The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield

The growth-promoting effect of Farmagülatör DRY Humate (FH) on live performance, carcass weight, and the abdominal fat pad of broilers was studied during different feeding periods. Four hundred, 1-d-old straight-run birds were randomly distributed to 20 floor pens of an environmentally controlled ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2002-02, Vol.81 (2), p.227-230
Hauptverfasser: Kocabağli, N, Alp, M, Acar, N, Kahraman, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 230
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 81
creator Kocabağli, N
Alp, M
Acar, N
Kahraman, R
description The growth-promoting effect of Farmagülatör DRY Humate (FH) on live performance, carcass weight, and the abdominal fat pad of broilers was studied during different feeding periods. Four hundred, 1-d-old straight-run birds were randomly distributed to 20 floor pens of an environmentally controlled house. Four dietary regimens were replicated in five pens, each containing 20 chicks, as follows: 1) birds received no added FH in the starter or grower (NAFH), 2) birds received FH from 0 to 21 d (FH0-21), 3) birds received FH from 22 to 42 d (FH22-42), 4) birds received FH from 0 to 42 d (FH0-42) in the starter and grower diets, respectively. The FH was added to the diets at 2.5 kg/per ton of feed. Starter and grower diets were formulated to meet the minimum NRC requirements for broilers and were provided as a mash feed. Body weights at 21 d were not affected by the dietary regimens. At 42 d, body weights and feed conversions of broilers were significantly affected by the dietary humate treatments. Birds fed FH22-42 weighed more than the NAFH, whereas the FH0-21 and FH0-42 were intermediate and not different from the other treatments. Feed:gain was lower for the FH22-42 and FH0-42 treatments compared to the NAFH. There was no difference in carcass yield or abdominal fat pad percentages due to feeding FH. Feeding FH during the grower period had the most beneficial effect in terms of growth and feed conversion on broiler performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ps/81.2.227
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71487602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71487602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2e94a91e7930141b1be81bb1427185fc78568dab19b66c950346eb5c222e63483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAYhnNQ3JyevEtOXqRbvqRN0qMMf8FAhHkOSfrVVdq1Jimy_97KBsIL7-Xhhfch5AbYElgpVkNcaVjyJefqjMwZEzwrVAkzchnjF2McpFQXZAagldAC5uR9u0OKdY0-RdrXtGow2XCgu7GzCWkch6HFDvfJpqbf0yku9E2LgX6G_iftqN1X1NvgbYz00GBbXZHz2rYRr0-9IB9Pj9v1S7Z5e35dP2wyL7ROGccytyWgKgWDHBw41OAc5FyBLmqvdCF1ZR2UTkpfFkzkEl3hOecoRa7Fgtwdd4fQf48Yk-ma6LFt7R77MRoFuVaS8Qm8P4I-9DEGrM0Qmm46aYCZP2tmiEaD4WayNtG3p9nRdVj9sydl4hcPgGnH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71487602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kocabağli, N ; Alp, M ; Acar, N ; Kahraman, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kocabağli, N ; Alp, M ; Acar, N ; Kahraman, R</creatorcontrib><description>The growth-promoting effect of Farmagülatör DRY Humate (FH) on live performance, carcass weight, and the abdominal fat pad of broilers was studied during different feeding periods. Four hundred, 1-d-old straight-run birds were randomly distributed to 20 floor pens of an environmentally controlled house. Four dietary regimens were replicated in five pens, each containing 20 chicks, as follows: 1) birds received no added FH in the starter or grower (NAFH), 2) birds received FH from 0 to 21 d (FH0-21), 3) birds received FH from 22 to 42 d (FH22-42), 4) birds received FH from 0 to 42 d (FH0-42) in the starter and grower diets, respectively. The FH was added to the diets at 2.5 kg/per ton of feed. Starter and grower diets were formulated to meet the minimum NRC requirements for broilers and were provided as a mash feed. Body weights at 21 d were not affected by the dietary regimens. At 42 d, body weights and feed conversions of broilers were significantly affected by the dietary humate treatments. Birds fed FH22-42 weighed more than the NAFH, whereas the FH0-21 and FH0-42 were intermediate and not different from the other treatments. Feed:gain was lower for the FH22-42 and FH0-42 treatments compared to the NAFH. There was no difference in carcass yield or abdominal fat pad percentages due to feeding FH. Feeding FH during the grower period had the most beneficial effect in terms of growth and feed conversion on broiler performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.2.227</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11873831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Benzopyrans - administration &amp; dosage ; Body Composition ; Body Weight ; Chickens - growth &amp; development ; Diet ; Dietary Supplements ; Humic Substances - administration &amp; dosage ; Nutritional Requirements</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2002-02, Vol.81 (2), p.227-230</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2e94a91e7930141b1be81bb1427185fc78568dab19b66c950346eb5c222e63483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2e94a91e7930141b1be81bb1427185fc78568dab19b66c950346eb5c222e63483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11873831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kocabağli, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alp, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, R</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>The growth-promoting effect of Farmagülatör DRY Humate (FH) on live performance, carcass weight, and the abdominal fat pad of broilers was studied during different feeding periods. Four hundred, 1-d-old straight-run birds were randomly distributed to 20 floor pens of an environmentally controlled house. Four dietary regimens were replicated in five pens, each containing 20 chicks, as follows: 1) birds received no added FH in the starter or grower (NAFH), 2) birds received FH from 0 to 21 d (FH0-21), 3) birds received FH from 22 to 42 d (FH22-42), 4) birds received FH from 0 to 42 d (FH0-42) in the starter and grower diets, respectively. The FH was added to the diets at 2.5 kg/per ton of feed. Starter and grower diets were formulated to meet the minimum NRC requirements for broilers and were provided as a mash feed. Body weights at 21 d were not affected by the dietary regimens. At 42 d, body weights and feed conversions of broilers were significantly affected by the dietary humate treatments. Birds fed FH22-42 weighed more than the NAFH, whereas the FH0-21 and FH0-42 were intermediate and not different from the other treatments. Feed:gain was lower for the FH22-42 and FH0-42 treatments compared to the NAFH. There was no difference in carcass yield or abdominal fat pad percentages due to feeding FH. Feeding FH during the grower period had the most beneficial effect in terms of growth and feed conversion on broiler performance.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Benzopyrans - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Chickens - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Humic Substances - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAYhnNQ3JyevEtOXqRbvqRN0qMMf8FAhHkOSfrVVdq1Jimy_97KBsIL7-Xhhfch5AbYElgpVkNcaVjyJefqjMwZEzwrVAkzchnjF2McpFQXZAagldAC5uR9u0OKdY0-RdrXtGow2XCgu7GzCWkch6HFDvfJpqbf0yku9E2LgX6G_iftqN1X1NvgbYz00GBbXZHz2rYRr0-9IB9Pj9v1S7Z5e35dP2wyL7ROGccytyWgKgWDHBw41OAc5FyBLmqvdCF1ZR2UTkpfFkzkEl3hOecoRa7Fgtwdd4fQf48Yk-ma6LFt7R77MRoFuVaS8Qm8P4I-9DEGrM0Qmm46aYCZP2tmiEaD4WayNtG3p9nRdVj9sydl4hcPgGnH</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>Kocabağli, N</creator><creator>Alp, M</creator><creator>Acar, N</creator><creator>Kahraman, R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield</title><author>Kocabağli, N ; Alp, M ; Acar, N ; Kahraman, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2e94a91e7930141b1be81bb1427185fc78568dab19b66c950346eb5c222e63483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Benzopyrans - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Chickens - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Humic Substances - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kocabağli, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alp, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kocabağli, N</au><au>Alp, M</au><au>Acar, N</au><au>Kahraman, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>227-230</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><abstract>The growth-promoting effect of Farmagülatör DRY Humate (FH) on live performance, carcass weight, and the abdominal fat pad of broilers was studied during different feeding periods. Four hundred, 1-d-old straight-run birds were randomly distributed to 20 floor pens of an environmentally controlled house. Four dietary regimens were replicated in five pens, each containing 20 chicks, as follows: 1) birds received no added FH in the starter or grower (NAFH), 2) birds received FH from 0 to 21 d (FH0-21), 3) birds received FH from 22 to 42 d (FH22-42), 4) birds received FH from 0 to 42 d (FH0-42) in the starter and grower diets, respectively. The FH was added to the diets at 2.5 kg/per ton of feed. Starter and grower diets were formulated to meet the minimum NRC requirements for broilers and were provided as a mash feed. Body weights at 21 d were not affected by the dietary regimens. At 42 d, body weights and feed conversions of broilers were significantly affected by the dietary humate treatments. Birds fed FH22-42 weighed more than the NAFH, whereas the FH0-21 and FH0-42 were intermediate and not different from the other treatments. Feed:gain was lower for the FH22-42 and FH0-42 treatments compared to the NAFH. There was no difference in carcass yield or abdominal fat pad percentages due to feeding FH. Feeding FH during the grower period had the most beneficial effect in terms of growth and feed conversion on broiler performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>11873831</pmid><doi>10.1093/ps/81.2.227</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2002-02, Vol.81 (2), p.227-230
issn 0032-5791
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71487602
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adipose Tissue
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animals
Benzopyrans - administration & dosage
Body Composition
Body Weight
Chickens - growth & development
Diet
Dietary Supplements
Humic Substances - administration & dosage
Nutritional Requirements
title The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20dietary%20humate%20supplementation%20on%20broiler%20growth%20and%20carcass%20yield&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Kocaba%C4%9Fli,%20N&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=227-230&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ps/81.2.227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71487602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71487602&rft_id=info:pmid/11873831&rfr_iscdi=true