Growth and Health of Holstein Calves Fed Milk Replacers Supplemented with Antibiotics or Enteroguard

Forty-five Holstein calves were fed milk replacers containing either antibiotics [MRA (oxytetracycline at 138 mg/kg and neomycin at 276 mg/kg), n = 22)] or Enteroguard [MRE, a blend of fructooligosaccharides, allicin, and gut-active microbes at (129 mg/kg, n = 23)] from birth to 5 wk of age to compa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2002-04, Vol.85 (4), p.947-950
Hauptverfasser: Donovan, D. C, Franklin, S. T, Chase, C. C. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 950
container_issue 4
container_start_page 947
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 85
creator Donovan, D. C
Franklin, S. T
Chase, C. C. L
description Forty-five Holstein calves were fed milk replacers containing either antibiotics [MRA (oxytetracycline at 138 mg/kg and neomycin at 276 mg/kg), n = 22)] or Enteroguard [MRE, a blend of fructooligosaccharides, allicin, and gut-active microbes at (129 mg/kg, n = 23)] from birth to 5 wk of age to compare effects on average daily gain and on incidence of scours. Performance was evaluated by measuring weight gain, feed efficiency, and fecal scores. The overall body weight gains and severity of scours were not different between treatments, nor were there differences in starter intake or mean body weight gain. During wk 2, the average gain of calves fed MRA was less than that of calves fed MRE (0.07 vs. 0.09 kg/d, P = 0.09), and greater during wk 5 (0.62 vs. 0.51 kg/d, P < 0.01); however, total gain for calves fed MRE was not different from calves fed MRA. Likewise, average feed efficiencies (gain/dry matter intake) were not different. Severity of scours, as measured by fecal scores, and concentrations of serum proteins, an indirect measure of immunoglobulins, were similar for calves fed MRA and MRE. The results suggest that antibiotics in milk replacers can be replaced with compounds such as fructooligosaccharides, probiotics, and allicin to obtain similar calf performance.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74153-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71701371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71701371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-41e6834d1d7c6bd721cc3323970b9c20d6a3eda57b56bc0c21a00185571a9c913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkW9rFDEQxoMo9qx-BYmCoi-2ZvJns_uyHG1PaBGsvg7ZJNfLmd2syW6Pfntz7eFBITAZ5vfMJPMg9AHIGYO6-ba1-eyWEEorwgj9QuhXyUGwir5ACxBUVAza5iVa_EdO0JuctyUFSsRrdFICNJyTBbJXKe6mDdaDxSunQ7nGNV7FkCfnB7zU4d5lfOksvvHhD_7pxqCNSxnfzuMYXO-GqdR2vujOh8l3Pk7eZBwTviiVFO9mnexb9GqtQ3bvDvEU_b68-LVcVdc_rr4vz68rwwVMFQdXN4xbsNLUnZUUjGGMslaSrjWU2FozZ7WQnag7QwwFTco_hJCgW9MCO0Wfn_qOKf6dXZ5U77NxIejBxTkrCZIAk3vw4zNwG-c0lLcpaEUDQta8QO0TZFLMObm1GpPvdXpQQNTeB1V8UI8-qP2SVTmPPihatO8PA-aud_aoPCy-AJ8OgM5Gh3XSg_H5yLGaU17XR27j7zY7n5zKvQ6htIX9-EYorlou2T9-N52n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195815764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth and Health of Holstein Calves Fed Milk Replacers Supplemented with Antibiotics or Enteroguard</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Donovan, D. C ; Franklin, S. T ; Chase, C. C. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Donovan, D. C ; Franklin, S. T ; Chase, C. C. L</creatorcontrib><description>Forty-five Holstein calves were fed milk replacers containing either antibiotics [MRA (oxytetracycline at 138 mg/kg and neomycin at 276 mg/kg), n = 22)] or Enteroguard [MRE, a blend of fructooligosaccharides, allicin, and gut-active microbes at (129 mg/kg, n = 23)] from birth to 5 wk of age to compare effects on average daily gain and on incidence of scours. Performance was evaluated by measuring weight gain, feed efficiency, and fecal scores. The overall body weight gains and severity of scours were not different between treatments, nor were there differences in starter intake or mean body weight gain. During wk 2, the average gain of calves fed MRA was less than that of calves fed MRE (0.07 vs. 0.09 kg/d, P = 0.09), and greater during wk 5 (0.62 vs. 0.51 kg/d, P &lt; 0.01); however, total gain for calves fed MRE was not different from calves fed MRA. Likewise, average feed efficiencies (gain/dry matter intake) were not different. Severity of scours, as measured by fecal scores, and concentrations of serum proteins, an indirect measure of immunoglobulins, were similar for calves fed MRA and MRE. The results suggest that antibiotics in milk replacers can be replaced with compounds such as fructooligosaccharides, probiotics, and allicin to obtain similar calf performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74153-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12018440</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Dairy Sci Assoc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Animal Feed ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Animals, Newborn - growth & development ; Animals, Newborn - physiology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle - growth & development ; Cattle - physiology ; Diarrhea - epidemiology ; Diarrhea - veterinary ; Feces ; Feed and pet food industries ; Female ; Food industries ; Food, Formulated ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Incidence ; Male ; Neomycin - administration & dosage ; Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage ; Oxytetracycline - administration & dosage ; Probiotics - administration & dosage ; Random Allocation ; Sulfinic Acids - administration & dosage ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Weight Gain]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2002-04, Vol.85 (4), p.947-950</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-41e6834d1d7c6bd721cc3323970b9c20d6a3eda57b56bc0c21a00185571a9c913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-41e6834d1d7c6bd721cc3323970b9c20d6a3eda57b56bc0c21a00185571a9c913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13642466$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12018440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donovan, D. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, S. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, C. C. L</creatorcontrib><title>Growth and Health of Holstein Calves Fed Milk Replacers Supplemented with Antibiotics or Enteroguard</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Forty-five Holstein calves were fed milk replacers containing either antibiotics [MRA (oxytetracycline at 138 mg/kg and neomycin at 276 mg/kg), n = 22)] or Enteroguard [MRE, a blend of fructooligosaccharides, allicin, and gut-active microbes at (129 mg/kg, n = 23)] from birth to 5 wk of age to compare effects on average daily gain and on incidence of scours. Performance was evaluated by measuring weight gain, feed efficiency, and fecal scores. The overall body weight gains and severity of scours were not different between treatments, nor were there differences in starter intake or mean body weight gain. During wk 2, the average gain of calves fed MRA was less than that of calves fed MRE (0.07 vs. 0.09 kg/d, P = 0.09), and greater during wk 5 (0.62 vs. 0.51 kg/d, P &lt; 0.01); however, total gain for calves fed MRE was not different from calves fed MRA. Likewise, average feed efficiencies (gain/dry matter intake) were not different. Severity of scours, as measured by fecal scores, and concentrations of serum proteins, an indirect measure of immunoglobulins, were similar for calves fed MRA and MRE. The results suggest that antibiotics in milk replacers can be replaced with compounds such as fructooligosaccharides, probiotics, and allicin to obtain similar calf performance.</description><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Newborn - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Animals, Newborn - physiology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Diarrhea - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diarrhea - veterinary</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food, Formulated</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neomycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Oligosaccharides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Oxytetracycline - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Probiotics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Sulfinic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkW9rFDEQxoMo9qx-BYmCoi-2ZvJns_uyHG1PaBGsvg7ZJNfLmd2syW6Pfntz7eFBITAZ5vfMJPMg9AHIGYO6-ba1-eyWEEorwgj9QuhXyUGwir5ACxBUVAza5iVa_EdO0JuctyUFSsRrdFICNJyTBbJXKe6mDdaDxSunQ7nGNV7FkCfnB7zU4d5lfOksvvHhD_7pxqCNSxnfzuMYXO-GqdR2vujOh8l3Pk7eZBwTviiVFO9mnexb9GqtQ3bvDvEU_b68-LVcVdc_rr4vz68rwwVMFQdXN4xbsNLUnZUUjGGMslaSrjWU2FozZ7WQnag7QwwFTco_hJCgW9MCO0Wfn_qOKf6dXZ5U77NxIejBxTkrCZIAk3vw4zNwG-c0lLcpaEUDQta8QO0TZFLMObm1GpPvdXpQQNTeB1V8UI8-qP2SVTmPPihatO8PA-aud_aoPCy-AJ8OgM5Gh3XSg_H5yLGaU17XR27j7zY7n5zKvQ6htIX9-EYorlou2T9-N52n</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Donovan, D. C</creator><creator>Franklin, S. T</creator><creator>Chase, C. C. L</creator><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Growth and Health of Holstein Calves Fed Milk Replacers Supplemented with Antibiotics or Enteroguard</title><author>Donovan, D. C ; Franklin, S. T ; Chase, C. C. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-41e6834d1d7c6bd721cc3323970b9c20d6a3eda57b56bc0c21a00185571a9c913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Newborn - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Animals, Newborn - physiology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Diarrhea - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diarrhea - veterinary</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food, Formulated</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neomycin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Oligosaccharides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Oxytetracycline - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Probiotics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Sulfinic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donovan, D. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, S. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, C. C. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donovan, D. C</au><au>Franklin, S. T</au><au>Chase, C. C. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth and Health of Holstein Calves Fed Milk Replacers Supplemented with Antibiotics or Enteroguard</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>947</spage><epage>950</epage><pages>947-950</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>Forty-five Holstein calves were fed milk replacers containing either antibiotics [MRA (oxytetracycline at 138 mg/kg and neomycin at 276 mg/kg), n = 22)] or Enteroguard [MRE, a blend of fructooligosaccharides, allicin, and gut-active microbes at (129 mg/kg, n = 23)] from birth to 5 wk of age to compare effects on average daily gain and on incidence of scours. Performance was evaluated by measuring weight gain, feed efficiency, and fecal scores. The overall body weight gains and severity of scours were not different between treatments, nor were there differences in starter intake or mean body weight gain. During wk 2, the average gain of calves fed MRA was less than that of calves fed MRE (0.07 vs. 0.09 kg/d, P = 0.09), and greater during wk 5 (0.62 vs. 0.51 kg/d, P &lt; 0.01); however, total gain for calves fed MRE was not different from calves fed MRA. Likewise, average feed efficiencies (gain/dry matter intake) were not different. Severity of scours, as measured by fecal scores, and concentrations of serum proteins, an indirect measure of immunoglobulins, were similar for calves fed MRA and MRE. The results suggest that antibiotics in milk replacers can be replaced with compounds such as fructooligosaccharides, probiotics, and allicin to obtain similar calf performance.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</pub><pmid>12018440</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74153-2</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2002-04, Vol.85 (4), p.947-950
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71701371
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal Feed
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animal productions
Animals
Animals, Newborn - growth & development
Animals, Newborn - physiology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle - growth & development
Cattle - physiology
Diarrhea - epidemiology
Diarrhea - veterinary
Feces
Feed and pet food industries
Female
Food industries
Food, Formulated
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Incidence
Male
Neomycin - administration & dosage
Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage
Oxytetracycline - administration & dosage
Probiotics - administration & dosage
Random Allocation
Sulfinic Acids - administration & dosage
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
Weight Gain
title Growth and Health of Holstein Calves Fed Milk Replacers Supplemented with Antibiotics or Enteroguard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A08%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth%20and%20Health%20of%20Holstein%20Calves%20Fed%20Milk%20Replacers%20Supplemented%20with%20Antibiotics%20or%20Enteroguard&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Donovan,%20D.%20C&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=947&rft.epage=950&rft.pages=947-950&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74153-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71701371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195815764&rft_id=info:pmid/12018440&rfr_iscdi=true