RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH
The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of community health 2002-04, Vol.27 (2), p.79-89 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Journal of community health |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Shelton, Brent J. Wofford, James L. Gosselink, Carol A. McClatchey, Maureen W. Brekke, Karen Conry, Colleen Wolfe, Pamela Cohen, Stuart J. |
description | The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1014598332211 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71592373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45444289</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45444289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f86b15ed11b8c6625190597bafa4e6c6778a8b34607fc2b370befa66252a4cda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0L9PwlAQB_AXoxFEZydN4-BWvfe7z62pRZpAS0oZmJrX8ppAgGJLB_97HwEdXJzukvvcJfdF6B7DCwZCX_03DJhx5VFKCMYXqI-5pC4VGC5RH0Axl9t5D9207RoAMEhxjXoYKyokV33kp2GQzqNsEsaZ48fvThpmto2S2EmGznS0mEVB5MczZ5ikzjSNJn66cAK7ZeEs9NNgdIuuKr1pzd25DtB8GGbByB0nH1Hgj92SUnpwK08UmJslxoVXCkE4VsCVLHSlmRGlkNLTXkGZAFmVpKASClPpIySalUtNB-j5dHff1J-daQ_5dtWWZrPRO1N3bS4xV4RK-i-0aTEhPbDw6Q9c112zs0_khDBgHOB47fGMumJrlvm-WW1185X_RGjBwwms20Pd_M4ZZ4wRT9FvQGx0XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224045003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shelton, Brent J. ; Wofford, James L. ; Gosselink, Carol A. ; McClatchey, Maureen W. ; Brekke, Karen ; Conry, Colleen ; Wolfe, Pamela ; Cohen, Stuart J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Brent J. ; Wofford, James L. ; Gosselink, Carol A. ; McClatchey, Maureen W. ; Brekke, Karen ; Conry, Colleen ; Wolfe, Pamela ; Cohen, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><description>The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014598332211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11936759</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMHBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Human Science Press</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Administration ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cancer ; Colorado ; Community health services ; Community Relations ; Cooperative Behavior ; Data Collection ; Educational Psychology ; Eligibility ; Family Practice (Medicine) ; Female ; Health Services Research - organization & administration ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Medical profession ; Medical sector ; Medical service ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Physician's Role ; Physicians ; Physicians, Family - psychology ; Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Professional recruitment ; Questionnaires ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recruitment ; Retention ; Rural Population - statistics & numerical data ; United States ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of community health, 2002-04, Vol.27 (2), p.79-89</ispartof><rights>2002 Human Sciences Press, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Human Sciences Press, Inc. Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f86b15ed11b8c6625190597bafa4e6c6778a8b34607fc2b370befa66252a4cda3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45444289$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45444289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11936759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Brent J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wofford, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselink, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClatchey, Maureen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conry, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><title>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</title><title>Journal of community health</title><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><description>The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Administration</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Community health services</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Eligibility</subject><subject>Family Practice (Medicine)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Research - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Medical profession</subject><subject>Medical sector</subject><subject>Medical service</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Professional recruitment</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0094-5145</issn><issn>1573-3610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0L9PwlAQB_AXoxFEZydN4-BWvfe7z62pRZpAS0oZmJrX8ppAgGJLB_97HwEdXJzukvvcJfdF6B7DCwZCX_03DJhx5VFKCMYXqI-5pC4VGC5RH0Axl9t5D9207RoAMEhxjXoYKyokV33kp2GQzqNsEsaZ48fvThpmto2S2EmGznS0mEVB5MczZ5ikzjSNJn66cAK7ZeEs9NNgdIuuKr1pzd25DtB8GGbByB0nH1Hgj92SUnpwK08UmJslxoVXCkE4VsCVLHSlmRGlkNLTXkGZAFmVpKASClPpIySalUtNB-j5dHff1J-daQ_5dtWWZrPRO1N3bS4xV4RK-i-0aTEhPbDw6Q9c112zs0_khDBgHOB47fGMumJrlvm-WW1185X_RGjBwwms20Pd_M4ZZ4wRT9FvQGx0XA</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Shelton, Brent J.</creator><creator>Wofford, James L.</creator><creator>Gosselink, Carol A.</creator><creator>McClatchey, Maureen W.</creator><creator>Brekke, Karen</creator><creator>Conry, Colleen</creator><creator>Wolfe, Pamela</creator><creator>Cohen, Stuart J.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic/Human Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</title><author>Shelton, Brent J. ; Wofford, James L. ; Gosselink, Carol A. ; McClatchey, Maureen W. ; Brekke, Karen ; Conry, Colleen ; Wolfe, Pamela ; Cohen, Stuart J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f86b15ed11b8c6625190597bafa4e6c6778a8b34607fc2b370befa66252a4cda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Administration</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Community health services</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Eligibility</topic><topic>Family Practice (Medicine)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Research - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Medical profession</topic><topic>Medical sector</topic><topic>Medical service</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Professional recruitment</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Brent J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wofford, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselink, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClatchey, Maureen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conry, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shelton, Brent J.</au><au>Wofford, James L.</au><au>Gosselink, Carol A.</au><au>McClatchey, Maureen W.</au><au>Brekke, Karen</au><au>Conry, Colleen</au><au>Wolfe, Pamela</au><au>Cohen, Stuart J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>79-89</pages><issn>0094-5145</issn><eissn>1573-3610</eissn><coden>JCMHBR</coden><abstract>The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a statewide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between trial participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic/Human Science Press</pub><pmid>11936759</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1014598332211</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-5145 |
ispartof | Journal of community health, 2002-04, Vol.27 (2), p.79-89 |
issn | 0094-5145 1573-3610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71592373 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Academic Achievement Administration Attitude of Health Personnel Cancer Colorado Community health services Community Relations Cooperative Behavior Data Collection Educational Psychology Eligibility Family Practice (Medicine) Female Health Services Research - organization & administration Humans Informed Consent Internal Medicine Male Mass Screening - utilization Medical profession Medical sector Medical service Neoplasms - diagnosis Physician's Role Physicians Physicians, Family - psychology Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data Practice Patterns, Physicians Primary care Primary Health Care - standards Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data Professional recruitment Questionnaires Randomized Controlled Trials Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Recruitment Retention Rural Population - statistics & numerical data United States Urban areas |
title | RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RECRUITMENT%20AND%20RETENTION%20OF%20PHYSICIANS%20FOR%20PRIMARY%20CARE%20RESEARCH&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20health&rft.au=Shelton,%20Brent%20J.&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=79-89&rft.issn=0094-5145&rft.eissn=1573-3610&rft.coden=JCMHBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014598332211&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45444289%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224045003&rft_id=info:pmid/11936759&rft_jstor_id=45444289&rfr_iscdi=true |