A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer
Objectives: To compare the performance of a new coaxial catheter system with an echo-dense tip (Cook Echo-Tip® catheter) with a Wallace catheter during ultrasound-guided ET. Design: Prospective, randomized study Setting: Private academically affiliated infertility center. Patient(s): Two hundred fif...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2002-04, Vol.77 (4), p.826-830 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 830 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 826 |
| container_title | Fertility and sterility |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Karande, Vishvanath Hazlett, David Vietzke, Mary Gleicher, Norbert |
| description | Objectives: To compare the performance of a new coaxial catheter system with an echo-dense tip (Cook Echo-Tip® catheter) with a Wallace catheter during ultrasound-guided ET.
Design: Prospective, randomized study
Setting: Private academically affiliated infertility center.
Patient(s): Two hundred fifty-one patients undergoing IVF-ET.
Intervention(s): The patients underwent ultrasound-guided ET by a single physician with a standardized technique alternately using one of the two catheters.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates, pregnancy rates, ease of transfer, visualization, and status of catheter tip.
Result(s): The echo-dense tip of the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter was consistently seen with ultrasound guidance, minimizing the need for catheter movement to identify the tip. Implantation rate (30% vs. 35%), clinical pregnancy rate (57% vs. 55%), and ongoing pregnancy rate (49% vs. 47%) were similar in both groups.
Conclusion(s): The Cook Echo-Tip® catheter with its echogenic tip simplifies ultrasound-guided ET, but pregnancy success rates are similar to those obtained when a Wallace catheter is used. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03247-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71589708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028201032472</els_id><sourcerecordid>71589708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9b30e28ef2690ffd096e77bcedf2c034a46eb5e77f231a82a848e62691e9303c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQRi1ERS-FRwB5A4JFYGzHTrKqqqu2VKrEgiKWluOMqSGJg51Uapc8EA_Bk-H7o94lK8vjM2N_x4S8YvCBAVMfvwAwWQCv-Ttg70Hwsir4E7JiUqpCKimektUjckyep_QDABSr-DNyzFgjKlayFfl9RqcY0oR29ndIoxm7MPgH7KgNw2SiT2GkwdH5Fuk30_fGIrUm72aMNMPbg3UIP-m5vQ3FjZ_-_jkALkS69HM0KSxjV3xffJcn49DG-0BzeUwO4wty5Eyf8OV-PSFfL85v1p-K68-XV-uz68KKhs1F0wpAXqPjqgHnOmgUVlVrsXPcgihNqbCVueS4YKbmpi5rVBlm2AgQVpyQt7u5OfCvBdOsB58s5kwjhiXpism6qaDOoNyBNptJEZ2eoh9MvNcM9Ea-3srXG7MamN7K1zz3vd5fsLQDdoeuve0MvNkDJlnTuyzA-nTghBKNrDbc6Y7DrOPOY9TJehxzVB_zR-ku-P885R-PT6NT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71589708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Karande, Vishvanath ; Hazlett, David ; Vietzke, Mary ; Gleicher, Norbert</creator><creatorcontrib>Karande, Vishvanath ; Hazlett, David ; Vietzke, Mary ; Gleicher, Norbert</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To compare the performance of a new coaxial catheter system with an echo-dense tip (Cook Echo-Tip® catheter) with a Wallace catheter during ultrasound-guided ET.
Design: Prospective, randomized study
Setting: Private academically affiliated infertility center.
Patient(s): Two hundred fifty-one patients undergoing IVF-ET.
Intervention(s): The patients underwent ultrasound-guided ET by a single physician with a standardized technique alternately using one of the two catheters.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates, pregnancy rates, ease of transfer, visualization, and status of catheter tip.
Result(s): The echo-dense tip of the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter was consistently seen with ultrasound guidance, minimizing the need for catheter movement to identify the tip. Implantation rate (30% vs. 35%), clinical pregnancy rate (57% vs. 55%), and ongoing pregnancy rate (49% vs. 47%) were similar in both groups.
Conclusion(s): The Cook Echo-Tip® catheter with its echogenic tip simplifies ultrasound-guided ET, but pregnancy success rates are similar to those obtained when a Wallace catheter is used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03247-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11937141</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Catheterization - instrumentation ; Cook Echo-Tip® catheter ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infertility - etiology ; Infertility - therapy ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Ultrasonography ; ultrasound-guided ; Wallace catheter</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2002-04, Vol.77 (4), p.826-830</ispartof><rights>2002 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9b30e28ef2690ffd096e77bcedf2c034a46eb5e77f231a82a848e62691e9303c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9b30e28ef2690ffd096e77bcedf2c034a46eb5e77f231a82a848e62691e9303c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03247-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13639571$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11937141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karande, Vishvanath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazlett, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vietzke, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleicher, Norbert</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objectives: To compare the performance of a new coaxial catheter system with an echo-dense tip (Cook Echo-Tip® catheter) with a Wallace catheter during ultrasound-guided ET.
Design: Prospective, randomized study
Setting: Private academically affiliated infertility center.
Patient(s): Two hundred fifty-one patients undergoing IVF-ET.
Intervention(s): The patients underwent ultrasound-guided ET by a single physician with a standardized technique alternately using one of the two catheters.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates, pregnancy rates, ease of transfer, visualization, and status of catheter tip.
Result(s): The echo-dense tip of the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter was consistently seen with ultrasound guidance, minimizing the need for catheter movement to identify the tip. Implantation rate (30% vs. 35%), clinical pregnancy rate (57% vs. 55%), and ongoing pregnancy rate (49% vs. 47%) were similar in both groups.
Conclusion(s): The Cook Echo-Tip® catheter with its echogenic tip simplifies ultrasound-guided ET, but pregnancy success rates are similar to those obtained when a Wallace catheter is used.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cook Echo-Tip® catheter</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - etiology</subject><subject>Infertility - therapy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>ultrasound-guided</subject><subject>Wallace catheter</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQRi1ERS-FRwB5A4JFYGzHTrKqqqu2VKrEgiKWluOMqSGJg51Uapc8EA_Bk-H7o94lK8vjM2N_x4S8YvCBAVMfvwAwWQCv-Ttg70Hwsir4E7JiUqpCKimektUjckyep_QDABSr-DNyzFgjKlayFfl9RqcY0oR29ndIoxm7MPgH7KgNw2SiT2GkwdH5Fuk30_fGIrUm72aMNMPbg3UIP-m5vQ3FjZ_-_jkALkS69HM0KSxjV3xffJcn49DG-0BzeUwO4wty5Eyf8OV-PSFfL85v1p-K68-XV-uz68KKhs1F0wpAXqPjqgHnOmgUVlVrsXPcgihNqbCVueS4YKbmpi5rVBlm2AgQVpyQt7u5OfCvBdOsB58s5kwjhiXpism6qaDOoNyBNptJEZ2eoh9MvNcM9Ea-3srXG7MamN7K1zz3vd5fsLQDdoeuve0MvNkDJlnTuyzA-nTghBKNrDbc6Y7DrOPOY9TJehxzVB_zR-ku-P885R-PT6NT</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Karande, Vishvanath</creator><creator>Hazlett, David</creator><creator>Vietzke, Mary</creator><creator>Gleicher, Norbert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer</title><author>Karande, Vishvanath ; Hazlett, David ; Vietzke, Mary ; Gleicher, Norbert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-9b30e28ef2690ffd096e77bcedf2c034a46eb5e77f231a82a848e62691e9303c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cook Echo-Tip® catheter</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - etiology</topic><topic>Infertility - therapy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>ultrasound-guided</topic><topic>Wallace catheter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karande, Vishvanath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazlett, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vietzke, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleicher, Norbert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karande, Vishvanath</au><au>Hazlett, David</au><au>Vietzke, Mary</au><au>Gleicher, Norbert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>826</spage><epage>830</epage><pages>826-830</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objectives: To compare the performance of a new coaxial catheter system with an echo-dense tip (Cook Echo-Tip® catheter) with a Wallace catheter during ultrasound-guided ET.
Design: Prospective, randomized study
Setting: Private academically affiliated infertility center.
Patient(s): Two hundred fifty-one patients undergoing IVF-ET.
Intervention(s): The patients underwent ultrasound-guided ET by a single physician with a standardized technique alternately using one of the two catheters.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates, pregnancy rates, ease of transfer, visualization, and status of catheter tip.
Result(s): The echo-dense tip of the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter was consistently seen with ultrasound guidance, minimizing the need for catheter movement to identify the tip. Implantation rate (30% vs. 35%), clinical pregnancy rate (57% vs. 55%), and ongoing pregnancy rate (49% vs. 47%) were similar in both groups.
Conclusion(s): The Cook Echo-Tip® catheter with its echogenic tip simplifies ultrasound-guided ET, but pregnancy success rates are similar to those obtained when a Wallace catheter is used.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11937141</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03247-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
| ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2002-04, Vol.77 (4), p.826-830 |
| issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71589708 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Catheterization - instrumentation Cook Echo-Tip® catheter Embryo Implantation Embryo Transfer Female Fertilization in Vitro Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infertility - etiology Infertility - therapy Medical sciences Pregnancy Prospective Studies Sterility. Assisted procreation Ultrasonography ultrasound-guided Wallace catheter |
| title | A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip® catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20randomized%20comparison%20of%20the%20Wallace%20catheter%20and%20the%20Cook%20Echo-Tip%C2%AE%20catheter%20for%20ultrasound-guided%20embryo%20transfer&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Karande,%20Vishvanath&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=826&rft.epage=830&rft.pages=826-830&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03247-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71589708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71589708&rft_id=info:pmid/11937141&rft_els_id=S0015028201032472&rfr_iscdi=true |