HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery
The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients. A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eight...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care injury, infection, and critical care, 2008-06, Vol.64 (6), p.1484-1497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1484 |
container_title | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | JAHR, Jonathan S MACKENZIE, Colin PEARCE, L. Bruce PITMAN, Arkadiy GREENBURG, A. Gerson |
description | The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients.
A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity.
A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (>80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance.
HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71666692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71666692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1qGzEQhUVpaUyaJwgU3bR3m0qj1a7UO8c4jSHFgfh-mdVPI5B3XWk34LfII0dpTAudmxmG75yBM4RccnbFmW6_TXjFesaFE1zxVqAW_h1ZcAm6Uorp92TBGEAlQcEZucg59KwsZKtBfSRnXMlaci4W5Pn2eruqgHGKmeJAl3FyacApPDk6jfQ6jqOlu4RD9nMO40C_07X3waA5FtzSB_RuOtL1E8a5qAoQBor05xynYNxQzOj9I2ZHN5tN8QkYX4F1dObPiW2aHseDs8HQhzn9cun4iXzwGLO7OPVzsrtZ71a31d32x2a1vKtM3eipMkxJgDICF73rudXcSgQLvWA1k7LpG-1RskbbupHQG29BKAe15Y1XjTgnX99sD2n8Pbs8dfuQjYsRBzfOuWt5U0pDAcUbaNKYc3K-O6Swx3TsOOteX9Htlt3_ryiqzyf7ud87-09zCr4AX04AZoPRl4RNyH85YLWEtgbxArTwkXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71666692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>JAHR, Jonathan S ; MACKENZIE, Colin ; PEARCE, L. Bruce ; PITMAN, Arkadiy ; GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creator><creatorcontrib>JAHR, Jonathan S ; MACKENZIE, Colin ; PEARCE, L. Bruce ; PITMAN, Arkadiy ; GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creatorcontrib><description>The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients.
A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [</=3 (R3-) vs. >3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity.
A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (>80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance.
HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients <80 years old with moderate clinical need may safely avoid transfusion when treated with up to 10 units of HBOC-201.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18545113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control ; Blood Substitutes - administration & dosage ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Erythrocyte Transfusion ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Hemoglobins - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Procedures - methods ; Orthopedic surgery ; Probability ; Risk Assessment ; Safety ; Single-Blind Method ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2008-06, Vol.64 (6), p.1484-1497</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20452742$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18545113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JAHR, Jonathan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARCE, L. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITMAN, Arkadiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creatorcontrib><title>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</title><title>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</title><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><description>The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients.
A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [</=3 (R3-) vs. >3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity.
A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (>80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance.
HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients <80 years old with moderate clinical need may safely avoid transfusion when treated with up to 10 units of HBOC-201.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control</subject><subject>Blood Substitutes - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0022-5282</issn><issn>1529-8809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1qGzEQhUVpaUyaJwgU3bR3m0qj1a7UO8c4jSHFgfh-mdVPI5B3XWk34LfII0dpTAudmxmG75yBM4RccnbFmW6_TXjFesaFE1zxVqAW_h1ZcAm6Uorp92TBGEAlQcEZucg59KwsZKtBfSRnXMlaci4W5Pn2eruqgHGKmeJAl3FyacApPDk6jfQ6jqOlu4RD9nMO40C_07X3waA5FtzSB_RuOtL1E8a5qAoQBor05xynYNxQzOj9I2ZHN5tN8QkYX4F1dObPiW2aHseDs8HQhzn9cun4iXzwGLO7OPVzsrtZ71a31d32x2a1vKtM3eipMkxJgDICF73rudXcSgQLvWA1k7LpG-1RskbbupHQG29BKAe15Y1XjTgnX99sD2n8Pbs8dfuQjYsRBzfOuWt5U0pDAcUbaNKYc3K-O6Swx3TsOOteX9Htlt3_ryiqzyf7ud87-09zCr4AX04AZoPRl4RNyH85YLWEtgbxArTwkXg</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>JAHR, Jonathan S</creator><creator>MACKENZIE, Colin</creator><creator>PEARCE, L. Bruce</creator><creator>PITMAN, Arkadiy</creator><creator>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</title><author>JAHR, Jonathan S ; MACKENZIE, Colin ; PEARCE, L. Bruce ; PITMAN, Arkadiy ; GREENBURG, A. Gerson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control</topic><topic>Blood Substitutes - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JAHR, Jonathan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARCE, L. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITMAN, Arkadiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JAHR, Jonathan S</au><au>MACKENZIE, Colin</au><au>PEARCE, L. Bruce</au><au>PITMAN, Arkadiy</au><au>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1484</spage><epage>1497</epage><pages>1484-1497</pages><issn>0022-5282</issn><eissn>1529-8809</eissn><abstract>The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients.
A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [</=3 (R3-) vs. >3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity.
A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (>80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance.
HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients <80 years old with moderate clinical need may safely avoid transfusion when treated with up to 10 units of HBOC-201.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>18545113</pmid><doi>10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5282 |
ispartof | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2008-06, Vol.64 (6), p.1484-1497 |
issn | 0022-5282 1529-8809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71666692 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control Blood Substitutes - administration & dosage Diseases of the osteoarticular system Elective Surgical Procedures Erythrocyte Transfusion Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Follow-Up Studies General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation Hemoglobins - administration & dosage Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Orthopedic Procedures - methods Orthopedic surgery Probability Risk Assessment Safety Single-Blind Method Statistics, Nonparametric Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Treatment Outcome |
title | HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A30%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HBOC-201%20as%20an%20Alternative%20to%20Blood%20Transfusion%20:%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20Evaluation%20in%20a%20Multicenter%20Phase%20III%20Trial%20in%20Elective%20Orthopedic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20trauma,%20injury,%20infection,%20and%20critical%20care&rft.au=JAHR,%20Jonathan%20S&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1484&rft.epage=1497&rft.pages=1484-1497&rft.issn=0022-5282&rft.eissn=1529-8809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71666692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71666692&rft_id=info:pmid/18545113&rfr_iscdi=true |