The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?

Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Body image 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.216-223
Hauptverfasser: Giovannelli, Thorayya Said, Cash, Thomas F, Henson, James M, Engle, Erin K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue 2
container_start_page 216
container_title Body image
container_volume 5
creator Giovannelli, Thorayya Said
Cash, Thomas F
Henson, James M
Engle, Erin K
description Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71656577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71656577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9PwzAMxSMEYmPwDRDqiVuL3aRNxwWhiX_SJC7jxCHKEndkWtuRtId9ezJtAk62n_ye7B9j1wgZApZ362zZ2Z1rshygygAzADxhY6wkT8sK5GnspYAUhShG7CKENYBAnotzNsJKlBwQxuxz8UVJQzoMnhpq-6Srk31u6hq9osS6EHTvQq1N77o2_T_cJy4kPgrtKnHNtvO9bg39tv3DJTur9SbQ1bFO2Mfz02L2ms7fX95mj_PUcCj6eKCtUExluaRK2JqsMdKQLI2ta8CKpMFCStS41HlhuY0_cA6C8igCTqd8wm4PuVvffQ8UetW4YGiz0S11Q1ASy6KMEXFRHBaN70LwVKutj3_6nUJQe6hqrQ5Q1R6qAlQRarTdHPOHZUP2z3SkyH8AOJt2Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71656577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said ; Cash, Thomas F ; Henson, James M ; Engle, Erin K</creator><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said ; Cash, Thomas F ; Henson, James M ; Engle, Erin K</creatorcontrib><description>Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-1445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18463010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Body Image ; Female ; Gender Identity ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Personal Satisfaction ; Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Concept ; Students - psychology</subject><ispartof>Body image, 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.216-223</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18463010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Thomas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henson, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Erin K</creatorcontrib><title>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</title><title>Body image</title><addtitle>Body Image</addtitle><description>Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><issn>1740-1445</issn><issn>1873-6807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9PwzAMxSMEYmPwDRDqiVuL3aRNxwWhiX_SJC7jxCHKEndkWtuRtId9ezJtAk62n_ye7B9j1wgZApZ362zZ2Z1rshygygAzADxhY6wkT8sK5GnspYAUhShG7CKENYBAnotzNsJKlBwQxuxz8UVJQzoMnhpq-6Srk31u6hq9osS6EHTvQq1N77o2_T_cJy4kPgrtKnHNtvO9bg39tv3DJTur9SbQ1bFO2Mfz02L2ms7fX95mj_PUcCj6eKCtUExluaRK2JqsMdKQLI2ta8CKpMFCStS41HlhuY0_cA6C8igCTqd8wm4PuVvffQ8UetW4YGiz0S11Q1ASy6KMEXFRHBaN70LwVKutj3_6nUJQe6hqrQ5Q1R6qAlQRarTdHPOHZUP2z3SkyH8AOJt2Qw</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</creator><creator>Cash, Thomas F</creator><creator>Henson, James M</creator><creator>Engle, Erin K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</title><author>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said ; Cash, Thomas F ; Henson, James M ; Engle, Erin K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-14d814976be84dfedcc7ce76cdff018e7c15771a1ba25d3d1323304e277101993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Thomas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henson, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Erin K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Body image</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giovannelli, Thorayya Said</au><au>Cash, Thomas F</au><au>Henson, James M</au><au>Engle, Erin K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?</atitle><jtitle>Body image</jtitle><addtitle>Body Image</addtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>216-223</pages><issn>1740-1445</issn><eissn>1873-6807</eissn><abstract>Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>18463010</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1740-1445
ispartof Body image, 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.216-223
issn 1740-1445
1873-6807
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71656577
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Body Image
Female
Gender Identity
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Personal Satisfaction
Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Self Concept
Students - psychology
title The measurement of body-image dissatisfaction-satisfaction: is rating importance important?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20measurement%20of%20body-image%20dissatisfaction-satisfaction:%20is%20rating%20importance%20important?&rft.jtitle=Body%20image&rft.au=Giovannelli,%20Thorayya%20Said&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=216-223&rft.issn=1740-1445&rft.eissn=1873-6807&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71656577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71656577&rft_id=info:pmid/18463010&rfr_iscdi=true