Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children

Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of paediatric dentistry 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.177-182
Hauptverfasser: Dean, J. A., Mack, R. B., Fulkerson, B. T., Sanders, B. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 3
container_start_page 177
container_title International journal of paediatric dentistry
container_volume 12
creator Dean, J. A.
Mack, R. B.
Fulkerson, B. T.
Sanders, B. J.
description Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth. Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy. Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively. Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P 
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71717269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71717269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0qUnTfoWJ0272HmCwLfUyZU1aLepyaNVpF0QJtE6xcSHWkm9fskTZdeIAgv_vvccPIUwgJ1CIr-ucMMEzKtivnALQHIBxnm8_oPHp4SMaQy0gKwtWj9B5jGsAwoHCGRoRCrRiUI_R3dS3vQpN9B32Fhtn9Cb4OITnRiuHVbfC1ofW62Cid7gfXO83vt3hPnhtVkO6xk2H9UvjVsF0F-iTVS6ay-M-QQ-z6_vpTbb4Ob-dfltkmlWMZwUtBBWVKouqJNoWmhXGMiCK8jQ-r7QBq60V3BYcQJSq1lTxiiSKE8Oe2AR9OdRNY7wNJm5k20RtnFOd8UOUJUmLijoFq0NQp1_FYKzsQ9OqsJME5N6lXMu9MrlXJvcu5V-XcpvQz8cew1NrVv_Ao7wUuDoE_jTO7P67sLxdfk-HhGcHvIkbsz3hKrxKUbKSy8e7uVwubmbT34tS_mDv0AGSLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71717269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dean, J. A. ; Mack, R. B. ; Fulkerson, B. T. ; Sanders, B. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dean, J. A. ; Mack, R. B. ; Fulkerson, B. T. ; Sanders, B. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth. Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy. Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively. Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P &lt; 0·05 level as tested by Fisher’s exact test. This study failed to demonstrate a difference in the success rate between the electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12028309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Crowns ; Dentistry ; Electrosurgery - methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; Formocresols - therapeutic use ; Hemostasis, Surgical ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Humans ; Molar - diagnostic imaging ; Molar - pathology ; Prospective Studies ; Pulpotomy - methods ; Radiography ; Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use ; Stainless Steel ; Statistics as Topic ; Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging ; Tooth, Deciduous - pathology ; Treatment Outcome ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.177-182</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-263X.2002.00355.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-263X.2002.00355.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12028309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dean, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulkerson, B. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, B. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</title><title>International journal of paediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><description>Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth. Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy. Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively. Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P &lt; 0·05 level as tested by Fisher’s exact test. This study failed to demonstrate a difference in the success rate between the electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy techniques.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electrosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Formocresols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molar - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Molar - pathology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulpotomy - methods</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tooth, Deciduous - pathology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0960-7439</issn><issn>1365-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0qUnTfoWJ0272HmCwLfUyZU1aLepyaNVpF0QJtE6xcSHWkm9fskTZdeIAgv_vvccPIUwgJ1CIr-ucMMEzKtivnALQHIBxnm8_oPHp4SMaQy0gKwtWj9B5jGsAwoHCGRoRCrRiUI_R3dS3vQpN9B32Fhtn9Cb4OITnRiuHVbfC1ofW62Cid7gfXO83vt3hPnhtVkO6xk2H9UvjVsF0F-iTVS6ay-M-QQ-z6_vpTbb4Ob-dfltkmlWMZwUtBBWVKouqJNoWmhXGMiCK8jQ-r7QBq60V3BYcQJSq1lTxiiSKE8Oe2AR9OdRNY7wNJm5k20RtnFOd8UOUJUmLijoFq0NQp1_FYKzsQ9OqsJME5N6lXMu9MrlXJvcu5V-XcpvQz8cew1NrVv_Ao7wUuDoE_jTO7P67sLxdfk-HhGcHvIkbsz3hKrxKUbKSy8e7uVwubmbT34tS_mDv0AGSLg</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Dean, J. A.</creator><creator>Mack, R. B.</creator><creator>Fulkerson, B. T.</creator><creator>Sanders, B. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</title><author>Dean, J. A. ; Mack, R. B. ; Fulkerson, B. T. ; Sanders, B. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electrosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Formocresols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molar - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Molar - pathology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulpotomy - methods</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tooth, Deciduous - pathology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dean, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulkerson, B. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, B. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dean, J. A.</au><au>Mack, R. B.</au><au>Fulkerson, B. T.</au><au>Sanders, B. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</atitle><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>177-182</pages><issn>0960-7439</issn><eissn>1365-263X</eissn><abstract>Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth. Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy. Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively. Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P &lt; 0·05 level as tested by Fisher’s exact test. This study failed to demonstrate a difference in the success rate between the electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy techniques.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12028309</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7439
ispartof International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.177-182
issn 0960-7439
1365-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71717269
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Crowns
Dentistry
Electrosurgery - methods
Follow-Up Studies
Formocresols - therapeutic use
Hemostasis, Surgical
Hemostatic Techniques
Humans
Molar - diagnostic imaging
Molar - pathology
Prospective Studies
Pulpotomy - methods
Radiography
Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use
Stainless Steel
Statistics as Topic
Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging
Tooth, Deciduous - pathology
Treatment Outcome
Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use
title Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20electrosurgical%20and%20formocresol%20pulpotomy%20procedures%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20paediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Dean,%20J.%20A.&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=177-182&rft.issn=0960-7439&rft.eissn=1365-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71717269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71717269&rft_id=info:pmid/12028309&rfr_iscdi=true