Ferguson v. McKiernan: the problematic concept of technological paternity
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics medicine & ethics, 2008-06, Vol.36 (2), p.425-427 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 427 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 425 |
| container_title | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Bailin, Paul |
| description | |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00287.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71683177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A249311727</galeid><sourcerecordid>A249311727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g475t-b141c3d44f8e7585005998c2abba8260de6107fa73b63e3f64ed892bb82fc5683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90k9r2zAYBnAdNpas21cYgkFhB7v6Y1vKbiWsbWhGLiv0ZmT5taMgS5klj_TbV6UpLBAqHQTi94iHFyGEKclpWle7nIpCZoKRx5wRInNCmBT54QOaUyJ4RikpZ-hzCDtCCGW8-oRmVJaFYJTN0eoGxn4K3uF_Of6t7w2MTrmfOG4B70ffWBhUNBpr7zTsI_YdjqC3zlvfG60s3quYIiY-fUEfO2UDfD2eF-jh5tef5V223tyultfrrC9EGbOGFlTztig6CaKUJSHlYiE1U02jJKtIC1Wq3SnBm4oD76oCWrlgTSNZp8tK8gt0-fpuqvd3ghDrwQQN1ioHfgq1oAlRIRL8_gp7ZaE2rvNxVPoF19esWHBKBXtR2RnVg4NRWe-gM-n6xOdnfNotDEafDfw4CSQT4RB7NYVQy9v1e2WOVntroYc6zXG5OfWX__ktKBu3wdspGu_CKfx2HNrUDNDW-9EManyq3z4Cfwb3ZK-v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71683177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ferguson v. McKiernan: the problematic concept of technological paternity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Bailin, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Bailin, Paul</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1105</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00287.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18547212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Best interests of the child doctrine ; Child Care - economics ; Child Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Child support ; Child, Preschool ; Contract agreement ; Contracts ; Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence ; Government regulation ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Male ; Paternity ; Pennsylvania ; Sperm donors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2008-06, Vol.36 (2), p.425-427</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bailin, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Ferguson v. McKiernan: the problematic concept of technological paternity</title><title>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</title><addtitle>J Law Med Ethics</addtitle><subject>Best interests of the child doctrine</subject><subject>Child Care - economics</subject><subject>Child Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Child support</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Contract agreement</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Paternity</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Sperm donors</subject><issn>1073-1105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90k9r2zAYBnAdNpas21cYgkFhB7v6Y1vKbiWsbWhGLiv0ZmT5taMgS5klj_TbV6UpLBAqHQTi94iHFyGEKclpWle7nIpCZoKRx5wRInNCmBT54QOaUyJ4RikpZ-hzCDtCCGW8-oRmVJaFYJTN0eoGxn4K3uF_Of6t7w2MTrmfOG4B70ffWBhUNBpr7zTsI_YdjqC3zlvfG60s3quYIiY-fUEfO2UDfD2eF-jh5tef5V223tyultfrrC9EGbOGFlTztig6CaKUJSHlYiE1U02jJKtIC1Wq3SnBm4oD76oCWrlgTSNZp8tK8gt0-fpuqvd3ghDrwQQN1ioHfgq1oAlRIRL8_gp7ZaE2rvNxVPoF19esWHBKBXtR2RnVg4NRWe-gM-n6xOdnfNotDEafDfw4CSQT4RB7NYVQy9v1e2WOVntroYc6zXG5OfWX__ktKBu3wdspGu_CKfx2HNrUDNDW-9EManyq3z4Cfwb3ZK-v</recordid><startdate>20080622</startdate><enddate>20080622</enddate><creator>Bailin, Paul</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080622</creationdate><title>Ferguson v. McKiernan: the problematic concept of technological paternity</title><author>Bailin, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g475t-b141c3d44f8e7585005998c2abba8260de6107fa73b63e3f64ed892bb82fc5683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Best interests of the child doctrine</topic><topic>Child Care - economics</topic><topic>Child Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Child support</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Contract agreement</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Paternity</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Sperm donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bailin, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bailin, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ferguson v. McKiernan: the problematic concept of technological paternity</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Law Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2008-06-22</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>425-427</pages><issn>1073-1105</issn><cop>United States</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><pmid>18547212</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00287.x</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1073-1105 |
| ispartof | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2008-06, Vol.36 (2), p.425-427 |
| issn | 1073-1105 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71683177 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Best interests of the child doctrine Child Care - economics Child Care - legislation & jurisprudence Child support Child, Preschool Contract agreement Contracts Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence Female Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence Government regulation Health technology assessment Humans Infant, Newborn Laws, regulations and rules Male Paternity Pennsylvania Sperm donors |
| title | Ferguson v. McKiernan: the problematic concept of technological paternity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ferguson%20v.%20McKiernan:%20the%20problematic%20concept%20of%20technological%20paternity&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law,%20medicine%20&%20ethics&rft.au=Bailin,%20Paul&rft.date=2008-06-22&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=425-427&rft.issn=1073-1105&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00287.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA249311727%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71683177&rft_id=info:pmid/18547212&rft_galeid=A249311727&rfr_iscdi=true |