Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds
Objectives: To determine the influence of diagnostic adjuncts (dental brushing and drying) in dental caries diagnosis. To analyse the underestimation levels in epidemiological examinations when compared to traditional dental setting examinations. To evaluate the influence of including noncavitated (...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International dental journal 2003-12, Vol.53 (6), p.485-490 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 490 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 485 |
| container_title | International dental journal |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | Assaf, Andréa Videira Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro Zanin, Luciane Pardi, Vanessa Pereira, Antonio Carlos Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi |
| description | Objectives: To determine the influence of diagnostic adjuncts (dental brushing and drying) in dental caries diagnosis. To analyse the underestimation levels in epidemiological examinations when compared to traditional dental setting examinations. To evaluate the influence of including noncavitated (NC) carious lesions in the estimation of the disease. Participants: 51, 12‐year‐old children. Interventions/methods: Four epidemiological exams performed in an outdoor setting and one performed in a traditional dental setting (visual‐tactile method associated or not with diagnostic adjuncts). Main outcome measures: DMFS (Decayed, Missing and Filled Surfaces) index, according to the WHO criteria. Results: When compared to exams carried out in a traditional dental setting, the epidemiological examinations showed no significant statistical differences for the DMFS score (p>0.05), presenting underestimation levels lower than 10% (except for the low prevalence caries group in the WHO exam). For the DMFS, previous dental brushing was more relevant than previous dental drying, although drying was the most important resource for NC diagnosis (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00891.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71502299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71502299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-51d85ad540ebf8ecb7cbd57f131edb2704162b5e20a6f2e34db17f05e845b02c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi1ERZeWv4AiDtwSxnYcJxyQaIF2VxVciuBm2c64myUfW9uB7b8n6UblzGlGmud9R3oIeUMhowDs3S6jpRSpqMTPjAHwLBqAsqLZ4RlZPZ2ek9UEQ1oIXp2SlyHsAPKSQ_GCnNJcMsGlXJG7de_aEXuLyeCSutF3_RBiYxNd78bexpDEIYlbTDrUYfTYYR9n0mrfYEj2Hn_r9jGu4xR3Dv1MLOe49Ri2Q1uHc3LidBvw1TLPyPcvn28vr9Obb1fry483qc0LoKmgdSl0LXJA40q0RlpTC-kop1gbJiGnBTMCGejCMeR5bah0ILDMhQFm-Rl5e-zd--F-xBBV1wSLbat7HMagJBXAWFVN4PsjaP0Qgken9r7ptH9QFNSsWe3U7FLNLtWsWS2a1WEKv16-jKbD-l908ToBH47An6bFh_-oVutPm2mZCtJjQRMiHp4KtP-lCsmn7I-vV4ptNhfXgl4o4H8Bs-Oepg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71502299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Assaf, Andréa Videira ; Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro ; Zanin, Luciane ; Pardi, Vanessa ; Pereira, Antonio Carlos ; Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creator><creatorcontrib>Assaf, Andréa Videira ; Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro ; Zanin, Luciane ; Pardi, Vanessa ; Pereira, Antonio Carlos ; Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To determine the influence of diagnostic adjuncts (dental brushing and drying) in dental caries diagnosis. To analyse the underestimation levels in epidemiological examinations when compared to traditional dental setting examinations. To evaluate the influence of including noncavitated (NC) carious lesions in the estimation of the disease. Participants: 51, 12‐year‐old children. Interventions/methods: Four epidemiological exams performed in an outdoor setting and one performed in a traditional dental setting (visual‐tactile method associated or not with diagnostic adjuncts). Main outcome measures: DMFS (Decayed, Missing and Filled Surfaces) index, according to the WHO criteria. Results: When compared to exams carried out in a traditional dental setting, the epidemiological examinations showed no significant statistical differences for the DMFS score (p>0.05), presenting underestimation levels lower than 10% (except for the low prevalence caries group in the WHO exam). For the DMFS, previous dental brushing was more relevant than previous dental drying, although drying was the most important resource for NC diagnosis (p<0.05). Conclusion: The visual/tactile method, with or without diagnostic adjuncts, can diagnose cavitated lesions efficiently, but not NC lesions. However, for the low caries prevalence group, the implementation of dental brushing prior to an exam could be suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-595X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00891.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14725377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Child ; Dental caries ; Dental Caries - diagnosis ; Dental Caries - epidemiology ; Dental Caries Activity Tests - methods ; Dentistry ; diagnosis ; DMF Index ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Prevalence</subject><ispartof>International dental journal, 2003-12, Vol.53 (6), p.485-490</ispartof><rights>2003 FDI/World Dental Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-51d85ad540ebf8ecb7cbd57f131edb2704162b5e20a6f2e34db17f05e845b02c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-51d85ad540ebf8ecb7cbd57f131edb2704162b5e20a6f2e34db17f05e845b02c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.1875-595X.2003.tb00891.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.1875-595X.2003.tb00891.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14725377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Assaf, Andréa Videira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanin, Luciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardi, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Antonio Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds</title><title>International dental journal</title><addtitle>Int Dent J</addtitle><description>Objectives: To determine the influence of diagnostic adjuncts (dental brushing and drying) in dental caries diagnosis. To analyse the underestimation levels in epidemiological examinations when compared to traditional dental setting examinations. To evaluate the influence of including noncavitated (NC) carious lesions in the estimation of the disease. Participants: 51, 12‐year‐old children. Interventions/methods: Four epidemiological exams performed in an outdoor setting and one performed in a traditional dental setting (visual‐tactile method associated or not with diagnostic adjuncts). Main outcome measures: DMFS (Decayed, Missing and Filled Surfaces) index, according to the WHO criteria. Results: When compared to exams carried out in a traditional dental setting, the epidemiological examinations showed no significant statistical differences for the DMFS score (p>0.05), presenting underestimation levels lower than 10% (except for the low prevalence caries group in the WHO exam). For the DMFS, previous dental brushing was more relevant than previous dental drying, although drying was the most important resource for NC diagnosis (p<0.05). Conclusion: The visual/tactile method, with or without diagnostic adjuncts, can diagnose cavitated lesions efficiently, but not NC lesions. However, for the low caries prevalence group, the implementation of dental brushing prior to an exam could be suggested.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental Caries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dental Caries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dental Caries Activity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>DMF Index</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><issn>0020-6539</issn><issn>1875-595X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi1ERZeWv4AiDtwSxnYcJxyQaIF2VxVciuBm2c64myUfW9uB7b8n6UblzGlGmud9R3oIeUMhowDs3S6jpRSpqMTPjAHwLBqAsqLZ4RlZPZ2ek9UEQ1oIXp2SlyHsAPKSQ_GCnNJcMsGlXJG7de_aEXuLyeCSutF3_RBiYxNd78bexpDEIYlbTDrUYfTYYR9n0mrfYEj2Hn_r9jGu4xR3Dv1MLOe49Ri2Q1uHc3LidBvw1TLPyPcvn28vr9Obb1fry483qc0LoKmgdSl0LXJA40q0RlpTC-kop1gbJiGnBTMCGejCMeR5bah0ILDMhQFm-Rl5e-zd--F-xBBV1wSLbat7HMagJBXAWFVN4PsjaP0Qgken9r7ptH9QFNSsWe3U7FLNLtWsWS2a1WEKv16-jKbD-l908ToBH47An6bFh_-oVutPm2mZCtJjQRMiHp4KtP-lCsmn7I-vV4ptNhfXgl4o4H8Bs-Oepg</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Assaf, Andréa Videira</creator><creator>Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro</creator><creator>Zanin, Luciane</creator><creator>Pardi, Vanessa</creator><creator>Pereira, Antonio Carlos</creator><creator>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds</title><author>Assaf, Andréa Videira ; Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro ; Zanin, Luciane ; Pardi, Vanessa ; Pereira, Antonio Carlos ; Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-51d85ad540ebf8ecb7cbd57f131edb2704162b5e20a6f2e34db17f05e845b02c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental Caries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dental Caries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dental Caries Activity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>DMF Index</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Assaf, Andréa Videira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanin, Luciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardi, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Antonio Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Assaf, Andréa Videira</au><au>Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro</au><au>Zanin, Luciane</au><au>Pardi, Vanessa</au><au>Pereira, Antonio Carlos</au><au>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds</atitle><jtitle>International dental journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Dent J</addtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>485-490</pages><issn>0020-6539</issn><eissn>1875-595X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To determine the influence of diagnostic adjuncts (dental brushing and drying) in dental caries diagnosis. To analyse the underestimation levels in epidemiological examinations when compared to traditional dental setting examinations. To evaluate the influence of including noncavitated (NC) carious lesions in the estimation of the disease. Participants: 51, 12‐year‐old children. Interventions/methods: Four epidemiological exams performed in an outdoor setting and one performed in a traditional dental setting (visual‐tactile method associated or not with diagnostic adjuncts). Main outcome measures: DMFS (Decayed, Missing and Filled Surfaces) index, according to the WHO criteria. Results: When compared to exams carried out in a traditional dental setting, the epidemiological examinations showed no significant statistical differences for the DMFS score (p>0.05), presenting underestimation levels lower than 10% (except for the low prevalence caries group in the WHO exam). For the DMFS, previous dental brushing was more relevant than previous dental drying, although drying was the most important resource for NC diagnosis (p<0.05). Conclusion: The visual/tactile method, with or without diagnostic adjuncts, can diagnose cavitated lesions efficiently, but not NC lesions. However, for the low caries prevalence group, the implementation of dental brushing prior to an exam could be suggested.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>14725377</pmid><doi>10.1002/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00891.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-6539 |
| ispartof | International dental journal, 2003-12, Vol.53 (6), p.485-490 |
| issn | 0020-6539 1875-595X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71502299 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Analysis of Variance Brazil - epidemiology Child Dental caries Dental Caries - diagnosis Dental Caries - epidemiology Dental Caries Activity Tests - methods Dentistry diagnosis DMF Index epidemiology Humans Prevalence |
| title | Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A16%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20diagnostic%20adjuncts%20to%20the%20measurement%20of%20caries%20prevalence%20at%20different%20caries%20thresholds&rft.jtitle=International%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Assaf,%20Andr%C3%A9a%20Videira&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=485-490&rft.issn=0020-6539&rft.eissn=1875-595X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00891.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71502299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71502299&rft_id=info:pmid/14725377&rfr_iscdi=true |