Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming
There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and childr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of applied physiology 2004-04, Vol.91 (4), p.473-480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 473 |
container_title | European journal of applied physiology |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik Ingjer, Frank Madsen, Ørjan Stallman, Robert Keig Stray-Gundersen, James |
description | There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17945814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7f2b9c0206237082a84b95cc612f47a3861c4f543977eecc394879596e031da93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igiAO3gvPRpjmi8SlN4gJcoyx1t05tOpJW0_49nTaBxIWTLeu1_doPIZcMbhmAuosAkrMEQCQMOE_giIyZFDrJBFfHPznTI3IW4woAcs7yUzJiMku5yviYfD5UZYkBvcNIK0-7JVL0GBZb6trY0Tl2G0RP3bKqi0FGrS-oLfq6i7ToQ-UXtAyt76gLdlPTuKmaZiiek5PS1hEvDnFCPp4e36cvyezt-XV6P0vcYLxLVMnn2gGHjAs1mLO5nOvUuYzxUior8ow5WabDGUohOie0zJVOdYYgWGG1mJCb_dx1aL96jJ1pquiwrq3Hto9GMZUCS-FfIVNapvnwsAm5_iNctX3wwxEmByUlh3y3lu1FLrQxBizNOlSNDVvDwOzQmD0aM6AxOzRm5-DqMLifN1j8dhxYiG8ZSYfF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807442089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik ; Ingjer, Frank ; Madsen, Ørjan ; Stallman, Robert Keig ; Stray-Gundersen, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik ; Ingjer, Frank ; Madsen, Ørjan ; Stallman, Robert Keig ; Stray-Gundersen, James</creatorcontrib><description>There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P<0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-6319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14652762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aging - physiology ; Child ; Energy Transfer - physiology ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Swimming - physiology ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>European journal of applied physiology, 2004-04, Vol.91 (4), p.473-480</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7f2b9c0206237082a84b95cc612f47a3861c4f543977eecc394879596e031da93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14652762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingjer, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Ørjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallman, Robert Keig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stray-Gundersen, James</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</title><title>European journal of applied physiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol</addtitle><description>There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P<0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Energy Transfer - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Swimming - physiology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>1439-6319</issn><issn>1439-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igiAO3gvPRpjmi8SlN4gJcoyx1t05tOpJW0_49nTaBxIWTLeu1_doPIZcMbhmAuosAkrMEQCQMOE_giIyZFDrJBFfHPznTI3IW4woAcs7yUzJiMku5yviYfD5UZYkBvcNIK0-7JVL0GBZb6trY0Tl2G0RP3bKqi0FGrS-oLfq6i7ToQ-UXtAyt76gLdlPTuKmaZiiek5PS1hEvDnFCPp4e36cvyezt-XV6P0vcYLxLVMnn2gGHjAs1mLO5nOvUuYzxUior8ow5WabDGUohOie0zJVOdYYgWGG1mJCb_dx1aL96jJ1pquiwrq3Hto9GMZUCS-FfIVNapvnwsAm5_iNctX3wwxEmByUlh3y3lu1FLrQxBizNOlSNDVvDwOzQmD0aM6AxOzRm5-DqMLifN1j8dhxYiG8ZSYfF</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</creator><creator>Ingjer, Frank</creator><creator>Madsen, Ørjan</creator><creator>Stallman, Robert Keig</creator><creator>Stray-Gundersen, James</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</title><author>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik ; Ingjer, Frank ; Madsen, Ørjan ; Stallman, Robert Keig ; Stray-Gundersen, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7f2b9c0206237082a84b95cc612f47a3861c4f543977eecc394879596e031da93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Energy Transfer - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Swimming - physiology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingjer, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Ørjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallman, Robert Keig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stray-Gundersen, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</au><au>Ingjer, Frank</au><au>Madsen, Ørjan</au><au>Stallman, Robert Keig</au><au>Stray-Gundersen, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</atitle><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>473-480</pages><issn>1439-6319</issn><eissn>1439-6327</eissn><abstract>There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P<0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>14652762</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-6319 |
ispartof | European journal of applied physiology, 2004-04, Vol.91 (4), p.473-480 |
issn | 1439-6319 1439-6327 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750150 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aging - physiology Child Energy Transfer - physiology Exercise - physiology Female Humans Male Oxygen Consumption - physiology Physical Exertion - physiology Swimming - physiology Task Performance and Analysis |
title | Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T01%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20energy%20cost%20between%20children%20and%20adults%20during%20front%20crawl%20swimming&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20applied%20physiology&rft.au=Kjendlie,%20Per-Ludvik&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=473-480&rft.issn=1439-6319&rft.eissn=1439-6327&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17945814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807442089&rft_id=info:pmid/14652762&rfr_iscdi=true |