Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss
The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working pla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European Journal of Neurology 2002-03, Vol.9 (2), p.171-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | European Journal of Neurology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Pop, P. H. M. Gierveld, C. M. Karis, H. A. M. Tiedink, H. G. M. |
description | The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71504398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71504398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhS3UCijlLyCvukvqR_yIxAbRgSLRaaXSdofl-AEekjiNM2L49zjMCJbtyte637nXPgcAiFGJUcU_r0pccVlgSnFJECIlQpSxcrMHDl8b73JNGS4YRvgAfEhphTIpCNoHBxhLSRCTh-B2MQTruhDbeBeMbqFOgzNTgtHDe6etNvcOhh5q-BjHh6HVxsHkpin0d1D3Fk5zuxu0mWDsX27OxD52wcA2pvQRvPe6Te54dx6BXxeLm_OvxfX3y6vzs-vCVHXNCkKE55Y7TjHxNbHUEiw9x4g2sqaVbETVIM-pJ95axmntMBPEG1GjRuCK0SPwaTt3GOPftUuT6kIyrm117-I6KYEZqmgt_wkSJIWkXGRQbkEz5n-MzqthDJ0enxRGag5BrdTstZq9VnMI6iUEtcnSk92OddM5-ybcuZ6B0y3wGFr39N-D1WK5yEWWF1t5SJPbvMr1-KDywwVTf5aX6sfvm5_Liy_fVEWfARqCo4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20878367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Pop, P. H. M. ; Gierveld, C. M. ; Karis, H. A. M. ; Tiedink, H. G. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pop, P. H. M. ; Gierveld, C. M. ; Karis, H. A. M. ; Tiedink, H. G. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-5101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11882058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost of Illness ; economic loss ; Female ; headache ; Humans ; Male ; Migraine Disorders - economics ; Migraine Disorders - epidemiology ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Occupational Health ; Prevalence ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tension-Type Headache - economics ; Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Neurology, 2002-03, Vol.9 (2), p.171-174</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1468-1331.2002.00355.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1468-1331.2002.00355.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11882058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pop, P. H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierveld, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karis, H. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiedink, H. G. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</title><title>European Journal of Neurology</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.</description><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>economic loss</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>headache</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - economics</subject><subject>Migraine Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tension-Type Headache - economics</subject><subject>Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1351-5101</issn><issn>1468-1331</issn><issn>1471-0552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhS3UCijlLyCvukvqR_yIxAbRgSLRaaXSdofl-AEekjiNM2L49zjMCJbtyte637nXPgcAiFGJUcU_r0pccVlgSnFJECIlQpSxcrMHDl8b73JNGS4YRvgAfEhphTIpCNoHBxhLSRCTh-B2MQTruhDbeBeMbqFOgzNTgtHDe6etNvcOhh5q-BjHh6HVxsHkpin0d1D3Fk5zuxu0mWDsX27OxD52wcA2pvQRvPe6Te54dx6BXxeLm_OvxfX3y6vzs-vCVHXNCkKE55Y7TjHxNbHUEiw9x4g2sqaVbETVIM-pJ95axmntMBPEG1GjRuCK0SPwaTt3GOPftUuT6kIyrm117-I6KYEZqmgt_wkSJIWkXGRQbkEz5n-MzqthDJ0enxRGag5BrdTstZq9VnMI6iUEtcnSk92OddM5-ybcuZ6B0y3wGFr39N-D1WK5yEWWF1t5SJPbvMr1-KDywwVTf5aX6sfvm5_Liy_fVEWfARqCo4A</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Pop, P. H. M.</creator><creator>Gierveld, C. M.</creator><creator>Karis, H. A. M.</creator><creator>Tiedink, H. G. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</title><author>Pop, P. H. M. ; Gierveld, C. M. ; Karis, H. A. M. ; Tiedink, H. G. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4995-227f6d6e6312f92d3d218f6103b89348b74b0f63f2fdd5639e1572fc790b71453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>economic loss</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>headache</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - economics</topic><topic>Migraine Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tension-Type Headache - economics</topic><topic>Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pop, P. H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierveld, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karis, H. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiedink, H. G. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pop, P. H. M.</au><au>Gierveld, C. M.</au><au>Karis, H. A. M.</au><au>Tiedink, H. G. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>171-174</pages><issn>1351-5101</issn><eissn>1468-1331</eissn><eissn>1471-0552</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the economical impact. By sending a questionnaire to 1781 employees of a Dutch manufacturing company we tried to assess the prevalence of headache and headache subtype within this working place. Besides the personal view of each responder regarding his/her headache subtype, the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to classify headaches on the basis of reported features. Moreover the missing labour days, as a result of headache, during the previous 4 weeks were measured, as well as the loss of productivity at the working place during an episode of headache; from this an estimate of the economic loss could be calculated. The response rate of the questionnaire was 60.8%. The lifetime prevalence of headache amongst the responders was 53.3%. Of these, 34.5% thought their headache was tension‐type headache, 10.6% thought it was migraine, 5.4% mentioned daily headache, and 18.2% mentioned another type of headache. According to the IHS criteria the differentiation was somewhat different: 26.2% of the headache could be classified as tension‐type headache and 15% as migraine. When the costs for lost labour days and loss of productivity as a result of all types of headache were accumulated, the economic loss was estimated at 18.933 US$ in 4 weeks (for the group of responders). In conclusion, headache is related to a substantial economic loss; migraine is probably underestimated in a workplace setting.</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11882058</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1351-5101 |
ispartof | European Journal of Neurology, 2002-03, Vol.9 (2), p.171-174 |
issn | 1351-5101 1468-1331 1471-0552 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71504398 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Cost of Illness economic loss Female headache Humans Male Migraine Disorders - economics Migraine Disorders - epidemiology Netherlands - epidemiology Occupational Health Prevalence Quality of Life Surveys and Questionnaires Tension-Type Headache - economics Tension-Type Headache - epidemiology Workplace |
title | Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiological%20aspects%20of%20headache%20in%20a%20workplace%20setting%20and%20the%20impact%20on%20the%20economic%20loss&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Neurology&rft.au=Pop,%20P.%20H.%20M.&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=171-174&rft.issn=1351-5101&rft.eissn=1468-1331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00355.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71504398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20878367&rft_id=info:pmid/11882058&rfr_iscdi=true |