Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark
Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian id...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Early science and medicine 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.210-252 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 210 |
container_title | Early science and medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Shackelford, Jole |
description | Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157338203X00071 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71561968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4130380</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4130380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b305t-71c71f2092bffc795566b6fde29e066811a64fe052048e733e10f54eed3138673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1v1DAQxSMEoh9w5oKQT9xC7Ti2kyPalhZYqRUsqOJiOclY8TZrL7aDuv89U-2qlZA4-Gvez6M3ryjeMPqBMcnPmFCcNxXlt5RSxZ4Vxw-VEkv8Od55w0tVV-qoOElpjYjgqn5ZHDFBa05FfVzc3ZhoepiSM96lDTF-IHkEch3zGIZwT5YzPqPx5Busoc8ueBIs-emymcjN6KaQwnbcEefJhYnTjnyHP-Az4BrLBe5z3JFz8BsT714VL6yZErw-nKfFj08Xq8VVuby-_Lz4uCw79JRLxXrFbEXbqrO2V60QUnbSDlC1QKVsGDOytkBFResGcH5g1IoaYOA4sFT8tHi_77uN4fcMKeuNSzjjZDyEOWnFhGStbBA824N9DClFsHobHTrdaUb1Q776n3zxx7tD67nbwPDEHwJF4O0eWKcc4qNeM055Q1Eu97JLGe4fZQxHo3El9JevK311y1qqzlf61xPfRTdNeh3m6DG6__r7C6gpm1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71561968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shackelford, Jole</creator><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jole</creatorcontrib><description>Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-7427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1383-7427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157338203X00071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15043054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Aristotelianism ; Chemicals ; Denmark ; History of medicine ; History, 17th Century ; Lutheranism ; Medicine ; Natural philosophy ; Orthodoxy ; Paracelsus ; Protestantism - history ; Religion and Science ; Renaissance philosophy ; Rosicrucian ; Rosicrucianism ; Theology ; Worms</subject><ispartof>Early science and medicine, 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.210-252</ispartof><rights>2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b305t-71c71f2092bffc795566b6fde29e066811a64fe052048e733e10f54eed3138673</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4130380$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4130380$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15043054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jole</creatorcontrib><title>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</title><title>Early science and medicine</title><addtitle>ESM</addtitle><description>Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.</description><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History, 17th Century</subject><subject>Lutheranism</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Natural philosophy</subject><subject>Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Paracelsus</subject><subject>Protestantism - history</subject><subject>Religion and Science</subject><subject>Renaissance philosophy</subject><subject>Rosicrucian</subject><subject>Rosicrucianism</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Worms</subject><issn>1383-7427</issn><issn>1573-3823</issn><issn>1383-7427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1v1DAQxSMEoh9w5oKQT9xC7Ti2kyPalhZYqRUsqOJiOclY8TZrL7aDuv89U-2qlZA4-Gvez6M3ryjeMPqBMcnPmFCcNxXlt5RSxZ4Vxw-VEkv8Od55w0tVV-qoOElpjYjgqn5ZHDFBa05FfVzc3ZhoepiSM96lDTF-IHkEch3zGIZwT5YzPqPx5Busoc8ueBIs-emymcjN6KaQwnbcEefJhYnTjnyHP-Az4BrLBe5z3JFz8BsT714VL6yZErw-nKfFj08Xq8VVuby-_Lz4uCw79JRLxXrFbEXbqrO2V60QUnbSDlC1QKVsGDOytkBFResGcH5g1IoaYOA4sFT8tHi_77uN4fcMKeuNSzjjZDyEOWnFhGStbBA824N9DClFsHobHTrdaUb1Q776n3zxx7tD67nbwPDEHwJF4O0eWKcc4qNeM055Q1Eu97JLGe4fZQxHo3El9JevK311y1qqzlf61xPfRTdNeh3m6DG6__r7C6gpm1c</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Shackelford, Jole</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>Brill Academic Publishers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</title><author>Shackelford, Jole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b305t-71c71f2092bffc795566b6fde29e066811a64fe052048e733e10f54eed3138673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History, 17th Century</topic><topic>Lutheranism</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Natural philosophy</topic><topic>Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Paracelsus</topic><topic>Protestantism - history</topic><topic>Religion and Science</topic><topic>Renaissance philosophy</topic><topic>Rosicrucian</topic><topic>Rosicrucianism</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Worms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jole</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Early science and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shackelford, Jole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</atitle><jtitle>Early science and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>ESM</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>210-252</pages><issn>1383-7427</issn><eissn>1573-3823</eissn><eissn>1383-7427</eissn><abstract>Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><pmid>15043054</pmid><doi>10.1163/157338203X00071</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1383-7427 |
ispartof | Early science and medicine, 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.210-252 |
issn | 1383-7427 1573-3823 1383-7427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71561968 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aristotelianism Chemicals Denmark History of medicine History, 17th Century Lutheranism Medicine Natural philosophy Orthodoxy Paracelsus Protestantism - history Religion and Science Renaissance philosophy Rosicrucian Rosicrucianism Theology Worms |
title | Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paracelsianism%20and%20the%20Orthodox%20Lutheran%20Rejection%20of%20Vital%20Philosophy%20in%20Early%20Seventeenth-Century%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=Early%20science%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Shackelford,%20Jole&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=210-252&rft.issn=1383-7427&rft.eissn=1573-3823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157338203X00071&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4130380%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71561968&rft_id=info:pmid/15043054&rft_jstor_id=4130380&rfr_iscdi=true |