Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service

Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista de gastroenterología de México 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.185-191
Hauptverfasser: Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino, Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo, Sandoval Munro, René David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 191
container_issue 3
container_start_page 185
container_title Revista de gastroenterología de México
container_volume 68
creator Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino
Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo
Sandoval Munro, René David
description Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001. 31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively. Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71496076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p541-947d13912a70000e0c97d190e7bbe640ffbdbcc97adadd09d7b09984d92950ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BeQTt6B1ksb1EVXlR6rEgd7D2t6gICcxtoPo22OJ9jTSzKfRaC7YEiq5LkBBs2DXMX4BQLOB8ootRC2hVJVYso_3OXz2Bh1PgTANNCY-ddxMg3eUiAcyKYc-TA59pAe--_UUehoNcUwcM-mmkeNoz2jMhRSOPFL46Q3dsMsOXaTbk67Y4Wl32L4U-7fn1-3jvvDrWhSqllZUSpQo80ogMCobCkhqTU0NXaetNtlEi9aCslKDUpvaqlKtAalasfv_2rz0e6aY2qGPhpzDkaY5tlLUqgHZZPDuBM56INv60A8Yju35kuoPLVldbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71496076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino ; Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo ; Sandoval Munro, René David</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino ; Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo ; Sandoval Munro, René David</creatorcontrib><description>Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001. 31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively. Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0375-0906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14702931</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Mexico</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Hospital Units ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Prolapse - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Revista de gastroenterología de México, 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.185-191</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14702931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval Munro, René David</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</title><title>Revista de gastroenterología de México</title><addtitle>Rev Gastroenterol Mex</addtitle><description>Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001. 31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively. Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Units</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0375-0906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BeQTt6B1ksb1EVXlR6rEgd7D2t6gICcxtoPo22OJ9jTSzKfRaC7YEiq5LkBBs2DXMX4BQLOB8ootRC2hVJVYso_3OXz2Bh1PgTANNCY-ddxMg3eUiAcyKYc-TA59pAe--_UUehoNcUwcM-mmkeNoz2jMhRSOPFL46Q3dsMsOXaTbk67Y4Wl32L4U-7fn1-3jvvDrWhSqllZUSpQo80ogMCobCkhqTU0NXaetNtlEi9aCslKDUpvaqlKtAalasfv_2rz0e6aY2qGPhpzDkaY5tlLUqgHZZPDuBM56INv60A8Yju35kuoPLVldbA</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</creator><creator>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</creator><creator>Sandoval Munro, René David</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</title><author>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino ; Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo ; Sandoval Munro, René David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p541-947d13912a70000e0c97d190e7bbe640ffbdbcc97adadd09d7b09984d92950ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Units</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval Munro, René David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista de gastroenterología de México</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</au><au>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</au><au>Sandoval Munro, René David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</atitle><jtitle>Revista de gastroenterología de México</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Gastroenterol Mex</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>185-191</pages><issn>0375-0906</issn><abstract>Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001. 31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively. Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.</abstract><cop>Mexico</cop><pmid>14702931</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0375-0906
ispartof Revista de gastroenterología de México, 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.185-191
issn 0375-0906
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496076
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colorectal Surgery
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Hospital Units
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Rectal Prolapse - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20of%20complete%20rectal%20prolapse.%20Experience%20at%20a%20colon%20and%20rectal%20surgery%20service&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20gastroenterolog%C3%ADa%20de%20M%C3%A9xico&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez%20Hern%C3%A1ndez-Magro,%20Paulino&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=185-191&rft.issn=0375-0906&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71496076%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71496076&rft_id=info:pmid/14702931&rfr_iscdi=true