Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength
The reliability of tests for isometric strength of the shoulder joint in symptomatic subjects has yet to be established. For this purpose, interrater and intrarater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of manual muscle tests, a handheld dynamometer, and a spring-scale dynamo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2002-01, Vol.11 (1), p.33-39 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 39 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 33 |
| container_title | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Hayes, Kimberley Walton, Judie R. Szomor, Zoltan L. Murrell, George A.C. |
| description | The reliability of tests for isometric strength of the shoulder joint in symptomatic subjects has yet to be established. For this purpose, interrater and intrarater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of manual muscle tests, a handheld dynamometer, and a spring-scale dynamometer for 5 different shoulder movements in symptomatic subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from a random-effects model. All movements tested with the handheld dynamometer demonstrated excellent reliability for the interrater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.92). Excellent reliability was also demonstrated for elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation for the intrarater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.96). For the interrater trial, measurement of the lift-off maneuver with the handheld dynamometer was significantly more reliable than with manual muscle tests (P =.002). In summary, the handheld dynamometer was the most reliable and discriminatory means for assessing strength of the rotator cuff in symptomatic subjects. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:33-9.) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mse.2002.119852 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71488915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274602009448</els_id><sourcerecordid>71488915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b431833fe6fc1d87a0774caffab99d142394639aa148ab8c5a9d23c53bab53f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUkueku7X0l2j1L8goIgel42m9l2JR91JxH6701poSdPM4fnfZl5CLlldM5oXiwahDmnlM8Z0yrjZ2TKMsHTPKP0fNxpplJeyHxCrhC_KaVaUn5JJowpmTGZT4n6gDrYMtSh3yWdT0TSQL_pKkx8FxOLCIihXSe46Ya6gphgH6Fd95trcuFtjXBznDPy9fz0uXxNV-8vb8vHVeqk0H1aSsGUEB5y71ilCkuLQjrrvS21rpjkQstcaGuZVLZULrO64sJlorRlJrwUM_Jw6N3G7mcA7E0T0EFd2xa6AU0xBpUev56RxQF0sUOM4M02hsbGnWHU7GWZUZbZyzIHWWPi7lg9lA1UJ_5oZwTuj4BFZ2sfbesCnjiRC8VzPXL6wMEo4jdANOgCtA6qEMH1purCv0f8ASMUhPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71488915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hayes, Kimberley ; Walton, Judie R. ; Szomor, Zoltan L. ; Murrell, George A.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kimberley ; Walton, Judie R. ; Szomor, Zoltan L. ; Murrell, George A.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The reliability of tests for isometric strength of the shoulder joint in symptomatic subjects has yet to be established. For this purpose, interrater and intrarater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of manual muscle tests, a handheld dynamometer, and a spring-scale dynamometer for 5 different shoulder movements in symptomatic subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from a random-effects model. All movements tested with the handheld dynamometer demonstrated excellent reliability for the interrater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.92). Excellent reliability was also demonstrated for elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation for the intrarater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.96). For the interrater trial, measurement of the lift-off maneuver with the handheld dynamometer was significantly more reliable than with manual muscle tests (P =.002). In summary, the handheld dynamometer was the most reliable and discriminatory means for assessing strength of the rotator cuff in symptomatic subjects. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:33-9.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.119852</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11845146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Joint Diseases - physiopathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotation ; Rotator Cuff - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2002-01, Vol.11 (1), p.33-39</ispartof><rights>2002 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b431833fe6fc1d87a0774caffab99d142394639aa148ab8c5a9d23c53bab53f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b431833fe6fc1d87a0774caffab99d142394639aa148ab8c5a9d23c53bab53f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.119852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13638269$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11845146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kimberley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walton, Judie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szomor, Zoltan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrell, George A.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>The reliability of tests for isometric strength of the shoulder joint in symptomatic subjects has yet to be established. For this purpose, interrater and intrarater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of manual muscle tests, a handheld dynamometer, and a spring-scale dynamometer for 5 different shoulder movements in symptomatic subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from a random-effects model. All movements tested with the handheld dynamometer demonstrated excellent reliability for the interrater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.92). Excellent reliability was also demonstrated for elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation for the intrarater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.96). For the interrater trial, measurement of the lift-off maneuver with the handheld dynamometer was significantly more reliable than with manual muscle tests (P =.002). In summary, the handheld dynamometer was the most reliable and discriminatory means for assessing strength of the rotator cuff in symptomatic subjects. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:33-9.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUkueku7X0l2j1L8goIgel42m9l2JR91JxH6701poSdPM4fnfZl5CLlldM5oXiwahDmnlM8Z0yrjZ2TKMsHTPKP0fNxpplJeyHxCrhC_KaVaUn5JJowpmTGZT4n6gDrYMtSh3yWdT0TSQL_pKkx8FxOLCIihXSe46Ya6gphgH6Fd95trcuFtjXBznDPy9fz0uXxNV-8vb8vHVeqk0H1aSsGUEB5y71ilCkuLQjrrvS21rpjkQstcaGuZVLZULrO64sJlorRlJrwUM_Jw6N3G7mcA7E0T0EFd2xa6AU0xBpUev56RxQF0sUOM4M02hsbGnWHU7GWZUZbZyzIHWWPi7lg9lA1UJ_5oZwTuj4BFZ2sfbesCnjiRC8VzPXL6wMEo4jdANOgCtA6qEMH1purCv0f8ASMUhPk</recordid><startdate>200201</startdate><enddate>200201</enddate><creator>Hayes, Kimberley</creator><creator>Walton, Judie R.</creator><creator>Szomor, Zoltan L.</creator><creator>Murrell, George A.C.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200201</creationdate><title>Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength</title><author>Hayes, Kimberley ; Walton, Judie R. ; Szomor, Zoltan L. ; Murrell, George A.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b431833fe6fc1d87a0774caffab99d142394639aa148ab8c5a9d23c53bab53f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kimberley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walton, Judie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szomor, Zoltan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrell, George A.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Kimberley</au><au>Walton, Judie R.</au><au>Szomor, Zoltan L.</au><au>Murrell, George A.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2002-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>33-39</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>The reliability of tests for isometric strength of the shoulder joint in symptomatic subjects has yet to be established. For this purpose, interrater and intrarater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of manual muscle tests, a handheld dynamometer, and a spring-scale dynamometer for 5 different shoulder movements in symptomatic subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated from a random-effects model. All movements tested with the handheld dynamometer demonstrated excellent reliability for the interrater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.92). Excellent reliability was also demonstrated for elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation for the intrarater trial (ρ = 0.79−0.96). For the interrater trial, measurement of the lift-off maneuver with the handheld dynamometer was significantly more reliable than with manual muscle tests (P =.002). In summary, the handheld dynamometer was the most reliable and discriminatory means for assessing strength of the rotator cuff in symptomatic subjects. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:33-9.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11845146</pmid><doi>10.1067/mse.2002.119852</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1058-2746 |
| ispartof | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2002-01, Vol.11 (1), p.33-39 |
| issn | 1058-2746 1532-6500 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71488915 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Joint Diseases - physiopathology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology Osteoarticular system. Muscles Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Reproducibility of Results Rotation Rotator Cuff - physiopathology Shoulder Joint - physiopathology |
| title | Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A09%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%203%20methods%20for%20assessing%20shoulder%20strength&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Hayes,%20Kimberley&rft.date=2002-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=33-39&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mse.2002.119852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71488915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71488915&rft_id=info:pmid/11845146&rft_els_id=S1058274602009448&rfr_iscdi=true |