Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces?
Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Perception (London) 2002-01, Vol.31 (3), p.287-296 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 296 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 287 |
| container_title | Perception (London) |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Collishaw, Stephan M Hole, Graham J |
| description | Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were asked to discriminate blurred famous and unfamiliar faces presented at nine angles. Blurred faces were used to minimise featural processing strategies, and to assess the effects of rotation that are specific to configural processing. The results indicate a linear relationship between angle of rotation and recognition accuracy. It appears that configural processing becomes gradually more disrupted the further a face is oriented away from the upright. The implications of these findings for competing explanations of the face-inversion effect are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1068/p3195 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71636401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1068_p3195</sage_id><sourcerecordid>71636401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d10def14eee70dc457e5df0c30d4ee97e10f9ef41c87b0710617866d9d24487b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFrGzEQhUVpqR0nf6GIQHvbdMbSar2nUkydBEwbQnpeZGlkb1hLG2mXkn8fxTYYepp5j483zGPsCuEGQS2-9wLr8gObolSLQs6F-MimIAALAKUm7CKlZwCUdSk-swlmVqoap2xzn_jTjiJxzdetJx15iHn_HXx3lI_U6aENPu3anm9o-Efk-WMYDibX3vJl8K7djlF3_CEGQym1fsuD4yudxY9L9snpLtHVac7Y39Wvp-Vdsf5ze7_8uS6MUDgUFsGSQ0lEFVgjy4pK68AIsNmrK0JwNTmJZlFtoMpPY7VQytZ2LmW2xIx9O-b2MbyMlIZm3yZDXac9hTE1FSqhJGAGvx5BE0NKkVzTx3av42uD0LyX2RzKzNyXU-C42ZM9U6f2zkG9TkZ3Lmpv2nTmhCrnCt6Dro9c0ltqnsMYfS7iv2tvtNSF_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71636401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Collishaw, Stephan M ; Hole, Graham J</creator><creatorcontrib>Collishaw, Stephan M ; Hole, Graham J</creatorcontrib><description>Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were asked to discriminate blurred famous and unfamiliar faces presented at nine angles. Blurred faces were used to minimise featural processing strategies, and to assess the effects of rotation that are specific to configural processing. The results indicate a linear relationship between angle of rotation and recognition accuracy. It appears that configural processing becomes gradually more disrupted the further a face is oriented away from the upright. The implications of these findings for competing explanations of the face-inversion effect are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1068/p3195</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11954691</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PCTNBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Face ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Perception ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Perception (London), 2002-01, Vol.31 (3), p.287-296</ispartof><rights>2002 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d10def14eee70dc457e5df0c30d4ee97e10f9ef41c87b0710617866d9d24487b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d10def14eee70dc457e5df0c30d4ee97e10f9ef41c87b0710617866d9d24487b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/p3195$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p3195$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13652605$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11954691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collishaw, Stephan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hole, Graham J</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces?</title><title>Perception (London)</title><addtitle>Perception</addtitle><description>Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were asked to discriminate blurred famous and unfamiliar faces presented at nine angles. Blurred faces were used to minimise featural processing strategies, and to assess the effects of rotation that are specific to configural processing. The results indicate a linear relationship between angle of rotation and recognition accuracy. It appears that configural processing becomes gradually more disrupted the further a face is oriented away from the upright. The implications of these findings for competing explanations of the face-inversion effect are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0301-0066</issn><issn>1468-4233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEFrGzEQhUVpqR0nf6GIQHvbdMbSar2nUkydBEwbQnpeZGlkb1hLG2mXkn8fxTYYepp5j483zGPsCuEGQS2-9wLr8gObolSLQs6F-MimIAALAKUm7CKlZwCUdSk-swlmVqoap2xzn_jTjiJxzdetJx15iHn_HXx3lI_U6aENPu3anm9o-Efk-WMYDibX3vJl8K7djlF3_CEGQym1fsuD4yudxY9L9snpLtHVac7Y39Wvp-Vdsf5ze7_8uS6MUDgUFsGSQ0lEFVgjy4pK68AIsNmrK0JwNTmJZlFtoMpPY7VQytZ2LmW2xIx9O-b2MbyMlIZm3yZDXac9hTE1FSqhJGAGvx5BE0NKkVzTx3av42uD0LyX2RzKzNyXU-C42ZM9U6f2zkG9TkZ3Lmpv2nTmhCrnCt6Dro9c0ltqnsMYfS7iv2tvtNSF_A</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Collishaw, Stephan M</creator><creator>Hole, Graham J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Pion</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces?</title><author>Collishaw, Stephan M ; Hole, Graham J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d10def14eee70dc457e5df0c30d4ee97e10f9ef41c87b0710617866d9d24487b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collishaw, Stephan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hole, Graham J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collishaw, Stephan M</au><au>Hole, Graham J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces?</atitle><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Perception</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>287-296</pages><issn>0301-0066</issn><eissn>1468-4233</eissn><coden>PCTNBA</coden><abstract>Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were asked to discriminate blurred famous and unfamiliar faces presented at nine angles. Blurred faces were used to minimise featural processing strategies, and to assess the effects of rotation that are specific to configural processing. The results indicate a linear relationship between angle of rotation and recognition accuracy. It appears that configural processing becomes gradually more disrupted the further a face is oriented away from the upright. The implications of these findings for competing explanations of the face-inversion effect are discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>11954691</pmid><doi>10.1068/p3195</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-0066 |
| ispartof | Perception (London), 2002-01, Vol.31 (3), p.287-296 |
| issn | 0301-0066 1468-4233 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71636401 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Face Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Middle Aged Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Perception Psychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition (Psychology) Vision |
| title | Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Linear%20or%20a%20Nonlinear%20Relationship%20between%20Rotation%20and%20Configural%20Processing%20of%20Faces?&rft.jtitle=Perception%20(London)&rft.au=Collishaw,%20Stephan%20M&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=287-296&rft.issn=0301-0066&rft.eissn=1468-4233&rft.coden=PCTNBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1068/p3195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71636401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71636401&rft_id=info:pmid/11954691&rft_sage_id=10.1068_p3195&rfr_iscdi=true |