The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?
Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Body image 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.216-223 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 223 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 216 |
container_title | Body image |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Giovannelli, Thorayya Said Cash, Thomas F Henson, James M Engle, Erin K |
description | Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71656577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71656577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9PwzAMxSMEYmPwDRDqiVuL3aRNxwWhiX_SJC7jxCHKEndkWtuRtId9ezJtAk62n_ye7B9j1wgZApZ362zZ2Z1rshygygAzADxhY6wkT8sK5GnspYAUhShG7CKENYBAnotzNsJKlBwQxuxz8UVJQzoMnhpq-6Srk31u6hq9osS6EHTvQq1N77o2_T_cJy4kPgrtKnHNtvO9bg39tv3DJTur9SbQ1bFO2Mfz02L2ms7fX95mj_PUcCj6eKCtUExluaRK2JqsMdKQLI2ta8CKpMFCStS41HlhuY0_cA6C8igCTqd8wm4PuVvffQ8UetW4YGiz0S11Q1ASy6KMEXFRHBaN70LwVKutj3_6nUJQe6hqrQ5Q1R6qAlQRarTdHPOHZUP2z3SkyH8AOJt2Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71656577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said ; Cash, Thomas F ; Henson, James M ; Engle, Erin K</creator><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said ; Cash, Thomas F ; Henson, James M ; Engle, Erin K</creatorcontrib><description>Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-1445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18463010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Body Image ; Female ; Gender Identity ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Personal Satisfaction ; Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Concept ; Students - psychology</subject><ispartof>Body image, 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.216-223</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18463010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Thomas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henson, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Erin K</creatorcontrib><title>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</title><title>Body image</title><addtitle>Body Image</addtitle><description>Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><issn>1740-1445</issn><issn>1873-6807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9PwzAMxSMEYmPwDRDqiVuL3aRNxwWhiX_SJC7jxCHKEndkWtuRtId9ezJtAk62n_ye7B9j1wgZApZ362zZ2Z1rshygygAzADxhY6wkT8sK5GnspYAUhShG7CKENYBAnotzNsJKlBwQxuxz8UVJQzoMnhpq-6Srk31u6hq9osS6EHTvQq1N77o2_T_cJy4kPgrtKnHNtvO9bg39tv3DJTur9SbQ1bFO2Mfz02L2ms7fX95mj_PUcCj6eKCtUExluaRK2JqsMdKQLI2ta8CKpMFCStS41HlhuY0_cA6C8igCTqd8wm4PuVvffQ8UetW4YGiz0S11Q1ASy6KMEXFRHBaN70LwVKutj3_6nUJQe6hqrQ5Q1R6qAlQRarTdHPOHZUP2z3SkyH8AOJt2Qw</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</creator><creator>Cash, Thomas F</creator><creator>Henson, James M</creator><creator>Engle, Erin K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</title><author>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said ; Cash, Thomas F ; Henson, James M ; Engle, Erin K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Thomas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henson, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Erin K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Body image</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</au><au>Cash, Thomas F</au><au>Henson, James M</au><au>Engle, Erin K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</atitle><jtitle>Body image</jtitle><addtitle>Body Image</addtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>216-223</pages><issn>1740-1445</issn><eissn>1873-6807</eissn><abstract>Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>18463010</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1740-1445 |
ispartof | Body image, 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.216-223 |
issn | 1740-1445 1873-6807 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71656577 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Body Image Female Gender Identity Humans Male Middle Aged Motivation Personal Satisfaction Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Reproducibility of Results Self Concept Students - psychology |
title | The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20measurement%20of%20body-image%20dissatisfaction-satisfaction:%20is%20rating%20importance%20important?&rft.jtitle=Body%20image&rft.au=Giovannelli,%20Thorayya%20Said&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=216-223&rft.issn=1740-1445&rft.eissn=1873-6807&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71656577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71656577&rft_id=info:pmid/18463010&rfr_iscdi=true |