Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopic surgery requires the surgeon to assume atypical postures for extended periods of time, potentially leading to fatigue and chronic injury. This study assessed the level of muscle activity and compared the effects of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated lap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2002-04, Vol.16 (4), p.635-639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 639 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | UHRICH, M. L UNDERWOOD, R. A STANDEVEN, J. W SOPER, N. J ENGSBERG, J. R |
description | Laparoscopic surgery requires the surgeon to assume atypical postures for extended periods of time, potentially leading to fatigue and chronic injury. This study assessed the level of muscle activity and compared the effects of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery.
Four attending and four resident surgeons repeated a series of four tasks with a View site and a standard operating room monitor. Electromyography (EMG) activity and muscular discomfort scores were obtained before and after a "fatigue session." Two variables, the EMG amplitudes and discomfort scores, were analyzed.
The EMG amplitudes generally exceed the recommended threshold limits of acceptable muscular load. EMG data and discomfort scores demonstrated a fatigue response in several muscle groups. Minimal differences between the two monitor positions were seen. Overall, the EMG data and discomfort scores showed less muscle activity and discomfort in the attending surgeons.
Laparoscopic surgery required a relatively high muscular load, putting surgeons at risk for fatigue and injury. Altering the monitor placement did not reduce the surgeon's risk of fatigue. Experience slightly reduced the level of fatigue, but not enough to reduce the surgeon's risk category. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-001-8151-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71616362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71616362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-91a4fe06d199c24ae3ab794766282aed69bd345df08d7790853dc055809529c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rFEEQxRtRzCb6B3iRRtBTRqv6a6aPIWgUAl703PR21ywd5svuGTD_fXrdhYCnOtTvPareY-wdwmcEaL8UAGVUA4BNhxob_YLtUEnRCIHdS7YDK6ERrVUX7LKUB6i4Rf2aXSDaVghQO3a4KYVKGWla-dzz3q_psNE1H-cprXPmy-ADHbfX3E-Rly0fUvADp78L5URTIB63nKYDL2ncBr9S5INffJ5LmJcU_ikoP75hr3o_FHp7nlfs97evv26_N_c_737c3tw3QXRmbSx61ROYiNYGoTxJv6_3t8aITniKxu6jVDr20MW2tdBpGQNo3YHVwgYlr9ink--S5z8bldWNqQQaBj_RvBXXokEjjajgh__Ah3nLU73NCbRKI7SmQniCQv2nZOrdktPo86NDcMcK3KkCVytwxwqcrpr3Z-NtP1J8Vpwzr8DHM-BLjbLPfgqpPHPSyE61Wj4Bc1eOvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219451076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>UHRICH, M. L ; UNDERWOOD, R. A ; STANDEVEN, J. W ; SOPER, N. J ; ENGSBERG, J. R</creator><creatorcontrib>UHRICH, M. L ; UNDERWOOD, R. A ; STANDEVEN, J. W ; SOPER, N. J ; ENGSBERG, J. R</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic surgery requires the surgeon to assume atypical postures for extended periods of time, potentially leading to fatigue and chronic injury. This study assessed the level of muscle activity and compared the effects of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery.
Four attending and four resident surgeons repeated a series of four tasks with a View site and a standard operating room monitor. Electromyography (EMG) activity and muscular discomfort scores were obtained before and after a "fatigue session." Two variables, the EMG amplitudes and discomfort scores, were analyzed.
The EMG amplitudes generally exceed the recommended threshold limits of acceptable muscular load. EMG data and discomfort scores demonstrated a fatigue response in several muscle groups. Minimal differences between the two monitor positions were seen. Overall, the EMG data and discomfort scores showed less muscle activity and discomfort in the attending surgeons.
Laparoscopic surgery required a relatively high muscular load, putting surgeons at risk for fatigue and injury. Altering the monitor placement did not reduce the surgeon's risk of fatigue. Experience slightly reduced the level of fatigue, but not enough to reduce the surgeon's risk category.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8151-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11972204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Electromyography ; Electromyography - methods ; Endoscopy ; Ergonomics - methods ; Ergonomics. Workplace layout ; Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Laparoscopy - trends ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Muscle Fatigue ; Muscle function ; Occupational medicine ; Pilot Projects ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Factors ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2002-04, Vol.16 (4), p.635-639</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-91a4fe06d199c24ae3ab794766282aed69bd345df08d7790853dc055809529c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-91a4fe06d199c24ae3ab794766282aed69bd345df08d7790853dc055809529c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13638475$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11972204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>UHRICH, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UNDERWOOD, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STANDEVEN, J. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOPER, N. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGSBERG, J. R</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic surgery requires the surgeon to assume atypical postures for extended periods of time, potentially leading to fatigue and chronic injury. This study assessed the level of muscle activity and compared the effects of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery.
Four attending and four resident surgeons repeated a series of four tasks with a View site and a standard operating room monitor. Electromyography (EMG) activity and muscular discomfort scores were obtained before and after a "fatigue session." Two variables, the EMG amplitudes and discomfort scores, were analyzed.
The EMG amplitudes generally exceed the recommended threshold limits of acceptable muscular load. EMG data and discomfort scores demonstrated a fatigue response in several muscle groups. Minimal differences between the two monitor positions were seen. Overall, the EMG data and discomfort scores showed less muscle activity and discomfort in the attending surgeons.
Laparoscopic surgery required a relatively high muscular load, putting surgeons at risk for fatigue and injury. Altering the monitor placement did not reduce the surgeon's risk of fatigue. Experience slightly reduced the level of fatigue, but not enough to reduce the surgeon's risk category.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Ergonomics - methods</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Workplace layout</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopes</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - trends</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rFEEQxRtRzCb6B3iRRtBTRqv6a6aPIWgUAl703PR21ywd5svuGTD_fXrdhYCnOtTvPareY-wdwmcEaL8UAGVUA4BNhxob_YLtUEnRCIHdS7YDK6ERrVUX7LKUB6i4Rf2aXSDaVghQO3a4KYVKGWla-dzz3q_psNE1H-cprXPmy-ADHbfX3E-Rly0fUvADp78L5URTIB63nKYDL2ncBr9S5INffJ5LmJcU_ikoP75hr3o_FHp7nlfs97evv26_N_c_737c3tw3QXRmbSx61ROYiNYGoTxJv6_3t8aITniKxu6jVDr20MW2tdBpGQNo3YHVwgYlr9ink--S5z8bldWNqQQaBj_RvBXXokEjjajgh__Ah3nLU73NCbRKI7SmQniCQv2nZOrdktPo86NDcMcK3KkCVytwxwqcrpr3Z-NtP1J8Vpwzr8DHM-BLjbLPfgqpPHPSyE61Wj4Bc1eOvg</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>UHRICH, M. L</creator><creator>UNDERWOOD, R. A</creator><creator>STANDEVEN, J. W</creator><creator>SOPER, N. J</creator><creator>ENGSBERG, J. R</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery</title><author>UHRICH, M. L ; UNDERWOOD, R. A ; STANDEVEN, J. W ; SOPER, N. J ; ENGSBERG, J. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-91a4fe06d199c24ae3ab794766282aed69bd345df08d7790853dc055809529c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Ergonomics - methods</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Workplace layout</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopes</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - trends</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UHRICH, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UNDERWOOD, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STANDEVEN, J. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOPER, N. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGSBERG, J. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UHRICH, M. L</au><au>UNDERWOOD, R. A</au><au>STANDEVEN, J. W</au><au>SOPER, N. J</au><au>ENGSBERG, J. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>635-639</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>Laparoscopic surgery requires the surgeon to assume atypical postures for extended periods of time, potentially leading to fatigue and chronic injury. This study assessed the level of muscle activity and compared the effects of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery.
Four attending and four resident surgeons repeated a series of four tasks with a View site and a standard operating room monitor. Electromyography (EMG) activity and muscular discomfort scores were obtained before and after a "fatigue session." Two variables, the EMG amplitudes and discomfort scores, were analyzed.
The EMG amplitudes generally exceed the recommended threshold limits of acceptable muscular load. EMG data and discomfort scores demonstrated a fatigue response in several muscle groups. Minimal differences between the two monitor positions were seen. Overall, the EMG data and discomfort scores showed less muscle activity and discomfort in the attending surgeons.
Laparoscopic surgery required a relatively high muscular load, putting surgeons at risk for fatigue and injury. Altering the monitor placement did not reduce the surgeon's risk of fatigue. Experience slightly reduced the level of fatigue, but not enough to reduce the surgeon's risk category.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11972204</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-001-8151-5</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2002-04, Vol.16 (4), p.635-639 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71616362 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index Electromyography Electromyography - methods Endoscopy Ergonomics - methods Ergonomics. Workplace layout Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology Humans Laparoscopes Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Laparoscopy - trends Male Medical sciences Muscle Fatigue Muscle function Occupational medicine Pilot Projects Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Risk Factors Surgeons Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20fatigue,%20monitor%20placement,%20and%20surgical%20experience%20during%20simulated%20laparoscopic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=UHRICH,%20M.%20L&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=635-639&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-001-8151-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71616362%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219451076&rft_id=info:pmid/11972204&rfr_iscdi=true |