Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America

A series of randomized, controlled, masked field studies was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of selamectin in the treatment of flea infestations on dogs and cats, and in the prevention of heartworm infection in dogs. In addition, observations were made on the beneficial effect of selamec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary parasitology 2000-08, Vol.91 (3), p.233-250
Hauptverfasser: Boy, M.G, Six, R.H, Thomas, C.A, Novotny, M.J, Smothers, C.D, Rowan, T.G, Jernigan, A.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue 3
container_start_page 233
container_title Veterinary parasitology
container_volume 91
creator Boy, M.G
Six, R.H
Thomas, C.A
Novotny, M.J
Smothers, C.D
Rowan, T.G
Jernigan, A.D
description A series of randomized, controlled, masked field studies was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of selamectin in the treatment of flea infestations on dogs and cats, and in the prevention of heartworm infection in dogs. In addition, observations were made on the beneficial effect of selamectin treatment on dogs and cats showing signs of flea allergy dermatitis (FAD). In all studies selamectin was applied topically, once per month, in unit doses providing a minimum dosage of 6 mg kg −1. Dogs and cats with naturally occurring flea infestations, some of which also had signs associated with FAD, were assigned randomly to receive three months of topical treatment with selamectin (220 dogs, 189 cats) or a positive-control product (dogs: fenthion, n=81; cats: pyrethrins, n=66). Selamectin was administered on days 0, 30, and 60. Day 0 was defined as the day that the animal first received treatment. Flea burdens were assessed by flea comb counts and clinical evaluations of FAD were performed before treatment, and on days 14, 30, 60, and 90. On days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated dogs were reduced by 92.1, 99.0, and 99.8%, and mean flea counts in fenthion-treated dogs were reduced by 81.5, 86.8, and 86.1%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Also, on days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated cats were reduced by 92.5, 98.3, and 99.3%, and mean flea counts in pyrethrin-treated cats were reduced by 66.4, 73.9, and 81.3%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Selamectin also was beneficial in alleviating signs in dogs and cats diagnosed clinically with FAD. A total of 397 dogs free of adult heartworm infection from four heartworm-endemic areas of the USA were allocated randomly to six months of treatment with selamectin ( n=298) or ivermectin ( n=99). Selamectin achieved a heartworm prevention rate of 100%, with all dogs testing negative for microfilariae and adult heartworm antigen on days 180 and 300. Selamectin was administered to a total of 673 dogs and 347 cats having an age range of 6 weeks to 19 years (3954 doses). The animals included 19 purebred or crossbred Collies (Bearded, Border, and unspecified). There were no serious adverse events. Results of these studies indicated that selamectin was highly effective in the control of flea infestations in dogs and cats without the need for simultaneous treatment of the environment or of in-contact animals and also was beneficial in alleviating signs associat
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00295-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71751035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304401700002958</els_id><sourcerecordid>17807236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-a9b78a280d55ff40e4dcc2321d737df8fd7859838037f7d98496fee8d7e344593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PXSEQhkmjqVfbn6BhZezitMMBLpxVY4y1TYwu2q4JwqCY83ELXM1d-s_Fe4zpzhXJzPMymXkIOWTwlQFbfvsNHEQjgKkTgC8AbScb_YEsmFa8aaWEHbJ4Q_bIfs73ACBgqT6SPQadANnKBXk6DyE66zbUjp5mG7Bs6BRoxt4O6Eocqb21ccyFhh5t3mJ3aFN5nNKQae376XYuO1syXSXMOBb0tMIPWDDF0aYNXdkSa32buJpSuaOnQ-05-4nsBttn_Pz6HpC_P87_nP1sLq8vfp2dXjZOSF0a290obVsNXsoQBKDwzrW8ZV5x5YMOXmnZaa6Bq6B8p0W3DIjaK-RCyI4fkOP531Wa_q0xFzPE7LDv7YjTOhvFlGTA5bsgUxpUy5cVlDPo0pRzwmBWKQ51WcPAvEgyW0nmxYABMFtJRtfc0euA9c2A_r_UbKUC32cA6z0eIiaTXT2eQx9TdWL8FN8Z8QxVIqJh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17807236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Boy, M.G ; Six, R.H ; Thomas, C.A ; Novotny, M.J ; Smothers, C.D ; Rowan, T.G ; Jernigan, A.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Boy, M.G ; Six, R.H ; Thomas, C.A ; Novotny, M.J ; Smothers, C.D ; Rowan, T.G ; Jernigan, A.D</creatorcontrib><description>A series of randomized, controlled, masked field studies was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of selamectin in the treatment of flea infestations on dogs and cats, and in the prevention of heartworm infection in dogs. In addition, observations were made on the beneficial effect of selamectin treatment on dogs and cats showing signs of flea allergy dermatitis (FAD). In all studies selamectin was applied topically, once per month, in unit doses providing a minimum dosage of 6 mg kg −1. Dogs and cats with naturally occurring flea infestations, some of which also had signs associated with FAD, were assigned randomly to receive three months of topical treatment with selamectin (220 dogs, 189 cats) or a positive-control product (dogs: fenthion, n=81; cats: pyrethrins, n=66). Selamectin was administered on days 0, 30, and 60. Day 0 was defined as the day that the animal first received treatment. Flea burdens were assessed by flea comb counts and clinical evaluations of FAD were performed before treatment, and on days 14, 30, 60, and 90. On days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated dogs were reduced by 92.1, 99.0, and 99.8%, and mean flea counts in fenthion-treated dogs were reduced by 81.5, 86.8, and 86.1%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Also, on days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated cats were reduced by 92.5, 98.3, and 99.3%, and mean flea counts in pyrethrin-treated cats were reduced by 66.4, 73.9, and 81.3%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Selamectin also was beneficial in alleviating signs in dogs and cats diagnosed clinically with FAD. A total of 397 dogs free of adult heartworm infection from four heartworm-endemic areas of the USA were allocated randomly to six months of treatment with selamectin ( n=298) or ivermectin ( n=99). Selamectin achieved a heartworm prevention rate of 100%, with all dogs testing negative for microfilariae and adult heartworm antigen on days 180 and 300. Selamectin was administered to a total of 673 dogs and 347 cats having an age range of 6 weeks to 19 years (3954 doses). The animals included 19 purebred or crossbred Collies (Bearded, Border, and unspecified). There were no serious adverse events. Results of these studies indicated that selamectin was highly effective in the control of flea infestations in dogs and cats without the need for simultaneous treatment of the environment or of in-contact animals and also was beneficial in alleviating signs associated with FAD. Selamectin also was 100% effective in preventing the development of canine heartworms and was safe for topical use in dogs and cats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00295-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10940525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthelmintics - therapeutic use ; Antiparasitic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antiparasitic Agents - therapeutic use ; Avermectin ; Cat ; Cat Diseases - drug therapy ; Cats ; Ctenocephalides felis felis ; Dirofilaria immitis ; Dirofilariasis - drug therapy ; Dog ; Dog Diseases - drug therapy ; Dogs ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Ectoparasitic Infestations - drug therapy ; Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary ; Female ; Flea ; Flea allergy dermatitis ; Heartworm ; Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Ivermectin - therapeutic use ; Male ; North America ; Pulicidae ; Revolution ; Selamectin ; Siphonaptera - drug effects ; Stronghold</subject><ispartof>Veterinary parasitology, 2000-08, Vol.91 (3), p.233-250</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-a9b78a280d55ff40e4dcc2321d737df8fd7859838037f7d98496fee8d7e344593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-a9b78a280d55ff40e4dcc2321d737df8fd7859838037f7d98496fee8d7e344593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401700002958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10940525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boy, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Six, R.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smothers, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, T.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jernigan, A.D</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America</title><title>Veterinary parasitology</title><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><description>A series of randomized, controlled, masked field studies was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of selamectin in the treatment of flea infestations on dogs and cats, and in the prevention of heartworm infection in dogs. In addition, observations were made on the beneficial effect of selamectin treatment on dogs and cats showing signs of flea allergy dermatitis (FAD). In all studies selamectin was applied topically, once per month, in unit doses providing a minimum dosage of 6 mg kg −1. Dogs and cats with naturally occurring flea infestations, some of which also had signs associated with FAD, were assigned randomly to receive three months of topical treatment with selamectin (220 dogs, 189 cats) or a positive-control product (dogs: fenthion, n=81; cats: pyrethrins, n=66). Selamectin was administered on days 0, 30, and 60. Day 0 was defined as the day that the animal first received treatment. Flea burdens were assessed by flea comb counts and clinical evaluations of FAD were performed before treatment, and on days 14, 30, 60, and 90. On days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated dogs were reduced by 92.1, 99.0, and 99.8%, and mean flea counts in fenthion-treated dogs were reduced by 81.5, 86.8, and 86.1%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Also, on days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated cats were reduced by 92.5, 98.3, and 99.3%, and mean flea counts in pyrethrin-treated cats were reduced by 66.4, 73.9, and 81.3%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Selamectin also was beneficial in alleviating signs in dogs and cats diagnosed clinically with FAD. A total of 397 dogs free of adult heartworm infection from four heartworm-endemic areas of the USA were allocated randomly to six months of treatment with selamectin ( n=298) or ivermectin ( n=99). Selamectin achieved a heartworm prevention rate of 100%, with all dogs testing negative for microfilariae and adult heartworm antigen on days 180 and 300. Selamectin was administered to a total of 673 dogs and 347 cats having an age range of 6 weeks to 19 years (3954 doses). The animals included 19 purebred or crossbred Collies (Bearded, Border, and unspecified). There were no serious adverse events. Results of these studies indicated that selamectin was highly effective in the control of flea infestations in dogs and cats without the need for simultaneous treatment of the environment or of in-contact animals and also was beneficial in alleviating signs associated with FAD. Selamectin also was 100% effective in preventing the development of canine heartworms and was safe for topical use in dogs and cats.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthelmintics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Avermectin</subject><subject>Cat</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Ctenocephalides felis felis</subject><subject>Dirofilaria immitis</subject><subject>Dirofilariasis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dog</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Ectoparasitic Infestations - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flea</subject><subject>Flea allergy dermatitis</subject><subject>Heartworm</subject><subject>Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Ivermectin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Pulicidae</subject><subject>Revolution</subject><subject>Selamectin</subject><subject>Siphonaptera - drug effects</subject><subject>Stronghold</subject><issn>0304-4017</issn><issn>1873-2550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1PXSEQhkmjqVfbn6BhZezitMMBLpxVY4y1TYwu2q4JwqCY83ELXM1d-s_Fe4zpzhXJzPMymXkIOWTwlQFbfvsNHEQjgKkTgC8AbScb_YEsmFa8aaWEHbJ4Q_bIfs73ACBgqT6SPQadANnKBXk6DyE66zbUjp5mG7Bs6BRoxt4O6Eocqb21ccyFhh5t3mJ3aFN5nNKQae376XYuO1syXSXMOBb0tMIPWDDF0aYNXdkSa32buJpSuaOnQ-05-4nsBttn_Pz6HpC_P87_nP1sLq8vfp2dXjZOSF0a290obVsNXsoQBKDwzrW8ZV5x5YMOXmnZaa6Bq6B8p0W3DIjaK-RCyI4fkOP531Wa_q0xFzPE7LDv7YjTOhvFlGTA5bsgUxpUy5cVlDPo0pRzwmBWKQ51WcPAvEgyW0nmxYABMFtJRtfc0euA9c2A_r_UbKUC32cA6z0eIiaTXT2eQx9TdWL8FN8Z8QxVIqJh</recordid><startdate>20000823</startdate><enddate>20000823</enddate><creator>Boy, M.G</creator><creator>Six, R.H</creator><creator>Thomas, C.A</creator><creator>Novotny, M.J</creator><creator>Smothers, C.D</creator><creator>Rowan, T.G</creator><creator>Jernigan, A.D</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000823</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America</title><author>Boy, M.G ; Six, R.H ; Thomas, C.A ; Novotny, M.J ; Smothers, C.D ; Rowan, T.G ; Jernigan, A.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-a9b78a280d55ff40e4dcc2321d737df8fd7859838037f7d98496fee8d7e344593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthelmintics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Avermectin</topic><topic>Cat</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Ctenocephalides felis felis</topic><topic>Dirofilaria immitis</topic><topic>Dirofilariasis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dog</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Ectoparasitic Infestations - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flea</topic><topic>Flea allergy dermatitis</topic><topic>Heartworm</topic><topic>Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Ivermectin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Pulicidae</topic><topic>Revolution</topic><topic>Selamectin</topic><topic>Siphonaptera - drug effects</topic><topic>Stronghold</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boy, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Six, R.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smothers, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, T.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jernigan, A.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boy, M.G</au><au>Six, R.H</au><au>Thomas, C.A</au><au>Novotny, M.J</au><au>Smothers, C.D</au><au>Rowan, T.G</au><au>Jernigan, A.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><date>2000-08-23</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>233-250</pages><issn>0304-4017</issn><eissn>1873-2550</eissn><abstract>A series of randomized, controlled, masked field studies was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of selamectin in the treatment of flea infestations on dogs and cats, and in the prevention of heartworm infection in dogs. In addition, observations were made on the beneficial effect of selamectin treatment on dogs and cats showing signs of flea allergy dermatitis (FAD). In all studies selamectin was applied topically, once per month, in unit doses providing a minimum dosage of 6 mg kg −1. Dogs and cats with naturally occurring flea infestations, some of which also had signs associated with FAD, were assigned randomly to receive three months of topical treatment with selamectin (220 dogs, 189 cats) or a positive-control product (dogs: fenthion, n=81; cats: pyrethrins, n=66). Selamectin was administered on days 0, 30, and 60. Day 0 was defined as the day that the animal first received treatment. Flea burdens were assessed by flea comb counts and clinical evaluations of FAD were performed before treatment, and on days 14, 30, 60, and 90. On days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated dogs were reduced by 92.1, 99.0, and 99.8%, and mean flea counts in fenthion-treated dogs were reduced by 81.5, 86.8, and 86.1%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Also, on days 30, 60, and 90, mean flea counts in selamectin-treated cats were reduced by 92.5, 98.3, and 99.3%, and mean flea counts in pyrethrin-treated cats were reduced by 66.4, 73.9, and 81.3%, respectively, compared with day 0 counts. Selamectin also was beneficial in alleviating signs in dogs and cats diagnosed clinically with FAD. A total of 397 dogs free of adult heartworm infection from four heartworm-endemic areas of the USA were allocated randomly to six months of treatment with selamectin ( n=298) or ivermectin ( n=99). Selamectin achieved a heartworm prevention rate of 100%, with all dogs testing negative for microfilariae and adult heartworm antigen on days 180 and 300. Selamectin was administered to a total of 673 dogs and 347 cats having an age range of 6 weeks to 19 years (3954 doses). The animals included 19 purebred or crossbred Collies (Bearded, Border, and unspecified). There were no serious adverse events. Results of these studies indicated that selamectin was highly effective in the control of flea infestations in dogs and cats without the need for simultaneous treatment of the environment or of in-contact animals and also was beneficial in alleviating signs associated with FAD. Selamectin also was 100% effective in preventing the development of canine heartworms and was safe for topical use in dogs and cats.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10940525</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00295-8</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-4017
ispartof Veterinary parasitology, 2000-08, Vol.91 (3), p.233-250
issn 0304-4017
1873-2550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71751035
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Anthelmintics - therapeutic use
Antiparasitic Agents - administration & dosage
Antiparasitic Agents - therapeutic use
Avermectin
Cat
Cat Diseases - drug therapy
Cats
Ctenocephalides felis felis
Dirofilaria immitis
Dirofilariasis - drug therapy
Dog
Dog Diseases - drug therapy
Dogs
Drug Administration Schedule
Ectoparasitic Infestations - drug therapy
Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary
Female
Flea
Flea allergy dermatitis
Heartworm
Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives
Ivermectin - therapeutic use
Male
North America
Pulicidae
Revolution
Selamectin
Siphonaptera - drug effects
Stronghold
title Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20selamectin%20against%20fleas%20and%20heartworms%20in%20dogs%20and%20cats%20presented%20as%20veterinary%20patients%20in%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20parasitology&rft.au=Boy,%20M.G&rft.date=2000-08-23&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=233-250&rft.issn=0304-4017&rft.eissn=1873-2550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00295-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17807236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17807236&rft_id=info:pmid/10940525&rft_els_id=S0304401700002958&rfr_iscdi=true