Smokers’ Rights to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Imagine a health maintenance organization creating a policy to deny all smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cost savings to the organization and society would be potentially significant. Now envision the smoker, a hardworking father with daily angina, and the prov...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation ethics, and regulation, 2002-06, Vol.4 (2), p.32-35 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 35 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 32 |
| container_title | JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Heath, Janie Braun, Mary Ann Brindle, Margaret |
| description | Imagine a health maintenance organization creating a policy to deny all smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cost savings to the organization and society would be potentially significant. Now envision the smoker, a hardworking father with daily angina, and the provider, writing costly prescriptions to manage the angina. What ethical and legal questions do you suppose would present in that setting? Now imagine how you would respond if given this scenario of denying smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft. This article discusses the implications of resource allocation with self-inflicted health behaviors such as smoking. Tough questions are raised that explore both the pros and the cons of smokers’ rights to coronary artery bypass graft. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00128488-200206000-00005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71767269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71767269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2715-608e33b2f65c43f18c5d45b0e1694d7740fa5b562ac22d9ffdb2879802713b073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9KAzEQh4MotlZfQfbkbXWSbP4da9EqFASr4C1kd7Nt7bapyS6lN1_D1_NJTG3Vk4cwYfh-GeYLQgmGSwxKXAFgIjMpUwJAgANAGg-wA9TFjKoUBH053N4JpIoQ1UEnIbxGQlLGj1EHE8gIF6KL1Hjh5taHz_eP5HE2mTYhaVwycN4tjd8kfd_YWK43KxNCMvSmapJx6yexeYqOKlMHe7avPfR8e_M0uEtHD8P7QX-UFkRglnKQltKcVJwVGa2wLFiZsRws5iorhcigMixnnJiCkFJVVZkTKZSEmKZ5XKSHLnbvrrx7a21o9GIWClvXZmldG7TAggvCVQTlDiy8C8HbSq_8bBG30Bj0Vpv-0aZ_telvbTF6vp_R5gtb_gX3niKQ7YC1q6ORMK_btfV6ak3dTPV_30G_AOVvdt4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71767269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smokers’ Rights to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Heath, Janie ; Braun, Mary Ann ; Brindle, Margaret</creator><creatorcontrib>Heath, Janie ; Braun, Mary Ann ; Brindle, Margaret</creatorcontrib><description>Imagine a health maintenance organization creating a policy to deny all smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cost savings to the organization and society would be potentially significant. Now envision the smoker, a hardworking father with daily angina, and the provider, writing costly prescriptions to manage the angina. What ethical and legal questions do you suppose would present in that setting? Now imagine how you would respond if given this scenario of denying smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft. This article discusses the implications of resource allocation with self-inflicted health behaviors such as smoking. Tough questions are raised that explore both the pros and the cons of smokers’ rights to coronary artery bypass graft.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-9229</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-073X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00128488-200206000-00005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12042677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Ethics, Medical ; Health Care Rationing ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Managed Care Programs ; Nursing ; Patient Rights ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation, 2002-06, Vol.4 (2), p.32-35</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2715-608e33b2f65c43f18c5d45b0e1694d7740fa5b562ac22d9ffdb2879802713b073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2715-608e33b2f65c43f18c5d45b0e1694d7740fa5b562ac22d9ffdb2879802713b073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12042677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heath, Janie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Margaret</creatorcontrib><title>Smokers’ Rights to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</title><title>JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation</title><addtitle>JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul</addtitle><description>Imagine a health maintenance organization creating a policy to deny all smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cost savings to the organization and society would be potentially significant. Now envision the smoker, a hardworking father with daily angina, and the provider, writing costly prescriptions to manage the angina. What ethical and legal questions do you suppose would present in that setting? Now imagine how you would respond if given this scenario of denying smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft. This article discusses the implications of resource allocation with self-inflicted health behaviors such as smoking. Tough questions are raised that explore both the pros and the cons of smokers’ rights to coronary artery bypass graft.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Rights</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>1520-9229</issn><issn>1539-073X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9KAzEQh4MotlZfQfbkbXWSbP4da9EqFASr4C1kd7Nt7bapyS6lN1_D1_NJTG3Vk4cwYfh-GeYLQgmGSwxKXAFgIjMpUwJAgANAGg-wA9TFjKoUBH053N4JpIoQ1UEnIbxGQlLGj1EHE8gIF6KL1Hjh5taHz_eP5HE2mTYhaVwycN4tjd8kfd_YWK43KxNCMvSmapJx6yexeYqOKlMHe7avPfR8e_M0uEtHD8P7QX-UFkRglnKQltKcVJwVGa2wLFiZsRws5iorhcigMixnnJiCkFJVVZkTKZSEmKZ5XKSHLnbvrrx7a21o9GIWClvXZmldG7TAggvCVQTlDiy8C8HbSq_8bBG30Bj0Vpv-0aZ_telvbTF6vp_R5gtb_gX3niKQ7YC1q6ORMK_btfV6ak3dTPV_30G_AOVvdt4</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>Heath, Janie</creator><creator>Braun, Mary Ann</creator><creator>Brindle, Margaret</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>Smokers’ Rights to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</title><author>Heath, Janie ; Braun, Mary Ann ; Brindle, Margaret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2715-608e33b2f65c43f18c5d45b0e1694d7740fa5b562ac22d9ffdb2879802713b073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Rights</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heath, Janie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Margaret</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heath, Janie</au><au>Braun, Mary Ann</au><au>Brindle, Margaret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smokers’ Rights to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</atitle><jtitle>JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation</jtitle><addtitle>JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul</addtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>32-35</pages><issn>1520-9229</issn><eissn>1539-073X</eissn><abstract>Imagine a health maintenance organization creating a policy to deny all smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cost savings to the organization and society would be potentially significant. Now envision the smoker, a hardworking father with daily angina, and the provider, writing costly prescriptions to manage the angina. What ethical and legal questions do you suppose would present in that setting? Now imagine how you would respond if given this scenario of denying smokers access to nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft. This article discusses the implications of resource allocation with self-inflicted health behaviors such as smoking. Tough questions are raised that explore both the pros and the cons of smokers’ rights to coronary artery bypass graft.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12042677</pmid><doi>10.1097/00128488-200206000-00005</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1520-9229 |
| ispartof | JONA'S healthcare law, ethics, and regulation, 2002-06, Vol.4 (2), p.32-35 |
| issn | 1520-9229 1539-073X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71767269 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Bioethics Coronary Artery Bypass Ethics, Medical Health Care Rationing Health Services Accessibility Humans Managed Care Programs Nursing Patient Rights Smoking |
| title | Smokers’ Rights to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A42%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smokers%E2%80%99%20Rights%20to%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Graft%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=JONA'S%20healthcare%20law,%20ethics,%20and%20regulation&rft.au=Heath,%20Janie&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=32-35&rft.issn=1520-9229&rft.eissn=1539-073X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00128488-200206000-00005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71767269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71767269&rft_id=info:pmid/12042677&rfr_iscdi=true |