Helium vs carbon dioxide gas insufflation with or without saline lavage during laparoscopy
Helium is an inert gas that, if used for insufflation during laparoscopy, may be followed by less postoperative pain than carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, due to a more limited effect on intraabdominal pH and metabolism. Saline lavage has also recently been shown to reduce postoperative pain follo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2002-04, Vol.16 (4), p.620-625 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 625 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 620 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | O'Boyle, C J deBeaux, A C Watson, D I Ackroyd, R Lafullarde, T Leong, J Y Williams, J A R Jamieson, G G |
description | Helium is an inert gas that, if used for insufflation during laparoscopy, may be followed by less postoperative pain than carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, due to a more limited effect on intraabdominal pH and metabolism. Saline lavage has also recently been shown to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. To evaluate these possibilities and to better define the clinical safety of helium insufflation, we undertook a prospective randomized trial comparing CO2 and helium insufflation with or without saline lavage in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery.
From January to November 2000, 173 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or fundoplication were randomized to undergo laparoscopy with either CO2 or helium insufflation. Within each group, patients were further randomized to undergo peritoneal lavage with 2 L of 0.9% saline at the end of the surgical procedure. This yielded the following four patient groups; CO2 (group 1, n = 47), CO2 + saline lavage (group 2, n = 43), helium (group 3, n = 43) and helium + saline lavage (group 4, n = 40). Patients were blinded to their randomization, and post-operative assessment was also performed by a blinded investigator, who applied a standardized scoring system to assess postoperative pain.
The study groups were well matched for age, sex, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, duration of surgery, and volume of gas utilized, and 81% of patients were discharged within 48 h. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications among the study groups, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different when all four groups were compared. When helium (groups 3 and 4) was compared with CO2 (groups 1 and 2), no differences in pain score were seen. When no lavage (groups 1 and 3) was compared with lavage (groups 2 and 4), less pain was found in the group undergoing saline peritoneal lavage (mean 4-h pain score, 5.9 vs 5.2; 24-h pain score, 4.8 vs 4.1; p > 0.05).
The use of helium insufflation for laparoscopic surgery, while not associated with any significant adverse sequelae, was not associated with less postoperative pain in this trial. The use of saline peritoneal lavage was associated with less pain in the early postoperative period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-001-8218-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71629293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71629293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1581-c9fbfded0f78ccec5a7dc28fbcd67233b1ac3f77968ffaa93c5503d50cdd95223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpPAALshjYDL4kcTyiCihSJRZYWCLHl-AqiYMdF_r2BCgL069f59PR0QHgnOBrgjG_iRhnRYYwJqikpETsAMxJxiiiUzsEcywYRpSLbAZOYtzgiQuSH4MZIYJTiskcvK5M61IHtxEqGWrfQ-38p9MGNjJC18dkbStHNw0-3PgGffhJn0YYZet6A1u5lY2BOgXXN1MbZPBR-WF3Co6sbKM52-cCvNzfPS9XaP308Li8XSNF8pIgJWxttdHY8lIpo3LJtaKlrZUuOGWsJlIxy7koSmulFEzlOWY6x0prkVPKFuDqd-8Q_Hsycaw6F5VpW9kbn2LFSUEFFWyCl__gxqfQT7dVlIiMcVp-o4s9SnVndDUE18mwq_5exr4AU8NviA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219437283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Helium vs carbon dioxide gas insufflation with or without saline lavage during laparoscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>O'Boyle, C J ; deBeaux, A C ; Watson, D I ; Ackroyd, R ; Lafullarde, T ; Leong, J Y ; Williams, J A R ; Jamieson, G G</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Boyle, C J ; deBeaux, A C ; Watson, D I ; Ackroyd, R ; Lafullarde, T ; Leong, J Y ; Williams, J A R ; Jamieson, G G</creatorcontrib><description>Helium is an inert gas that, if used for insufflation during laparoscopy, may be followed by less postoperative pain than carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, due to a more limited effect on intraabdominal pH and metabolism. Saline lavage has also recently been shown to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. To evaluate these possibilities and to better define the clinical safety of helium insufflation, we undertook a prospective randomized trial comparing CO2 and helium insufflation with or without saline lavage in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery.
From January to November 2000, 173 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or fundoplication were randomized to undergo laparoscopy with either CO2 or helium insufflation. Within each group, patients were further randomized to undergo peritoneal lavage with 2 L of 0.9% saline at the end of the surgical procedure. This yielded the following four patient groups; CO2 (group 1, n = 47), CO2 + saline lavage (group 2, n = 43), helium (group 3, n = 43) and helium + saline lavage (group 4, n = 40). Patients were blinded to their randomization, and post-operative assessment was also performed by a blinded investigator, who applied a standardized scoring system to assess postoperative pain.
The study groups were well matched for age, sex, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, duration of surgery, and volume of gas utilized, and 81% of patients were discharged within 48 h. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications among the study groups, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different when all four groups were compared. When helium (groups 3 and 4) was compared with CO2 (groups 1 and 2), no differences in pain score were seen. When no lavage (groups 1 and 3) was compared with lavage (groups 2 and 4), less pain was found in the group undergoing saline peritoneal lavage (mean 4-h pain score, 5.9 vs 5.2; 24-h pain score, 4.8 vs 4.1; p > 0.05).
The use of helium insufflation for laparoscopic surgery, while not associated with any significant adverse sequelae, was not associated with less postoperative pain in this trial. The use of saline peritoneal lavage was associated with less pain in the early postoperative period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8218-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11972201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Abdominal Pain - prevention & control ; Biliary Tract Diseases - surgery ; Carbon Dioxide - therapeutic use ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods ; Esophageal Diseases - surgery ; Esophagogastric Junction - surgery ; Female ; Fundoplication - methods ; Helium - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Insufflation - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Diseases - surgery ; Peritoneal Lavage - methods ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Prospective Studies ; Sodium Chloride - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2002-04, Vol.16 (4), p.620-625</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1581-c9fbfded0f78ccec5a7dc28fbcd67233b1ac3f77968ffaa93c5503d50cdd95223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11972201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Boyle, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deBeaux, A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, D I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafullarde, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, J Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, J A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, G G</creatorcontrib><title>Helium vs carbon dioxide gas insufflation with or without saline lavage during laparoscopy</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Helium is an inert gas that, if used for insufflation during laparoscopy, may be followed by less postoperative pain than carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, due to a more limited effect on intraabdominal pH and metabolism. Saline lavage has also recently been shown to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. To evaluate these possibilities and to better define the clinical safety of helium insufflation, we undertook a prospective randomized trial comparing CO2 and helium insufflation with or without saline lavage in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery.
From January to November 2000, 173 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or fundoplication were randomized to undergo laparoscopy with either CO2 or helium insufflation. Within each group, patients were further randomized to undergo peritoneal lavage with 2 L of 0.9% saline at the end of the surgical procedure. This yielded the following four patient groups; CO2 (group 1, n = 47), CO2 + saline lavage (group 2, n = 43), helium (group 3, n = 43) and helium + saline lavage (group 4, n = 40). Patients were blinded to their randomization, and post-operative assessment was also performed by a blinded investigator, who applied a standardized scoring system to assess postoperative pain.
The study groups were well matched for age, sex, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, duration of surgery, and volume of gas utilized, and 81% of patients were discharged within 48 h. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications among the study groups, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different when all four groups were compared. When helium (groups 3 and 4) was compared with CO2 (groups 1 and 2), no differences in pain score were seen. When no lavage (groups 1 and 3) was compared with lavage (groups 2 and 4), less pain was found in the group undergoing saline peritoneal lavage (mean 4-h pain score, 5.9 vs 5.2; 24-h pain score, 4.8 vs 4.1; p > 0.05).
The use of helium insufflation for laparoscopic surgery, while not associated with any significant adverse sequelae, was not associated with less postoperative pain in this trial. The use of saline peritoneal lavage was associated with less pain in the early postoperative period.</description><subject>Abdominal Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biliary Tract Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundoplication - methods</subject><subject>Helium - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insufflation - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreatic Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Peritoneal Lavage - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpPAALshjYDL4kcTyiCihSJRZYWCLHl-AqiYMdF_r2BCgL069f59PR0QHgnOBrgjG_iRhnRYYwJqikpETsAMxJxiiiUzsEcywYRpSLbAZOYtzgiQuSH4MZIYJTiskcvK5M61IHtxEqGWrfQ-38p9MGNjJC18dkbStHNw0-3PgGffhJn0YYZet6A1u5lY2BOgXXN1MbZPBR-WF3Co6sbKM52-cCvNzfPS9XaP308Li8XSNF8pIgJWxttdHY8lIpo3LJtaKlrZUuOGWsJlIxy7koSmulFEzlOWY6x0prkVPKFuDqd-8Q_Hsycaw6F5VpW9kbn2LFSUEFFWyCl__gxqfQT7dVlIiMcVp-o4s9SnVndDUE18mwq_5exr4AU8NviA</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>O'Boyle, C J</creator><creator>deBeaux, A C</creator><creator>Watson, D I</creator><creator>Ackroyd, R</creator><creator>Lafullarde, T</creator><creator>Leong, J Y</creator><creator>Williams, J A R</creator><creator>Jamieson, G G</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>Helium vs carbon dioxide gas insufflation with or without saline lavage during laparoscopy</title><author>O'Boyle, C J ; deBeaux, A C ; Watson, D I ; Ackroyd, R ; Lafullarde, T ; Leong, J Y ; Williams, J A R ; Jamieson, G G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1581-c9fbfded0f78ccec5a7dc28fbcd67233b1ac3f77968ffaa93c5503d50cdd95223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biliary Tract Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundoplication - methods</topic><topic>Helium - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insufflation - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreatic Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Peritoneal Lavage - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Boyle, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deBeaux, A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, D I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafullarde, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, J Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, J A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, G G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Boyle, C J</au><au>deBeaux, A C</au><au>Watson, D I</au><au>Ackroyd, R</au><au>Lafullarde, T</au><au>Leong, J Y</au><au>Williams, J A R</au><au>Jamieson, G G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Helium vs carbon dioxide gas insufflation with or without saline lavage during laparoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>620-625</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Helium is an inert gas that, if used for insufflation during laparoscopy, may be followed by less postoperative pain than carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, due to a more limited effect on intraabdominal pH and metabolism. Saline lavage has also recently been shown to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery. To evaluate these possibilities and to better define the clinical safety of helium insufflation, we undertook a prospective randomized trial comparing CO2 and helium insufflation with or without saline lavage in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery.
From January to November 2000, 173 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or fundoplication were randomized to undergo laparoscopy with either CO2 or helium insufflation. Within each group, patients were further randomized to undergo peritoneal lavage with 2 L of 0.9% saline at the end of the surgical procedure. This yielded the following four patient groups; CO2 (group 1, n = 47), CO2 + saline lavage (group 2, n = 43), helium (group 3, n = 43) and helium + saline lavage (group 4, n = 40). Patients were blinded to their randomization, and post-operative assessment was also performed by a blinded investigator, who applied a standardized scoring system to assess postoperative pain.
The study groups were well matched for age, sex, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, duration of surgery, and volume of gas utilized, and 81% of patients were discharged within 48 h. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications among the study groups, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different when all four groups were compared. When helium (groups 3 and 4) was compared with CO2 (groups 1 and 2), no differences in pain score were seen. When no lavage (groups 1 and 3) was compared with lavage (groups 2 and 4), less pain was found in the group undergoing saline peritoneal lavage (mean 4-h pain score, 5.9 vs 5.2; 24-h pain score, 4.8 vs 4.1; p > 0.05).
The use of helium insufflation for laparoscopic surgery, while not associated with any significant adverse sequelae, was not associated with less postoperative pain in this trial. The use of saline peritoneal lavage was associated with less pain in the early postoperative period.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>11972201</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-001-8218-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2002-04, Vol.16 (4), p.620-625 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71629293 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdominal Pain - prevention & control Biliary Tract Diseases - surgery Carbon Dioxide - therapeutic use Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Elective Surgical Procedures - methods Esophageal Diseases - surgery Esophagogastric Junction - surgery Female Fundoplication - methods Helium - therapeutic use Humans Insufflation - methods Male Middle Aged Pancreatic Diseases - surgery Peritoneal Lavage - methods Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Prospective Studies Sodium Chloride - therapeutic use |
title | Helium vs carbon dioxide gas insufflation with or without saline lavage during laparoscopy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Helium%20vs%20carbon%20dioxide%20gas%20insufflation%20with%20or%20without%20saline%20lavage%20during%20laparoscopy&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=O'Boyle,%20C%20J&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=620-625&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-001-8218-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71629293%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219437283&rft_id=info:pmid/11972201&rfr_iscdi=true |