVHoLDbIeFGyTGfpjJxv7_bevY8Yhrytg8WmMR26MeQSpJSCw78gKBAQNUZQbUHrXQgeq7z3dWv8OgeWb8Tn3-LzH_H5l_i4err7YyxaLP8sbk1H4GwHmGBNU_lotw6_nAAJiqefdqOJHg</recordid><startdate>20000801</startdate><enddate>20000801</enddate><creator>BALMER, J</creator><creator>DAVISON, R. C. R</creator><creator>BIRD, S. R</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000801</creationdate><title>Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial</title><author>BALMER, J ; DAVISON, R. C. R ; BIRD, S. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-802d9cb390f4a97b0511efe61cd59e44f145b5e85b0817895b9685be04bd06963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bicycling - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BALMER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVISON, R. C. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIRD, S. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BALMER, J</au><au>DAVISON, R. C. R</au><au>BIRD, S. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2000-08-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1485</spage><epage>1490</epage><pages>1485-1490</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><coden>MSPEDA</coden><abstract>To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).
Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).
There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).
The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>10949016</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005768-200008000-00018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0195-9131 |
| ispartof | Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2000-08, Vol.32 (8), p.1485-1490 |
| issn | 0195-9131 1530-0315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71777541 |
| source | Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive; MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Bicycling - physiology Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Middle Aged Reproducibility of Results Space life sciences Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports |
| title | Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A23%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peak%20power%20predicts%20performance%20power%20during%20an%20outdoor%2016.1-km%20cycling%20time%20trial&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=BALMER,%20J&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1485&rft.epage=1490&rft.pages=1485-1490&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft.coden=MSPEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005768-200008000-00018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71777541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18151008&rft_id=info:pmid/10949016&rfr_iscdi=true |