User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system
Summary Background and objective: This paper describes the user acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system at the University Hospital in Giessen, Germany, after 5 yr of routine use. Methods: A questionnaire with 75 items was distributed to all anaesthesiologists and anaesthetic nurse...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of anaesthesiology 2003-12, Vol.20 (12), p.967-972 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 972 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 967 |
| container_title | European journal of anaesthesiology |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Quinzio, L. Junger, A. Gottwald, B. Benson, M. Hartmann, B. Jost, A. Banzhaf, A. Hempelmann, G. |
| description | Summary Background and objective: This paper describes the user acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system at the University Hospital in Giessen, Germany, after 5 yr of routine use. Methods: A questionnaire with 75 items was distributed to all anaesthesiologists and anaesthetic nurses of the Department of Anaesthesiology. The questions were answered anonymously on a five-point Likert scale. Results: The return rate was 60% (44 physicians and 24 nurses). The results indicated that the system generally met user expectations. The respondents thought that electronic record keeping improved the quality of their work, and they did not want to switch back to paper records. Problems arose with hardware placement and software features, e.g. coding tools for diagnoses and type of surgery. The perceived quality of training strongly influenced user acceptance. Conclusions: Despite the deficits revealed by the survey, the respondents did not want to switch back to manual record keeping. A structured user survey is a useful tool for the development, adaptation and implementation of an anaesthesia information management system. A training strategy that takes the needs of the users into account is recommended. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S026502150300156X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71472616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S026502150300156X</cupid><sourcerecordid>1495482751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-a09aa0852831cfcdf6069f2d9f613f874f76824f17f9037c6a36c41b7b4b81013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhoMo9rT6A7yRRdC71Zl87l5JKVoLhV5owbswm5P0bN2PY7JL6b9vlrNwQCmEDGSeGd73DWPvED4joPnyE7hWwFGBAEClf79gGxRalVxI_ZJtlna59E_YaUr3AKDy3Gt2glLXAHW9YV9vk48FOef3Ew3OF2MoaMiHfJp2PrVUtEMYY09TOw5Fnxt3vvfDVKTHNPn-DXsVqEv-7VrP2O33b78ufpTXN5dXF-fXpROq0iVBTQSV4pVAF9w2aNB14Ns6aBShMjIYXXEZ0IQahHGahHYSG9PIpsqaxRn7dNi7j-PfOWuzfZuc7zoa_Dgna1AarlFn8MM_4P04xyFrsxy1qpVBlSE8QC6OKUUf7D62PcVHi2CXaO1_0eaZ9-viuen99jixZpmBjytAyVEXYs6zTUdOCVFJsViRB-5h7CYf059ufvDR7jx1087mTwKhpSh5rpgvKJenxZhYNVPfxHZ754_Onlf9BFPTnYs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216595715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Quinzio, L. ; Junger, A. ; Gottwald, B. ; Benson, M. ; Hartmann, B. ; Jost, A. ; Banzhaf, A. ; Hempelmann, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinzio, L. ; Junger, A. ; Gottwald, B. ; Benson, M. ; Hartmann, B. ; Jost, A. ; Banzhaf, A. ; Hempelmann, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background and objective: This paper describes the user acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system at the University Hospital in Giessen, Germany, after 5 yr of routine use. Methods: A questionnaire with 75 items was distributed to all anaesthesiologists and anaesthetic nurses of the Department of Anaesthesiology. The questions were answered anonymously on a five-point Likert scale. Results: The return rate was 60% (44 physicians and 24 nurses). The results indicated that the system generally met user expectations. The respondents thought that electronic record keeping improved the quality of their work, and they did not want to switch back to paper records. Problems arose with hardware placement and software features, e.g. coding tools for diagnoses and type of surgery. The perceived quality of training strongly influenced user acceptance. Conclusions: Despite the deficits revealed by the survey, the respondents did not want to switch back to manual record keeping. A structured user survey is a useful tool for the development, adaptation and implementation of an anaesthesia information management system. A training strategy that takes the needs of the users into account is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S026502150300156X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14690099</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJANEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia - utilization ; Anesthesia Department, Hospital - organization & administration ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesiology ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Computers ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer User Training ; Data bases ; Data processing ; Female ; Germany ; Hospital Information Systems - utilization ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, University - organization & administration ; Humans ; Likert scale ; Male ; Medical coding ; Medical personnel ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization ; Medical sciences ; Medical Staff, Hospital - education ; Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Methods ; Miscellaneous ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - education ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Original Article ; Personnel, Hospital - education ; Personnel, Hospital - psychology ; Response rates ; Software ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; User interface</subject><ispartof>European journal of anaesthesiology, 2003-12, Vol.20 (12), p.967-972</ispartof><rights>2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology</rights><rights>2003 European Academy of Anaesthesiology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-a09aa0852831cfcdf6069f2d9f613f874f76824f17f9037c6a36c41b7b4b81013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-a09aa0852831cfcdf6069f2d9f613f874f76824f17f9037c6a36c41b7b4b81013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15338431$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14690099$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinzio, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottwald, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banzhaf, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hempelmann, G.</creatorcontrib><title>User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system</title><title>European journal of anaesthesiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><description>Summary Background and objective: This paper describes the user acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system at the University Hospital in Giessen, Germany, after 5 yr of routine use. Methods: A questionnaire with 75 items was distributed to all anaesthesiologists and anaesthetic nurses of the Department of Anaesthesiology. The questions were answered anonymously on a five-point Likert scale. Results: The return rate was 60% (44 physicians and 24 nurses). The results indicated that the system generally met user expectations. The respondents thought that electronic record keeping improved the quality of their work, and they did not want to switch back to paper records. Problems arose with hardware placement and software features, e.g. coding tools for diagnoses and type of surgery. The perceived quality of training strongly influenced user acceptance. Conclusions: Despite the deficits revealed by the survey, the respondents did not want to switch back to manual record keeping. A structured user survey is a useful tool for the development, adaptation and implementation of an anaesthesia information management system. A training strategy that takes the needs of the users into account is recommended.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia - utilization</subject><subject>Anesthesia Department, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Computers</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer User Training</subject><subject>Data bases</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Hospital Information Systems - utilization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, University - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical coding</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - education</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - education</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital - education</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>User interface</subject><issn>0265-0215</issn><issn>1365-2346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhoMo9rT6A7yRRdC71Zl87l5JKVoLhV5owbswm5P0bN2PY7JL6b9vlrNwQCmEDGSeGd73DWPvED4joPnyE7hWwFGBAEClf79gGxRalVxI_ZJtlna59E_YaUr3AKDy3Gt2glLXAHW9YV9vk48FOef3Ew3OF2MoaMiHfJp2PrVUtEMYY09TOw5Fnxt3vvfDVKTHNPn-DXsVqEv-7VrP2O33b78ufpTXN5dXF-fXpROq0iVBTQSV4pVAF9w2aNB14Ns6aBShMjIYXXEZ0IQahHGahHYSG9PIpsqaxRn7dNi7j-PfOWuzfZuc7zoa_Dgna1AarlFn8MM_4P04xyFrsxy1qpVBlSE8QC6OKUUf7D62PcVHi2CXaO1_0eaZ9-viuen99jixZpmBjytAyVEXYs6zTUdOCVFJsViRB-5h7CYf059ufvDR7jx1087mTwKhpSh5rpgvKJenxZhYNVPfxHZ754_Onlf9BFPTnYs</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Quinzio, L.</creator><creator>Junger, A.</creator><creator>Gottwald, B.</creator><creator>Benson, M.</creator><creator>Hartmann, B.</creator><creator>Jost, A.</creator><creator>Banzhaf, A.</creator><creator>Hempelmann, G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>European Academy of Anaesthesiology</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system</title><author>Quinzio, L. ; Junger, A. ; Gottwald, B. ; Benson, M. ; Hartmann, B. ; Jost, A. ; Banzhaf, A. ; Hempelmann, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-a09aa0852831cfcdf6069f2d9f613f874f76824f17f9037c6a36c41b7b4b81013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia - utilization</topic><topic>Anesthesia Department, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Computers</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer User Training</topic><topic>Data bases</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Hospital Information Systems - utilization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, University - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical coding</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - education</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - education</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital - education</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>User interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinzio, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottwald, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banzhaf, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hempelmann, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinzio, L.</au><au>Junger, A.</au><au>Gottwald, B.</au><au>Benson, M.</au><au>Hartmann, B.</au><au>Jost, A.</au><au>Banzhaf, A.</au><au>Hempelmann, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system</atitle><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>967</spage><epage>972</epage><pages>967-972</pages><issn>0265-0215</issn><eissn>1365-2346</eissn><coden>EJANEG</coden><abstract>Summary Background and objective: This paper describes the user acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system at the University Hospital in Giessen, Germany, after 5 yr of routine use. Methods: A questionnaire with 75 items was distributed to all anaesthesiologists and anaesthetic nurses of the Department of Anaesthesiology. The questions were answered anonymously on a five-point Likert scale. Results: The return rate was 60% (44 physicians and 24 nurses). The results indicated that the system generally met user expectations. The respondents thought that electronic record keeping improved the quality of their work, and they did not want to switch back to paper records. Problems arose with hardware placement and software features, e.g. coding tools for diagnoses and type of surgery. The perceived quality of training strongly influenced user acceptance. Conclusions: Despite the deficits revealed by the survey, the respondents did not want to switch back to manual record keeping. A structured user survey is a useful tool for the development, adaptation and implementation of an anaesthesia information management system. A training strategy that takes the needs of the users into account is recommended.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>14690099</pmid><doi>10.1017/S026502150300156X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0265-0215 |
| ispartof | European journal of anaesthesiology, 2003-12, Vol.20 (12), p.967-972 |
| issn | 0265-0215 1365-2346 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71472616 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
| subjects | Adult Anesthesia Anesthesia - utilization Anesthesia Department, Hospital - organization & administration Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesiology Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude to Computers Biological and medical sciences Computer User Training Data bases Data processing Female Germany Hospital Information Systems - utilization Hospitals Hospitals, University - organization & administration Humans Likert scale Male Medical coding Medical personnel Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization Medical sciences Medical Staff, Hospital - education Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology Methods Miscellaneous Nursing Staff, Hospital - education Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology Original Article Personnel, Hospital - education Personnel, Hospital - psychology Response rates Software Surveys and Questionnaires User interface |
| title | User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=User%20acceptance%20of%20an%20anaesthesia%20information%20management%20system&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20anaesthesiology&rft.au=Quinzio,%20L.&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=967&rft.epage=972&rft.pages=967-972&rft.issn=0265-0215&rft.eissn=1365-2346&rft.coden=EJANEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S026502150300156X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1495482751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216595715&rft_id=info:pmid/14690099&rft_cupid=10_1017_S026502150300156X&rfr_iscdi=true |