Axillary Staging Using Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

:  Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard of care for nodal staging of patients with invasive breast cancer. Due to significant somatic and psychological side effects, replacement of ALND with less invasive techniques is desirable. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The breast journal 2004-03, Vol.10 (2), p.89-93
Hauptverfasser: Fehr, Mathias K., Hornung, Rene, Varga, Zsuzsanna, Burger, Daniel, Hess, Thomas, Haller, Urs, Fink, Daniel, Von Schulthess, Gustav K., Steinert, Hans C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 93
container_issue 2
container_start_page 89
container_title The breast journal
container_volume 10
creator Fehr, Mathias K.
Hornung, Rene
Varga, Zsuzsanna
Burger, Daniel
Hess, Thomas
Haller, Urs
Fink, Daniel
Von Schulthess, Gustav K.
Steinert, Hans C.
description :  Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard of care for nodal staging of patients with invasive breast cancer. Due to significant somatic and psychological side effects, replacement of ALND with less invasive techniques is desirable. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of axillary lymph node (ALN) staging by means of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG‐PET was performed within 1 week before surgery in 24 clinically node‐negative breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy following peritumoral technetium 99m‐labeled colloid albumin injection, and by intraoperative gamma detector and blue dye localization. Following SLNB, a standard ALND was performed. Serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the SLN as well as standard histologic examination of the non‐SLN was performed. FDG‐PET detected all primary breast cancers. Staging of ALNs by PET was accurate in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), whereas PET staging was false negative in 8 of 10 node‐positive patients and false‐positive in 1 patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG‐PET for nodal status was 20%, 93%, 67%, and 62%, respectively. The mean diameter of false‐negative ALN metastases was 7.5 mm (range 1–15 mm). Lymph node staging using FDG‐PET is not accurate enough in clinically node‐negative patients with breast cancer qualifying for SLNB and should not be used for this purpose.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21455.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71731085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71731085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-758c9895abc99deb50ca99ca726dee1ae5545a848b4f0c7400aae686921a0a803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1v2yAUhtG0av1Y_8LE1e7sHQzY5mZSE7Vdpyjt1LTdHSIEp2S2ccFR438_3GTb7biAI_Se5-g8CGECKYnnyyYlUPCEZNnPNANgaUYY5-nuHTohPGMJKxh5H-s_oWN0GsIGADIB7AM6JhxAAKUn6PViZ-ta-QHf92pt2zV-CON954LtvWvxZWNDsLFYuMatveqeB2xbPPFGhR5PVauNx3eqt6btA_6xVbWthpFQOY_v46dtTY1nQ9M947lbGTyxrgvDR3RUqTqY88N7hh6uLhfTb8ns9vpmejFLNM0FTwpealEKrpZaiJVZctBKCK2KLF8ZQ5ThnHFVsnLJKtAFA1DK5GUuMqJAlUDP0Oc9t_PuZWtCL-M-2sSVW-O2QRakoARKHoPlPqi9C8GbSnbeNlGMJCBH6XIjR59y9ClH6fJNutzF1k-HGdtlY1b_Gg-WY-DrPvBqazP8N1guJt_fyghI9gAberP7C1D-l8wLGnuf5tfyij7yOX2MUPobbFmhMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71731085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Axillary Staging Using Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Fehr, Mathias K. ; Hornung, Rene ; Varga, Zsuzsanna ; Burger, Daniel ; Hess, Thomas ; Haller, Urs ; Fink, Daniel ; Von Schulthess, Gustav K. ; Steinert, Hans C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fehr, Mathias K. ; Hornung, Rene ; Varga, Zsuzsanna ; Burger, Daniel ; Hess, Thomas ; Haller, Urs ; Fink, Daniel ; Von Schulthess, Gustav K. ; Steinert, Hans C.</creatorcontrib><description>:  Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard of care for nodal staging of patients with invasive breast cancer. Due to significant somatic and psychological side effects, replacement of ALND with less invasive techniques is desirable. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of axillary lymph node (ALN) staging by means of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG‐PET was performed within 1 week before surgery in 24 clinically node‐negative breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy following peritumoral technetium 99m‐labeled colloid albumin injection, and by intraoperative gamma detector and blue dye localization. Following SLNB, a standard ALND was performed. Serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the SLN as well as standard histologic examination of the non‐SLN was performed. FDG‐PET detected all primary breast cancers. Staging of ALNs by PET was accurate in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), whereas PET staging was false negative in 8 of 10 node‐positive patients and false‐positive in 1 patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG‐PET for nodal status was 20%, 93%, 67%, and 62%, respectively. The mean diameter of false‐negative ALN metastases was 7.5 mm (range 1–15 mm). Lymph node staging using FDG‐PET is not accurate enough in clinically node‐negative patients with breast cancer qualifying for SLNB and should not be used for this purpose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-122X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4741</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21455.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15009033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Axilla ; breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; lymph node metastasis ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; positron emission tomography ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><ispartof>The breast journal, 2004-03, Vol.10 (2), p.89-93</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-758c9895abc99deb50ca99ca726dee1ae5545a848b4f0c7400aae686921a0a803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-758c9895abc99deb50ca99ca726dee1ae5545a848b4f0c7400aae686921a0a803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1075-122X.2004.21455.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1075-122X.2004.21455.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15009033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fehr, Mathias K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornung, Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varga, Zsuzsanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Schulthess, Gustav K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinert, Hans C.</creatorcontrib><title>Axillary Staging Using Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</title><title>The breast journal</title><addtitle>Breast J</addtitle><description>:  Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard of care for nodal staging of patients with invasive breast cancer. Due to significant somatic and psychological side effects, replacement of ALND with less invasive techniques is desirable. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of axillary lymph node (ALN) staging by means of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG‐PET was performed within 1 week before surgery in 24 clinically node‐negative breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy following peritumoral technetium 99m‐labeled colloid albumin injection, and by intraoperative gamma detector and blue dye localization. Following SLNB, a standard ALND was performed. Serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the SLN as well as standard histologic examination of the non‐SLN was performed. FDG‐PET detected all primary breast cancers. Staging of ALNs by PET was accurate in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), whereas PET staging was false negative in 8 of 10 node‐positive patients and false‐positive in 1 patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG‐PET for nodal status was 20%, 93%, 67%, and 62%, respectively. The mean diameter of false‐negative ALN metastases was 7.5 mm (range 1–15 mm). Lymph node staging using FDG‐PET is not accurate enough in clinically node‐negative patients with breast cancer qualifying for SLNB and should not be used for this purpose.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lymph node metastasis</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><issn>1075-122X</issn><issn>1524-4741</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1v2yAUhtG0av1Y_8LE1e7sHQzY5mZSE7Vdpyjt1LTdHSIEp2S2ccFR438_3GTb7biAI_Se5-g8CGECKYnnyyYlUPCEZNnPNANgaUYY5-nuHTohPGMJKxh5H-s_oWN0GsIGADIB7AM6JhxAAKUn6PViZ-ta-QHf92pt2zV-CON954LtvWvxZWNDsLFYuMatveqeB2xbPPFGhR5PVauNx3eqt6btA_6xVbWthpFQOY_v46dtTY1nQ9M947lbGTyxrgvDR3RUqTqY88N7hh6uLhfTb8ns9vpmejFLNM0FTwpealEKrpZaiJVZctBKCK2KLF8ZQ5ThnHFVsnLJKtAFA1DK5GUuMqJAlUDP0Oc9t_PuZWtCL-M-2sSVW-O2QRakoARKHoPlPqi9C8GbSnbeNlGMJCBH6XIjR59y9ClH6fJNutzF1k-HGdtlY1b_Gg-WY-DrPvBqazP8N1guJt_fyghI9gAberP7C1D-l8wLGnuf5tfyij7yOX2MUPobbFmhMg</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Fehr, Mathias K.</creator><creator>Hornung, Rene</creator><creator>Varga, Zsuzsanna</creator><creator>Burger, Daniel</creator><creator>Hess, Thomas</creator><creator>Haller, Urs</creator><creator>Fink, Daniel</creator><creator>Von Schulthess, Gustav K.</creator><creator>Steinert, Hans C.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Axillary Staging Using Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</title><author>Fehr, Mathias K. ; Hornung, Rene ; Varga, Zsuzsanna ; Burger, Daniel ; Hess, Thomas ; Haller, Urs ; Fink, Daniel ; Von Schulthess, Gustav K. ; Steinert, Hans C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-758c9895abc99deb50ca99ca726dee1ae5545a848b4f0c7400aae686921a0a803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lymph node metastasis</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fehr, Mathias K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornung, Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varga, Zsuzsanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Schulthess, Gustav K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinert, Hans C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The breast journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fehr, Mathias K.</au><au>Hornung, Rene</au><au>Varga, Zsuzsanna</au><au>Burger, Daniel</au><au>Hess, Thomas</au><au>Haller, Urs</au><au>Fink, Daniel</au><au>Von Schulthess, Gustav K.</au><au>Steinert, Hans C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Axillary Staging Using Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</atitle><jtitle>The breast journal</jtitle><addtitle>Breast J</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>89-93</pages><issn>1075-122X</issn><eissn>1524-4741</eissn><abstract>:  Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard of care for nodal staging of patients with invasive breast cancer. Due to significant somatic and psychological side effects, replacement of ALND with less invasive techniques is desirable. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of axillary lymph node (ALN) staging by means of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG‐PET was performed within 1 week before surgery in 24 clinically node‐negative breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy following peritumoral technetium 99m‐labeled colloid albumin injection, and by intraoperative gamma detector and blue dye localization. Following SLNB, a standard ALND was performed. Serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the SLN as well as standard histologic examination of the non‐SLN was performed. FDG‐PET detected all primary breast cancers. Staging of ALNs by PET was accurate in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), whereas PET staging was false negative in 8 of 10 node‐positive patients and false‐positive in 1 patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG‐PET for nodal status was 20%, 93%, 67%, and 62%, respectively. The mean diameter of false‐negative ALN metastases was 7.5 mm (range 1–15 mm). Lymph node staging using FDG‐PET is not accurate enough in clinically node‐negative patients with breast cancer qualifying for SLNB and should not be used for this purpose.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>15009033</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21455.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1075-122X
ispartof The breast journal, 2004-03, Vol.10 (2), p.89-93
issn 1075-122X
1524-4741
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71731085
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Axilla
breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
lymph node metastasis
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Middle Aged
positron emission tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Tomography, Emission-Computed
title Axillary Staging Using Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Axillary%20Staging%20Using%20Positron%20Emission%20Tomography%20in%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients%20Qualifying%20for%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy&rft.jtitle=The%20breast%20journal&rft.au=Fehr,%20Mathias%20K.&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=89-93&rft.issn=1075-122X&rft.eissn=1524-4741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21455.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71731085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71731085&rft_id=info:pmid/15009033&rfr_iscdi=true