Comparison of SSCP and DHPLC for the detection of LDLR mutations in a New Zealand cohort
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder, associated with premature vascular disease. FH may be caused by many different mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, about 700 mutations have been described, most of which occur rarely and often only in sing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human mutation 2002-03, Vol.19 (3), p.311-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 311 |
container_title | Human mutation |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Bunn, Caroline F. Lintott, Caroline J. Scott, Russell S. George, Peter M. |
description | Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder, associated with premature vascular disease. FH may be caused by many different mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, about 700 mutations have been described, most of which occur rarely and often only in single families. Although particular mutations are prevalent in certain ethnic groups, countries with heterogeneous population bases (such as NZ) may carry a wide variety of mutations; making a gene screening approach the appropriate first step for a mutation detection programme. We have compared SSCP with DHPLC to assess their effectiveness as methods for LDLR mutation detection. Although five novel LDLR mutations were detected by SSCP in patients with FH, DHPLC was more sensitive, with eight novel mutations detected. Six of these mutations (T392M, R419G, Y421N, 1206‐1207delCT, 1872delC, and 1943delC) were clustered in exons 9 and 13 of the EGF precursor homology domain, one (679‐680delAC) in the ligand binding domain (exon 4) and the eighth (P774H) in the membrane‐spanning domain (exon 16). Twenty five mutations were identified in 35 patients in total. Of these, we were able to detect only 64% of mutations by SSCP even though all variants were detected by DHPLC. All patients are heterozygous for the mutations, which is consistent with the clinical phenotypes. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/humu.9021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71519725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71519725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3671-ccc5eae2840e30994a9947de48315cc75de8612be7f1baec7591e6fd28f6ef1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMovhf-AQkuBBfVpG2aZqkddYT6wHFU3IRMestUp5MxaVH_vSkdFAQXl3s5fOdwOQjtUXJMCQlPpm3dHgsS0hW0SYlIA6_Gq93NRMC5iDfQlnOvhJCUsWgdbVCaMs4Z20TPmakXylbOzLEp8WiU3WE1L_BgeJdnuDQWN1PABTSgm6pn8kF-j-u2UZ3gcDXHCt_AB34BNeus2kyNbXbQWqlmDnaXexuNL84fsmGQ315eZad5oKOE00BrzUBBmMYEIiJErPzwAuI0okxrzgpIExpOgJd0osALgkJSFmFaJuClaBsd9rkLa95bcI2sK6dh5l8B0zrJKaOCh8yDB3_AV9Pauf9NdkDCBaUeOuohbY1zFkq5sFWt7JekRHZdy65r2XXt2f1lYDupofgll-V64KQHPqoZfP2fJIfj6_EyMugdlWvg88eh7JtMeMSZfLq5lOTpMR8lz5k8i74B_FOWpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197267911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of SSCP and DHPLC for the detection of LDLR mutations in a New Zealand cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bunn, Caroline F. ; Lintott, Caroline J. ; Scott, Russell S. ; George, Peter M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunn, Caroline F. ; Lintott, Caroline J. ; Scott, Russell S. ; George, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><description>Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder, associated with premature vascular disease. FH may be caused by many different mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, about 700 mutations have been described, most of which occur rarely and often only in single families. Although particular mutations are prevalent in certain ethnic groups, countries with heterogeneous population bases (such as NZ) may carry a wide variety of mutations; making a gene screening approach the appropriate first step for a mutation detection programme. We have compared SSCP with DHPLC to assess their effectiveness as methods for LDLR mutation detection. Although five novel LDLR mutations were detected by SSCP in patients with FH, DHPLC was more sensitive, with eight novel mutations detected. Six of these mutations (T392M, R419G, Y421N, 1206‐1207delCT, 1872delC, and 1943delC) were clustered in exons 9 and 13 of the EGF precursor homology domain, one (679‐680delAC) in the ligand binding domain (exon 4) and the eighth (P774H) in the membrane‐spanning domain (exon 16). Twenty five mutations were identified in 35 patients in total. Of these, we were able to detect only 64% of mutations by SSCP even though all variants were detected by DHPLC. All patients are heterozygous for the mutations, which is consistent with the clinical phenotypes. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/humu.9021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11857755</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - standards ; Cohort Studies ; denaturing high performance liquid chromatography ; DHPLC ; DNA Mutational Analysis - methods ; familial hypercholestrolaemia ; Female ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Genetic Testing - standards ; Humans ; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - diagnosis ; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - genetics ; LDLR ; low density lipoprotein receptor ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation - genetics ; mutation detection ; New Zealand ; Nucleic Acid Denaturation ; Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational ; Receptors, LDL - genetics ; single strand conformational polymorphism ; SSCP</subject><ispartof>Human mutation, 2002-03, Vol.19 (3), p.311-311</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3671-ccc5eae2840e30994a9947de48315cc75de8612be7f1baec7591e6fd28f6ef1b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhumu.9021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhumu.9021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11857755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunn, Caroline F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lintott, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Russell S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of SSCP and DHPLC for the detection of LDLR mutations in a New Zealand cohort</title><title>Human mutation</title><addtitle>Hum. Mutat</addtitle><description>Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder, associated with premature vascular disease. FH may be caused by many different mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, about 700 mutations have been described, most of which occur rarely and often only in single families. Although particular mutations are prevalent in certain ethnic groups, countries with heterogeneous population bases (such as NZ) may carry a wide variety of mutations; making a gene screening approach the appropriate first step for a mutation detection programme. We have compared SSCP with DHPLC to assess their effectiveness as methods for LDLR mutation detection. Although five novel LDLR mutations were detected by SSCP in patients with FH, DHPLC was more sensitive, with eight novel mutations detected. Six of these mutations (T392M, R419G, Y421N, 1206‐1207delCT, 1872delC, and 1943delC) were clustered in exons 9 and 13 of the EGF precursor homology domain, one (679‐680delAC) in the ligand binding domain (exon 4) and the eighth (P774H) in the membrane‐spanning domain (exon 16). Twenty five mutations were identified in 35 patients in total. Of these, we were able to detect only 64% of mutations by SSCP even though all variants were detected by DHPLC. All patients are heterozygous for the mutations, which is consistent with the clinical phenotypes. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - standards</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>denaturing high performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>DHPLC</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis - methods</subject><subject>familial hypercholestrolaemia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - genetics</subject><subject>LDLR</subject><subject>low density lipoprotein receptor</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>mutation detection</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Denaturation</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational</subject><subject>Receptors, LDL - genetics</subject><subject>single strand conformational polymorphism</subject><subject>SSCP</subject><issn>1059-7794</issn><issn>1098-1004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMovhf-AQkuBBfVpG2aZqkddYT6wHFU3IRMestUp5MxaVH_vSkdFAQXl3s5fOdwOQjtUXJMCQlPpm3dHgsS0hW0SYlIA6_Gq93NRMC5iDfQlnOvhJCUsWgdbVCaMs4Z20TPmakXylbOzLEp8WiU3WE1L_BgeJdnuDQWN1PABTSgm6pn8kF-j-u2UZ3gcDXHCt_AB34BNeus2kyNbXbQWqlmDnaXexuNL84fsmGQ315eZad5oKOE00BrzUBBmMYEIiJErPzwAuI0okxrzgpIExpOgJd0osALgkJSFmFaJuClaBsd9rkLa95bcI2sK6dh5l8B0zrJKaOCh8yDB3_AV9Pauf9NdkDCBaUeOuohbY1zFkq5sFWt7JekRHZdy65r2XXt2f1lYDupofgll-V64KQHPqoZfP2fJIfj6_EyMugdlWvg88eh7JtMeMSZfLq5lOTpMR8lz5k8i74B_FOWpA</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Bunn, Caroline F.</creator><creator>Lintott, Caroline J.</creator><creator>Scott, Russell S.</creator><creator>George, Peter M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>Comparison of SSCP and DHPLC for the detection of LDLR mutations in a New Zealand cohort</title><author>Bunn, Caroline F. ; Lintott, Caroline J. ; Scott, Russell S. ; George, Peter M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3671-ccc5eae2840e30994a9947de48315cc75de8612be7f1baec7591e6fd28f6ef1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - standards</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>denaturing high performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>DHPLC</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis - methods</topic><topic>familial hypercholestrolaemia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - genetics</topic><topic>LDLR</topic><topic>low density lipoprotein receptor</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>mutation detection</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Denaturation</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational</topic><topic>Receptors, LDL - genetics</topic><topic>single strand conformational polymorphism</topic><topic>SSCP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunn, Caroline F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lintott, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Russell S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunn, Caroline F.</au><au>Lintott, Caroline J.</au><au>Scott, Russell S.</au><au>George, Peter M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of SSCP and DHPLC for the detection of LDLR mutations in a New Zealand cohort</atitle><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle><addtitle>Hum. Mutat</addtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>311-311</pages><issn>1059-7794</issn><eissn>1098-1004</eissn><abstract>Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder, associated with premature vascular disease. FH may be caused by many different mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, about 700 mutations have been described, most of which occur rarely and often only in single families. Although particular mutations are prevalent in certain ethnic groups, countries with heterogeneous population bases (such as NZ) may carry a wide variety of mutations; making a gene screening approach the appropriate first step for a mutation detection programme. We have compared SSCP with DHPLC to assess their effectiveness as methods for LDLR mutation detection. Although five novel LDLR mutations were detected by SSCP in patients with FH, DHPLC was more sensitive, with eight novel mutations detected. Six of these mutations (T392M, R419G, Y421N, 1206‐1207delCT, 1872delC, and 1943delC) were clustered in exons 9 and 13 of the EGF precursor homology domain, one (679‐680delAC) in the ligand binding domain (exon 4) and the eighth (P774H) in the membrane‐spanning domain (exon 16). Twenty five mutations were identified in 35 patients in total. Of these, we were able to detect only 64% of mutations by SSCP even though all variants were detected by DHPLC. All patients are heterozygous for the mutations, which is consistent with the clinical phenotypes. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>11857755</pmid><doi>10.1002/humu.9021</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-7794 |
ispartof | Human mutation, 2002-03, Vol.19 (3), p.311-311 |
issn | 1059-7794 1098-1004 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71519725 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - standards Cohort Studies denaturing high performance liquid chromatography DHPLC DNA Mutational Analysis - methods familial hypercholestrolaemia Female Genetic Testing - methods Genetic Testing - standards Humans Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - diagnosis Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II - genetics LDLR low density lipoprotein receptor Male Middle Aged Mutation - genetics mutation detection New Zealand Nucleic Acid Denaturation Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational Receptors, LDL - genetics single strand conformational polymorphism SSCP |
title | Comparison of SSCP and DHPLC for the detection of LDLR mutations in a New Zealand cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20SSCP%20and%20DHPLC%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20LDLR%20mutations%20in%20a%20New%20Zealand%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Human%20mutation&rft.au=Bunn,%20Caroline%20F.&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=311-311&rft.issn=1059-7794&rft.eissn=1098-1004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/humu.9021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71519725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197267911&rft_id=info:pmid/11857755&rfr_iscdi=true |