Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service
Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista de gastroenterología de México 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.185-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 185 |
container_title | Revista de gastroenterología de México |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo Sandoval Munro, René David |
description | Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy.
One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001.
31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively.
Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71496076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p541-947d13912a70000e0c97d190e7bbe640ffbdbcc97adadd09d7b09984d92950ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BeQTt6B1ksb1EVXlR6rEgd7D2t6gICcxtoPo22OJ9jTSzKfRaC7YEiq5LkBBs2DXMX4BQLOB8ootRC2hVJVYso_3OXz2Bh1PgTANNCY-ddxMg3eUiAcyKYc-TA59pAe--_UUehoNcUwcM-mmkeNoz2jMhRSOPFL46Q3dsMsOXaTbk67Y4Wl32L4U-7fn1-3jvvDrWhSqllZUSpQo80ogMCobCkhqTU0NXaetNtlEi9aCslKDUpvaqlKtAalasfv_2rz0e6aY2qGPhpzDkaY5tlLUqgHZZPDuBM56INv60A8Yju35kuoPLVldbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71496076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino ; Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo ; Sandoval Munro, René David</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino ; Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo ; Sandoval Munro, René David</creatorcontrib><description>Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy.
One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001.
31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively.
Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0375-0906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14702931</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Mexico</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Hospital Units ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Prolapse - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Revista de gastroenterología de México, 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.185-191</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14702931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval Munro, René David</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</title><title>Revista de gastroenterología de México</title><addtitle>Rev Gastroenterol Mex</addtitle><description>Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy.
One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001.
31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively.
Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Units</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0375-0906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BeQTt6B1ksb1EVXlR6rEgd7D2t6gICcxtoPo22OJ9jTSzKfRaC7YEiq5LkBBs2DXMX4BQLOB8ootRC2hVJVYso_3OXz2Bh1PgTANNCY-ddxMg3eUiAcyKYc-TA59pAe--_UUehoNcUwcM-mmkeNoz2jMhRSOPFL46Q3dsMsOXaTbk67Y4Wl32L4U-7fn1-3jvvDrWhSqllZUSpQo80ogMCobCkhqTU0NXaetNtlEi9aCslKDUpvaqlKtAalasfv_2rz0e6aY2qGPhpzDkaY5tlLUqgHZZPDuBM56INv60A8Yju35kuoPLVldbA</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</creator><creator>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</creator><creator>Sandoval Munro, René David</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</title><author>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino ; Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo ; Sandoval Munro, René David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p541-947d13912a70000e0c97d190e7bbe640ffbdbcc97adadd09d7b09984d92950ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Units</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval Munro, René David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista de gastroenterología de México</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez Hernández-Magro, Paulino</au><au>Villanueva Sáenz, Eduardo</au><au>Sandoval Munro, René David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service</atitle><jtitle>Revista de gastroenterología de México</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Gastroenterol Mex</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>185-191</pages><issn>0375-0906</issn><abstract>Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy.
One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001.
31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively.
Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.</abstract><cop>Mexico</cop><pmid>14702931</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0375-0906 |
ispartof | Revista de gastroenterología de México, 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.185-191 |
issn | 0375-0906 |
language | spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71496076 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Colorectal Surgery Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods Female Hospital Units Humans Male Middle Aged Postoperative Complications Rectal Prolapse - surgery Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome |
title | Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20of%20complete%20rectal%20prolapse.%20Experience%20at%20a%20colon%20and%20rectal%20surgery%20service&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20gastroenterolog%C3%ADa%20de%20M%C3%A9xico&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez%20Hern%C3%A1ndez-Magro,%20Paulino&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=185-191&rft.issn=0375-0906&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71496076%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71496076&rft_id=info:pmid/14702931&rfr_iscdi=true |