OSTEOBLASTS SUBJECTED TO SPACEFLIGHT AND SIMULATED SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH CONDITIONS
To understand further the effects of spaceflight on osteoblast-enriched cultures, normal chicken calvarial osteoblasts were flown aboard shuttle flight STS-77, and the total number of attached cells was determined. Spaceflight and control cultures were chemically fixed 3 h and 3 d after launch. Thes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal 2003-11, Vol.39 (10), p.454-459 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 459 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 454 |
container_title | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | KACENA, MELISSA A TODD, PAUL LANDIS, WILLIAM J |
description | To understand further the effects of spaceflight on osteoblast-enriched cultures, normal chicken calvarial osteoblasts were flown aboard shuttle flight STS-77, and the total number of attached cells was determined. Spaceflight and control cultures were chemically fixed 3 h and 3 d after launch. These fixed cultures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM analysis showed that with just 3 d of exposure to spaceflight, coverslip cultures contained 300 ± 100 cells/mm2, whereas 1G control samples contained a confluent monolayer of cells (2400 ± 200 cells/mm2). Although the cultures flown in space experienced a drastic decline in cell number in just 3 d, without further experimentation it was impossible to determine whether the decline was a result of microgravity, the harsh launch environment, or some combination of these factors. Therefore, this research attempted to address the effect of launch by subjecting osteoblasts to conditions simulating shuttle launch accelerations, noise, and vibrations. No differences, compared with controls, were seen in the number of total or viable cells after exposure to these various launch conditions. Taken together, these data indicate that the magnitude of gravitational loading (3G maximum) and vibration (7.83G rms maximum) resulting from launch does not adversely affect osteoblasts in terms of total or viable cell number immediately, but launch conditions, or the microgravity environment itself, may start a cascade of events that over several d contributes to cell loss. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<0454:OSTSAS>2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71578671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4295505</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4295505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b412t-a228025b20def8bcc5185945387b242ad7728f391ab680fb49fd13fb035df8a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkVGr0zAYhoMonuP0H4gUL0QvuvPlS9IkKkJP17NV6iq2Be9Cs7awsa3Hdrvw35vacQRvBHPzBd6H90t4CLmhMKeo4YYKznwJwfe3CMDeAdMfgQv-PsuLPMw_4RzmUfYBH5HrB_Kxu4OkPgYarsizYdiBO5oGT8kVFZRKZHBNvrmGOLtNQ1fk5eXt5zgq4oVXZF7-NYziuzRZrgovXC-8PPlSpuEY_k68fFUWRRp7aViuo5UXZetFUiTZOn9OnrTVfmheXOaMlHdxEa38NFsmUZj6llM8-RWiAhQWoW5aZTcbQZXQXDAlLXKsailRtUzTygYKWst1W1PWWmCiblXF2Yy8mXrv--7HuRlO5rAdNs1-Xx2b7jwYSYVUgaT_BKlmjNNAOvD1X-CuO_dH9wmDjOtAIFUOWk7Qpu-GoW9ac99vD1X_01AwoywzKjCjAjPKMk6WGWWZSZZBAybKXOOMvLqsO9tDU__pudhxwMsJ2A2nrn_IOWohQLg4nmK77bpj89_v-AWlvKhk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234965218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OSTEOBLASTS SUBJECTED TO SPACEFLIGHT AND SIMULATED SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH CONDITIONS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>KACENA, MELISSA A ; TODD, PAUL ; LANDIS, WILLIAM J</creator><creatorcontrib>KACENA, MELISSA A ; TODD, PAUL ; LANDIS, WILLIAM J</creatorcontrib><description>To understand further the effects of spaceflight on osteoblast-enriched cultures, normal chicken calvarial osteoblasts were flown aboard shuttle flight STS-77, and the total number of attached cells was determined. Spaceflight and control cultures were chemically fixed 3 h and 3 d after launch. These fixed cultures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM analysis showed that with just 3 d of exposure to spaceflight, coverslip cultures contained 300 ± 100 cells/mm2, whereas 1G control samples contained a confluent monolayer of cells (2400 ± 200 cells/mm2). Although the cultures flown in space experienced a drastic decline in cell number in just 3 d, without further experimentation it was impossible to determine whether the decline was a result of microgravity, the harsh launch environment, or some combination of these factors. Therefore, this research attempted to address the effect of launch by subjecting osteoblasts to conditions simulating shuttle launch accelerations, noise, and vibrations. No differences, compared with controls, were seen in the number of total or viable cells after exposure to these various launch conditions. Taken together, these data indicate that the magnitude of gravitational loading (3G maximum) and vibration (7.83G rms maximum) resulting from launch does not adversely affect osteoblasts in terms of total or viable cell number immediately, but launch conditions, or the microgravity environment itself, may start a cascade of events that over several d contributes to cell loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-2690</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-706X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-706X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<0454:OSTSAS>2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15117230</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IVCAED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Society for In Vitro Biology</publisher><subject>acceleration ; Animals ; bone cells ; Bones ; Cell Adhesion ; Cell growth ; CELL GROWTH/DIFFERENTIATION/APOPTOSIS ; Cell lines ; Chick Embryo ; Cultured cells ; Microgravity ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Osteoblasts ; Osteoblasts - cytology ; Osteoblasts - physiology ; Osteoblasts - ultrastructure ; Space Flight ; Space Simulation ; Spacecraft launching ; Vehicular flight ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2003-11, Vol.39 (10), p.454-459</ispartof><rights>Society for In Vitro Biology</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Society for In Vitro Biology</rights><rights>Copyright Society for In Vitro Biology Nov/Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b412t-a228025b20def8bcc5185945387b242ad7728f391ab680fb49fd13fb035df8a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<0454:OSTSAS>2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4295505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,26978,27924,27925,52363,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15117230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KACENA, MELISSA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TODD, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, WILLIAM J</creatorcontrib><title>OSTEOBLASTS SUBJECTED TO SPACEFLIGHT AND SIMULATED SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH CONDITIONS</title><title>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</title><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><description>To understand further the effects of spaceflight on osteoblast-enriched cultures, normal chicken calvarial osteoblasts were flown aboard shuttle flight STS-77, and the total number of attached cells was determined. Spaceflight and control cultures were chemically fixed 3 h and 3 d after launch. These fixed cultures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM analysis showed that with just 3 d of exposure to spaceflight, coverslip cultures contained 300 ± 100 cells/mm2, whereas 1G control samples contained a confluent monolayer of cells (2400 ± 200 cells/mm2). Although the cultures flown in space experienced a drastic decline in cell number in just 3 d, without further experimentation it was impossible to determine whether the decline was a result of microgravity, the harsh launch environment, or some combination of these factors. Therefore, this research attempted to address the effect of launch by subjecting osteoblasts to conditions simulating shuttle launch accelerations, noise, and vibrations. No differences, compared with controls, were seen in the number of total or viable cells after exposure to these various launch conditions. Taken together, these data indicate that the magnitude of gravitational loading (3G maximum) and vibration (7.83G rms maximum) resulting from launch does not adversely affect osteoblasts in terms of total or viable cell number immediately, but launch conditions, or the microgravity environment itself, may start a cascade of events that over several d contributes to cell loss.</description><subject>acceleration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bone cells</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>CELL GROWTH/DIFFERENTIATION/APOPTOSIS</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Chick Embryo</subject><subject>Cultured cells</subject><subject>Microgravity</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Osteoblasts</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - physiology</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Space Flight</subject><subject>Space Simulation</subject><subject>Spacecraft launching</subject><subject>Vehicular flight</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1071-2690</issn><issn>1543-706X</issn><issn>1543-706X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkVGr0zAYhoMonuP0H4gUL0QvuvPlS9IkKkJP17NV6iq2Be9Cs7awsa3Hdrvw35vacQRvBHPzBd6H90t4CLmhMKeo4YYKznwJwfe3CMDeAdMfgQv-PsuLPMw_4RzmUfYBH5HrB_Kxu4OkPgYarsizYdiBO5oGT8kVFZRKZHBNvrmGOLtNQ1fk5eXt5zgq4oVXZF7-NYziuzRZrgovXC-8PPlSpuEY_k68fFUWRRp7aViuo5UXZetFUiTZOn9OnrTVfmheXOaMlHdxEa38NFsmUZj6llM8-RWiAhQWoW5aZTcbQZXQXDAlLXKsailRtUzTygYKWst1W1PWWmCiblXF2Yy8mXrv--7HuRlO5rAdNs1-Xx2b7jwYSYVUgaT_BKlmjNNAOvD1X-CuO_dH9wmDjOtAIFUOWk7Qpu-GoW9ac99vD1X_01AwoywzKjCjAjPKMk6WGWWZSZZBAybKXOOMvLqsO9tDU__pudhxwMsJ2A2nrn_IOWohQLg4nmK77bpj89_v-AWlvKhk</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>KACENA, MELISSA A</creator><creator>TODD, PAUL</creator><creator>LANDIS, WILLIAM J</creator><general>Society for In Vitro Biology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>OSTEOBLASTS SUBJECTED TO SPACEFLIGHT AND SIMULATED SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH CONDITIONS</title><author>KACENA, MELISSA A ; TODD, PAUL ; LANDIS, WILLIAM J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b412t-a228025b20def8bcc5185945387b242ad7728f391ab680fb49fd13fb035df8a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>acceleration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bone cells</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>CELL GROWTH/DIFFERENTIATION/APOPTOSIS</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Chick Embryo</topic><topic>Cultured cells</topic><topic>Microgravity</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Osteoblasts</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - physiology</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Space Flight</topic><topic>Space Simulation</topic><topic>Spacecraft launching</topic><topic>Vehicular flight</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KACENA, MELISSA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TODD, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, WILLIAM J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KACENA, MELISSA A</au><au>TODD, PAUL</au><au>LANDIS, WILLIAM J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OSTEOBLASTS SUBJECTED TO SPACEFLIGHT AND SIMULATED SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH CONDITIONS</atitle><jtitle>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</jtitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>454-459</pages><issn>1071-2690</issn><issn>1543-706X</issn><eissn>1543-706X</eissn><coden>IVCAED</coden><abstract>To understand further the effects of spaceflight on osteoblast-enriched cultures, normal chicken calvarial osteoblasts were flown aboard shuttle flight STS-77, and the total number of attached cells was determined. Spaceflight and control cultures were chemically fixed 3 h and 3 d after launch. These fixed cultures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM analysis showed that with just 3 d of exposure to spaceflight, coverslip cultures contained 300 ± 100 cells/mm2, whereas 1G control samples contained a confluent monolayer of cells (2400 ± 200 cells/mm2). Although the cultures flown in space experienced a drastic decline in cell number in just 3 d, without further experimentation it was impossible to determine whether the decline was a result of microgravity, the harsh launch environment, or some combination of these factors. Therefore, this research attempted to address the effect of launch by subjecting osteoblasts to conditions simulating shuttle launch accelerations, noise, and vibrations. No differences, compared with controls, were seen in the number of total or viable cells after exposure to these various launch conditions. Taken together, these data indicate that the magnitude of gravitational loading (3G maximum) and vibration (7.83G rms maximum) resulting from launch does not adversely affect osteoblasts in terms of total or viable cell number immediately, but launch conditions, or the microgravity environment itself, may start a cascade of events that over several d contributes to cell loss.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Society for In Vitro Biology</pub><pmid>15117230</pmid><doi>10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<0454:OSTSAS>2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1071-2690 |
ispartof | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2003-11, Vol.39 (10), p.454-459 |
issn | 1071-2690 1543-706X 1543-706X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71578671 |
source | MEDLINE; BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | acceleration Animals bone cells Bones Cell Adhesion Cell growth CELL GROWTH/DIFFERENTIATION/APOPTOSIS Cell lines Chick Embryo Cultured cells Microgravity Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Osteoblasts Osteoblasts - cytology Osteoblasts - physiology Osteoblasts - ultrastructure Space Flight Space Simulation Spacecraft launching Vehicular flight Vibration |
title | OSTEOBLASTS SUBJECTED TO SPACEFLIGHT AND SIMULATED SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH CONDITIONS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A42%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OSTEOBLASTS%20SUBJECTED%20TO%20SPACEFLIGHT%20AND%20SIMULATED%20SPACE%20SHUTTLE%20LAUNCH%20CONDITIONS&rft.jtitle=In%20vitro%20cellular%20&%20developmental%20biology.%20Animal&rft.au=KACENA,%20MELISSA%20A&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=454-459&rft.issn=1071-2690&rft.eissn=1543-706X&rft.coden=IVCAED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039%3C0454:OSTSAS%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4295505%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234965218&rft_id=info:pmid/15117230&rft_jstor_id=4295505&rfr_iscdi=true |