To Protect or Not to Protect? In Lower Extremity Angioplasty Procedures, “Why Not?” is the Question

PROTECT does, though, add another single-center experience to a growing list of similar reports that share like experiences and conclusions: (1) distal emboli are very common during lower extremity percutaneous peripheral interventions (PPI), (2) the use of an embolie protection device (EPD) appears...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2008-06, Vol.15 (3), p.277-282
1. Verfasser: Allie, David E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PROTECT does, though, add another single-center experience to a growing list of similar reports that share like experiences and conclusions: (1) distal emboli are very common during lower extremity percutaneous peripheral interventions (PPI), (2) the use of an embolie protection device (EPD) appears safe and at least feasible during lower extremity PPI, and (3) more clinical data need to be accumulated to fully define the clinical entity of distal embolization and the true role of EPDs during lower extremity PPI. Further complicating the issue at this time is the fact that we have no "gold standard" technology corresponding to cardiac nuclear or magnetic resonance imaging to assess pedal microcirculatory function.\n We have found preprocedure CTA lesion morphology to be helpful in identifying lesions at high risk for distal embolization.
ISSN:1526-6028
1545-1550
DOI:10.1583/08-2397C.1