Effects of photoperiod history on immune responses to intermediate day lengths in Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus)

Seasonal changes in day length enhance or suppress immune function in individuals of several mammalian species. Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus) are long-day breeders that adjust reproductive physiology and behavior, body mass, and immune function following exposure to short photoperiods. Phot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroimmunology 2004-04, Vol.149 (1), p.31-39
Hauptverfasser: Prendergast, Brian J, Bilbo, Staci D, Dhabhar, Firdaus S, Nelson, Randy J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Journal of neuroimmunology
container_volume 149
creator Prendergast, Brian J
Bilbo, Staci D
Dhabhar, Firdaus S
Nelson, Randy J
description Seasonal changes in day length enhance or suppress immune function in individuals of several mammalian species. Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus) are long-day breeders that adjust reproductive physiology and behavior, body mass, and immune function following exposure to short photoperiods. Photoperiods of intermediate-duration, encountered in nature by juvenile hamsters born in early-spring and by those born in mid-summer, trigger gonadal development in the former cohort and inhibit the onset of puberty in the latter. Divergent reproductive responses to the same intermediate photoperiod depend on a photoperiod history, communicated during gestation. These experiments assessed whether photoperiod history during gestation likewise impacts immunological responses to intermediate photoperiods. Male hamsters were gestated in long photoperiods and remained in long photoperiods postnatally, or were transferred to an intermediate-duration or a short-duration photoperiod; other males were gestated in short days and transferred to an intermediate-duration photoperiod at birth. Long days stimulated, and short days inhibited, somatic and reproductive development; intermediate day lengths either accelerated or inhibited somatic and reproductive development, depending on whether hamsters were gestated in short days or long days, respectively. By contrast, photoperiod during gestation did not affect most immune endpoints. The data suggest that photoperiodic mechanisms that enhance and suppress several aspects of immunity in young-adult hamsters are not responsive to prenatally communicated photoperiod history information.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.12.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71745560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165572803005447</els_id><sourcerecordid>17766380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e9698e265a42d1dbe916949a6f47b7d1527e3d52928ad12773b72eb9ded2ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL1Q-ITgk2E5sxzdQVT6kSiDRu-XEk8arjR08CWL_PV7tIo49zWGed0Z6H0JuOKs54-rDvt5H2HIKcy0Ya2ouasbUM7LjnRZV1wr-nOwKKCupRXdFXiHuGeOyac1LcsUlKyklduTP3TjCsCJNI12mtKYFckieTgHXlI80RRrmeYtAM-CSIgLSNdEQV8gz-OBWoN4d6QHi4zphWdCfoS83XKSTm7FgSN_RH1PyadmQ4hYfU97w_WvyYnQHhDeXeU0ePt893H6t7r9_-Xb76b4aGiPXCowyHQglXSs89z0YrkxrnBpb3WvPpdDQeCmM6JznQuum1wJ648ELGERzTd6ezy45_doAVzsHHOBwcBHShlZz3Uqp2JMg11qppjuB6gwOOSFmGO2Sw-zy0XJmT27s3v5zY09uLBe2lF2CN5cPW1-q-x-7yCjAxzMApY_fAbLFIUAcSs25OLI-had-_AUSJKXh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17766380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of photoperiod history on immune responses to intermediate day lengths in Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Prendergast, Brian J ; Bilbo, Staci D ; Dhabhar, Firdaus S ; Nelson, Randy J</creator><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, Brian J ; Bilbo, Staci D ; Dhabhar, Firdaus S ; Nelson, Randy J</creatorcontrib><description>Seasonal changes in day length enhance or suppress immune function in individuals of several mammalian species. Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus) are long-day breeders that adjust reproductive physiology and behavior, body mass, and immune function following exposure to short photoperiods. Photoperiods of intermediate-duration, encountered in nature by juvenile hamsters born in early-spring and by those born in mid-summer, trigger gonadal development in the former cohort and inhibit the onset of puberty in the latter. Divergent reproductive responses to the same intermediate photoperiod depend on a photoperiod history, communicated during gestation. These experiments assessed whether photoperiod history during gestation likewise impacts immunological responses to intermediate photoperiods. Male hamsters were gestated in long photoperiods and remained in long photoperiods postnatally, or were transferred to an intermediate-duration or a short-duration photoperiod; other males were gestated in short days and transferred to an intermediate-duration photoperiod at birth. Long days stimulated, and short days inhibited, somatic and reproductive development; intermediate day lengths either accelerated or inhibited somatic and reproductive development, depending on whether hamsters were gestated in short days or long days, respectively. By contrast, photoperiod during gestation did not affect most immune endpoints. The data suggest that photoperiodic mechanisms that enhance and suppress several aspects of immunity in young-adult hamsters are not responsive to prenatally communicated photoperiod history information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5728</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.12.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15020062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Animals, Newborn ; Behavior, Animal ; Body Weight - radiation effects ; Cricetinae ; Dinitrobenzenes - pharmacology ; Environment ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Female ; Hair - physiology ; Hemocyanins - immunology ; Immune System - radiation effects ; Immunization ; Immunoglobulins - blood ; Leukocyte Count - methods ; Leukocytes - metabolism ; Leukocytes - radiation effects ; Lymphocyte Activation ; Male ; Maternal fetal communication ; Organ Size - radiation effects ; Phodopus - immunology ; Phodopus sungorus ; Photoperiod ; Photoperiodism ; Pregnancy ; Seasonality ; Seasons ; Testis - radiation effects ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroimmunology, 2004-04, Vol.149 (1), p.31-39</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e9698e265a42d1dbe916949a6f47b7d1527e3d52928ad12773b72eb9ded2ec23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165572803005447$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilbo, Staci D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhabhar, Firdaus S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Randy J</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of photoperiod history on immune responses to intermediate day lengths in Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus)</title><title>Journal of neuroimmunology</title><addtitle>J Neuroimmunol</addtitle><description>Seasonal changes in day length enhance or suppress immune function in individuals of several mammalian species. Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus) are long-day breeders that adjust reproductive physiology and behavior, body mass, and immune function following exposure to short photoperiods. Photoperiods of intermediate-duration, encountered in nature by juvenile hamsters born in early-spring and by those born in mid-summer, trigger gonadal development in the former cohort and inhibit the onset of puberty in the latter. Divergent reproductive responses to the same intermediate photoperiod depend on a photoperiod history, communicated during gestation. These experiments assessed whether photoperiod history during gestation likewise impacts immunological responses to intermediate photoperiods. Male hamsters were gestated in long photoperiods and remained in long photoperiods postnatally, or were transferred to an intermediate-duration or a short-duration photoperiod; other males were gestated in short days and transferred to an intermediate-duration photoperiod at birth. Long days stimulated, and short days inhibited, somatic and reproductive development; intermediate day lengths either accelerated or inhibited somatic and reproductive development, depending on whether hamsters were gestated in short days or long days, respectively. By contrast, photoperiod during gestation did not affect most immune endpoints. The data suggest that photoperiodic mechanisms that enhance and suppress several aspects of immunity in young-adult hamsters are not responsive to prenatally communicated photoperiod history information.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Newborn</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Body Weight - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Dinitrobenzenes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hair - physiology</subject><subject>Hemocyanins - immunology</subject><subject>Immune System - radiation effects</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins - blood</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count - methods</subject><subject>Leukocytes - metabolism</subject><subject>Leukocytes - radiation effects</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal fetal communication</subject><subject>Organ Size - radiation effects</subject><subject>Phodopus - immunology</subject><subject>Phodopus sungorus</subject><subject>Photoperiod</subject><subject>Photoperiodism</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Seasonality</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Testis - radiation effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0165-5728</issn><issn>1872-8421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL1Q-ITgk2E5sxzdQVT6kSiDRu-XEk8arjR08CWL_PV7tIo49zWGed0Z6H0JuOKs54-rDvt5H2HIKcy0Ya2ouasbUM7LjnRZV1wr-nOwKKCupRXdFXiHuGeOyac1LcsUlKyklduTP3TjCsCJNI12mtKYFckieTgHXlI80RRrmeYtAM-CSIgLSNdEQV8gz-OBWoN4d6QHi4zphWdCfoS83XKSTm7FgSN_RH1PyadmQ4hYfU97w_WvyYnQHhDeXeU0ePt893H6t7r9_-Xb76b4aGiPXCowyHQglXSs89z0YrkxrnBpb3WvPpdDQeCmM6JznQuum1wJ648ELGERzTd6ezy45_doAVzsHHOBwcBHShlZz3Uqp2JMg11qppjuB6gwOOSFmGO2Sw-zy0XJmT27s3v5zY09uLBe2lF2CN5cPW1-q-x-7yCjAxzMApY_fAbLFIUAcSs25OLI-had-_AUSJKXh</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Prendergast, Brian J</creator><creator>Bilbo, Staci D</creator><creator>Dhabhar, Firdaus S</creator><creator>Nelson, Randy J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Effects of photoperiod history on immune responses to intermediate day lengths in Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus)</title><author>Prendergast, Brian J ; Bilbo, Staci D ; Dhabhar, Firdaus S ; Nelson, Randy J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e9698e265a42d1dbe916949a6f47b7d1527e3d52928ad12773b72eb9ded2ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Newborn</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Body Weight - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Dinitrobenzenes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hair - physiology</topic><topic>Hemocyanins - immunology</topic><topic>Immune System - radiation effects</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins - blood</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count - methods</topic><topic>Leukocytes - metabolism</topic><topic>Leukocytes - radiation effects</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal fetal communication</topic><topic>Organ Size - radiation effects</topic><topic>Phodopus - immunology</topic><topic>Phodopus sungorus</topic><topic>Photoperiod</topic><topic>Photoperiodism</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Seasonality</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Testis - radiation effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilbo, Staci D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhabhar, Firdaus S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Randy J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroimmunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prendergast, Brian J</au><au>Bilbo, Staci D</au><au>Dhabhar, Firdaus S</au><au>Nelson, Randy J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of photoperiod history on immune responses to intermediate day lengths in Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroimmunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroimmunol</addtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>31-39</pages><issn>0165-5728</issn><eissn>1872-8421</eissn><abstract>Seasonal changes in day length enhance or suppress immune function in individuals of several mammalian species. Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus) are long-day breeders that adjust reproductive physiology and behavior, body mass, and immune function following exposure to short photoperiods. Photoperiods of intermediate-duration, encountered in nature by juvenile hamsters born in early-spring and by those born in mid-summer, trigger gonadal development in the former cohort and inhibit the onset of puberty in the latter. Divergent reproductive responses to the same intermediate photoperiod depend on a photoperiod history, communicated during gestation. These experiments assessed whether photoperiod history during gestation likewise impacts immunological responses to intermediate photoperiods. Male hamsters were gestated in long photoperiods and remained in long photoperiods postnatally, or were transferred to an intermediate-duration or a short-duration photoperiod; other males were gestated in short days and transferred to an intermediate-duration photoperiod at birth. Long days stimulated, and short days inhibited, somatic and reproductive development; intermediate day lengths either accelerated or inhibited somatic and reproductive development, depending on whether hamsters were gestated in short days or long days, respectively. By contrast, photoperiod during gestation did not affect most immune endpoints. The data suggest that photoperiodic mechanisms that enhance and suppress several aspects of immunity in young-adult hamsters are not responsive to prenatally communicated photoperiod history information.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15020062</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.12.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5728
ispartof Journal of neuroimmunology, 2004-04, Vol.149 (1), p.31-39
issn 0165-5728
1872-8421
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71745560
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Age Factors
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Animals, Newborn
Behavior, Animal
Body Weight - radiation effects
Cricetinae
Dinitrobenzenes - pharmacology
Environment
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
Female
Hair - physiology
Hemocyanins - immunology
Immune System - radiation effects
Immunization
Immunoglobulins - blood
Leukocyte Count - methods
Leukocytes - metabolism
Leukocytes - radiation effects
Lymphocyte Activation
Male
Maternal fetal communication
Organ Size - radiation effects
Phodopus - immunology
Phodopus sungorus
Photoperiod
Photoperiodism
Pregnancy
Seasonality
Seasons
Testis - radiation effects
Time Factors
title Effects of photoperiod history on immune responses to intermediate day lengths in Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A17%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20photoperiod%20history%20on%20immune%20responses%20to%20intermediate%20day%20lengths%20in%20Siberian%20hamsters%20(%20Phodopus%20sungorus)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroimmunology&rft.au=Prendergast,%20Brian%20J&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=31-39&rft.issn=0165-5728&rft.eissn=1872-8421&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17766380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17766380&rft_id=info:pmid/15020062&rft_els_id=S0165572803005447&rfr_iscdi=true