Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark

Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian id...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Early science and medicine 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.210-252
1. Verfasser: Shackelford, Jole
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 3
container_start_page 210
container_title Early science and medicine
container_volume 8
creator Shackelford, Jole
description Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/157338203X00071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71561968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4130380</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4130380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b305t-71c71f2092bffc795566b6fde29e066811a64fe052048e733e10f54eed3138673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1v1DAQxSMEoh9w5oKQT9xC7Ti2kyPalhZYqRUsqOJiOclY8TZrL7aDuv89U-2qlZA4-Gvez6M3ryjeMPqBMcnPmFCcNxXlt5RSxZ4Vxw-VEkv8Od55w0tVV-qoOElpjYjgqn5ZHDFBa05FfVzc3ZhoepiSM96lDTF-IHkEch3zGIZwT5YzPqPx5Busoc8ueBIs-emymcjN6KaQwnbcEefJhYnTjnyHP-Az4BrLBe5z3JFz8BsT714VL6yZErw-nKfFj08Xq8VVuby-_Lz4uCw79JRLxXrFbEXbqrO2V60QUnbSDlC1QKVsGDOytkBFResGcH5g1IoaYOA4sFT8tHi_77uN4fcMKeuNSzjjZDyEOWnFhGStbBA824N9DClFsHobHTrdaUb1Q776n3zxx7tD67nbwPDEHwJF4O0eWKcc4qNeM055Q1Eu97JLGe4fZQxHo3El9JevK311y1qqzlf61xPfRTdNeh3m6DG6__r7C6gpm1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71561968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shackelford, Jole</creator><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jole</creatorcontrib><description>Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-7427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1383-7427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157338203X00071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15043054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Aristotelianism ; Chemicals ; Denmark ; History of medicine ; History, 17th Century ; Lutheranism ; Medicine ; Natural philosophy ; Orthodoxy ; Paracelsus ; Protestantism - history ; Religion and Science ; Renaissance philosophy ; Rosicrucian ; Rosicrucianism ; Theology ; Worms</subject><ispartof>Early science and medicine, 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.210-252</ispartof><rights>2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b305t-71c71f2092bffc795566b6fde29e066811a64fe052048e733e10f54eed3138673</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4130380$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4130380$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15043054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jole</creatorcontrib><title>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</title><title>Early science and medicine</title><addtitle>ESM</addtitle><description>Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.</description><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History, 17th Century</subject><subject>Lutheranism</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Natural philosophy</subject><subject>Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Paracelsus</subject><subject>Protestantism - history</subject><subject>Religion and Science</subject><subject>Renaissance philosophy</subject><subject>Rosicrucian</subject><subject>Rosicrucianism</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Worms</subject><issn>1383-7427</issn><issn>1573-3823</issn><issn>1383-7427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1v1DAQxSMEoh9w5oKQT9xC7Ti2kyPalhZYqRUsqOJiOclY8TZrL7aDuv89U-2qlZA4-Gvez6M3ryjeMPqBMcnPmFCcNxXlt5RSxZ4Vxw-VEkv8Od55w0tVV-qoOElpjYjgqn5ZHDFBa05FfVzc3ZhoepiSM96lDTF-IHkEch3zGIZwT5YzPqPx5Busoc8ueBIs-emymcjN6KaQwnbcEefJhYnTjnyHP-Az4BrLBe5z3JFz8BsT714VL6yZErw-nKfFj08Xq8VVuby-_Lz4uCw79JRLxXrFbEXbqrO2V60QUnbSDlC1QKVsGDOytkBFResGcH5g1IoaYOA4sFT8tHi_77uN4fcMKeuNSzjjZDyEOWnFhGStbBA824N9DClFsHobHTrdaUb1Q776n3zxx7tD67nbwPDEHwJF4O0eWKcc4qNeM055Q1Eu97JLGe4fZQxHo3El9JevK311y1qqzlf61xPfRTdNeh3m6DG6__r7C6gpm1c</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Shackelford, Jole</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>Brill Academic Publishers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</title><author>Shackelford, Jole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b305t-71c71f2092bffc795566b6fde29e066811a64fe052048e733e10f54eed3138673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History, 17th Century</topic><topic>Lutheranism</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Natural philosophy</topic><topic>Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Paracelsus</topic><topic>Protestantism - history</topic><topic>Religion and Science</topic><topic>Renaissance philosophy</topic><topic>Rosicrucian</topic><topic>Rosicrucianism</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Worms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jole</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Early science and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shackelford, Jole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark</atitle><jtitle>Early science and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>ESM</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>210-252</pages><issn>1383-7427</issn><eissn>1573-3823</eissn><eissn>1383-7427</eissn><abstract>Paracelsian medicine and natural philosophy was formed during the Radical Reformation and incorporated metaphysical propositions that were incompatible with the Lutheran confession as codified in the Confessio Augustana and elaborated in the ultra-orthodox Formula of Concord. Although Paracelsian ideas and practices were endorsed by important philosophers and physicians in late-sixteenth century Denmark without raising serious alarm, the imposition of strict Lutheran orthodoxy in the Danish Church and a concomitant resurgence of Aristotelian philosophy drew attention to the religious heterodoxies inherent in Paracelsianism. Unacceptable theological and religious propositions, which reached Denmark in Rosicrucian texts and were implicit in certain medical and philosophi treatises, were in many cases inseparable from core Paracelsian concepts, with the result that Danish academic philosophers, physicians, and theologians rejected Paracelsian ideas except where they could be accommodated to acceptable Galenic and Aristotelian interpretations. When this was done, such ideas are arguably no longer Paracelsian in any meaningful way.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><pmid>15043054</pmid><doi>10.1163/157338203X00071</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1383-7427
ispartof Early science and medicine, 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.210-252
issn 1383-7427
1573-3823
1383-7427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71561968
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aristotelianism
Chemicals
Denmark
History of medicine
History, 17th Century
Lutheranism
Medicine
Natural philosophy
Orthodoxy
Paracelsus
Protestantism - history
Religion and Science
Renaissance philosophy
Rosicrucian
Rosicrucianism
Theology
Worms
title Paracelsianism and the Orthodox Lutheran Rejection of Vital Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Denmark
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paracelsianism%20and%20the%20Orthodox%20Lutheran%20Rejection%20of%20Vital%20Philosophy%20in%20Early%20Seventeenth-Century%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=Early%20science%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Shackelford,%20Jole&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=210-252&rft.issn=1383-7427&rft.eissn=1573-3823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157338203X00071&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4130380%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71561968&rft_id=info:pmid/15043054&rft_jstor_id=4130380&rfr_iscdi=true