Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany

Studies from six regions of Germany (Aachen (W1), Dresden (E1), Jena (E2), Marburg (W2), Munich (W3), and Stuttgart (C1)) have been compared to verify and assess the quality of healthcare using breast cancer as an example. All of the data collection was carried out in comprehensive cancer centres an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2002-03, Vol.38 (4), p.578-585
Hauptverfasser: Engel, J, Nagel, G, Breuer, E, Meisner, C, Albert, U.-S, Strelocke, K, Sauer, H, Katenkamp, D, Mittermayer, Ch, Heidemann, E, Schulz, K.-D, Kunath, H, Lorenz, W, Hölzel, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 585
container_issue 4
container_start_page 578
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 38
creator Engel, J
Nagel, G
Breuer, E
Meisner, C
Albert, U.-S
Strelocke, K
Sauer, H
Katenkamp, D
Mittermayer, Ch
Heidemann, E
Schulz, K.-D
Kunath, H
Lorenz, W
Hölzel, D
description Studies from six regions of Germany (Aachen (W1), Dresden (E1), Jena (E2), Marburg (W2), Munich (W3), and Stuttgart (C1)) have been compared to verify and assess the quality of healthcare using breast cancer as an example. All of the data collection was carried out in comprehensive cancer centres and is population-based, with the exception of C1. Classic prognostic factors and the initial treatment of 8661 women with breast cancer, diagnosed between 1996 and 1998, were examined. Primary therapy, breast conserving therapy (BCT), and the use of subsequent local radiation and/or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) were analysed. BCT was performed on 39.3–57.7% of patients. By pT-category, the proportion of BCT in the six regions were as follows: for pTis between 37.8 and 64.3%, for pT1 between 51.7 and 71.5%, for pT2 between 25.9 and 51.1%, for pT3 between 0 and 13.1% and for pT4 between 0 and 15.2%. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for age and biological factors, showed a significant influence of the treating hospital on the mastectomy rate. The use of radiotherapy after BCT (80%) was quite homogeneous in the six regions. The application of radiotherapy after mastectomy, however, varied between 10.4 and 32.2%. In all regions, for premenopausal patients, the use of adjuvant systemic therapy almost reflected the St. Gallen-Consensus recommendations. In contrast, post-menopausal women with positive lymph nodes were not always treated according to these standards. In all regions, age had an influence on the administration of treatment: elderly breast cancer patients received less BCT, less radiotherapy and less adjuvant therapy than recommended in the St. Gallen-Consensus. Feedback of the results was made available to each hospital, providing a comparative summary of patient care that could be used by the participating hospitals for self-assessment and quality-control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00407-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71501555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804901004075</els_id><sourcerecordid>71501555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5e24fa6800a1c99c4b2392064672513243990060cd4955bc2c4bcd7ff4f426e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFLwzAUwPEgis7pR1B6UfRQfUmTtjmJDJ3CQEE9hzR91UjXzqQT9-3N1uKOnnL5vZfkT8gJhSsKNL1-ASlknAOXF0AvAThksdghI5pnMoZcsF0y-iMH5ND7TwDIcg775IAGxRKRjEj27Oxcu1VUONS-i4xuDLqo-0CnF6vINpG3P5HDd9s2PmqraIpurpvVEdmrdO3xeDjH5O3-7nXyEM-epo-T21lsEkm7WCDjlU5zAE2NlIYXLJEMUp5mTNCE8URKgBRMyaUQhWFBmDKrKl5xlmKajMl5v3fh2q8l-k7NrTdY17rBdulVRgVQIUSAoofGtd47rNSi_5mioNbF1KaYWudQQNWmmFrPnQ4XLIs5ltupIVEAZwPQ3ui6cqGQ9VsXTC7zLLib3mHI8W3RKW8shpqldWg6Vbb2n6f8AtXZhcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71501555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Engel, J ; Nagel, G ; Breuer, E ; Meisner, C ; Albert, U.-S ; Strelocke, K ; Sauer, H ; Katenkamp, D ; Mittermayer, Ch ; Heidemann, E ; Schulz, K.-D ; Kunath, H ; Lorenz, W ; Hölzel, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Engel, J ; Nagel, G ; Breuer, E ; Meisner, C ; Albert, U.-S ; Strelocke, K ; Sauer, H ; Katenkamp, D ; Mittermayer, Ch ; Heidemann, E ; Schulz, K.-D ; Kunath, H ; Lorenz, W ; Hölzel, D</creatorcontrib><description>Studies from six regions of Germany (Aachen (W1), Dresden (E1), Jena (E2), Marburg (W2), Munich (W3), and Stuttgart (C1)) have been compared to verify and assess the quality of healthcare using breast cancer as an example. All of the data collection was carried out in comprehensive cancer centres and is population-based, with the exception of C1. Classic prognostic factors and the initial treatment of 8661 women with breast cancer, diagnosed between 1996 and 1998, were examined. Primary therapy, breast conserving therapy (BCT), and the use of subsequent local radiation and/or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) were analysed. BCT was performed on 39.3–57.7% of patients. By pT-category, the proportion of BCT in the six regions were as follows: for pTis between 37.8 and 64.3%, for pT1 between 51.7 and 71.5%, for pT2 between 25.9 and 51.1%, for pT3 between 0 and 13.1% and for pT4 between 0 and 15.2%. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for age and biological factors, showed a significant influence of the treating hospital on the mastectomy rate. The use of radiotherapy after BCT (80%) was quite homogeneous in the six regions. The application of radiotherapy after mastectomy, however, varied between 10.4 and 32.2%. In all regions, for premenopausal patients, the use of adjuvant systemic therapy almost reflected the St. Gallen-Consensus recommendations. In contrast, post-menopausal women with positive lymph nodes were not always treated according to these standards. In all regions, age had an influence on the administration of treatment: elderly breast cancer patients received less BCT, less radiotherapy and less adjuvant therapy than recommended in the St. Gallen-Consensus. Feedback of the results was made available to each hospital, providing a comparative summary of patient care that could be used by the participating hospitals for self-assessment and quality-control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00407-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11872353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Distribution ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Data Collection ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Germany - epidemiology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mastectomy - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Population-based ; Primary therapy ; Quality assurance ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Quality of Health Care ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2002-03, Vol.38 (4), p.578-585</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5e24fa6800a1c99c4b2392064672513243990060cd4955bc2c4bcd7ff4f426e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5e24fa6800a1c99c4b2392064672513243990060cd4955bc2c4bcd7ff4f426e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804901004075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13538987$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11872353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engel, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, U.-S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strelocke, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katenkamp, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittermayer, Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidemann, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, K.-D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunath, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenz, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzel, D</creatorcontrib><title>Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Studies from six regions of Germany (Aachen (W1), Dresden (E1), Jena (E2), Marburg (W2), Munich (W3), and Stuttgart (C1)) have been compared to verify and assess the quality of healthcare using breast cancer as an example. All of the data collection was carried out in comprehensive cancer centres and is population-based, with the exception of C1. Classic prognostic factors and the initial treatment of 8661 women with breast cancer, diagnosed between 1996 and 1998, were examined. Primary therapy, breast conserving therapy (BCT), and the use of subsequent local radiation and/or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) were analysed. BCT was performed on 39.3–57.7% of patients. By pT-category, the proportion of BCT in the six regions were as follows: for pTis between 37.8 and 64.3%, for pT1 between 51.7 and 71.5%, for pT2 between 25.9 and 51.1%, for pT3 between 0 and 13.1% and for pT4 between 0 and 15.2%. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for age and biological factors, showed a significant influence of the treating hospital on the mastectomy rate. The use of radiotherapy after BCT (80%) was quite homogeneous in the six regions. The application of radiotherapy after mastectomy, however, varied between 10.4 and 32.2%. In all regions, for premenopausal patients, the use of adjuvant systemic therapy almost reflected the St. Gallen-Consensus recommendations. In contrast, post-menopausal women with positive lymph nodes were not always treated according to these standards. In all regions, age had an influence on the administration of treatment: elderly breast cancer patients received less BCT, less radiotherapy and less adjuvant therapy than recommended in the St. Gallen-Consensus. Feedback of the results was made available to each hospital, providing a comparative summary of patient care that could be used by the participating hospitals for self-assessment and quality-control.</description><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mastectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Population-based</subject><subject>Primary therapy</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EFLwzAUwPEgis7pR1B6UfRQfUmTtjmJDJ3CQEE9hzR91UjXzqQT9-3N1uKOnnL5vZfkT8gJhSsKNL1-ASlknAOXF0AvAThksdghI5pnMoZcsF0y-iMH5ND7TwDIcg775IAGxRKRjEj27Oxcu1VUONS-i4xuDLqo-0CnF6vINpG3P5HDd9s2PmqraIpurpvVEdmrdO3xeDjH5O3-7nXyEM-epo-T21lsEkm7WCDjlU5zAE2NlIYXLJEMUp5mTNCE8URKgBRMyaUQhWFBmDKrKl5xlmKajMl5v3fh2q8l-k7NrTdY17rBdulVRgVQIUSAoofGtd47rNSi_5mioNbF1KaYWudQQNWmmFrPnQ4XLIs5ltupIVEAZwPQ3ui6cqGQ9VsXTC7zLLib3mHI8W3RKW8shpqldWg6Vbb2n6f8AtXZhcU</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Engel, J</creator><creator>Nagel, G</creator><creator>Breuer, E</creator><creator>Meisner, C</creator><creator>Albert, U.-S</creator><creator>Strelocke, K</creator><creator>Sauer, H</creator><creator>Katenkamp, D</creator><creator>Mittermayer, Ch</creator><creator>Heidemann, E</creator><creator>Schulz, K.-D</creator><creator>Kunath, H</creator><creator>Lorenz, W</creator><creator>Hölzel, D</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany</title><author>Engel, J ; Nagel, G ; Breuer, E ; Meisner, C ; Albert, U.-S ; Strelocke, K ; Sauer, H ; Katenkamp, D ; Mittermayer, Ch ; Heidemann, E ; Schulz, K.-D ; Kunath, H ; Lorenz, W ; Hölzel, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5e24fa6800a1c99c4b2392064672513243990060cd4955bc2c4bcd7ff4f426e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mastectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Population-based</topic><topic>Primary therapy</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engel, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, U.-S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strelocke, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katenkamp, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittermayer, Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidemann, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, K.-D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunath, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenz, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzel, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engel, J</au><au>Nagel, G</au><au>Breuer, E</au><au>Meisner, C</au><au>Albert, U.-S</au><au>Strelocke, K</au><au>Sauer, H</au><au>Katenkamp, D</au><au>Mittermayer, Ch</au><au>Heidemann, E</au><au>Schulz, K.-D</au><au>Kunath, H</au><au>Lorenz, W</au><au>Hölzel, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>578-585</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Studies from six regions of Germany (Aachen (W1), Dresden (E1), Jena (E2), Marburg (W2), Munich (W3), and Stuttgart (C1)) have been compared to verify and assess the quality of healthcare using breast cancer as an example. All of the data collection was carried out in comprehensive cancer centres and is population-based, with the exception of C1. Classic prognostic factors and the initial treatment of 8661 women with breast cancer, diagnosed between 1996 and 1998, were examined. Primary therapy, breast conserving therapy (BCT), and the use of subsequent local radiation and/or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) were analysed. BCT was performed on 39.3–57.7% of patients. By pT-category, the proportion of BCT in the six regions were as follows: for pTis between 37.8 and 64.3%, for pT1 between 51.7 and 71.5%, for pT2 between 25.9 and 51.1%, for pT3 between 0 and 13.1% and for pT4 between 0 and 15.2%. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for age and biological factors, showed a significant influence of the treating hospital on the mastectomy rate. The use of radiotherapy after BCT (80%) was quite homogeneous in the six regions. The application of radiotherapy after mastectomy, however, varied between 10.4 and 32.2%. In all regions, for premenopausal patients, the use of adjuvant systemic therapy almost reflected the St. Gallen-Consensus recommendations. In contrast, post-menopausal women with positive lymph nodes were not always treated according to these standards. In all regions, age had an influence on the administration of treatment: elderly breast cancer patients received less BCT, less radiotherapy and less adjuvant therapy than recommended in the St. Gallen-Consensus. Feedback of the results was made available to each hospital, providing a comparative summary of patient care that could be used by the participating hospitals for self-assessment and quality-control.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11872353</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00407-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2002-03, Vol.38 (4), p.578-585
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71501555
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Age Distribution
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Data Collection
Epidemiology
Female
Germany - epidemiology
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Mastectomy - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Population-based
Primary therapy
Quality assurance
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Tumors
title Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20breast%20cancer%20therapy%20in%20six%20regions%20of%20Germany&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Engel,%20J&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=578-585&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00407-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71501555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71501555&rft_id=info:pmid/11872353&rft_els_id=S0959804901004075&rfr_iscdi=true