Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle

Objective: To compare the pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed 2-pronucleate (2PN) oocytes obtained either in a long protocol or in an antagonist protocol and ovarian stimulation with either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (recFSH). Design: Retrospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2002-03, Vol.77 (3), p.472-475
Hauptverfasser: Seelig, Anna Sophie, Al-Hasani, Safa, Katalinic, Alexander, Schöpper, Beate, Sturm, Rita, Diedrich, Klaus, Ludwig, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 475
container_issue 3
container_start_page 472
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 77
creator Seelig, Anna Sophie
Al-Hasani, Safa
Katalinic, Alexander
Schöpper, Beate
Sturm, Rita
Diedrich, Klaus
Ludwig, Michael
description Objective: To compare the pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed 2-pronucleate (2PN) oocytes obtained either in a long protocol or in an antagonist protocol and ovarian stimulation with either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (recFSH). Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Academic infertility center. Patient(s): Three hundred forty-two infertile couples who underwent a transfer of cryopreserved 2PN oocytes. Intervention(s): hMG (n = 194) or recFSH (n = 92) in a long protocol or hMG (n = 16) or recFSH (n = 40) stimulation under pituitary suppression with the GnRH antagonist Cetrotide was used. The 2PN oocytes were transferred after endometrial preparation using E 2 valerate and vaginal progesterone (Crinone 8% vaginal gel). Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation, pregnancy, and abortion rates. Result(s): Implantation rates in the freeze-thaw cycles were 5.6% (hMG) and 3.8% (recFSH) with 2PN oocytes from the long protocol and 7% from the antagonist cycles, irrespective of whether hMG or recFSH was used. Pregnancy rates were similar independent of whether they resulted from the long-protocol cycles with hMG (15.4%) and recFSH (13.1%) or from the antagonist protocol cycles with hMG (25.0%) and recFSH (17.5%). Conclusion(s): The potential to implant is independent of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and gonadotropin chosen for the collection cycle when previously cryopreserved 2PN oocytes were replaced after thawing in the cleavage stage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03008-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71479362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028201030084</els_id><sourcerecordid>71479362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-32cb38cde2173d76414079b5332b4be3d0677a8c20a78eb880860330660af9223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCTwD5AoJDYGwntnNCaMVHpUocgLPlOJOuUWIH21u0_Pom3VV77Mkaz_POjB5CXjH4wIDJjz8BWFMB1_wdsPcgAHRVPyEb1jSyamQjnpLNPXJOnuf8BwAkU_wZOWdMK85atSH_t3GabfI5BhoH6tIhzgkzphtb_Pq3Ly5OSP_5sqPXMdg-lhRnH6qEI9rswzXdxTTFgNQufZ9LpjFRG8p96QMtO6QujiO6sibcwY34gpwNdsz48vRekN9fv_zafq-ufny73H6-qlwtdKkEd53QrkfOlOiVrFkNqu0aIXhXdyh6kEpZ7ThYpbHTGrQEIUBKsEPLubggb49z5xT_7jEXM_nscBxtwLjPRrFatUKuYHMEXYo5JxzMnPxk08EwMKt0cyfdrEYNMHMn3dRL7vVpwb6bsH9InSwvwJsTYLOz45BscD4_cKJpoG3Fwn06crjouPGYTHYeg8Pep8Wc6aN_5JRbO56gLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71479362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Seelig, Anna Sophie ; Al-Hasani, Safa ; Katalinic, Alexander ; Schöpper, Beate ; Sturm, Rita ; Diedrich, Klaus ; Ludwig, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Seelig, Anna Sophie ; Al-Hasani, Safa ; Katalinic, Alexander ; Schöpper, Beate ; Sturm, Rita ; Diedrich, Klaus ; Ludwig, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To compare the pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed 2-pronucleate (2PN) oocytes obtained either in a long protocol or in an antagonist protocol and ovarian stimulation with either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (recFSH). Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Academic infertility center. Patient(s): Three hundred forty-two infertile couples who underwent a transfer of cryopreserved 2PN oocytes. Intervention(s): hMG (n = 194) or recFSH (n = 92) in a long protocol or hMG (n = 16) or recFSH (n = 40) stimulation under pituitary suppression with the GnRH antagonist Cetrotide was used. The 2PN oocytes were transferred after endometrial preparation using E 2 valerate and vaginal progesterone (Crinone 8% vaginal gel). Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation, pregnancy, and abortion rates. Result(s): Implantation rates in the freeze-thaw cycles were 5.6% (hMG) and 3.8% (recFSH) with 2PN oocytes from the long protocol and 7% from the antagonist cycles, irrespective of whether hMG or recFSH was used. Pregnancy rates were similar independent of whether they resulted from the long-protocol cycles with hMG (15.4%) and recFSH (13.1%) or from the antagonist protocol cycles with hMG (25.0%) and recFSH (17.5%). Conclusion(s): The potential to implant is independent of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and gonadotropin chosen for the collection cycle when previously cryopreserved 2PN oocytes were replaced after thawing in the cleavage stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03008-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11872197</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cetrorelix ; cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - pharmacology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GnRH agonist ; GnRH antagonist ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology ; Hormone Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Hormone Antagonists - pharmacology ; Hormone metabolism and regulation ; Humans ; Male ; Oocytes ; open freezing system ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation ; Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage ; Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic ; Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2002-03, Vol.77 (3), p.472-475</ispartof><rights>2002 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-32cb38cde2173d76414079b5332b4be3d0677a8c20a78eb880860330660af9223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-32cb38cde2173d76414079b5332b4be3d0677a8c20a78eb880860330660af9223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03008-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13550993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11872197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seelig, Anna Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Hasani, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katalinic, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöpper, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective: To compare the pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed 2-pronucleate (2PN) oocytes obtained either in a long protocol or in an antagonist protocol and ovarian stimulation with either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (recFSH). Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Academic infertility center. Patient(s): Three hundred forty-two infertile couples who underwent a transfer of cryopreserved 2PN oocytes. Intervention(s): hMG (n = 194) or recFSH (n = 92) in a long protocol or hMG (n = 16) or recFSH (n = 40) stimulation under pituitary suppression with the GnRH antagonist Cetrotide was used. The 2PN oocytes were transferred after endometrial preparation using E 2 valerate and vaginal progesterone (Crinone 8% vaginal gel). Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation, pregnancy, and abortion rates. Result(s): Implantation rates in the freeze-thaw cycles were 5.6% (hMG) and 3.8% (recFSH) with 2PN oocytes from the long protocol and 7% from the antagonist cycles, irrespective of whether hMG or recFSH was used. Pregnancy rates were similar independent of whether they resulted from the long-protocol cycles with hMG (15.4%) and recFSH (13.1%) or from the antagonist protocol cycles with hMG (25.0%) and recFSH (17.5%). Conclusion(s): The potential to implant is independent of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and gonadotropin chosen for the collection cycle when previously cryopreserved 2PN oocytes were replaced after thawing in the cleavage stage.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cetrorelix</subject><subject>cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GnRH agonist</subject><subject>GnRH antagonist</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Hormone Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hormone Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Hormone metabolism and regulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>open freezing system</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><subject>Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCTwD5AoJDYGwntnNCaMVHpUocgLPlOJOuUWIH21u0_Pom3VV77Mkaz_POjB5CXjH4wIDJjz8BWFMB1_wdsPcgAHRVPyEb1jSyamQjnpLNPXJOnuf8BwAkU_wZOWdMK85atSH_t3GabfI5BhoH6tIhzgkzphtb_Pq3Ly5OSP_5sqPXMdg-lhRnH6qEI9rswzXdxTTFgNQufZ9LpjFRG8p96QMtO6QujiO6sibcwY34gpwNdsz48vRekN9fv_zafq-ufny73H6-qlwtdKkEd53QrkfOlOiVrFkNqu0aIXhXdyh6kEpZ7ThYpbHTGrQEIUBKsEPLubggb49z5xT_7jEXM_nscBxtwLjPRrFatUKuYHMEXYo5JxzMnPxk08EwMKt0cyfdrEYNMHMn3dRL7vVpwb6bsH9InSwvwJsTYLOz45BscD4_cKJpoG3Fwn06crjouPGYTHYeg8Pep8Wc6aN_5JRbO56gLg</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Seelig, Anna Sophie</creator><creator>Al-Hasani, Safa</creator><creator>Katalinic, Alexander</creator><creator>Schöpper, Beate</creator><creator>Sturm, Rita</creator><creator>Diedrich, Klaus</creator><creator>Ludwig, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle</title><author>Seelig, Anna Sophie ; Al-Hasani, Safa ; Katalinic, Alexander ; Schöpper, Beate ; Sturm, Rita ; Diedrich, Klaus ; Ludwig, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-32cb38cde2173d76414079b5332b4be3d0677a8c20a78eb880860330660af9223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cetrorelix</topic><topic>cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GnRH agonist</topic><topic>GnRH antagonist</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Hormone Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hormone Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Hormone metabolism and regulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>open freezing system</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><topic>Vertebrates: reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seelig, Anna Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Hasani, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katalinic, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöpper, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seelig, Anna Sophie</au><au>Al-Hasani, Safa</au><au>Katalinic, Alexander</au><au>Schöpper, Beate</au><au>Sturm, Rita</au><au>Diedrich, Klaus</au><au>Ludwig, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>472-475</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective: To compare the pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed 2-pronucleate (2PN) oocytes obtained either in a long protocol or in an antagonist protocol and ovarian stimulation with either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (recFSH). Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Academic infertility center. Patient(s): Three hundred forty-two infertile couples who underwent a transfer of cryopreserved 2PN oocytes. Intervention(s): hMG (n = 194) or recFSH (n = 92) in a long protocol or hMG (n = 16) or recFSH (n = 40) stimulation under pituitary suppression with the GnRH antagonist Cetrotide was used. The 2PN oocytes were transferred after endometrial preparation using E 2 valerate and vaginal progesterone (Crinone 8% vaginal gel). Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation, pregnancy, and abortion rates. Result(s): Implantation rates in the freeze-thaw cycles were 5.6% (hMG) and 3.8% (recFSH) with 2PN oocytes from the long protocol and 7% from the antagonist cycles, irrespective of whether hMG or recFSH was used. Pregnancy rates were similar independent of whether they resulted from the long-protocol cycles with hMG (15.4%) and recFSH (13.1%) or from the antagonist protocol cycles with hMG (25.0%) and recFSH (17.5%). Conclusion(s): The potential to implant is independent of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and gonadotropin chosen for the collection cycle when previously cryopreserved 2PN oocytes were replaced after thawing in the cleavage stage.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11872197</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03008-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2002-03, Vol.77 (3), p.472-475
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71479362
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cetrorelix
cryopreservation
Cryopreservation - methods
Embryo Transfer
Female
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - pharmacology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GnRH agonist
GnRH antagonist
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs & derivatives
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology
Hormone Antagonists - administration & dosage
Hormone Antagonists - pharmacology
Hormone metabolism and regulation
Humans
Male
Oocytes
open freezing system
Ovulation Induction - methods
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation
Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage
Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology
Retrospective Studies
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
Vertebrates: reproduction
title Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A18%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cryopreservation%20outcome%20with%20gonadotropin-releasing%20hormone%20agonists%20or%20antagonists%20in%20the%20collecting%20cycle&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Seelig,%20Anna%20Sophie&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=472-475&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03008-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71479362%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71479362&rft_id=info:pmid/11872197&rft_els_id=S0015028201030084&rfr_iscdi=true