Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program

Objective: This study was undertaken to develop a comprehensive risk-assessment approach capable of evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes. Study Design: Data from 10,984 women and 11,066 infants delivered at 79 military treatment facilities in the United States from 1995 to 1997 were used to develo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2000-08, Vol.183 (2), p.291-300
Hauptverfasser: Novicoff, Wendy M., Wagner, Douglas P., Knaus, William A., Kane, Elizabeth K., Cecere, Fred, Draper, Elizabeth, Ferguson, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 2
container_start_page 291
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 183
creator Novicoff, Wendy M.
Wagner, Douglas P.
Knaus, William A.
Kane, Elizabeth K.
Cecere, Fred
Draper, Elizabeth
Ferguson, James E.
description Objective: This study was undertaken to develop a comprehensive risk-assessment approach capable of evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes. Study Design: Data from 10,984 women and 11,066 infants delivered at 79 military treatment facilities in the United States from 1995 to 1997 were used to develop two individual but complementary risk-adjustment models for maternal and, separately, fetal outcomes. A range of maternal and delivery-related risk variables and clinically important outcomes were identified by expert opinion and selected and weighted with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves for the maternal and fetal models were determined. Variation across the facilities in risk-adjusted performance was also evaluated. Results: Risk factors and poor outcomes were rare for both mothers and infants, with 96.9% of infants and 97.7% of mothers having good or excellent outcomes (0.7% mortality and 0.01% mortality, respectively). Despite the low frequency of poor outcomes both models performed well, with receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.75 for maternal outcomes and 0.78 for infant outcomes. When the models were applied to the military treatment facilities, there were significant differences among facilities in risk-adjusted outcomes. Twenty-four of the facilities in the study (30%) had outcomes odds ratios that were significantly >1 or significantly
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mob.2000.108087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71748198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937800210247</els_id><sourcerecordid>71748198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-83f0f75835393ec9b684b23705eb4a554bb102567a0d4dbedf475e783fac2e873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EoqUws6FMbGnt2ImdEVV8VKrUBWbLcV6QURwX2y3qv8chDCxM1pPPvU_vIHRL8JLgiq-sa5YFxuMksOBnaE5wzfNKVOIczdNHkdeUixm6CuFjHIu6uESzBLGCVWSOdpvBRKP6rIUj9G5vYYiZ6zKVhVOIYPMv00JmVQQ_qD7vICbWHaJ2FkKmQoAQfjJ77969stfoolN9gJvfd4Henh5f1y_5dve8WT9sc00ZjbmgHe54KWhJawq6birBmoJyXELDVFmypiG4KCuucMvaBtqO8RJ4iildgOB0ge6n3rT38wAhSmuChr5XA7hDkJxwJkgtEriaQO1dCB46uffGKn-SBMvRoUwO5ehQTg5T4u63-tBYaP_wk7QE1BMA6cCjAS-DNjBoaI0HHWXrzL_l38ZggNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71748198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Novicoff, Wendy M. ; Wagner, Douglas P. ; Knaus, William A. ; Kane, Elizabeth K. ; Cecere, Fred ; Draper, Elizabeth ; Ferguson, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Novicoff, Wendy M. ; Wagner, Douglas P. ; Knaus, William A. ; Kane, Elizabeth K. ; Cecere, Fred ; Draper, Elizabeth ; Ferguson, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study was undertaken to develop a comprehensive risk-assessment approach capable of evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes. Study Design: Data from 10,984 women and 11,066 infants delivered at 79 military treatment facilities in the United States from 1995 to 1997 were used to develop two individual but complementary risk-adjustment models for maternal and, separately, fetal outcomes. A range of maternal and delivery-related risk variables and clinically important outcomes were identified by expert opinion and selected and weighted with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves for the maternal and fetal models were determined. Variation across the facilities in risk-adjusted performance was also evaluated. Results: Risk factors and poor outcomes were rare for both mothers and infants, with 96.9% of infants and 97.7% of mothers having good or excellent outcomes (0.7% mortality and 0.01% mortality, respectively). Despite the low frequency of poor outcomes both models performed well, with receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.75 for maternal outcomes and 0.78 for infant outcomes. When the models were applied to the military treatment facilities, there were significant differences among facilities in risk-adjusted outcomes. Twenty-four of the facilities in the study (30%) had outcomes odds ratios that were significantly &gt;1 or significantly &lt;1 (P &lt;.05). There did not appear to be any relationship between the performance of a military treatment facility for maternal outcome and that for infant outcome. Conclusion: Complementary risk models for maternal and infant outcomes were developed that had satisfactory discriminatory power across a variety of facilities within a large health system. With further development and refinement this approach holds promise of being able to detect variations in risk-adjusted performance that could be used to identify best practices. The results might also be used to help coordinate and improve the quality of care for the entire conception-to-delivery process. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183: 291-300.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.108087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10942461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Female ; Hospitals, Military ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn - physiology ; Maternal-fetal outcomes assessment ; Mothers ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; risk adjustment</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-08, Vol.183 (2), p.291-300</ispartof><rights>2000 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-83f0f75835393ec9b684b23705eb4a554bb102567a0d4dbedf475e783fac2e873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-83f0f75835393ec9b684b23705eb4a554bb102567a0d4dbedf475e783fac2e873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.108087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10942461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novicoff, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knaus, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecere, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: This study was undertaken to develop a comprehensive risk-assessment approach capable of evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes. Study Design: Data from 10,984 women and 11,066 infants delivered at 79 military treatment facilities in the United States from 1995 to 1997 were used to develop two individual but complementary risk-adjustment models for maternal and, separately, fetal outcomes. A range of maternal and delivery-related risk variables and clinically important outcomes were identified by expert opinion and selected and weighted with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves for the maternal and fetal models were determined. Variation across the facilities in risk-adjusted performance was also evaluated. Results: Risk factors and poor outcomes were rare for both mothers and infants, with 96.9% of infants and 97.7% of mothers having good or excellent outcomes (0.7% mortality and 0.01% mortality, respectively). Despite the low frequency of poor outcomes both models performed well, with receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.75 for maternal outcomes and 0.78 for infant outcomes. When the models were applied to the military treatment facilities, there were significant differences among facilities in risk-adjusted outcomes. Twenty-four of the facilities in the study (30%) had outcomes odds ratios that were significantly &gt;1 or significantly &lt;1 (P &lt;.05). There did not appear to be any relationship between the performance of a military treatment facility for maternal outcome and that for infant outcome. Conclusion: Complementary risk models for maternal and infant outcomes were developed that had satisfactory discriminatory power across a variety of facilities within a large health system. With further development and refinement this approach holds promise of being able to detect variations in risk-adjusted performance that could be used to identify best practices. The results might also be used to help coordinate and improve the quality of care for the entire conception-to-delivery process. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183: 291-300.)</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Military</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn - physiology</subject><subject>Maternal-fetal outcomes assessment</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>risk adjustment</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EoqUws6FMbGnt2ImdEVV8VKrUBWbLcV6QURwX2y3qv8chDCxM1pPPvU_vIHRL8JLgiq-sa5YFxuMksOBnaE5wzfNKVOIczdNHkdeUixm6CuFjHIu6uESzBLGCVWSOdpvBRKP6rIUj9G5vYYiZ6zKVhVOIYPMv00JmVQQ_qD7vICbWHaJ2FkKmQoAQfjJ77969stfoolN9gJvfd4Henh5f1y_5dve8WT9sc00ZjbmgHe54KWhJawq6birBmoJyXELDVFmypiG4KCuucMvaBtqO8RJ4iildgOB0ge6n3rT38wAhSmuChr5XA7hDkJxwJkgtEriaQO1dCB46uffGKn-SBMvRoUwO5ehQTg5T4u63-tBYaP_wk7QE1BMA6cCjAS-DNjBoaI0HHWXrzL_l38ZggNI</recordid><startdate>20000801</startdate><enddate>20000801</enddate><creator>Novicoff, Wendy M.</creator><creator>Wagner, Douglas P.</creator><creator>Knaus, William A.</creator><creator>Kane, Elizabeth K.</creator><creator>Cecere, Fred</creator><creator>Draper, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Ferguson, James E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000801</creationdate><title>Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program</title><author>Novicoff, Wendy M. ; Wagner, Douglas P. ; Knaus, William A. ; Kane, Elizabeth K. ; Cecere, Fred ; Draper, Elizabeth ; Ferguson, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-83f0f75835393ec9b684b23705eb4a554bb102567a0d4dbedf475e783fac2e873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Military</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn - physiology</topic><topic>Maternal-fetal outcomes assessment</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>risk adjustment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novicoff, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knaus, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecere, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novicoff, Wendy M.</au><au>Wagner, Douglas P.</au><au>Knaus, William A.</au><au>Kane, Elizabeth K.</au><au>Cecere, Fred</au><au>Draper, Elizabeth</au><au>Ferguson, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2000-08-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>291-300</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study was undertaken to develop a comprehensive risk-assessment approach capable of evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes. Study Design: Data from 10,984 women and 11,066 infants delivered at 79 military treatment facilities in the United States from 1995 to 1997 were used to develop two individual but complementary risk-adjustment models for maternal and, separately, fetal outcomes. A range of maternal and delivery-related risk variables and clinically important outcomes were identified by expert opinion and selected and weighted with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves for the maternal and fetal models were determined. Variation across the facilities in risk-adjusted performance was also evaluated. Results: Risk factors and poor outcomes were rare for both mothers and infants, with 96.9% of infants and 97.7% of mothers having good or excellent outcomes (0.7% mortality and 0.01% mortality, respectively). Despite the low frequency of poor outcomes both models performed well, with receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.75 for maternal outcomes and 0.78 for infant outcomes. When the models were applied to the military treatment facilities, there were significant differences among facilities in risk-adjusted outcomes. Twenty-four of the facilities in the study (30%) had outcomes odds ratios that were significantly &gt;1 or significantly &lt;1 (P &lt;.05). There did not appear to be any relationship between the performance of a military treatment facility for maternal outcome and that for infant outcome. Conclusion: Complementary risk models for maternal and infant outcomes were developed that had satisfactory discriminatory power across a variety of facilities within a large health system. With further development and refinement this approach holds promise of being able to detect variations in risk-adjusted performance that could be used to identify best practices. The results might also be used to help coordinate and improve the quality of care for the entire conception-to-delivery process. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183: 291-300.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10942461</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2000.108087</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-08, Vol.183 (2), p.291-300
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71748198
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Female
Hospitals, Military
Humans
Infant, Newborn - physiology
Maternal-fetal outcomes assessment
Mothers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
risk adjustment
title Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A32%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20development%20of%20a%20system-wide%20maternal-fetal%20outcomes%20assessment%20program&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Novicoff,%20Wendy%20M.&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=291-300&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2000.108087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71748198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71748198&rft_id=info:pmid/10942461&rft_els_id=S0002937800210247&rfr_iscdi=true