Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers
This in vitro study evaluated the effect of Er:YAG laser on adhesion to human dentin of Grossman, Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Sealer 26 root canal sealers. The crowns of 40 human molars were cut on the occlusal side until a flat dentin surface was obtained. The teeth were divided into two groups:...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2002-03, Vol.28 (3), p.185-187 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 187 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 185 |
| container_title | Journal of endodontics |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Sousa-Neto, Manoel D. Marchesan, Melissa A. Pécora, Jesus D. Brugnera Junior, Aldo Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C. Saquy, Paulo C. |
| description | This in vitro study evaluated the effect of Er:YAG laser on adhesion to human dentin of Grossman, Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Sealer 26 root canal sealers. The crowns of 40 human molars were cut on the occlusal side until a flat dentin surface was obtained. The teeth were divided into two groups: group 1, no laser application; and group 2, irradiation with Er:YAG laser (KaVo Key Laser 2; 11 mm focal distance, perpendicular to the dentin surface, 4 Hz frequency, 200 mJ energy, 62 J total energy and 313 pulses, 1-min application time, and 2.25 W power). Five samples were tested for each sealer and each group. An Instron universal testing machine was used for the adhesion test. Sealer 26 showed the best adhesion both with and without laser application (p < 0.01). Grossman and N-Rickert sealers had intermediate values, and Endomethasone had the worst adhesion. Application of Er:YAG laser did not alter the adhesion of Grossman, N-Rickert, or Endomethasone sealers. However, laser application increased the adhesion of Sealer 26. The epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (Sealer 26) adhered better to dentin prepared with and without Er:YAG laser than the zinc oxide/eugenol-based sealers (Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Grossman). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71696483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239905606097</els_id><sourcerecordid>71696483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f35d73be9d073033d5b254477dc8e49e66ea6e2a8a42fb80056e22597e49319b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PAyEQQInR2Fr9C4aTt9UBdhfwVptaTZqY-HHwRNhlNq7ZLhW2Jv570VY9SkKYybxh4BFCGZwz0PIC0sqlhIwDcBApy9JmsEfGTEmViaLI98kYQOuMC61H5CjG10RIIeQhGTGeQiblmKh502A9UN_Qebh8ni7o0kYM1Pd06l4wtilItXvvBzqzve3oA9oOQzwmB43tIp7szgl5up4_zm6y5d3idjZdZnUuyiFrROGkqFA7kAKEcEXFizy93dUKc41libZEbpXNeVMpgCJlvNAyFQXTlZiQs-296-DfNhgHs2pjjV1ne_SbaCQrdZkrkUC1BevgYwzYmHVoVzZ8GAbmy5r5sWZ-rZlva6n1dDdjU63Q_TXuNCXgagtg-ul7i8HEusW-RteGZM843_4_5ROmK3h4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71696483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D. ; Marchesan, Melissa A. ; Pécora, Jesus D. ; Brugnera Junior, Aldo ; Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C. ; Saquy, Paulo C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D. ; Marchesan, Melissa A. ; Pécora, Jesus D. ; Brugnera Junior, Aldo ; Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C. ; Saquy, Paulo C.</creatorcontrib><description>This in vitro study evaluated the effect of Er:YAG laser on adhesion to human dentin of Grossman, Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Sealer 26 root canal sealers. The crowns of 40 human molars were cut on the occlusal side until a flat dentin surface was obtained. The teeth were divided into two groups: group 1, no laser application; and group 2, irradiation with Er:YAG laser (KaVo Key Laser 2; 11 mm focal distance, perpendicular to the dentin surface, 4 Hz frequency, 200 mJ energy, 62 J total energy and 313 pulses, 1-min application time, and 2.25 W power). Five samples were tested for each sealer and each group. An Instron universal testing machine was used for the adhesion test. Sealer 26 showed the best adhesion both with and without laser application (p < 0.01). Grossman and N-Rickert sealers had intermediate values, and Endomethasone had the worst adhesion. Application of Er:YAG laser did not alter the adhesion of Grossman, N-Rickert, or Endomethasone sealers. However, laser application increased the adhesion of Sealer 26. The epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (Sealer 26) adhered better to dentin prepared with and without Er:YAG laser than the zinc oxide/eugenol-based sealers (Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Grossman).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12017177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesiveness ; Administration, Topical ; Analysis of Variance ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents ; Bismuth ; Calcium Hydroxide ; Dental Bonding ; Dentin ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Dentistry ; Dexamethasone ; Drug Combinations ; Epoxy Resins ; Erbium ; Formaldehyde ; Humans ; Hydrocortisone ; Lasers ; Materials Testing ; Molar ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation ; Smear Layer ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Thymol - analogs & derivatives ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2002-03, Vol.28 (3), p.185-187</ispartof><rights>2002 The American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f35d73be9d073033d5b254477dc8e49e66ea6e2a8a42fb80056e22597e49319b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f35d73be9d073033d5b254477dc8e49e66ea6e2a8a42fb80056e22597e49319b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200203000-00010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12017177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesan, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pécora, Jesus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugnera Junior, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saquy, Paulo C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>This in vitro study evaluated the effect of Er:YAG laser on adhesion to human dentin of Grossman, Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Sealer 26 root canal sealers. The crowns of 40 human molars were cut on the occlusal side until a flat dentin surface was obtained. The teeth were divided into two groups: group 1, no laser application; and group 2, irradiation with Er:YAG laser (KaVo Key Laser 2; 11 mm focal distance, perpendicular to the dentin surface, 4 Hz frequency, 200 mJ energy, 62 J total energy and 313 pulses, 1-min application time, and 2.25 W power). Five samples were tested for each sealer and each group. An Instron universal testing machine was used for the adhesion test. Sealer 26 showed the best adhesion both with and without laser application (p < 0.01). Grossman and N-Rickert sealers had intermediate values, and Endomethasone had the worst adhesion. Application of Er:YAG laser did not alter the adhesion of Grossman, N-Rickert, or Endomethasone sealers. However, laser application increased the adhesion of Sealer 26. The epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (Sealer 26) adhered better to dentin prepared with and without Er:YAG laser than the zinc oxide/eugenol-based sealers (Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Grossman).</description><subject>Adhesiveness</subject><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents</subject><subject>Bismuth</subject><subject>Calcium Hydroxide</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dexamethasone</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins</subject><subject>Erbium</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocortisone</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Smear Layer</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Thymol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PAyEQQInR2Fr9C4aTt9UBdhfwVptaTZqY-HHwRNhlNq7ZLhW2Jv570VY9SkKYybxh4BFCGZwz0PIC0sqlhIwDcBApy9JmsEfGTEmViaLI98kYQOuMC61H5CjG10RIIeQhGTGeQiblmKh502A9UN_Qebh8ni7o0kYM1Pd06l4wtilItXvvBzqzve3oA9oOQzwmB43tIp7szgl5up4_zm6y5d3idjZdZnUuyiFrROGkqFA7kAKEcEXFizy93dUKc41libZEbpXNeVMpgCJlvNAyFQXTlZiQs-296-DfNhgHs2pjjV1ne_SbaCQrdZkrkUC1BevgYwzYmHVoVzZ8GAbmy5r5sWZ-rZlva6n1dDdjU63Q_TXuNCXgagtg-ul7i8HEusW-RteGZM843_4_5ROmK3h4</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D.</creator><creator>Marchesan, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Pécora, Jesus D.</creator><creator>Brugnera Junior, Aldo</creator><creator>Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C.</creator><creator>Saquy, Paulo C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers</title><author>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D. ; Marchesan, Melissa A. ; Pécora, Jesus D. ; Brugnera Junior, Aldo ; Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C. ; Saquy, Paulo C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f35d73be9d073033d5b254477dc8e49e66ea6e2a8a42fb80056e22597e49319b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adhesiveness</topic><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents</topic><topic>Bismuth</topic><topic>Calcium Hydroxide</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dexamethasone</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins</topic><topic>Erbium</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocortisone</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Smear Layer</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Thymol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesan, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pécora, Jesus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugnera Junior, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saquy, Paulo C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sousa-Neto, Manoel D.</au><au>Marchesan, Melissa A.</au><au>Pécora, Jesus D.</au><au>Brugnera Junior, Aldo</au><au>Silva-Sousa, Yara T.C.</au><au>Saquy, Paulo C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>185-187</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>This in vitro study evaluated the effect of Er:YAG laser on adhesion to human dentin of Grossman, Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Sealer 26 root canal sealers. The crowns of 40 human molars were cut on the occlusal side until a flat dentin surface was obtained. The teeth were divided into two groups: group 1, no laser application; and group 2, irradiation with Er:YAG laser (KaVo Key Laser 2; 11 mm focal distance, perpendicular to the dentin surface, 4 Hz frequency, 200 mJ energy, 62 J total energy and 313 pulses, 1-min application time, and 2.25 W power). Five samples were tested for each sealer and each group. An Instron universal testing machine was used for the adhesion test. Sealer 26 showed the best adhesion both with and without laser application (p < 0.01). Grossman and N-Rickert sealers had intermediate values, and Endomethasone had the worst adhesion. Application of Er:YAG laser did not alter the adhesion of Grossman, N-Rickert, or Endomethasone sealers. However, laser application increased the adhesion of Sealer 26. The epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (Sealer 26) adhered better to dentin prepared with and without Er:YAG laser than the zinc oxide/eugenol-based sealers (Endomethasone, N-Rickert, and Grossman).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12017177</pmid><doi>10.1097/00004770-200203000-00010</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
| ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2002-03, Vol.28 (3), p.185-187 |
| issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71696483 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Adhesiveness Administration, Topical Analysis of Variance Anti-Inflammatory Agents Bismuth Calcium Hydroxide Dental Bonding Dentin Dentin-Bonding Agents Dentistry Dexamethasone Drug Combinations Epoxy Resins Erbium Formaldehyde Humans Hydrocortisone Lasers Materials Testing Molar Root Canal Filling Materials Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation Smear Layer Statistics, Nonparametric Thymol - analogs & derivatives Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement |
| title | Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A53%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Er:YAG%20Laser%20on%20Adhesion%20of%20Root%20Canal%20Sealers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Sousa-Neto,%20Manoel%20D.&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=185-187&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00004770-200203000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71696483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71696483&rft_id=info:pmid/12017177&rft_els_id=S0099239905606097&rfr_iscdi=true |