Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer

Objectives. To correlate the abnormalities on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan with fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, using a lesion-by-lesion analysis, and to preliminarily explore p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2002-06, Vol.59 (6), p.913-918
Hauptverfasser: Morris, Michael J, Akhurst, Timothy, Osman, Iman, Nunez, Rodolfo, Macapinlac, Homer, Siedlecki, Karen, Verbel, David, Schwartz, Lawrence, Larson, Steven M, Scher, Howard I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 918
container_issue 6
container_start_page 913
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 59
creator Morris, Michael J
Akhurst, Timothy
Osman, Iman
Nunez, Rodolfo
Macapinlac, Homer
Siedlecki, Karen
Verbel, David
Schwartz, Lawrence
Larson, Steven M
Scher, Howard I
description Objectives. To correlate the abnormalities on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan with fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, using a lesion-by-lesion analysis, and to preliminarily explore post-treatment changes in standard uptake value (SUV) with changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Methods. A lesional analysis compared abnormalities on FDG-PET with those on CT/MRI or bone scan. Patients had rising PSA levels and progressive disease according to the imaging findings. Changes in the SUV were compared with the PSA changes in patients who had serial scans after treatment. Results. One hundred fifty-seven lesions in 17 patients were examined; 134 osseous lesions were evident on PET and/or bone scan, 95 lesions (71%) were evident on both, 31 (23%) were seen only on bone scan, and 8 (6%) were seen only on PET (adjusted McNemar’s chi-square = 8.32, P = 0.004). All but one of the lesions seen only on bone scan were “stable” compared with the previous bone scans. All lesions seen only on PET proved to be active disease on subsequent bone scans. Twenty-three soft-tissue lesions were present on CT/MRI or PET, or both; 9 (39%) lesions were evident on both and 14 (61%) were evident only on one imaging modality. In 9 (75%) of 12 cases in which serial PET scans were available, the SUV changed in parallel with the PSA level. Conclusions. FDG-PET can discriminate active osseous disease from scintigraphically quiescent lesions in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, but it is limited in detecting soft-tissue metastases. Post-treatment changes in the SUV tend to correlate with changes in PSA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01509-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71721701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429502015091</els_id><sourcerecordid>71721701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-17541281e2424774884f3e4be75da48c517102b08250804648f93f6d57a4b26f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EokvhJ4ByAcEhMOP4KyeEKgpIlTgAZ8vrTIJREi92UrH_Hqe7okdOHo2e8bzzMPYc4S0CqnffAFqoBW_la-BvACW0NT5gO5Rc123byods9w-5YE9y_gUASin9mF0ghwYbAzs2XI9rTGF2C3VVR_HPcRhXHzNVh5jDkuJc0RRyDqVY4hSH5A4_j1WY3BDmoQpzdUilSYW4pWqixeXFLcFv7a2iyrvZU3rKHvVuzPTs_F6yH9cfv199rm--fvpy9eGm9k2LS41aCuQGiQsutBbGiL4hsSctOyeMl6gR-B4Ml2BAKGH6tulVJ7UTe6765pK9Ov1b9v9eKS-2pPc0jm6muGarUXPUgAWUJ9CXoDlRbw-pXJWOFsFuhu2dYbvps8DtnWG7zb04L1j3E3X3U2elBXh5Blz2buxTuT_ke65RWgGawr0_cVR03AZKNvtAxVUXEvnFdjH8J8pfR3GY2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71721701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Morris, Michael J ; Akhurst, Timothy ; Osman, Iman ; Nunez, Rodolfo ; Macapinlac, Homer ; Siedlecki, Karen ; Verbel, David ; Schwartz, Lawrence ; Larson, Steven M ; Scher, Howard I</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Michael J ; Akhurst, Timothy ; Osman, Iman ; Nunez, Rodolfo ; Macapinlac, Homer ; Siedlecki, Karen ; Verbel, David ; Schwartz, Lawrence ; Larson, Steven M ; Scher, Howard I</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. To correlate the abnormalities on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan with fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, using a lesion-by-lesion analysis, and to preliminarily explore post-treatment changes in standard uptake value (SUV) with changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Methods. A lesional analysis compared abnormalities on FDG-PET with those on CT/MRI or bone scan. Patients had rising PSA levels and progressive disease according to the imaging findings. Changes in the SUV were compared with the PSA changes in patients who had serial scans after treatment. Results. One hundred fifty-seven lesions in 17 patients were examined; 134 osseous lesions were evident on PET and/or bone scan, 95 lesions (71%) were evident on both, 31 (23%) were seen only on bone scan, and 8 (6%) were seen only on PET (adjusted McNemar’s chi-square = 8.32, P = 0.004). All but one of the lesions seen only on bone scan were “stable” compared with the previous bone scans. All lesions seen only on PET proved to be active disease on subsequent bone scans. Twenty-three soft-tissue lesions were present on CT/MRI or PET, or both; 9 (39%) lesions were evident on both and 14 (61%) were evident only on one imaging modality. In 9 (75%) of 12 cases in which serial PET scans were available, the SUV changed in parallel with the PSA level. Conclusions. FDG-PET can discriminate active osseous disease from scintigraphically quiescent lesions in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, but it is limited in detecting soft-tissue metastases. Post-treatment changes in the SUV tend to correlate with changes in PSA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01509-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12031380</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Soft Tissue Neoplasms - secondary ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2002-06, Vol.59 (6), p.913-918</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-17541281e2424774884f3e4be75da48c517102b08250804648f93f6d57a4b26f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-17541281e2424774884f3e4be75da48c517102b08250804648f93f6d57a4b26f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429502015091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13676018$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12031380$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhurst, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Iman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunez, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macapinlac, Homer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbel, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scher, Howard I</creatorcontrib><title>Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objectives. To correlate the abnormalities on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan with fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, using a lesion-by-lesion analysis, and to preliminarily explore post-treatment changes in standard uptake value (SUV) with changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Methods. A lesional analysis compared abnormalities on FDG-PET with those on CT/MRI or bone scan. Patients had rising PSA levels and progressive disease according to the imaging findings. Changes in the SUV were compared with the PSA changes in patients who had serial scans after treatment. Results. One hundred fifty-seven lesions in 17 patients were examined; 134 osseous lesions were evident on PET and/or bone scan, 95 lesions (71%) were evident on both, 31 (23%) were seen only on bone scan, and 8 (6%) were seen only on PET (adjusted McNemar’s chi-square = 8.32, P = 0.004). All but one of the lesions seen only on bone scan were “stable” compared with the previous bone scans. All lesions seen only on PET proved to be active disease on subsequent bone scans. Twenty-three soft-tissue lesions were present on CT/MRI or PET, or both; 9 (39%) lesions were evident on both and 14 (61%) were evident only on one imaging modality. In 9 (75%) of 12 cases in which serial PET scans were available, the SUV changed in parallel with the PSA level. Conclusions. FDG-PET can discriminate active osseous disease from scintigraphically quiescent lesions in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, but it is limited in detecting soft-tissue metastases. Post-treatment changes in the SUV tend to correlate with changes in PSA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EokvhJ4ByAcEhMOP4KyeEKgpIlTgAZ8vrTIJREi92UrH_Hqe7okdOHo2e8bzzMPYc4S0CqnffAFqoBW_la-BvACW0NT5gO5Rc123byods9w-5YE9y_gUASin9mF0ghwYbAzs2XI9rTGF2C3VVR_HPcRhXHzNVh5jDkuJc0RRyDqVY4hSH5A4_j1WY3BDmoQpzdUilSYW4pWqixeXFLcFv7a2iyrvZU3rKHvVuzPTs_F6yH9cfv199rm--fvpy9eGm9k2LS41aCuQGiQsutBbGiL4hsSctOyeMl6gR-B4Ml2BAKGH6tulVJ7UTe6765pK9Ov1b9v9eKS-2pPc0jm6muGarUXPUgAWUJ9CXoDlRbw-pXJWOFsFuhu2dYbvps8DtnWG7zb04L1j3E3X3U2elBXh5Blz2buxTuT_ke65RWgGawr0_cVR03AZKNvtAxVUXEvnFdjH8J8pfR3GY2A</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Morris, Michael J</creator><creator>Akhurst, Timothy</creator><creator>Osman, Iman</creator><creator>Nunez, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Macapinlac, Homer</creator><creator>Siedlecki, Karen</creator><creator>Verbel, David</creator><creator>Schwartz, Lawrence</creator><creator>Larson, Steven M</creator><creator>Scher, Howard I</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer</title><author>Morris, Michael J ; Akhurst, Timothy ; Osman, Iman ; Nunez, Rodolfo ; Macapinlac, Homer ; Siedlecki, Karen ; Verbel, David ; Schwartz, Lawrence ; Larson, Steven M ; Scher, Howard I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-17541281e2424774884f3e4be75da48c517102b08250804648f93f6d57a4b26f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhurst, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Iman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunez, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macapinlac, Homer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbel, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scher, Howard I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Michael J</au><au>Akhurst, Timothy</au><au>Osman, Iman</au><au>Nunez, Rodolfo</au><au>Macapinlac, Homer</au><au>Siedlecki, Karen</au><au>Verbel, David</au><au>Schwartz, Lawrence</au><au>Larson, Steven M</au><au>Scher, Howard I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>918</epage><pages>913-918</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objectives. To correlate the abnormalities on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan with fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, using a lesion-by-lesion analysis, and to preliminarily explore post-treatment changes in standard uptake value (SUV) with changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Methods. A lesional analysis compared abnormalities on FDG-PET with those on CT/MRI or bone scan. Patients had rising PSA levels and progressive disease according to the imaging findings. Changes in the SUV were compared with the PSA changes in patients who had serial scans after treatment. Results. One hundred fifty-seven lesions in 17 patients were examined; 134 osseous lesions were evident on PET and/or bone scan, 95 lesions (71%) were evident on both, 31 (23%) were seen only on bone scan, and 8 (6%) were seen only on PET (adjusted McNemar’s chi-square = 8.32, P = 0.004). All but one of the lesions seen only on bone scan were “stable” compared with the previous bone scans. All lesions seen only on PET proved to be active disease on subsequent bone scans. Twenty-three soft-tissue lesions were present on CT/MRI or PET, or both; 9 (39%) lesions were evident on both and 14 (61%) were evident only on one imaging modality. In 9 (75%) of 12 cases in which serial PET scans were available, the SUV changed in parallel with the PSA level. Conclusions. FDG-PET can discriminate active osseous disease from scintigraphically quiescent lesions in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer, but it is limited in detecting soft-tissue metastases. Post-treatment changes in the SUV tend to correlate with changes in PSA.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12031380</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01509-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2002-06, Vol.59 (6), p.913-918
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71721701
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Neoplasms - diagnosis
Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Genital system. Mammary gland
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms - blood
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Radionuclide Imaging
Radiopharmaceuticals
Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnosis
Soft Tissue Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Soft Tissue Neoplasms - secondary
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumors of the urinary system
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
title Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluorinated%20deoxyglucose%20positron%20emission%20tomography%20imaging%20in%20progressive%20metastatic%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Morris,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=918&rft.pages=913-918&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01509-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71721701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71721701&rft_id=info:pmid/12031380&rft_els_id=S0090429502015091&rfr_iscdi=true