Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children
Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of paediatric dentistry 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.177-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | International journal of paediatric dentistry |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Dean, J. A. Mack, R. B. Fulkerson, B. T. Sanders, B. J. |
description | Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth.
Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy.
Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71717269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71717269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0qUnTfoWJ0272HmCwLfUyZU1aLepyaNVpF0QJtE6xcSHWkm9fskTZdeIAgv_vvccPIUwgJ1CIr-ucMMEzKtivnALQHIBxnm8_oPHp4SMaQy0gKwtWj9B5jGsAwoHCGRoRCrRiUI_R3dS3vQpN9B32Fhtn9Cb4OITnRiuHVbfC1ofW62Cid7gfXO83vt3hPnhtVkO6xk2H9UvjVsF0F-iTVS6ay-M-QQ-z6_vpTbb4Ob-dfltkmlWMZwUtBBWVKouqJNoWmhXGMiCK8jQ-r7QBq60V3BYcQJSq1lTxiiSKE8Oe2AR9OdRNY7wNJm5k20RtnFOd8UOUJUmLijoFq0NQp1_FYKzsQ9OqsJME5N6lXMu9MrlXJvcu5V-XcpvQz8cew1NrVv_Ao7wUuDoE_jTO7P67sLxdfk-HhGcHvIkbsz3hKrxKUbKSy8e7uVwubmbT34tS_mDv0AGSLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71717269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dean, J. A. ; Mack, R. B. ; Fulkerson, B. T. ; Sanders, B. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dean, J. A. ; Mack, R. B. ; Fulkerson, B. T. ; Sanders, B. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth.
Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy.
Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P < 0·05 level as tested by Fisher’s exact test. This study failed to demonstrate a difference in the success rate between the electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12028309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Crowns ; Dentistry ; Electrosurgery - methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; Formocresols - therapeutic use ; Hemostasis, Surgical ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Humans ; Molar - diagnostic imaging ; Molar - pathology ; Prospective Studies ; Pulpotomy - methods ; Radiography ; Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use ; Stainless Steel ; Statistics as Topic ; Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging ; Tooth, Deciduous - pathology ; Treatment Outcome ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.177-182</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-263X.2002.00355.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-263X.2002.00355.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12028309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dean, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulkerson, B. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, B. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</title><title>International journal of paediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><description>Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth.
Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy.
Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P < 0·05 level as tested by Fisher’s exact test. This study failed to demonstrate a difference in the success rate between the electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy techniques.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electrosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Formocresols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molar - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Molar - pathology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulpotomy - methods</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tooth, Deciduous - pathology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0960-7439</issn><issn>1365-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAUx9G0qUnTfoWJ0272HmCwLfUyZU1aLepyaNVpF0QJtE6xcSHWkm9fskTZdeIAgv_vvccPIUwgJ1CIr-ucMMEzKtivnALQHIBxnm8_oPHp4SMaQy0gKwtWj9B5jGsAwoHCGRoRCrRiUI_R3dS3vQpN9B32Fhtn9Cb4OITnRiuHVbfC1ofW62Cid7gfXO83vt3hPnhtVkO6xk2H9UvjVsF0F-iTVS6ay-M-QQ-z6_vpTbb4Ob-dfltkmlWMZwUtBBWVKouqJNoWmhXGMiCK8jQ-r7QBq60V3BYcQJSq1lTxiiSKE8Oe2AR9OdRNY7wNJm5k20RtnFOd8UOUJUmLijoFq0NQp1_FYKzsQ9OqsJME5N6lXMu9MrlXJvcu5V-XcpvQz8cew1NrVv_Ao7wUuDoE_jTO7P67sLxdfk-HhGcHvIkbsz3hKrxKUbKSy8e7uVwubmbT34tS_mDv0AGSLg</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Dean, J. A.</creator><creator>Mack, R. B.</creator><creator>Fulkerson, B. T.</creator><creator>Sanders, B. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</title><author>Dean, J. A. ; Mack, R. B. ; Fulkerson, B. T. ; Sanders, B. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-4246268a74871cf4c34ef301a2536558ce0fcff65f450067a9c2a58146251e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electrosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Formocresols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molar - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Molar - pathology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulpotomy - methods</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tooth, Deciduous - pathology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dean, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulkerson, B. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, B. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dean, J. A.</au><au>Mack, R. B.</au><au>Fulkerson, B. T.</au><au>Sanders, B. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children</atitle><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>177-182</pages><issn>0960-7439</issn><eissn>1365-263X</eissn><abstract>Objectives. Although previous studies have examined the electrosurgical pulpotomy technique for primary teeth, no well‐controlled, clinical human trials have been published. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare electrosurgical pulpotomies vs. formocresol pulpotomies in human vital primary molar teeth.
Design. Fifty children were randomly divided into two groups, 25 receiving an electrosurgical pulpotomy and 25 receiving a formocresol pulpotomy.
Results. After at least 5 months postoperative observation time, the clinical and radiographic success rates for the electrosurgical groups were 96 and 84%, respectively; and for the formocresol group, 100 and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the success rates for the two groups at the P < 0·05 level as tested by Fisher’s exact test. This study failed to demonstrate a difference in the success rate between the electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy techniques.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12028309</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7439 |
ispartof | International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.177-182 |
issn | 0960-7439 1365-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71717269 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Child Child, Preschool Crowns Dentistry Electrosurgery - methods Follow-Up Studies Formocresols - therapeutic use Hemostasis, Surgical Hemostatic Techniques Humans Molar - diagnostic imaging Molar - pathology Prospective Studies Pulpotomy - methods Radiography Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use Stainless Steel Statistics as Topic Tooth, Deciduous - diagnostic imaging Tooth, Deciduous - pathology Treatment Outcome Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use |
title | Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20electrosurgical%20and%20formocresol%20pulpotomy%20procedures%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20paediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Dean,%20J.%20A.&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=177-182&rft.issn=0960-7439&rft.eissn=1365-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00355.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71717269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71717269&rft_id=info:pmid/12028309&rfr_iscdi=true |