The left ventricular color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity V(p): in vivo comparison of alternative methods including physiologic implications
Three alternative methods have been proposed for determining the "velocity of propagation" (V(p)) from color M-mode Doppler transmitral flow images. A quantitative intermethod comparison is performed by using a broad class of images encountered in clinical practice. V(p) for 13 subjects wa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.339-348 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 348 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sessoms, Mark W Lisauskas, Jennifer Kovács, Sándor J |
description | Three alternative methods have been proposed for determining the "velocity of propagation" (V(p)) from color M-mode Doppler transmitral flow images. A quantitative intermethod comparison is performed by using a broad class of images encountered in clinical practice. V(p) for 13 subjects was measured by using each of the 3 methods and then statistically compared. Differences among the definitions of V(p) generated large differences in its numerical value when computed from the same image. Depending on the choice of method, the value of V(p) can vary by as much as 250%. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed in the context of the physical meaning of V(p). Development of an optimal version of V(p) and consensus on how it should be defined merits further attention. This will require a multidisciplinary approach encompassing physiology, fluid dynamics, image processing, and mathematical modeling. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71590904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71590904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p542-fa4f3df956364130af96839c0ec02d140d49ace670494e645627d654028664a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRbMA0VL4BeQVgkWkSeI4MTtUnlIRm4ptZOxxa-TExk6K-iN8L-a1Gml0zh3NPcjm0HKaN1XRzLLjGN8AoG4BjrJZUXBKoSjn2ed6i8SiHskOhzEYOVkRiHTWBfKU904huXHeWwxEW_dBfHBebMRo3JAM66QZ9-Tlwl9eEZM2ZueS3HsRTEyE00TYEcOQhB2SHsetUzGR0k7KDBvit_to0rGNkcT03hr5Ex1PskMtbMTTv7nI1ne36-VDvnq-f1xer3Jf0zLXgupKaV6zitGiAqE5aysuASWUqqCgKBcSWQOUU2S0ZmWjWE2hbBmjglaL7Pw3Nr31PmEcu95EidaKAd0Uu6aoOXD4Bs_-wOm1R9X5YHoR9t1_kdUXR55wzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71590904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The left ventricular color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity V(p): in vivo comparison of alternative methods including physiologic implications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sessoms, Mark W ; Lisauskas, Jennifer ; Kovács, Sándor J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sessoms, Mark W ; Lisauskas, Jennifer ; Kovács, Sándor J</creatorcontrib><description>Three alternative methods have been proposed for determining the "velocity of propagation" (V(p)) from color M-mode Doppler transmitral flow images. A quantitative intermethod comparison is performed by using a broad class of images encountered in clinical practice. V(p) for 13 subjects was measured by using each of the 3 methods and then statistically compared. Differences among the definitions of V(p) generated large differences in its numerical value when computed from the same image. Depending on the choice of method, the value of V(p) can vary by as much as 250%. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed in the context of the physical meaning of V(p). Development of an optimal version of V(p) and consensus on how it should be defined merits further attention. This will require a multidisciplinary approach encompassing physiology, fluid dynamics, image processing, and mathematical modeling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-7317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11944012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods ; Humans ; Time Factors ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.339-348</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11944012$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sessoms, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisauskas, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Sándor J</creatorcontrib><title>The left ventricular color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity V(p): in vivo comparison of alternative methods including physiologic implications</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><description>Three alternative methods have been proposed for determining the "velocity of propagation" (V(p)) from color M-mode Doppler transmitral flow images. A quantitative intermethod comparison is performed by using a broad class of images encountered in clinical practice. V(p) for 13 subjects was measured by using each of the 3 methods and then statistically compared. Differences among the definitions of V(p) generated large differences in its numerical value when computed from the same image. Depending on the choice of method, the value of V(p) can vary by as much as 250%. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed in the context of the physical meaning of V(p). Development of an optimal version of V(p) and consensus on how it should be defined merits further attention. This will require a multidisciplinary approach encompassing physiology, fluid dynamics, image processing, and mathematical modeling.</description><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>0894-7317</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRbMA0VL4BeQVgkWkSeI4MTtUnlIRm4ptZOxxa-TExk6K-iN8L-a1Gml0zh3NPcjm0HKaN1XRzLLjGN8AoG4BjrJZUXBKoSjn2ed6i8SiHskOhzEYOVkRiHTWBfKU904huXHeWwxEW_dBfHBebMRo3JAM66QZ9-Tlwl9eEZM2ZueS3HsRTEyE00TYEcOQhB2SHsetUzGR0k7KDBvit_to0rGNkcT03hr5Ex1PskMtbMTTv7nI1ne36-VDvnq-f1xer3Jf0zLXgupKaV6zitGiAqE5aysuASWUqqCgKBcSWQOUU2S0ZmWjWE2hbBmjglaL7Pw3Nr31PmEcu95EidaKAd0Uu6aoOXD4Bs_-wOm1R9X5YHoR9t1_kdUXR55wzg</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>Sessoms, Mark W</creator><creator>Lisauskas, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kovács, Sándor J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>The left ventricular color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity V(p): in vivo comparison of alternative methods including physiologic implications</title><author>Sessoms, Mark W ; Lisauskas, Jennifer ; Kovács, Sándor J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p542-fa4f3df956364130af96839c0ec02d140d49ace670494e645627d654028664a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sessoms, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisauskas, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Sándor J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sessoms, Mark W</au><au>Lisauskas, Jennifer</au><au>Kovács, Sándor J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The left ventricular color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity V(p): in vivo comparison of alternative methods including physiologic implications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>339-348</pages><issn>0894-7317</issn><abstract>Three alternative methods have been proposed for determining the "velocity of propagation" (V(p)) from color M-mode Doppler transmitral flow images. A quantitative intermethod comparison is performed by using a broad class of images encountered in clinical practice. V(p) for 13 subjects was measured by using each of the 3 methods and then statistically compared. Differences among the definitions of V(p) generated large differences in its numerical value when computed from the same image. Depending on the choice of method, the value of V(p) can vary by as much as 250%. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed in the context of the physical meaning of V(p). Development of an optimal version of V(p) and consensus on how it should be defined merits further attention. This will require a multidisciplinary approach encompassing physiology, fluid dynamics, image processing, and mathematical modeling.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>11944012</pmid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-7317 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.339-348 |
issn | 0894-7317 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71590904 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Blood Flow Velocity - physiology Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods Humans Time Factors Ventricular Function, Left - physiology |
title | The left ventricular color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity V(p): in vivo comparison of alternative methods including physiologic implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20left%20ventricular%20color%20M-mode%20Doppler%20flow%20propagation%20velocity%20V(p):%20in%20vivo%20comparison%20of%20alternative%20methods%20including%20physiologic%20implications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Echocardiography&rft.au=Sessoms,%20Mark%20W&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=339-348&rft.issn=0894-7317&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71590904%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71590904&rft_id=info:pmid/11944012&rfr_iscdi=true |