HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery

The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients. A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eight...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care injury, infection, and critical care, 2008-06, Vol.64 (6), p.1484-1497
Hauptverfasser: JAHR, Jonathan S, MACKENZIE, Colin, PEARCE, L. Bruce, PITMAN, Arkadiy, GREENBURG, A. Gerson
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1497
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1484
container_title The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care
container_volume 64
creator JAHR, Jonathan S
MACKENZIE, Colin
PEARCE, L. Bruce
PITMAN, Arkadiy
GREENBURG, A. Gerson
description The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients. A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity. A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (>80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance. HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71666692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71666692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1qGzEQhUVpaUyaJwgU3bR3m0qj1a7UO8c4jSHFgfh-mdVPI5B3XWk34LfII0dpTAudmxmG75yBM4RccnbFmW6_TXjFesaFE1zxVqAW_h1ZcAm6Uorp92TBGEAlQcEZucg59KwsZKtBfSRnXMlaci4W5Pn2eruqgHGKmeJAl3FyacApPDk6jfQ6jqOlu4RD9nMO40C_07X3waA5FtzSB_RuOtL1E8a5qAoQBor05xynYNxQzOj9I2ZHN5tN8QkYX4F1dObPiW2aHseDs8HQhzn9cun4iXzwGLO7OPVzsrtZ71a31d32x2a1vKtM3eipMkxJgDICF73rudXcSgQLvWA1k7LpG-1RskbbupHQG29BKAe15Y1XjTgnX99sD2n8Pbs8dfuQjYsRBzfOuWt5U0pDAcUbaNKYc3K-O6Swx3TsOOteX9Htlt3_ryiqzyf7ud87-09zCr4AX04AZoPRl4RNyH85YLWEtgbxArTwkXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71666692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>JAHR, Jonathan S ; MACKENZIE, Colin ; PEARCE, L. Bruce ; PITMAN, Arkadiy ; GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creator><creatorcontrib>JAHR, Jonathan S ; MACKENZIE, Colin ; PEARCE, L. Bruce ; PITMAN, Arkadiy ; GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creatorcontrib><description>The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients. A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [&lt;/=3 (R3-) vs. &gt;3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity. A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p &lt; 0.001 and p &lt; 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (&gt;80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance. HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients &lt;80 years old with moderate clinical need may safely avoid transfusion when treated with up to 10 units of HBOC-201.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18545113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control ; Blood Substitutes - administration &amp; dosage ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Erythrocyte Transfusion ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Hemoglobins - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Procedures - methods ; Orthopedic surgery ; Probability ; Risk Assessment ; Safety ; Single-Blind Method ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2008-06, Vol.64 (6), p.1484-1497</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20452742$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18545113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JAHR, Jonathan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARCE, L. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITMAN, Arkadiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creatorcontrib><title>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</title><title>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</title><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><description>The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients. A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [&lt;/=3 (R3-) vs. &gt;3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity. A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p &lt; 0.001 and p &lt; 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (&gt;80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance. HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients &lt;80 years old with moderate clinical need may safely avoid transfusion when treated with up to 10 units of HBOC-201.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Blood Substitutes - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0022-5282</issn><issn>1529-8809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1qGzEQhUVpaUyaJwgU3bR3m0qj1a7UO8c4jSHFgfh-mdVPI5B3XWk34LfII0dpTAudmxmG75yBM4RccnbFmW6_TXjFesaFE1zxVqAW_h1ZcAm6Uorp92TBGEAlQcEZucg59KwsZKtBfSRnXMlaci4W5Pn2eruqgHGKmeJAl3FyacApPDk6jfQ6jqOlu4RD9nMO40C_07X3waA5FtzSB_RuOtL1E8a5qAoQBor05xynYNxQzOj9I2ZHN5tN8QkYX4F1dObPiW2aHseDs8HQhzn9cun4iXzwGLO7OPVzsrtZ71a31d32x2a1vKtM3eipMkxJgDICF73rudXcSgQLvWA1k7LpG-1RskbbupHQG29BKAe15Y1XjTgnX99sD2n8Pbs8dfuQjYsRBzfOuWt5U0pDAcUbaNKYc3K-O6Swx3TsOOteX9Htlt3_ryiqzyf7ud87-09zCr4AX04AZoPRl4RNyH85YLWEtgbxArTwkXg</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>JAHR, Jonathan S</creator><creator>MACKENZIE, Colin</creator><creator>PEARCE, L. Bruce</creator><creator>PITMAN, Arkadiy</creator><creator>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</title><author>JAHR, Jonathan S ; MACKENZIE, Colin ; PEARCE, L. Bruce ; PITMAN, Arkadiy ; GREENBURG, A. Gerson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-c08522469213beb1d91d5a2d2b3040556b69fa5069d4652bcfd238e24d16f863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Blood Substitutes - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JAHR, Jonathan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACKENZIE, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARCE, L. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITMAN, Arkadiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JAHR, Jonathan S</au><au>MACKENZIE, Colin</au><au>PEARCE, L. Bruce</au><au>PITMAN, Arkadiy</au><au>GREENBURG, A. Gerson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1484</spage><epage>1497</epage><pages>1484-1497</pages><issn>0022-5282</issn><eissn>1529-8809</eissn><abstract>The ability of hemoglobin based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) to safely reduce and/or eliminate perioperative transfusion was studied in orthopedic surgery patients. A randomized, single-blind, packed red blood cell (PRBC)-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted. Six hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized to treatment with HBOC-201 (H, n = 350) or PRBC (R, n = 338) at the first transfusion decision. Primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and blinded assessment [Mann-Whitney estimator (MW)] of safety noninferiority. Groups were compared directly and by paired/matching group analyses predicated on a prospectively defined dichotomy [treatment success (HH) vs. failure (HR)] in the H arm and an equivalently defined dichotomy [&lt;/=3 (R3-) vs. &gt;3 (R3+) units PRBC] in the R arm, based on need (moderate vs. high) for additional oxygen carrying capacity. A total of 59.4% of patients in the H arm avoided PRBC transfusion. Adverse events (8.47 vs. 5.88), and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.35 vs. 0.25) per patient were higher in the H versus R arms (p &lt; 0.001 and p &lt; 0.01) with MW = 0.561 (95 CI 0.528-0.594). HH versus R3- had identical (0.14) serious adverse events/patient and a MW = 0.519 (95% confidence limit 0.481-0.558), whereas the incidence was higher (0.63 vs. 0.47) for HR versus R3+ with a MW = 0.605 (95% confidence limit 0.550-0.662). Age (&gt;80 years), volume overload and undertreatment contributed to this imbalance. HBOC-201 eliminated transfusion in the majority of subjects. The between arms (H vs. R) safety analysis was unfavorable and likely related to patient age, volume overload, and undertreatment and was isolated to patients that could not be managed by HBOC-201 alone. However, patients &lt;80 years old with moderate clinical need may safely avoid transfusion when treated with up to 10 units of HBOC-201.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>18545113</pmid><doi>10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5282
ispartof The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2008-06, Vol.64 (6), p.1484-1497
issn 0022-5282
1529-8809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71666692
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control
Blood Substitutes - administration & dosage
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Elective Surgical Procedures
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Follow-Up Studies
General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation
Hemoglobins - administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Procedures - methods
Orthopedic surgery
Probability
Risk Assessment
Safety
Single-Blind Method
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Treatment Outcome
title HBOC-201 as an Alternative to Blood Transfusion : Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in a Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedic Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A30%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HBOC-201%20as%20an%20Alternative%20to%20Blood%20Transfusion%20:%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20Evaluation%20in%20a%20Multicenter%20Phase%20III%20Trial%20in%20Elective%20Orthopedic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20trauma,%20injury,%20infection,%20and%20critical%20care&rft.au=JAHR,%20Jonathan%20S&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1484&rft.epage=1497&rft.pages=1484-1497&rft.issn=0022-5282&rft.eissn=1529-8809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ta.0b013e318173a93f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71666692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71666692&rft_id=info:pmid/18545113&rfr_iscdi=true