INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES

Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2003-12, Vol.19 (4), p.613-623
Hauptverfasser: Ramsay, Craig R., Matowe, Lloyd, Grilli, Roberto, Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Thomas, Ruth E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 623
container_issue 4
container_start_page 613
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 19
creator Ramsay, Craig R.
Matowe, Lloyd
Grilli, Roberto
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Thomas, Ruth E.
description Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462303000576
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71575068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462303000576</cupid><sourcerecordid>71575068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAD2CDLCTYBe6tEzthF1K3yZAmEHtmNCsrDxd1po8hbiXY8stx1YpBIFa2dL57zz06nvcS4R0C8vcSxowFbEyBAkDI2SNvhAFHn9EgeuyNDrJ_0M-8Z9beAiCFGJ56ZxhC7HA-8n7mpRJ1fflZiQlR-VwQKepcSDIRMp-VkuQlyURSqIwokWZlVVSzG5JIKaSci1J9IIX7VQ6c1tWcqOuKyBupxDxReUpqcZWLa0mqKfkosuQqr2qSZkk5czaqTpSYOavn3pNFs7Lmxek99y6nQqWZ76zyNCn8Lgxh5zccAwosNpx36OJyw-MxbRmPoev7MTYMO9q3ELUce4xaF94sENsF9DRgIdBz7-1x7_2w_bY3dqfXS9uZ1arZmO3eao4hD4FFDnz9F3i73Q8bd5seI1AeY8QdhEeoG7bWDmah74fluhl-aAR9aEf_046beXVavG_Xpn-YONXhgDcnoLFds1oMzaZb2j84RmOHOc4_cku7M99_681wp53MQ81mX_Sn-iINJheFRsfT07HNuh2W_VfzEOn_5_4CSkioxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210379187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Ramsay, Craig R. ; Matowe, Lloyd ; Grilli, Roberto ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Thomas, Ruth E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Craig R. ; Matowe, Lloyd ; Grilli, Roberto ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Thomas, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462303000576</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15095767</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJTCEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis. Health state ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Effectiveness ; Epidemiology ; Family physicians ; General aspects ; GENERAL ESSAYS ; Graphs ; Health Services - utilization ; Intervention ; Investigations ; Mass Media ; Medical sciences ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Professional practice ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regression Analysis ; Research Design ; Research methodology ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Studies ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods ; Time Factors ; Time series ; Trends ; Validity</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2003-12, Vol.19 (4), p.613-623</ispartof><rights>2004 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462303000576/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,27911,27912,55615</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15639673$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15095767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matowe, Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grilli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><title>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.</description><subject>Analysis. Health state</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>GENERAL ESSAYS</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAD2CDLCTYBe6tEzthF1K3yZAmEHtmNCsrDxd1po8hbiXY8stx1YpBIFa2dL57zz06nvcS4R0C8vcSxowFbEyBAkDI2SNvhAFHn9EgeuyNDrJ_0M-8Z9beAiCFGJ56ZxhC7HA-8n7mpRJ1fflZiQlR-VwQKepcSDIRMp-VkuQlyURSqIwokWZlVVSzG5JIKaSci1J9IIX7VQ6c1tWcqOuKyBupxDxReUpqcZWLa0mqKfkosuQqr2qSZkk5czaqTpSYOavn3pNFs7Lmxek99y6nQqWZ76zyNCn8Lgxh5zccAwosNpx36OJyw-MxbRmPoev7MTYMO9q3ELUce4xaF94sENsF9DRgIdBz7-1x7_2w_bY3dqfXS9uZ1arZmO3eao4hD4FFDnz9F3i73Q8bd5seI1AeY8QdhEeoG7bWDmah74fluhl-aAR9aEf_046beXVavG_Xpn-YONXhgDcnoLFds1oMzaZb2j84RmOHOc4_cku7M99_681wp53MQ81mX_Sn-iINJheFRsfT07HNuh2W_VfzEOn_5_4CSkioxg</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Ramsay, Craig R.</creator><creator>Matowe, Lloyd</creator><creator>Grilli, Roberto</creator><creator>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</creator><creator>Thomas, Ruth E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</title><author>Ramsay, Craig R. ; Matowe, Lloyd ; Grilli, Roberto ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Thomas, Ruth E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analysis. Health state</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>GENERAL ESSAYS</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matowe, Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grilli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramsay, Craig R.</au><au>Matowe, Lloyd</au><au>Grilli, Roberto</au><au>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</au><au>Thomas, Ruth E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>613-623</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><coden>IJTCEK</coden><abstract>Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>15095767</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462303000576</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2003-12, Vol.19 (4), p.613-623
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71575068
source MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection
subjects Analysis. Health state
Biological and medical sciences
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data analysis
Data collection
Diffusion of Innovation
Effectiveness
Epidemiology
Family physicians
General aspects
GENERAL ESSAYS
Graphs
Health Services - utilization
Intervention
Investigations
Mass Media
Medical sciences
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Professional practice
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Regression Analysis
Research Design
Research methodology
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Studies
Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods
Time Factors
Time series
Trends
Validity
title INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A01%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INTERRUPTED%20TIME%20SERIES%20DESIGNS%20IN%20HEALTH%20TECHNOLOGY%20ASSESSMENT:%20LESSONS%20FROM%20TWO%20SYSTEMATIC%20REVIEWS%20OF%20BEHAVIOR%20CHANGE%20STRATEGIES&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Ramsay,%20Craig%20R.&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=613-623&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft.coden=IJTCEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462303000576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71575068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210379187&rft_id=info:pmid/15095767&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462303000576&rfr_iscdi=true