Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay Analysis of Cotinine in Urine
A study was conducted to evaluate the performance comparison of a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EIA) designed to detect cotinine in urine and carbon monoxide (CO) breath measurements to determine smoking status. The clinical comparison was done using urine and breath specimens from 218 volunteers....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of analytical toxicology 2002-04, Vol.26 (3), p.166-170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Journal of analytical toxicology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Niedbala, R. Sam Haley, Nancy Kardos, Stephanie Kardos, Keith |
description | A study was conducted to evaluate the performance comparison of a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EIA) designed to detect cotinine in urine and carbon monoxide (CO) breath measurements to determine smoking status. The clinical comparison was done using urine and breath specimens from 218 volunteers. Urine samples were analyzed by immunoassay and confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Breath carbon monoxide was determined by a commercial analyzer. Using cutoffs of 10 ppm for CO and 500 ng/m/for urinary cotinine, the relative sensitivity/specificity was 93.6%/74.0%. The positive predictive value was 86.8%, and the negative predictive value was 86.5%. However, comparison of the EIA to GC-MS showed a sensitivity/specificity of 96.2%/98.4% and a positive predictive value of 99.3%. The EIA was also evaluated non-clinically for precision, stability, recovery, and interferences. In addition, the non-clinical evaluation demonstrated coefficients of variation from 0.37 to 1.09% across cotinine concentrations ranging from 0 to 5000 ng/mL. The assay was found to be highly specific for cotinine and cross-reacted to a limited degree with 3-hydroxycotinine. Finally, multiple freeze-thaw cycles of urines containing cotinine showed no degradation of the drug in the specimen when tested in the EIA. Thus, the EIA tested is a rapid, lab-based test that can reliably determine cotinine levels and their relation to smoking status. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jat/26.3.166 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71657765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jat/26.3.166</oup_id><sourcerecordid>71657765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ea509aa1380ba10803a09ec4e20a1252dfba04081576847fc299fad324ba69993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1P20AQBuAVKoJAufVc-dJywcnMfnn3hKIICChSq6pUiMtq4qwrU9ubem2J_HscEsGR08zh0Tujl7EvCGMEKyZP1E24Hosxan3ARmilSrkE8YmNAKVOZabhmJ3E-ASA2mhxxI4RrUUlxIhdTvsu1NT5VTIPdfjrGx_6mNzWdd8EipE2ybShahPLmIQimYWubMrGJ2WT3LfD8pkdFlRFf7afp-z--ur3bJ4uftzczqaLNJdoutSTAkuEwsCSEAwIAutz6TkQcsVXxZJAgkGVaSOzIufWFrQSXC5JW2vFKfu-y1234X_vY-fqMua-quj1YZehVlmm1YcQjTRciS282MG8DTG2vnDrtqyp3TgEt23WDc06rp1wQ7MD_7rP7Ze1X73jfZUD-LYHFHOqipaavIzvTmjQFvjgzncu9OuPTqY7WcbOP79Zav85nYlMufnDozOL-a-fD3-MuxMvrsGb0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18482535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay Analysis of Cotinine in Urine</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Niedbala, R. Sam ; Haley, Nancy ; Kardos, Stephanie ; Kardos, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Niedbala, R. Sam ; Haley, Nancy ; Kardos, Stephanie ; Kardos, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>A study was conducted to evaluate the performance comparison of a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EIA) designed to detect cotinine in urine and carbon monoxide (CO) breath measurements to determine smoking status. The clinical comparison was done using urine and breath specimens from 218 volunteers. Urine samples were analyzed by immunoassay and confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Breath carbon monoxide was determined by a commercial analyzer. Using cutoffs of 10 ppm for CO and 500 ng/m/for urinary cotinine, the relative sensitivity/specificity was 93.6%/74.0%. The positive predictive value was 86.8%, and the negative predictive value was 86.5%. However, comparison of the EIA to GC-MS showed a sensitivity/specificity of 96.2%/98.4% and a positive predictive value of 99.3%. The EIA was also evaluated non-clinically for precision, stability, recovery, and interferences. In addition, the non-clinical evaluation demonstrated coefficients of variation from 0.37 to 1.09% across cotinine concentrations ranging from 0 to 5000 ng/mL. The assay was found to be highly specific for cotinine and cross-reacted to a limited degree with 3-hydroxycotinine. Finally, multiple freeze-thaw cycles of urines containing cotinine showed no degradation of the drug in the specimen when tested in the EIA. Thus, the EIA tested is a rapid, lab-based test that can reliably determine cotinine levels and their relation to smoking status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-4760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jat/26.3.166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11991533</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATOD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Niles, IL: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cotinine - urine ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Humans ; Immunoenzyme Techniques - methods ; Medical sciences ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Smoking - metabolism ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of analytical toxicology, 2002-04, Vol.26 (3), p.166-170</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ea509aa1380ba10803a09ec4e20a1252dfba04081576847fc299fad324ba69993</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13606902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11991533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niedbala, R. Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haley, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardos, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardos, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay Analysis of Cotinine in Urine</title><title>Journal of analytical toxicology</title><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><description>A study was conducted to evaluate the performance comparison of a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EIA) designed to detect cotinine in urine and carbon monoxide (CO) breath measurements to determine smoking status. The clinical comparison was done using urine and breath specimens from 218 volunteers. Urine samples were analyzed by immunoassay and confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Breath carbon monoxide was determined by a commercial analyzer. Using cutoffs of 10 ppm for CO and 500 ng/m/for urinary cotinine, the relative sensitivity/specificity was 93.6%/74.0%. The positive predictive value was 86.8%, and the negative predictive value was 86.5%. However, comparison of the EIA to GC-MS showed a sensitivity/specificity of 96.2%/98.4% and a positive predictive value of 99.3%. The EIA was also evaluated non-clinically for precision, stability, recovery, and interferences. In addition, the non-clinical evaluation demonstrated coefficients of variation from 0.37 to 1.09% across cotinine concentrations ranging from 0 to 5000 ng/mL. The assay was found to be highly specific for cotinine and cross-reacted to a limited degree with 3-hydroxycotinine. Finally, multiple freeze-thaw cycles of urines containing cotinine showed no degradation of the drug in the specimen when tested in the EIA. Thus, the EIA tested is a rapid, lab-based test that can reliably determine cotinine levels and their relation to smoking status.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cotinine - urine</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Smoking - metabolism</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0146-4760</issn><issn>1945-2403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1P20AQBuAVKoJAufVc-dJywcnMfnn3hKIICChSq6pUiMtq4qwrU9ubem2J_HscEsGR08zh0Tujl7EvCGMEKyZP1E24Hosxan3ARmilSrkE8YmNAKVOZabhmJ3E-ASA2mhxxI4RrUUlxIhdTvsu1NT5VTIPdfjrGx_6mNzWdd8EipE2ybShahPLmIQimYWubMrGJ2WT3LfD8pkdFlRFf7afp-z--ur3bJ4uftzczqaLNJdoutSTAkuEwsCSEAwIAutz6TkQcsVXxZJAgkGVaSOzIufWFrQSXC5JW2vFKfu-y1234X_vY-fqMua-quj1YZehVlmm1YcQjTRciS282MG8DTG2vnDrtqyp3TgEt23WDc06rp1wQ7MD_7rP7Ze1X73jfZUD-LYHFHOqipaavIzvTmjQFvjgzncu9OuPTqY7WcbOP79Zav85nYlMufnDozOL-a-fD3-MuxMvrsGb0w</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Niedbala, R. Sam</creator><creator>Haley, Nancy</creator><creator>Kardos, Stephanie</creator><creator>Kardos, Keith</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Preston</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay Analysis of Cotinine in Urine</title><author>Niedbala, R. Sam ; Haley, Nancy ; Kardos, Stephanie ; Kardos, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ea509aa1380ba10803a09ec4e20a1252dfba04081576847fc299fad324ba69993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cotinine - urine</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Smoking - metabolism</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niedbala, R. Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haley, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardos, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardos, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niedbala, R. Sam</au><au>Haley, Nancy</au><au>Kardos, Stephanie</au><au>Kardos, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay Analysis of Cotinine in Urine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle><stitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</stitle><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>166-170</pages><issn>0146-4760</issn><eissn>1945-2403</eissn><coden>JATOD3</coden><abstract>A study was conducted to evaluate the performance comparison of a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EIA) designed to detect cotinine in urine and carbon monoxide (CO) breath measurements to determine smoking status. The clinical comparison was done using urine and breath specimens from 218 volunteers. Urine samples were analyzed by immunoassay and confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Breath carbon monoxide was determined by a commercial analyzer. Using cutoffs of 10 ppm for CO and 500 ng/m/for urinary cotinine, the relative sensitivity/specificity was 93.6%/74.0%. The positive predictive value was 86.8%, and the negative predictive value was 86.5%. However, comparison of the EIA to GC-MS showed a sensitivity/specificity of 96.2%/98.4% and a positive predictive value of 99.3%. The EIA was also evaluated non-clinically for precision, stability, recovery, and interferences. In addition, the non-clinical evaluation demonstrated coefficients of variation from 0.37 to 1.09% across cotinine concentrations ranging from 0 to 5000 ng/mL. The assay was found to be highly specific for cotinine and cross-reacted to a limited degree with 3-hydroxycotinine. Finally, multiple freeze-thaw cycles of urines containing cotinine showed no degradation of the drug in the specimen when tested in the EIA. Thus, the EIA tested is a rapid, lab-based test that can reliably determine cotinine levels and their relation to smoking status.</abstract><cop>Niles, IL</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11991533</pmid><doi>10.1093/jat/26.3.166</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-4760 |
ispartof | Journal of analytical toxicology, 2002-04, Vol.26 (3), p.166-170 |
issn | 0146-4760 1945-2403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71657765 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cotinine - urine Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques - methods Medical sciences Sensitivity and Specificity Smoking - metabolism Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology |
title | Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay Analysis of Cotinine in Urine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20Homogeneous%20Immunoassay%20Analysis%20of%20Cotinine%20in%20Urine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20analytical%20toxicology&rft.au=Niedbala,%20R.%20Sam&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=166-170&rft.issn=0146-4760&rft.eissn=1945-2403&rft.coden=JATOD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jat/26.3.166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71657765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18482535&rft_id=info:pmid/11991533&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jat/26.3.166&rfr_iscdi=true |