Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss

The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working pla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European Journal of Neurology 2002-03, Vol.9 (2), p.171-174
Hauptverfasser: Pop, P. H. M., Gierveld, C. M., Karis, H. A. M., Tiedink, H. G. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 2
container_start_page 171
container_title European Journal of Neurology
container_volume 9
creator Pop, P. H. M.
Gierveld, C. M.
Karis, H. A. M.
Tiedink, H. G. M.
description The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71504398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71504398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhS3UCijlLyCvukvqR_yIxAbRgSLRaaXSdofl-AEekjiNM2L49zjMCJbtyte637nXPgcAiFGJUcU_r0pccVlgSnFJECIlQpSxcrMHDl8b73JNGS4YRvgAfEhphTIpCNoHBxhLSRCTh-B2MQTruhDbeBeMbqFOgzNTgtHDe6etNvcOhh5q-BjHh6HVxsHkpin0d1D3Fk5zuxu0mWDsX27OxD52wcA2pvQRvPe6Te54dx6BXxeLm_OvxfX3y6vzs-vCVHXNCkKE55Y7TjHxNbHUEiw9x4g2sqaVbETVIM-pJ95axmntMBPEG1GjRuCK0SPwaTt3GOPftUuT6kIyrm117-I6KYEZqmgt_wkSJIWkXGRQbkEz5n-MzqthDJ0enxRGag5BrdTstZq9VnMI6iUEtcnSk92OddM5-ybcuZ6B0y3wGFr39N-D1WK5yEWWF1t5SJPbvMr1-KDywwVTf5aX6sfvm5_Liy_fVEWfARqCo4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20878367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Pop, P. H. M. ; Gierveld, C. M. ; Karis, H. A. M. ; Tiedink, H. G. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pop, P. H. M. ; Gierveld, C. M. ; Karis, H. A. M. ; Tiedink, H. G. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-5101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11882058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost of Illness ; economic loss ; Female ; headache ; Humans ; Male ; Migraine Disorders - economics ; Migraine Disorders - epidemiology ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Occupational Health ; Prevalence ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tension-Type Headache - economics ; Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Neurology, 2002-03, Vol.9 (2), p.171-174</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1468-1331.2002.00355.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1468-1331.2002.00355.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11882058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pop, P. H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierveld, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karis, H. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiedink, H. G. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</title><title>European Journal of Neurology</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.</description><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>economic loss</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>headache</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - economics</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tension-Type Headache - economics</subject><subject>Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1351-5101</issn><issn>1468-1331</issn><issn>1471-0552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhS3UCijlLyCvukvqR_yIxAbRgSLRaaXSdofl-AEekjiNM2L49zjMCJbtyte637nXPgcAiFGJUcU_r0pccVlgSnFJECIlQpSxcrMHDl8b73JNGS4YRvgAfEhphTIpCNoHBxhLSRCTh-B2MQTruhDbeBeMbqFOgzNTgtHDe6etNvcOhh5q-BjHh6HVxsHkpin0d1D3Fk5zuxu0mWDsX27OxD52wcA2pvQRvPe6Te54dx6BXxeLm_OvxfX3y6vzs-vCVHXNCkKE55Y7TjHxNbHUEiw9x4g2sqaVbETVIM-pJ95axmntMBPEG1GjRuCK0SPwaTt3GOPftUuT6kIyrm117-I6KYEZqmgt_wkSJIWkXGRQbkEz5n-MzqthDJ0enxRGag5BrdTstZq9VnMI6iUEtcnSk92OddM5-ybcuZ6B0y3wGFr39N-D1WK5yEWWF1t5SJPbvMr1-KDywwVTf5aX6sfvm5_Liy_fVEWfARqCo4A</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Pop, P. H. M.</creator><creator>Gierveld, C. M.</creator><creator>Karis, H. A. M.</creator><creator>Tiedink, H. G. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</title><author>Pop, P. H. M. ; Gierveld, C. M. ; Karis, H. A. M. ; Tiedink, H. G. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>economic loss</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>headache</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - economics</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tension-Type Headache - economics</topic><topic>Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pop, P. H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierveld, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karis, H. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiedink, H. G. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pop, P. H. M.</au><au>Gierveld, C. M.</au><au>Karis, H. A. M.</au><au>Tiedink, H. G. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>171-174</pages><issn>1351-5101</issn><eissn>1468-1331</eissn><eissn>1471-0552</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11882058</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-5101
ispartof European Journal of Neurology, 2002-03, Vol.9 (2), p.171-174
issn 1351-5101
1468-1331
1471-0552
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71504398
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Cost of Illness
economic loss
Female
headache
Humans
Male
Migraine Disorders - economics
Migraine Disorders - epidemiology
Netherlands - epidemiology
Occupational Health
Prevalence
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tension-Type Headache - economics
Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology
Workplace
title Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiological%20aspects%20of%20headache%20in%20a%20workplace%20setting%20and%20the%20impact%20on%20the%20economic%20loss&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Neurology&rft.au=Pop,%20P.%20H.%20M.&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=171-174&rft.issn=1351-5101&rft.eissn=1468-1331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71504398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20878367&rft_id=info:pmid/11882058&rfr_iscdi=true