Benchmarking: a useful tool for informing and improving care of the dying?

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of participating in two benchmarking exercises to assess the care delivered to patients in the dying phase using the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Design The study uses questionnaire evaluation of the benchmarkin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2008-07, Vol.16 (7), p.813-819
Hauptverfasser: Ellershaw, John, Gambles, Maureen, McGlinchey, Tamsin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of participating in two benchmarking exercises to assess the care delivered to patients in the dying phase using the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Design The study uses questionnaire evaluation of the benchmarking process assessing the quality/usefulness of: sector feedback reports, individual feedback reports and the workshop element. Setting Healthcare professionals representing hospital, hospice and community settings. Participants Sixty-two out of 75 potential participants (83%) returned completed questionnaires. Main outcome measure A study-specific questionnaire was administered as part of the final workshop element of the benchmarking exercise. The questionnaire contained a mixture of ‘Likert’-type responses and open-ended questions. Results Participants from all sectors reported that the feedback reports contained the right amount and level of data (82–100%), that they were easy to understand (77–92%) and that they were useful to the organisation (94–100%). Respondents particularly valued the opportunity to discuss more fully the results of the benchmark and to network and share elements of good practice with other attendees in the workshops. Participants from the hospital sector identified changes in practice that had occurred as a result of participation. Conclusions Using comparative audit data that are readily available from the LCP and using workshops to discuss the findings and plan future care was perceived as a valuable way in which to explore the care delivered to dying patients in a variety of settings.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-007-0353-5