The role of staging investigations for oesophago-gastric carcinoma
Aims. To study the frequency with which unresectable disease was identified on pre-operative staging investigations in patients with oesophago-gastric carcinoma, and to audit whether a staging protocol had reduced the rate of exploratory surgery. Methods. Ninety-eight patients with oesophageal carci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2004-04, Vol.30 (3), p.309-312 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims. To study the frequency with which unresectable disease was identified on pre-operative staging investigations in patients with oesophago-gastric carcinoma, and to audit whether a staging protocol had reduced the rate of exploratory surgery.
Methods. Ninety-eight patients with oesophageal carcinoma, 89 patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) and 68 patients with gastric carcinoma were staged according to a protocol of computerised tomography, laparoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound.
Results. The frequency with which each investigation identified unresectable disease was as follows: (a) computerised tomography—oesophagus 12/67, GOJ 13/58, stomach 10/60; (b) laparoscopy—oesophagus 3/22, GOJ 5/45, stomach 8/23; and (c) endoscopic ultrasound—oesophagus 15/55, GOJ 3/30. By tumour location, rates of exploratory surgery were 1/18 for the oesophagus, 12/35 for the GOJ and 4/42 for the stomach. All of the staging failures in patients with GOJ carcinomas related to posterior tumour extension into the lesser sac.
Conclusions. Staging investigations precluded resection in one-third of patients, the greatest yield being for laparoscopy in gastric carcinoma. In spite of this, 18% of patients undergoing surgical intervention underwent exploratory surgery alone, notably patients with GOJ carcinoma. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.11.013 |