Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming

There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and childr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of applied physiology 2004-04, Vol.91 (4), p.473-480
Hauptverfasser: Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik, Ingjer, Frank, Madsen, Ørjan, Stallman, Robert Keig, Stray-Gundersen, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 480
container_issue 4
container_start_page 473
container_title European journal of applied physiology
container_volume 91
creator Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik
Ingjer, Frank
Madsen, Ørjan
Stallman, Robert Keig
Stray-Gundersen, James
description There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17945814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7f2b9c0206237082a84b95cc612f47a3861c4f543977eecc394879596e031da93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igiAO3gvPRpjmi8SlN4gJcoyx1t05tOpJW0_49nTaBxIWTLeu1_doPIZcMbhmAuosAkrMEQCQMOE_giIyZFDrJBFfHPznTI3IW4woAcs7yUzJiMku5yviYfD5UZYkBvcNIK0-7JVL0GBZb6trY0Tl2G0RP3bKqi0FGrS-oLfq6i7ToQ-UXtAyt76gLdlPTuKmaZiiek5PS1hEvDnFCPp4e36cvyezt-XV6P0vcYLxLVMnn2gGHjAs1mLO5nOvUuYzxUior8ow5WabDGUohOie0zJVOdYYgWGG1mJCb_dx1aL96jJ1pquiwrq3Hto9GMZUCS-FfIVNapvnwsAm5_iNctX3wwxEmByUlh3y3lu1FLrQxBizNOlSNDVvDwOzQmD0aM6AxOzRm5-DqMLifN1j8dhxYiG8ZSYfF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807442089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik ; Ingjer, Frank ; Madsen, Ørjan ; Stallman, Robert Keig ; Stray-Gundersen, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik ; Ingjer, Frank ; Madsen, Ørjan ; Stallman, Robert Keig ; Stray-Gundersen, James</creatorcontrib><description>There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P&lt;0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-6319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14652762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aging - physiology ; Child ; Energy Transfer - physiology ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Swimming - physiology ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>European journal of applied physiology, 2004-04, Vol.91 (4), p.473-480</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7f2b9c0206237082a84b95cc612f47a3861c4f543977eecc394879596e031da93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14652762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingjer, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Ørjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallman, Robert Keig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stray-Gundersen, James</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</title><title>European journal of applied physiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol</addtitle><description>There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P&lt;0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Energy Transfer - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Swimming - physiology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>1439-6319</issn><issn>1439-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igiAO3gvPRpjmi8SlN4gJcoyx1t05tOpJW0_49nTaBxIWTLeu1_doPIZcMbhmAuosAkrMEQCQMOE_giIyZFDrJBFfHPznTI3IW4woAcs7yUzJiMku5yviYfD5UZYkBvcNIK0-7JVL0GBZb6trY0Tl2G0RP3bKqi0FGrS-oLfq6i7ToQ-UXtAyt76gLdlPTuKmaZiiek5PS1hEvDnFCPp4e36cvyezt-XV6P0vcYLxLVMnn2gGHjAs1mLO5nOvUuYzxUior8ow5WabDGUohOie0zJVOdYYgWGG1mJCb_dx1aL96jJ1pquiwrq3Hto9GMZUCS-FfIVNapvnwsAm5_iNctX3wwxEmByUlh3y3lu1FLrQxBizNOlSNDVvDwOzQmD0aM6AxOzRm5-DqMLifN1j8dhxYiG8ZSYfF</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</creator><creator>Ingjer, Frank</creator><creator>Madsen, Ørjan</creator><creator>Stallman, Robert Keig</creator><creator>Stray-Gundersen, James</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</title><author>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik ; Ingjer, Frank ; Madsen, Ørjan ; Stallman, Robert Keig ; Stray-Gundersen, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7f2b9c0206237082a84b95cc612f47a3861c4f543977eecc394879596e031da93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Energy Transfer - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Swimming - physiology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingjer, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Ørjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallman, Robert Keig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stray-Gundersen, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kjendlie, Per-Ludvik</au><au>Ingjer, Frank</au><au>Madsen, Ørjan</au><au>Stallman, Robert Keig</au><au>Stray-Gundersen, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming</atitle><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>473-480</pages><issn>1439-6319</issn><eissn>1439-6327</eissn><abstract>There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P&lt;0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>14652762</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-6319
ispartof European journal of applied physiology, 2004-04, Vol.91 (4), p.473-480
issn 1439-6319
1439-6327
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71750150
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aging - physiology
Child
Energy Transfer - physiology
Exercise - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Physical Exertion - physiology
Swimming - physiology
Task Performance and Analysis
title Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T01%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20energy%20cost%20between%20children%20and%20adults%20during%20front%20crawl%20swimming&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20applied%20physiology&rft.au=Kjendlie,%20Per-Ludvik&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=473-480&rft.issn=1439-6319&rft.eissn=1439-6327&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17945814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807442089&rft_id=info:pmid/14652762&rfr_iscdi=true