Comparison of three approaches for synchronization of ovulation for timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced cattle managed on the Texas gulf coast
Our objectives were to compare the relative efficacies of three protocols designed to synchronize ovulation for timed artificial insemination (AI) of predominantly Brahman-influenced cows and heifers. In Exp. 1, 273 Brahman x Hereford (F1) cows at three locations were stratified by BW, body conditio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2002-05, Vol.80 (5), p.1173-1178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1173 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Williams, S. W Stanko, R. L Amstalden, M Williams, G. L |
description | Our objectives were to compare the relative efficacies of three protocols designed to synchronize ovulation for timed artificial insemination (AI) of predominantly Brahman-influenced cows and heifers. In Exp. 1, 273 Brahman x Hereford (F1) cows at three locations were stratified by BW, body condition score (BCS), age, and days postpartum and assigned randomly to three treatments: 1) Syncro-Mate-B (SMB), 2) norgestomet-prostaglandin (NP), and 3) Ovsynch. The management goal required that cows have a minimum BCS of 5 and be at least 36 d postpartum (PP) at treatment onset. However, final results included 23 cows (8.4%) whose BCS fell below 5. In Exp. 2, 286 pubertal beef heifers were stratified by BW and BCS and allocated randomly to the three treatments. Heifers were predominantly Brahman crossbred (n = 265; Brahman x Hereford, F1; Santa Cruz) or purebred Brahman-influenced (Santa Gertrudis) with a smaller number (n = 21) of Hereford heifers also included. For both experiments, SMB treatment consisted of a 9-d norgestomet ear implant plus an estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection on d 0. Norgestomet-prostaglandin-treated females were implanted with a SMB implant without the estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection at the time of implant insertion and received 25 mg prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) i.m. 2 d before implant removal. Ovsynch consisted of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on d 1, 25 mg PGF i.m. on d 8, and a second GnRH injection on d 10. Beginning on d 9, calves were removed for 48 h in Exp. 1. Cattle in SMB and NP groups in both experiments were timed-inseminated 48 to 54 h after implant removal and at 12 to 24 h after the second GnRH injection (Ovsynch). Timed AI conception rates did not differ between the SMB (45.1%) and Ovsynch (42.4%) groups; however, conception rate in the NP group tended (P < 0.12) to be lower overall than in the other groups due to a reduced (P < 0.05) conception rate in cows that were < 60 d PP at treatment onset. Conversely, timed-AI conception was greatest (P < 0.056) in NP (54.7%) compared with SMB (40.4%) and Ovsynch (39.1%) for heifers in Exp. 2. We conclude that in mature, suckled beef cows with Brahman genetic influence, SMB and Ovsynch perform similarly when cow eligibility relies primarily on BCS and minimum days PP. The NP treatment results in lower conception in cows < 60 d PP compared with SMB and Ovsynch. However, in nulliparous Brahman-influenced heifers that are confirmed to be pubertal, NP may be superior to the other |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/2002.8051173x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71715857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71715857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-330af68caa936e31dba0613f0a3e3a3d100290c8afdc01a0e4759670383eab3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0U2PFCEQBmBiNO64evRqiIneeqWaoT-OOvEr2cTLeiY1NEwzoWEEWnf9Of5S6fSYSTxVCA8F1EvIS2A3tajbdzVj9U3HBEDL7x-RDYhaVBwa_phsyhZUXQf1FXmW0pExqEUvnpIrqBn0DeMb8mcXphNGm4KnwdA8Rq0pnk4xoBp1oiZEmh68GmPw9jdmu7rwc3brYgHZTnqgGLM1Vll01PqkJ-tXYT39EFIpg1Vzqqw3btZelRMKc3aaTujxUJbF5lHTO32PiR5mZ6gKmPJz8sSgS_rFuV6T758-3u2-VLffPn_dvb-tFG_bXHHO0DSdQux5ozkMe2QNcMOQa458gDKNnqkOzaAYINPbVvRNy3jHNe6LuCZv177l8z9mnbKcbFLaOfQ6zEm20ILoRFvg6__gMczRl7fJGroSBPAFVStSMaQUtZGnaCeMDxKYXJKTS3LyX3LFvzo3nfdlmhd9jqqAN2eASaEzEb2y6eK20PQctpdvjPYw_rJRyzShc6UtyCOmjkkhlyv5X3pxsHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218117137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three approaches for synchronization of ovulation for timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced cattle managed on the Texas gulf coast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Williams, S. W ; Stanko, R. L ; Amstalden, M ; Williams, G. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, S. W ; Stanko, R. L ; Amstalden, M ; Williams, G. L</creatorcontrib><description>Our objectives were to compare the relative efficacies of three protocols designed to synchronize ovulation for timed artificial insemination (AI) of predominantly Brahman-influenced cows and heifers. In Exp. 1, 273 Brahman x Hereford (F1) cows at three locations were stratified by BW, body condition score (BCS), age, and days postpartum and assigned randomly to three treatments: 1) Syncro-Mate-B (SMB), 2) norgestomet-prostaglandin (NP), and 3) Ovsynch. The management goal required that cows have a minimum BCS of 5 and be at least 36 d postpartum (PP) at treatment onset. However, final results included 23 cows (8.4%) whose BCS fell below 5. In Exp. 2, 286 pubertal beef heifers were stratified by BW and BCS and allocated randomly to the three treatments. Heifers were predominantly Brahman crossbred (n = 265; Brahman x Hereford, F1; Santa Cruz) or purebred Brahman-influenced (Santa Gertrudis) with a smaller number (n = 21) of Hereford heifers also included. For both experiments, SMB treatment consisted of a 9-d norgestomet ear implant plus an estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection on d 0. Norgestomet-prostaglandin-treated females were implanted with a SMB implant without the estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection at the time of implant insertion and received 25 mg prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) i.m. 2 d before implant removal. Ovsynch consisted of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on d 1, 25 mg PGF i.m. on d 8, and a second GnRH injection on d 10. Beginning on d 9, calves were removed for 48 h in Exp. 1. Cattle in SMB and NP groups in both experiments were timed-inseminated 48 to 54 h after implant removal and at 12 to 24 h after the second GnRH injection (Ovsynch). Timed AI conception rates did not differ between the SMB (45.1%) and Ovsynch (42.4%) groups; however, conception rate in the NP group tended (P < 0.12) to be lower overall than in the other groups due to a reduced (P < 0.05) conception rate in cows that were < 60 d PP at treatment onset. Conversely, timed-AI conception was greatest (P < 0.056) in NP (54.7%) compared with SMB (40.4%) and Ovsynch (39.1%) for heifers in Exp. 2. We conclude that in mature, suckled beef cows with Brahman genetic influence, SMB and Ovsynch perform similarly when cow eligibility relies primarily on BCS and minimum days PP. The NP treatment results in lower conception in cows < 60 d PP compared with SMB and Ovsynch. However, in nulliparous Brahman-influenced heifers that are confirmed to be pubertal, NP may be superior to the other two treatments for timed AI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2002.8051173x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12019603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Age Factors ; Animal productions ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Artificial insemination ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle - physiology ; Dinoprost - administration & dosage ; Drug Implants ; Estradiol - administration & dosage ; Estradiol - analogs & derivatives ; Estrus Synchronization - methods ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage ; Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary ; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary ; Ovulation - drug effects ; Ovulation Induction - veterinary ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnenediones - administration & dosage ; Progesterone Congeners - administration & dosage ; Random Allocation ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2002-05, Vol.80 (5), p.1173-1178</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science May 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-330af68caa936e31dba0613f0a3e3a3d100290c8afdc01a0e4759670383eab3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14169314$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12019603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanko, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amstalden, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, G. L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three approaches for synchronization of ovulation for timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced cattle managed on the Texas gulf coast</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Our objectives were to compare the relative efficacies of three protocols designed to synchronize ovulation for timed artificial insemination (AI) of predominantly Brahman-influenced cows and heifers. In Exp. 1, 273 Brahman x Hereford (F1) cows at three locations were stratified by BW, body condition score (BCS), age, and days postpartum and assigned randomly to three treatments: 1) Syncro-Mate-B (SMB), 2) norgestomet-prostaglandin (NP), and 3) Ovsynch. The management goal required that cows have a minimum BCS of 5 and be at least 36 d postpartum (PP) at treatment onset. However, final results included 23 cows (8.4%) whose BCS fell below 5. In Exp. 2, 286 pubertal beef heifers were stratified by BW and BCS and allocated randomly to the three treatments. Heifers were predominantly Brahman crossbred (n = 265; Brahman x Hereford, F1; Santa Cruz) or purebred Brahman-influenced (Santa Gertrudis) with a smaller number (n = 21) of Hereford heifers also included. For both experiments, SMB treatment consisted of a 9-d norgestomet ear implant plus an estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection on d 0. Norgestomet-prostaglandin-treated females were implanted with a SMB implant without the estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection at the time of implant insertion and received 25 mg prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) i.m. 2 d before implant removal. Ovsynch consisted of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on d 1, 25 mg PGF i.m. on d 8, and a second GnRH injection on d 10. Beginning on d 9, calves were removed for 48 h in Exp. 1. Cattle in SMB and NP groups in both experiments were timed-inseminated 48 to 54 h after implant removal and at 12 to 24 h after the second GnRH injection (Ovsynch). Timed AI conception rates did not differ between the SMB (45.1%) and Ovsynch (42.4%) groups; however, conception rate in the NP group tended (P < 0.12) to be lower overall than in the other groups due to a reduced (P < 0.05) conception rate in cows that were < 60 d PP at treatment onset. Conversely, timed-AI conception was greatest (P < 0.056) in NP (54.7%) compared with SMB (40.4%) and Ovsynch (39.1%) for heifers in Exp. 2. We conclude that in mature, suckled beef cows with Brahman genetic influence, SMB and Ovsynch perform similarly when cow eligibility relies primarily on BCS and minimum days PP. The NP treatment results in lower conception in cows < 60 d PP compared with SMB and Ovsynch. However, in nulliparous Brahman-influenced heifers that are confirmed to be pubertal, NP may be superior to the other two treatments for timed AI.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artificial insemination</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Dinoprost - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Drug Implants</subject><subject>Estradiol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Estradiol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Estrus Synchronization - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</subject><subject>Ovulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - veterinary</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Pregnenediones - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Progesterone Congeners - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0U2PFCEQBmBiNO64evRqiIneeqWaoT-OOvEr2cTLeiY1NEwzoWEEWnf9Of5S6fSYSTxVCA8F1EvIS2A3tajbdzVj9U3HBEDL7x-RDYhaVBwa_phsyhZUXQf1FXmW0pExqEUvnpIrqBn0DeMb8mcXphNGm4KnwdA8Rq0pnk4xoBp1oiZEmh68GmPw9jdmu7rwc3brYgHZTnqgGLM1Vll01PqkJ-tXYT39EFIpg1Vzqqw3btZelRMKc3aaTujxUJbF5lHTO32PiR5mZ6gKmPJz8sSgS_rFuV6T758-3u2-VLffPn_dvb-tFG_bXHHO0DSdQux5ozkMe2QNcMOQa458gDKNnqkOzaAYINPbVvRNy3jHNe6LuCZv177l8z9mnbKcbFLaOfQ6zEm20ILoRFvg6__gMczRl7fJGroSBPAFVStSMaQUtZGnaCeMDxKYXJKTS3LyX3LFvzo3nfdlmhd9jqqAN2eASaEzEb2y6eK20PQctpdvjPYw_rJRyzShc6UtyCOmjkkhlyv5X3pxsHY</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Williams, S. W</creator><creator>Stanko, R. L</creator><creator>Amstalden, M</creator><creator>Williams, G. L</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Comparison of three approaches for synchronization of ovulation for timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced cattle managed on the Texas gulf coast</title><author>Williams, S. W ; Stanko, R. L ; Amstalden, M ; Williams, G. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-330af68caa936e31dba0613f0a3e3a3d100290c8afdc01a0e4759670383eab3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artificial insemination</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Dinoprost - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Drug Implants</topic><topic>Estradiol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Estradiol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Estrus Synchronization - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</topic><topic>Ovulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - veterinary</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Pregnenediones - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Progesterone Congeners - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanko, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amstalden, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, G. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, S. W</au><au>Stanko, R. L</au><au>Amstalden, M</au><au>Williams, G. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three approaches for synchronization of ovulation for timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced cattle managed on the Texas gulf coast</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1173</spage><epage>1178</epage><pages>1173-1178</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Our objectives were to compare the relative efficacies of three protocols designed to synchronize ovulation for timed artificial insemination (AI) of predominantly Brahman-influenced cows and heifers. In Exp. 1, 273 Brahman x Hereford (F1) cows at three locations were stratified by BW, body condition score (BCS), age, and days postpartum and assigned randomly to three treatments: 1) Syncro-Mate-B (SMB), 2) norgestomet-prostaglandin (NP), and 3) Ovsynch. The management goal required that cows have a minimum BCS of 5 and be at least 36 d postpartum (PP) at treatment onset. However, final results included 23 cows (8.4%) whose BCS fell below 5. In Exp. 2, 286 pubertal beef heifers were stratified by BW and BCS and allocated randomly to the three treatments. Heifers were predominantly Brahman crossbred (n = 265; Brahman x Hereford, F1; Santa Cruz) or purebred Brahman-influenced (Santa Gertrudis) with a smaller number (n = 21) of Hereford heifers also included. For both experiments, SMB treatment consisted of a 9-d norgestomet ear implant plus an estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection on d 0. Norgestomet-prostaglandin-treated females were implanted with a SMB implant without the estradiol valerate/norgestomet injection at the time of implant insertion and received 25 mg prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) i.m. 2 d before implant removal. Ovsynch consisted of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on d 1, 25 mg PGF i.m. on d 8, and a second GnRH injection on d 10. Beginning on d 9, calves were removed for 48 h in Exp. 1. Cattle in SMB and NP groups in both experiments were timed-inseminated 48 to 54 h after implant removal and at 12 to 24 h after the second GnRH injection (Ovsynch). Timed AI conception rates did not differ between the SMB (45.1%) and Ovsynch (42.4%) groups; however, conception rate in the NP group tended (P < 0.12) to be lower overall than in the other groups due to a reduced (P < 0.05) conception rate in cows that were < 60 d PP at treatment onset. Conversely, timed-AI conception was greatest (P < 0.056) in NP (54.7%) compared with SMB (40.4%) and Ovsynch (39.1%) for heifers in Exp. 2. We conclude that in mature, suckled beef cows with Brahman genetic influence, SMB and Ovsynch perform similarly when cow eligibility relies primarily on BCS and minimum days PP. The NP treatment results in lower conception in cows < 60 d PP compared with SMB and Ovsynch. However, in nulliparous Brahman-influenced heifers that are confirmed to be pubertal, NP may be superior to the other two treatments for timed AI.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>12019603</pmid><doi>10.2527/2002.8051173x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2002-05, Vol.80 (5), p.1173-1178 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71715857 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Age Factors Animal productions Animal reproduction Animals Artificial insemination Biological and medical sciences Cattle Cattle - physiology Dinoprost - administration & dosage Drug Implants Estradiol - administration & dosage Estradiol - analogs & derivatives Estrus Synchronization - methods Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary Insemination, Artificial - veterinary Ovulation - drug effects Ovulation Induction - veterinary Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Pregnenediones - administration & dosage Progesterone Congeners - administration & dosage Random Allocation Terrestrial animal productions Time Factors Vertebrates |
title | Comparison of three approaches for synchronization of ovulation for timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced cattle managed on the Texas gulf coast |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20approaches%20for%20synchronization%20of%20ovulation%20for%20timed%20artificial%20insemination%20in%20Bos%20indicus-influenced%20cattle%20managed%20on%20the%20Texas%20gulf%20coast&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Williams,%20S.%20W&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1173&rft.epage=1178&rft.pages=1173-1178&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2002.8051173x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71715857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218117137&rft_id=info:pmid/12019603&rfr_iscdi=true |