Evaluation and extensions of a structural equation modeling approach to the analysis of survival data
Recently a new method for the analysis of survival data using a structural equation modeling approach has been suggested by Pickles and colleagues using twin data they demonstrated the application of this model to study the correlation in age of onset. The purpose of the current research is twofold:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavior genetics 2000-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 50 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Behavior genetics |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Posner, S F Baker, L |
description | Recently a new method for the analysis of survival data using a structural equation modeling approach has been suggested by Pickles and colleagues using twin data they demonstrated the application of this model to study the correlation in age of onset. The purpose of the current research is twofold: 1) to evaluate the statistical performance of the model as presented by Pickles and colleagues, and 2) to expand and evaluate the model in more applications, including both genetically informative data and other multivariate examples. Results evaluated from this study involve three areas of method performance: Type-I error rates, power, and parameter estimates under four different distributions (normal, Gamma-2, Gamma-6 and g-and-h) and four different sample sizes (n = 125, 250, 500 and 750). Results based on the original Pickles model indicated that in all sample size and distribution conditions the Type-I error rate was adequate, in fact below the nominal level of .05. Additionally, power was greater than .80 for sample sizes of 500 or more for all distribution conditions. Parameter estimates were upwardly biased when the population value was rho = .20. This bias varied across distributions; the g-and-h distribution showed the largest bias. Results from the expanded model indicated that Type-I error rates were adequate. Power results were not affected by distribution type; sample sizes of 500 were above the .80 level. Parameter estimates continued to be upwardly biased in this more general model, although the degree of bias was smaller. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1002086526693 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71730077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71730077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f1a0e7b1ce705f0e618eb572d34cfd669c45e0c1344c8a310a89b6bf790296f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iR48LY6k4_Nrjcp9QMKXvS8ZLNZu2U_2k1S7H9v0HrxIgwMD37zmPcIuUS4RWD87uEeARhkqWRpmvMjMkWpeMJZro7JFAAwyZgQE3Lm3DpKlgp5SiYIORcqz6bELna6Ddo3Q091X1H76W3vonJ0qKmmzo_B-DDqltrtgeuGyrZN_0H1ZjMO2qyoH6hf2Wig271rvk9dGHdN9KaV9vqcnNS6dfbisGfk_XHxNn9Olq9PL_OHZWI4ok9q1GBVicYqkDXYFDNbSsUqLkxdxYBGSAsGuRAm0xxBZ3mZlrXKgeVpjXxGbn5841_bYJ0vusYZ27a6t0NwhULFAZT6F0QlZRyI4PUfcD2EMeZ0BWM5xB4zGaGrAxTKzlbFZmw6Pe6L35r5Fy_Yf0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229009385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and extensions of a structural equation modeling approach to the analysis of survival data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Posner, S F ; Baker, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Posner, S F ; Baker, L</creatorcontrib><description>Recently a new method for the analysis of survival data using a structural equation modeling approach has been suggested by Pickles and colleagues using twin data they demonstrated the application of this model to study the correlation in age of onset. The purpose of the current research is twofold: 1) to evaluate the statistical performance of the model as presented by Pickles and colleagues, and 2) to expand and evaluate the model in more applications, including both genetically informative data and other multivariate examples. Results evaluated from this study involve three areas of method performance: Type-I error rates, power, and parameter estimates under four different distributions (normal, Gamma-2, Gamma-6 and g-and-h) and four different sample sizes (n = 125, 250, 500 and 750). Results based on the original Pickles model indicated that in all sample size and distribution conditions the Type-I error rate was adequate, in fact below the nominal level of .05. Additionally, power was greater than .80 for sample sizes of 500 or more for all distribution conditions. Parameter estimates were upwardly biased when the population value was rho = .20. This bias varied across distributions; the g-and-h distribution showed the largest bias. Results from the expanded model indicated that Type-I error rates were adequate. Power results were not affected by distribution type; sample sizes of 500 were above the .80 level. Parameter estimates continued to be upwardly biased in this more general model, although the degree of bias was smaller.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-8244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1002086526693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10934798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Age ; Bias ; Contingency tables ; Humans ; Mathematical Computing ; Models, Genetic ; Puberty ; Structural equation modeling ; Survival Analysis ; Twin Studies as Topic</subject><ispartof>Behavior genetics, 2000-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-50</ispartof><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f1a0e7b1ce705f0e618eb572d34cfd669c45e0c1344c8a310a89b6bf790296f13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10934798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Posner, S F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and extensions of a structural equation modeling approach to the analysis of survival data</title><title>Behavior genetics</title><addtitle>Behav Genet</addtitle><description>Recently a new method for the analysis of survival data using a structural equation modeling approach has been suggested by Pickles and colleagues using twin data they demonstrated the application of this model to study the correlation in age of onset. The purpose of the current research is twofold: 1) to evaluate the statistical performance of the model as presented by Pickles and colleagues, and 2) to expand and evaluate the model in more applications, including both genetically informative data and other multivariate examples. Results evaluated from this study involve three areas of method performance: Type-I error rates, power, and parameter estimates under four different distributions (normal, Gamma-2, Gamma-6 and g-and-h) and four different sample sizes (n = 125, 250, 500 and 750). Results based on the original Pickles model indicated that in all sample size and distribution conditions the Type-I error rate was adequate, in fact below the nominal level of .05. Additionally, power was greater than .80 for sample sizes of 500 or more for all distribution conditions. Parameter estimates were upwardly biased when the population value was rho = .20. This bias varied across distributions; the g-and-h distribution showed the largest bias. Results from the expanded model indicated that Type-I error rates were adequate. Power results were not affected by distribution type; sample sizes of 500 were above the .80 level. Parameter estimates continued to be upwardly biased in this more general model, although the degree of bias was smaller.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Contingency tables</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical Computing</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Puberty</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Twin Studies as Topic</subject><issn>0001-8244</issn><issn>1573-3297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iR48LY6k4_Nrjcp9QMKXvS8ZLNZu2U_2k1S7H9v0HrxIgwMD37zmPcIuUS4RWD87uEeARhkqWRpmvMjMkWpeMJZro7JFAAwyZgQE3Lm3DpKlgp5SiYIORcqz6bELna6Ddo3Q091X1H76W3vonJ0qKmmzo_B-DDqltrtgeuGyrZN_0H1ZjMO2qyoH6hf2Wig271rvk9dGHdN9KaV9vqcnNS6dfbisGfk_XHxNn9Olq9PL_OHZWI4ok9q1GBVicYqkDXYFDNbSsUqLkxdxYBGSAsGuRAm0xxBZ3mZlrXKgeVpjXxGbn5841_bYJ0vusYZ27a6t0NwhULFAZT6F0QlZRyI4PUfcD2EMeZ0BWM5xB4zGaGrAxTKzlbFZmw6Pe6L35r5Fy_Yf0k</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Posner, S F</creator><creator>Baker, L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Evaluation and extensions of a structural equation modeling approach to the analysis of survival data</title><author>Posner, S F ; Baker, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f1a0e7b1ce705f0e618eb572d34cfd669c45e0c1344c8a310a89b6bf790296f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Contingency tables</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical Computing</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Puberty</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Twin Studies as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Posner, S F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavior genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Posner, S F</au><au>Baker, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and extensions of a structural equation modeling approach to the analysis of survival data</atitle><jtitle>Behavior genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Genet</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>41-50</pages><issn>0001-8244</issn><eissn>1573-3297</eissn><abstract>Recently a new method for the analysis of survival data using a structural equation modeling approach has been suggested by Pickles and colleagues using twin data they demonstrated the application of this model to study the correlation in age of onset. The purpose of the current research is twofold: 1) to evaluate the statistical performance of the model as presented by Pickles and colleagues, and 2) to expand and evaluate the model in more applications, including both genetically informative data and other multivariate examples. Results evaluated from this study involve three areas of method performance: Type-I error rates, power, and parameter estimates under four different distributions (normal, Gamma-2, Gamma-6 and g-and-h) and four different sample sizes (n = 125, 250, 500 and 750). Results based on the original Pickles model indicated that in all sample size and distribution conditions the Type-I error rate was adequate, in fact below the nominal level of .05. Additionally, power was greater than .80 for sample sizes of 500 or more for all distribution conditions. Parameter estimates were upwardly biased when the population value was rho = .20. This bias varied across distributions; the g-and-h distribution showed the largest bias. Results from the expanded model indicated that Type-I error rates were adequate. Power results were not affected by distribution type; sample sizes of 500 were above the .80 level. Parameter estimates continued to be upwardly biased in this more general model, although the degree of bias was smaller.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>10934798</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1002086526693</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-8244 |
ispartof | Behavior genetics, 2000-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-50 |
issn | 0001-8244 1573-3297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71730077 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Age Bias Contingency tables Humans Mathematical Computing Models, Genetic Puberty Structural equation modeling Survival Analysis Twin Studies as Topic |
title | Evaluation and extensions of a structural equation modeling approach to the analysis of survival data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A06%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20extensions%20of%20a%20structural%20equation%20modeling%20approach%20to%20the%20analysis%20of%20survival%20data&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20genetics&rft.au=Posner,%20S%20F&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=41-50&rft.issn=0001-8244&rft.eissn=1573-3297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1002086526693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71730077%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229009385&rft_id=info:pmid/10934798&rfr_iscdi=true |