INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES
Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2003-12, Vol.19 (4), p.613-623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Ramsay, Craig R. Matowe, Lloyd Grilli, Roberto Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Thomas, Ruth E. |
description | Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462303000576 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71575068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462303000576</cupid><sourcerecordid>71575068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAD2CDLCTYBe6tEzthF1K3yZAmEHtmNCsrDxd1po8hbiXY8stx1YpBIFa2dL57zz06nvcS4R0C8vcSxowFbEyBAkDI2SNvhAFHn9EgeuyNDrJ_0M-8Z9beAiCFGJ56ZxhC7HA-8n7mpRJ1fflZiQlR-VwQKepcSDIRMp-VkuQlyURSqIwokWZlVVSzG5JIKaSci1J9IIX7VQ6c1tWcqOuKyBupxDxReUpqcZWLa0mqKfkosuQqr2qSZkk5czaqTpSYOavn3pNFs7Lmxek99y6nQqWZ76zyNCn8Lgxh5zccAwosNpx36OJyw-MxbRmPoev7MTYMO9q3ELUce4xaF94sENsF9DRgIdBz7-1x7_2w_bY3dqfXS9uZ1arZmO3eao4hD4FFDnz9F3i73Q8bd5seI1AeY8QdhEeoG7bWDmah74fluhl-aAR9aEf_046beXVavG_Xpn-YONXhgDcnoLFds1oMzaZb2j84RmOHOc4_cku7M99_681wp53MQ81mX_Sn-iINJheFRsfT07HNuh2W_VfzEOn_5_4CSkioxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210379187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Ramsay, Craig R. ; Matowe, Lloyd ; Grilli, Roberto ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Thomas, Ruth E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Craig R. ; Matowe, Lloyd ; Grilli, Roberto ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Thomas, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462303000576</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15095767</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJTCEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis. Health state ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Effectiveness ; Epidemiology ; Family physicians ; General aspects ; GENERAL ESSAYS ; Graphs ; Health Services - utilization ; Intervention ; Investigations ; Mass Media ; Medical sciences ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Professional practice ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regression Analysis ; Research Design ; Research methodology ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Studies ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods ; Time Factors ; Time series ; Trends ; Validity</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2003-12, Vol.19 (4), p.613-623</ispartof><rights>2004 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462303000576/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,27911,27912,55615</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15639673$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15095767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matowe, Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grilli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><title>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.</description><subject>Analysis. Health state</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>GENERAL ESSAYS</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAD2CDLCTYBe6tEzthF1K3yZAmEHtmNCsrDxd1po8hbiXY8stx1YpBIFa2dL57zz06nvcS4R0C8vcSxowFbEyBAkDI2SNvhAFHn9EgeuyNDrJ_0M-8Z9beAiCFGJ56ZxhC7HA-8n7mpRJ1fflZiQlR-VwQKepcSDIRMp-VkuQlyURSqIwokWZlVVSzG5JIKaSci1J9IIX7VQ6c1tWcqOuKyBupxDxReUpqcZWLa0mqKfkosuQqr2qSZkk5czaqTpSYOavn3pNFs7Lmxek99y6nQqWZ76zyNCn8Lgxh5zccAwosNpx36OJyw-MxbRmPoev7MTYMO9q3ELUce4xaF94sENsF9DRgIdBz7-1x7_2w_bY3dqfXS9uZ1arZmO3eao4hD4FFDnz9F3i73Q8bd5seI1AeY8QdhEeoG7bWDmah74fluhl-aAR9aEf_046beXVavG_Xpn-YONXhgDcnoLFds1oMzaZb2j84RmOHOc4_cku7M99_681wp53MQ81mX_Sn-iINJheFRsfT07HNuh2W_VfzEOn_5_4CSkioxg</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Ramsay, Craig R.</creator><creator>Matowe, Lloyd</creator><creator>Grilli, Roberto</creator><creator>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</creator><creator>Thomas, Ruth E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</title><author>Ramsay, Craig R. ; Matowe, Lloyd ; Grilli, Roberto ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Thomas, Ruth E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-a7143069e77c10007e7923b6790cdd21a61c3db08b71d18b026ef11bf0d346503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analysis. Health state</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>GENERAL ESSAYS</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matowe, Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grilli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramsay, Craig R.</au><au>Matowe, Lloyd</au><au>Grilli, Roberto</au><au>Grimshaw, Jeremy M.</au><au>Thomas, Ruth E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>613-623</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><coden>IJTCEK</coden><abstract>Objectives: In an interrupted time series (ITS) design, data are collected at multiple instances over time before and after an intervention to detect whether the intervention has an effect significantly greater than the underlying secular trend. We critically reviewed the methodological quality of ITS designs using studies included in two systematic reviews (a review of mass media interventions and a review of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies). Methods: Quality criteria were developed, and data were abstracted from each study. If the primary study analyzed the ITS design inappropriately, we reanalyzed the results by using time series regression. Results: Twenty mass media studies and thirty-eight guideline studies were included. A total of 66% of ITS studies did not rule out the threat that another event could have occurred at the point of intervention. Thirty-three studies were reanalyzed, of which eight had significant preintervention trends. All of the studies were considered “effective” in the original report, but approximately half of the reanalyzed studies showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ITS designs are often analyzed inappropriately, underpowered, and poorly reported in implementation research. We have illustrated a framework for appraising ITS designs, and more widespread adoption of this framework would strengthen reviews that use ITS designs.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>15095767</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462303000576</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2003-12, Vol.19 (4), p.613-623 |
issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71575068 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection |
subjects | Analysis. Health state Biological and medical sciences Cross-Sectional Studies Data analysis Data collection Diffusion of Innovation Effectiveness Epidemiology Family physicians General aspects GENERAL ESSAYS Graphs Health Services - utilization Intervention Investigations Mass Media Medical sciences Practice Guidelines as Topic Professional practice Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Regression Analysis Research Design Research methodology Statistical analysis Statistical methods Studies Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods Time Factors Time series Trends Validity |
title | INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A01%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INTERRUPTED%20TIME%20SERIES%20DESIGNS%20IN%20HEALTH%20TECHNOLOGY%20ASSESSMENT:%20LESSONS%20FROM%20TWO%20SYSTEMATIC%20REVIEWS%20OF%20BEHAVIOR%20CHANGE%20STRATEGIES&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Ramsay,%20Craig%20R.&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=613-623&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft.coden=IJTCEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462303000576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71575068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210379187&rft_id=info:pmid/15095767&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462303000576&rfr_iscdi=true |