Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools
The aim of this paper is to address the design and analysis of validity studies for evaluating the performance of a nutritional screening or assessment tool. Statistical aspects of validity are discussed with the non-statistician in mind. Particular emphasis is placed on construct and criterion vali...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2004-03, Vol.20 (3), p.312-317 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 317 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 312 |
| container_title | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Jones, J.Mary |
| description | The aim of this paper is to address the design and analysis of validity studies for evaluating the performance of a nutritional screening or assessment tool.
Statistical aspects of validity are discussed with the non-statistician in mind. Particular emphasis is placed on construct and criterion validity. Design issues are considered in relation to numbers of subjects and assessments. Appropriate methods of analysis are considered, as is interpretation of results. Practical suggestions regarding the implementation of validity studies in the field of nutrition risk assessment are proposed.
Guidelines for the standardization of the design, analysis, and publication of results are presented. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nut.2003.11.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71692131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899900703002739</els_id><sourcerecordid>71692131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-855fae020faeecf6e88702c5f6f7e25399ab477539bdc0266a226ea40597f313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78AC9SELy1zqRt0uBJFr9A8LJ4Ddl0Klm6jSat4L836y4IHrzMzOF5X5iHsXOEAgHF9aoYprHgAGWBWADUe2yGjSxz5FW1z2bQKJUrAHnEjmNcAQAqoQ7ZEVZKAZfVjIlX07vWjV-Z77LUFtzo_GD6LNpANLjhLTNDm5kYKcY1DWM2et_HU3bQmT7S2W6fsMX93WL-mD-_PDzNb59zW0o55k1dd4aAQ5pkO0FNI4HbuhOdJF6XSpllJWU6lq0FLoThXJCpoFayK7E8YVfb2vfgPyaKo167aKnvzUB-ilqiUBx_wMs_4MpPIf0RNUJZI8oamkThlrLBxxio0-_BrU34SpDeGNUrnRzojVGNqJPRlLnYNU_LNbW_iZ3CBNxsAUoePh0FHa2jwVLrAtlRt979U_8NIqmFfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035117508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Jones, J.Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, J.Mary</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this paper is to address the design and analysis of validity studies for evaluating the performance of a nutritional screening or assessment tool.
Statistical aspects of validity are discussed with the non-statistician in mind. Particular emphasis is placed on construct and criterion validity. Design issues are considered in relation to numbers of subjects and assessments. Appropriate methods of analysis are considered, as is interpretation of results. Practical suggestions regarding the implementation of validity studies in the field of nutrition risk assessment are proposed.
Guidelines for the standardization of the design, analysis, and publication of results are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2003.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14990274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Design ; Humans ; Mass Screening - instrumentation ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - standards ; Nutrition Assessment ; nutritional screening and assessment tools ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Assessment - standards ; Sample Size ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; statistical evaluation ; validity</subject><ispartof>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2004-03, Vol.20 (3), p.312-317</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-855fae020faeecf6e88702c5f6f7e25399ab477539bdc0266a226ea40597f313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-855fae020faeecf6e88702c5f6f7e25399ab477539bdc0266a226ea40597f313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1035117508?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982,64370,64372,64374,72224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14990274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, J.Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools</title><title>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Nutrition</addtitle><description>The aim of this paper is to address the design and analysis of validity studies for evaluating the performance of a nutritional screening or assessment tool.
Statistical aspects of validity are discussed with the non-statistician in mind. Particular emphasis is placed on construct and criterion validity. Design issues are considered in relation to numbers of subjects and assessments. Appropriate methods of analysis are considered, as is interpretation of results. Practical suggestions regarding the implementation of validity studies in the field of nutrition risk assessment are proposed.
Guidelines for the standardization of the design, analysis, and publication of results are presented.</description><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>nutritional screening and assessment tools</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>statistical evaluation</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>0899-9007</issn><issn>1873-1244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78AC9SELy1zqRt0uBJFr9A8LJ4Ddl0Klm6jSat4L836y4IHrzMzOF5X5iHsXOEAgHF9aoYprHgAGWBWADUe2yGjSxz5FW1z2bQKJUrAHnEjmNcAQAqoQ7ZEVZKAZfVjIlX07vWjV-Z77LUFtzo_GD6LNpANLjhLTNDm5kYKcY1DWM2et_HU3bQmT7S2W6fsMX93WL-mD-_PDzNb59zW0o55k1dd4aAQ5pkO0FNI4HbuhOdJF6XSpllJWU6lq0FLoThXJCpoFayK7E8YVfb2vfgPyaKo167aKnvzUB-ilqiUBx_wMs_4MpPIf0RNUJZI8oamkThlrLBxxio0-_BrU34SpDeGNUrnRzojVGNqJPRlLnYNU_LNbW_iZ3CBNxsAUoePh0FHa2jwVLrAtlRt979U_8NIqmFfg</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Jones, J.Mary</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools</title><author>Jones, J.Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-855fae020faeecf6e88702c5f6f7e25399ab477539bdc0266a226ea40597f313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>nutritional screening and assessment tools</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>statistical evaluation</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, J.Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, J.Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrition</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>312-317</pages><issn>0899-9007</issn><eissn>1873-1244</eissn><abstract>The aim of this paper is to address the design and analysis of validity studies for evaluating the performance of a nutritional screening or assessment tool.
Statistical aspects of validity are discussed with the non-statistician in mind. Particular emphasis is placed on construct and criterion validity. Design issues are considered in relation to numbers of subjects and assessments. Appropriate methods of analysis are considered, as is interpretation of results. Practical suggestions regarding the implementation of validity studies in the field of nutrition risk assessment are proposed.
Guidelines for the standardization of the design, analysis, and publication of results are presented.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14990274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nut.2003.11.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0899-9007 |
| ispartof | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2004-03, Vol.20 (3), p.312-317 |
| issn | 0899-9007 1873-1244 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71692131 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Data Interpretation, Statistical Design Humans Mass Screening - instrumentation Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - standards Nutrition Assessment nutritional screening and assessment tools Reproducibility of Results Research Design Risk assessment Risk Assessment - methods Risk Assessment - standards Sample Size Sensitivity and Specificity statistical evaluation validity |
| title | Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20nutritional%20screening%20and%20assessment%20tools&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20(Burbank,%20Los%20Angeles%20County,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Jones,%20J.Mary&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=312-317&rft.issn=0899-9007&rft.eissn=1873-1244&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nut.2003.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71692131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035117508&rft_id=info:pmid/14990274&rft_els_id=S0899900703002739&rfr_iscdi=true |