RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH

The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of community health 2002-04, Vol.27 (2), p.79-89
Hauptverfasser: Shelton, Brent J., Wofford, James L., Gosselink, Carol A., McClatchey, Maureen W., Brekke, Karen, Conry, Colleen, Wolfe, Pamela, Cohen, Stuart J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 89
container_issue 2
container_start_page 79
container_title Journal of community health
container_volume 27
creator Shelton, Brent J.
Wofford, James L.
Gosselink, Carol A.
McClatchey, Maureen W.
Brekke, Karen
Conry, Colleen
Wolfe, Pamela
Cohen, Stuart J.
description The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1014598332211
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71592373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45444289</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45444289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f86b15ed11b8c6625190597bafa4e6c6778a8b34607fc2b370befa66252a4cda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0L9PwlAQB_AXoxFEZydN4-BWvfe7z62pRZpAS0oZmJrX8ppAgGJLB_97HwEdXJzukvvcJfdF6B7DCwZCX_03DJhx5VFKCMYXqI-5pC4VGC5RH0Axl9t5D9207RoAMEhxjXoYKyokV33kp2GQzqNsEsaZ48fvThpmto2S2EmGznS0mEVB5MczZ5ikzjSNJn66cAK7ZeEs9NNgdIuuKr1pzd25DtB8GGbByB0nH1Hgj92SUnpwK08UmJslxoVXCkE4VsCVLHSlmRGlkNLTXkGZAFmVpKASClPpIySalUtNB-j5dHff1J-daQ_5dtWWZrPRO1N3bS4xV4RK-i-0aTEhPbDw6Q9c112zs0_khDBgHOB47fGMumJrlvm-WW1185X_RGjBwwms20Pd_M4ZZ4wRT9FvQGx0XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224045003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shelton, Brent J. ; Wofford, James L. ; Gosselink, Carol A. ; McClatchey, Maureen W. ; Brekke, Karen ; Conry, Colleen ; Wolfe, Pamela ; Cohen, Stuart J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Brent J. ; Wofford, James L. ; Gosselink, Carol A. ; McClatchey, Maureen W. ; Brekke, Karen ; Conry, Colleen ; Wolfe, Pamela ; Cohen, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><description>The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014598332211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11936759</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMHBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Human Science Press</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Administration ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cancer ; Colorado ; Community health services ; Community Relations ; Cooperative Behavior ; Data Collection ; Educational Psychology ; Eligibility ; Family Practice (Medicine) ; Female ; Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Medical profession ; Medical sector ; Medical service ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Physician's Role ; Physicians ; Physicians, Family - psychology ; Physicians, Family - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Professional Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Professional recruitment ; Questionnaires ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recruitment ; Retention ; Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of community health, 2002-04, Vol.27 (2), p.79-89</ispartof><rights>2002 Human Sciences Press, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Human Sciences Press, Inc. Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f86b15ed11b8c6625190597bafa4e6c6778a8b34607fc2b370befa66252a4cda3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45444289$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45444289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11936759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Brent J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wofford, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselink, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClatchey, Maureen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conry, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><title>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</title><title>Journal of community health</title><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><description>The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Administration</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Community health services</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Eligibility</subject><subject>Family Practice (Medicine)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Medical profession</subject><subject>Medical sector</subject><subject>Medical service</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Professional Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Professional recruitment</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0094-5145</issn><issn>1573-3610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0L9PwlAQB_AXoxFEZydN4-BWvfe7z62pRZpAS0oZmJrX8ppAgGJLB_97HwEdXJzukvvcJfdF6B7DCwZCX_03DJhx5VFKCMYXqI-5pC4VGC5RH0Axl9t5D9207RoAMEhxjXoYKyokV33kp2GQzqNsEsaZ48fvThpmto2S2EmGznS0mEVB5MczZ5ikzjSNJn66cAK7ZeEs9NNgdIuuKr1pzd25DtB8GGbByB0nH1Hgj92SUnpwK08UmJslxoVXCkE4VsCVLHSlmRGlkNLTXkGZAFmVpKASClPpIySalUtNB-j5dHff1J-daQ_5dtWWZrPRO1N3bS4xV4RK-i-0aTEhPbDw6Q9c112zs0_khDBgHOB47fGMumJrlvm-WW1185X_RGjBwwms20Pd_M4ZZ4wRT9FvQGx0XA</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Shelton, Brent J.</creator><creator>Wofford, James L.</creator><creator>Gosselink, Carol A.</creator><creator>McClatchey, Maureen W.</creator><creator>Brekke, Karen</creator><creator>Conry, Colleen</creator><creator>Wolfe, Pamela</creator><creator>Cohen, Stuart J.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic/Human Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</title><author>Shelton, Brent J. ; Wofford, James L. ; Gosselink, Carol A. ; McClatchey, Maureen W. ; Brekke, Karen ; Conry, Colleen ; Wolfe, Pamela ; Cohen, Stuart J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f86b15ed11b8c6625190597bafa4e6c6778a8b34607fc2b370befa66252a4cda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Administration</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Community health services</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Eligibility</topic><topic>Family Practice (Medicine)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Medical profession</topic><topic>Medical sector</topic><topic>Medical service</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Professional Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Professional recruitment</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Brent J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wofford, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselink, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClatchey, Maureen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conry, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shelton, Brent J.</au><au>Wofford, James L.</au><au>Gosselink, Carol A.</au><au>McClatchey, Maureen W.</au><au>Brekke, Karen</au><au>Conry, Colleen</au><au>Wolfe, Pamela</au><au>Cohen, Stuart J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>79-89</pages><issn>0094-5145</issn><eissn>1573-3610</eissn><coden>JCMHBR</coden><abstract>The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic/Human Science Press</pub><pmid>11936759</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1014598332211</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-5145
ispartof Journal of community health, 2002-04, Vol.27 (2), p.79-89
issn 0094-5145
1573-3610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71592373
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Academic Achievement
Administration
Attitude of Health Personnel
Cancer
Colorado
Community health services
Community Relations
Cooperative Behavior
Data Collection
Educational Psychology
Eligibility
Family Practice (Medicine)
Female
Health Services Research - organization & administration
Humans
Informed Consent
Internal Medicine
Male
Mass Screening - utilization
Medical profession
Medical sector
Medical service
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Physician's Role
Physicians
Physicians, Family - psychology
Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Primary care
Primary Health Care - standards
Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data
Professional recruitment
Questionnaires
Randomized Controlled Trials
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recruitment
Retention
Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
United States
Urban areas
title RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RECRUITMENT%20AND%20RETENTION%20OF%20PHYSICIANS%20FOR%20PRIMARY%20CARE%20RESEARCH&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20health&rft.au=Shelton,%20Brent%20J.&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=79-89&rft.issn=0094-5145&rft.eissn=1573-3610&rft.coden=JCMHBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014598332211&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45444289%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224045003&rft_id=info:pmid/11936759&rft_jstor_id=45444289&rfr_iscdi=true