Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: Biologic metastasis or procedural artifact?
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for patients with breast carcinoma, and allows enhanced pathologic analysis with serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratins to be performed on a routine basis. However, the significance of SLN micrometastases det...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2004-03, Vol.100 (5), p.929-934 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 934 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 929 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | MOORE, Katrina H THALER, Howard T TAN, Lee K BORGEN, Patrick I CODY, Hiram S |
description | Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for patients with breast carcinoma, and allows enhanced pathologic analysis with serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratins to be performed on a routine basis. However, the significance of SLN micrometastases detected only by IHC is uncertain. Are these tumor cells truly markers of metastatic potential, or simply evidence of passive displacement by preoperative instrumentation of the tumor site? Here we evaluate whether the pattern of SLN metastasis in breast carcinoma is related to the degree of manipulation at biopsy before surgery, independently of other known predictors.
Among 4016 consecutive eligible patients with breast carcinoma registered in a prospective SLN database at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we noted patient/tumor characteristics, pathologic status of the SLN (negative, positive by hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], or positive only on IHC), and method of previous biopsy (none, fine-needle aspiration biopsy [FNAB], core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy).
Multivariate analysis showed that the likelihood of an H&E-positive SLN was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion, tumor size, tumor type, and tumor location, but not with the method of biopsy. In contrast, the likelihood of finding an SLN positive only on IHC was unassociated with any of the four variables above, but was significantly associated with the method of biopsy. After no previous biopsy, FNAB, core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy, IHC-positive SLN were present in 1.2%, 3.0%, 3.8%, and 4.6% of patients, respectively (P = 0.002).
These data suggest that the frequency of IHC-positive SLN in patients with breast carcinoma 1) is unrelated to conventional predictors of lymph node positivity, 2) is increased after instrumentation of the tumor site, and 3) is increased approximately proportionate to the degree of manipulation. A proportion of IHC-positive SLN were present before biopsy and therefore less likely to be artifactual. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.20035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71677233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19920524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8b70fb9fd3b3c7ce4fe863490a10697c4307eed75c40628a3ed095aa67f989ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuK1UAQhhtRnDOjGx9AeqOLgYzVl6TTbgYdvAwMuFFwFyqdimlJp4_dHeQ8iO9rjnNglq6Kor76qeJj7IWAKwEg37jFpSsJoOpHbCfAmgqElo_ZDgDaqtbq-xk7z_nn1hpZq6fsTGjbKt2aHftzG8K6xMnnEt1EwTuc5wMfqJArNPCyhpi4o3nO3C-8TMQzLcUvNPP5EPYTX-JAmceR77H4bZT5b18m3ifCXLjD5PwSA77l732c4w_veKCyjTD7bS3xfYqOhjXhzDEVP6Ir18_YkxHnTM9P9YJ9-_jh683n6u7Lp9ubd3eVU6BK1fYGxt6Og-qVM470SG2jtAUU0FjjtAJDNJjaaWhki4oGsDViY0bb2h7VBXt9n7sd8WulXLrg8_FZXCiuuTOiMUYq9V9QWCuhlnoDL-9Bl2LOicZun3zAdOgEdEdb3dFW98_WBr88pa59oOEBPenZgFcnAPMmZky4OJ8fuFq3GrRUfwHaeaEW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19920524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: Biologic metastasis or procedural artifact?</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MOORE, Katrina H ; THALER, Howard T ; TAN, Lee K ; BORGEN, Patrick I ; CODY, Hiram S</creator><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Katrina H ; THALER, Howard T ; TAN, Lee K ; BORGEN, Patrick I ; CODY, Hiram S</creatorcontrib><description>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for patients with breast carcinoma, and allows enhanced pathologic analysis with serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratins to be performed on a routine basis. However, the significance of SLN micrometastases detected only by IHC is uncertain. Are these tumor cells truly markers of metastatic potential, or simply evidence of passive displacement by preoperative instrumentation of the tumor site? Here we evaluate whether the pattern of SLN metastasis in breast carcinoma is related to the degree of manipulation at biopsy before surgery, independently of other known predictors.
Among 4016 consecutive eligible patients with breast carcinoma registered in a prospective SLN database at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we noted patient/tumor characteristics, pathologic status of the SLN (negative, positive by hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], or positive only on IHC), and method of previous biopsy (none, fine-needle aspiration biopsy [FNAB], core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy).
Multivariate analysis showed that the likelihood of an H&E-positive SLN was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion, tumor size, tumor type, and tumor location, but not with the method of biopsy. In contrast, the likelihood of finding an SLN positive only on IHC was unassociated with any of the four variables above, but was significantly associated with the method of biopsy. After no previous biopsy, FNAB, core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy, IHC-positive SLN were present in 1.2%, 3.0%, 3.8%, and 4.6% of patients, respectively (P = 0.002).
These data suggest that the frequency of IHC-positive SLN in patients with breast carcinoma 1) is unrelated to conventional predictors of lymph node positivity, 2) is increased after instrumentation of the tumor site, and 3) is increased approximately proportionate to the degree of manipulation. A proportion of IHC-positive SLN were present before biopsy and therefore less likely to be artifactual.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14983487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Wiley-Liss</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy, Needle ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma - secondary ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Logistic Models ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Probability ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2004-03, Vol.100 (5), p.929-934</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8b70fb9fd3b3c7ce4fe863490a10697c4307eed75c40628a3ed095aa67f989ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15484042$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14983487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Katrina H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THALER, Howard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Lee K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BORGEN, Patrick I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODY, Hiram S</creatorcontrib><title>Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: Biologic metastasis or procedural artifact?</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for patients with breast carcinoma, and allows enhanced pathologic analysis with serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratins to be performed on a routine basis. However, the significance of SLN micrometastases detected only by IHC is uncertain. Are these tumor cells truly markers of metastatic potential, or simply evidence of passive displacement by preoperative instrumentation of the tumor site? Here we evaluate whether the pattern of SLN metastasis in breast carcinoma is related to the degree of manipulation at biopsy before surgery, independently of other known predictors.
Among 4016 consecutive eligible patients with breast carcinoma registered in a prospective SLN database at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we noted patient/tumor characteristics, pathologic status of the SLN (negative, positive by hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], or positive only on IHC), and method of previous biopsy (none, fine-needle aspiration biopsy [FNAB], core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy).
Multivariate analysis showed that the likelihood of an H&E-positive SLN was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion, tumor size, tumor type, and tumor location, but not with the method of biopsy. In contrast, the likelihood of finding an SLN positive only on IHC was unassociated with any of the four variables above, but was significantly associated with the method of biopsy. After no previous biopsy, FNAB, core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy, IHC-positive SLN were present in 1.2%, 3.0%, 3.8%, and 4.6% of patients, respectively (P = 0.002).
These data suggest that the frequency of IHC-positive SLN in patients with breast carcinoma 1) is unrelated to conventional predictors of lymph node positivity, 2) is increased after instrumentation of the tumor site, and 3) is increased approximately proportionate to the degree of manipulation. A proportion of IHC-positive SLN were present before biopsy and therefore less likely to be artifactual.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuK1UAQhhtRnDOjGx9AeqOLgYzVl6TTbgYdvAwMuFFwFyqdimlJp4_dHeQ8iO9rjnNglq6Kor76qeJj7IWAKwEg37jFpSsJoOpHbCfAmgqElo_ZDgDaqtbq-xk7z_nn1hpZq6fsTGjbKt2aHftzG8K6xMnnEt1EwTuc5wMfqJArNPCyhpi4o3nO3C-8TMQzLcUvNPP5EPYTX-JAmceR77H4bZT5b18m3ifCXLjD5PwSA77l732c4w_veKCyjTD7bS3xfYqOhjXhzDEVP6Ir18_YkxHnTM9P9YJ9-_jh683n6u7Lp9ubd3eVU6BK1fYGxt6Og-qVM470SG2jtAUU0FjjtAJDNJjaaWhki4oGsDViY0bb2h7VBXt9n7sd8WulXLrg8_FZXCiuuTOiMUYq9V9QWCuhlnoDL-9Bl2LOicZun3zAdOgEdEdb3dFW98_WBr88pa59oOEBPenZgFcnAPMmZky4OJ8fuFq3GrRUfwHaeaEW</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>MOORE, Katrina H</creator><creator>THALER, Howard T</creator><creator>TAN, Lee K</creator><creator>BORGEN, Patrick I</creator><creator>CODY, Hiram S</creator><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: Biologic metastasis or procedural artifact?</title><author>MOORE, Katrina H ; THALER, Howard T ; TAN, Lee K ; BORGEN, Patrick I ; CODY, Hiram S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8b70fb9fd3b3c7ce4fe863490a10697c4307eed75c40628a3ed095aa67f989ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOORE, Katrina H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THALER, Howard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Lee K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BORGEN, Patrick I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODY, Hiram S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOORE, Katrina H</au><au>THALER, Howard T</au><au>TAN, Lee K</au><au>BORGEN, Patrick I</au><au>CODY, Hiram S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: Biologic metastasis or procedural artifact?</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>929</spage><epage>934</epage><pages>929-934</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for patients with breast carcinoma, and allows enhanced pathologic analysis with serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratins to be performed on a routine basis. However, the significance of SLN micrometastases detected only by IHC is uncertain. Are these tumor cells truly markers of metastatic potential, or simply evidence of passive displacement by preoperative instrumentation of the tumor site? Here we evaluate whether the pattern of SLN metastasis in breast carcinoma is related to the degree of manipulation at biopsy before surgery, independently of other known predictors.
Among 4016 consecutive eligible patients with breast carcinoma registered in a prospective SLN database at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we noted patient/tumor characteristics, pathologic status of the SLN (negative, positive by hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], or positive only on IHC), and method of previous biopsy (none, fine-needle aspiration biopsy [FNAB], core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy).
Multivariate analysis showed that the likelihood of an H&E-positive SLN was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion, tumor size, tumor type, and tumor location, but not with the method of biopsy. In contrast, the likelihood of finding an SLN positive only on IHC was unassociated with any of the four variables above, but was significantly associated with the method of biopsy. After no previous biopsy, FNAB, core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy, IHC-positive SLN were present in 1.2%, 3.0%, 3.8%, and 4.6% of patients, respectively (P = 0.002).
These data suggest that the frequency of IHC-positive SLN in patients with breast carcinoma 1) is unrelated to conventional predictors of lymph node positivity, 2) is increased after instrumentation of the tumor site, and 3) is increased approximately proportionate to the degree of manipulation. A proportion of IHC-positive SLN were present before biopsy and therefore less likely to be artifactual.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Wiley-Liss</pub><pmid>14983487</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.20035</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2004-03, Vol.100 (5), p.929-934 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71677233 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Biopsy, Needle Breast Neoplasms - pathology Carcinoma - pathology Carcinoma - secondary Female Humans Immunohistochemistry Logistic Models Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Metastasis Medical sciences Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology Neoplasm Staging Probability Prognosis Prospective Studies Registries Sensitivity and Specificity Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Tumors |
title | Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: Biologic metastasis or procedural artifact? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A46%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunohistochemically%20detected%20tumor%20cells%20in%20the%20sentinel%20lymph%20nodes%20of%20patients%20with%20breast%20carcinoma:%20Biologic%20metastasis%20or%20procedural%20artifact?&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=MOORE,%20Katrina%20H&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=929&rft.epage=934&rft.pages=929-934&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.20035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19920524%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19920524&rft_id=info:pmid/14983487&rfr_iscdi=true |