Revisiting the Constraint Attunement Hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000)
This article is part of an exchange concerning the contributions of the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) to the understanding of expertise effects in memory recall. K. A. Ericsson, V. Patel, and W. Kintsch (2000 ) and H. A. Simon and F. Gobet (2000 ) claim that the CAH is not novel and that ex...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological review 2000-07, Vol.107 (3), p.601-608 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 608 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 601 |
| container_title | Psychological review |
| container_volume | 107 |
| creator | Vicente, Kim J |
| description | This article is part of an exchange concerning the contributions of the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) to the understanding of expertise effects in memory recall.
K. A. Ericsson, V. Patel, and W. Kintsch (2000
) and
H. A. Simon and F. Gobet (2000
) claim that the CAH is not novel and that existing theories of this phenomenon do not have the limitations that were attributed to them. In this reply, the CAH is argued to be the only theory of expertise effects in memory recall to adopt the abstraction hierarchy as a theory of the environment, a feature that has important theoretical implications. Also, other theories focus on psychological mechanisms but have not satisfied the burden of scientific proof required of process theories. Progress can be made by integrating the complementary advantages of existing theories into a unified theory that acknowledges the equally important roles of the organism and the environment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.601 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71740251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57599517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-478019ab1a101bdbfb8addae13eee0a6e58ab38cf7f8cb9ac8b4d8c527a5ef473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kW1rFDEQx4Mo9lr9BIIcPr3baybJXpKX5bBWKAii4Lswm53VlL3dNckW7tubYw8tgubNZJjfPP4ZewF8A1zqS86lrIStvxVXb-Rmy-ERW4GVtgKl4TFb_SbO2HlKd7w8sPYpOwNuFQgjV-zyM92HFHIYvq_zD1rvxiHliGHI66uc54H2VL43h2ks0RTSM_akwz7R85O9YF-v33_Z3VS3nz583F3dVqiUyJXSprTCBhA4NG3TNQbbFgkkEXHcUm2wkcZ3ujO-sehNo1rja6Gxpk5pecHeLXWnOP6cKWW3D8lT3-NA45ycBq24qKGAr_4C78Y5DmU2twUljRaW_w8SoIQAy4_Q639BsJUKynAgCyUXyscxpUidm2LYYzw44O6oizte3R2vXlztpCu6lKyXp9pzs6f2Qc4iRAHenABMHvsu4uBD-sMpsMu2bxcMJ3RTOniMOfiekot0_6DfLxhzoFI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614387290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Constraint Attunement Hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000)</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Vicente, Kim J</creator><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Kim J</creatorcontrib><description>This article is part of an exchange concerning the contributions of the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) to the understanding of expertise effects in memory recall.
K. A. Ericsson, V. Patel, and W. Kintsch (2000
) and
H. A. Simon and F. Gobet (2000
) claim that the CAH is not novel and that existing theories of this phenomenon do not have the limitations that were attributed to them. In this reply, the CAH is argued to be the only theory of expertise effects in memory recall to adopt the abstraction hierarchy as a theory of the environment, a feature that has important theoretical implications. Also, other theories focus on psychological mechanisms but have not satisfied the burden of scientific proof required of process theories. Progress can be made by integrating the complementary advantages of existing theories into a unified theory that acknowledges the equally important roles of the organism and the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10941283</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSRVAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Environment ; Experience Level ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Hypotheses ; Knowledge ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Models, Psychological ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Theories ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2000-07, Vol.107 (3), p.601-608</ispartof><rights>2000 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2000</rights><rights>2000, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-478019ab1a101bdbfb8addae13eee0a6e58ab38cf7f8cb9ac8b4d8c527a5ef473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27867,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1419251$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10941283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Kim J</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Constraint Attunement Hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000)</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>This article is part of an exchange concerning the contributions of the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) to the understanding of expertise effects in memory recall.
K. A. Ericsson, V. Patel, and W. Kintsch (2000
) and
H. A. Simon and F. Gobet (2000
) claim that the CAH is not novel and that existing theories of this phenomenon do not have the limitations that were attributed to them. In this reply, the CAH is argued to be the only theory of expertise effects in memory recall to adopt the abstraction hierarchy as a theory of the environment, a feature that has important theoretical implications. Also, other theories focus on psychological mechanisms but have not satisfied the burden of scientific proof required of process theories. Progress can be made by integrating the complementary advantages of existing theories into a unified theory that acknowledges the equally important roles of the organism and the environment.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kW1rFDEQx4Mo9lr9BIIcPr3baybJXpKX5bBWKAii4Lswm53VlL3dNckW7tubYw8tgubNZJjfPP4ZewF8A1zqS86lrIStvxVXb-Rmy-ERW4GVtgKl4TFb_SbO2HlKd7w8sPYpOwNuFQgjV-zyM92HFHIYvq_zD1rvxiHliGHI66uc54H2VL43h2ks0RTSM_akwz7R85O9YF-v33_Z3VS3nz583F3dVqiUyJXSprTCBhA4NG3TNQbbFgkkEXHcUm2wkcZ3ujO-sehNo1rja6Gxpk5pecHeLXWnOP6cKWW3D8lT3-NA45ycBq24qKGAr_4C78Y5DmU2twUljRaW_w8SoIQAy4_Q639BsJUKynAgCyUXyscxpUidm2LYYzw44O6oizte3R2vXlztpCu6lKyXp9pzs6f2Qc4iRAHenABMHvsu4uBD-sMpsMu2bxcMJ3RTOniMOfiekot0_6DfLxhzoFI</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Vicente, Kim J</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Constraint Attunement Hypothesis</title><author>Vicente, Kim J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-478019ab1a101bdbfb8addae13eee0a6e58ab38cf7f8cb9ac8b4d8c527a5ef473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Kim J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vicente, Kim J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Constraint Attunement Hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000)</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>601-608</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><coden>PSRVAX</coden><abstract>This article is part of an exchange concerning the contributions of the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) to the understanding of expertise effects in memory recall.
K. A. Ericsson, V. Patel, and W. Kintsch (2000
) and
H. A. Simon and F. Gobet (2000
) claim that the CAH is not novel and that existing theories of this phenomenon do not have the limitations that were attributed to them. In this reply, the CAH is argued to be the only theory of expertise effects in memory recall to adopt the abstraction hierarchy as a theory of the environment, a feature that has important theoretical implications. Also, other theories focus on psychological mechanisms but have not satisfied the burden of scientific proof required of process theories. Progress can be made by integrating the complementary advantages of existing theories into a unified theory that acknowledges the equally important roles of the organism and the environment.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>10941283</pmid><doi>10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.601</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-295X |
| ispartof | Psychological review, 2000-07, Vol.107 (3), p.601-608 |
| issn | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71740251 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Environment Experience Level Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Hypotheses Knowledge Learning. Memory Memory Mental Recall Models, Psychological Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reproducibility of Results Theories Theory |
| title | Revisiting the Constraint Attunement Hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A48%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Constraint%20Attunement%20Hypothesis:%20Reply%20to%20Ericsson,%20Patel,%20and%20Kintsch%20(2000)%20and%20Simon%20and%20Gobet%20(2000)&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Vicente,%20Kim%20J&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=601-608&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft.coden=PSRVAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57599517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614387290&rft_id=info:pmid/10941283&rfr_iscdi=true |