Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder

A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2003-12, Vol.19 (10), p.1109-1120
Hauptverfasser: Kirkley, Alexandra, Griffin, Sharon, Dainty, Katie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1120
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1109
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 19
creator Kirkley, Alexandra
Griffin, Sharon
Dainty, Katie
description A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71465965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806303009733</els_id><sourcerecordid>71465965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaLZp_0EpvjQ3b8b6sORDAiWkTSGQQ5Kz0MqjrhbbSjV2If--2u5CbjkNvPPMMPMw9qWBdQNNe7Fbuzxvc1pzAFGiNQh4x1aN4m0tuGjesxVo2dUGWnHKPhLtoIDCiA_stJGtFlLJFbt88CnH6XdFLzTjSFVIuZq3WIVl8nNMkxsqR4REI05zlcL_Jm3TMvSYP7GT4AbCz8d6xp5-3Dxe39Z39z9_XX-_q70wZq5bAN9xFQxo5UEY6JSQ2hkJQQoVuACt-971Sjs0mhveIPiNkFJx4Ju2F2fs_LD3Oac_C9Jsx0geh8FNmBayujykulYVUB5AnxNRxmCfcxxdfrEN2L02u7MHbXavbZ8WbWXs63H_shmxfx06eirAtyPgyLshZDf5SK-cEoZz3hXu6sBhsfE3YrbkI04e-5jRz7ZP8e1L_gESTIuf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71465965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kirkley, Alexandra ; Griffin, Sharon ; Dainty, Katie</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Alexandra ; Griffin, Sharon ; Dainty, Katie</creatorcontrib><description>A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14673454</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARTHE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Joint Instability - physiopathology ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteoarthritis - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Outcome development ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotator Cuff - physiopathology ; Rotator Cuff Injuries ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder - physiology ; Shoulder Injuries ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Shoulder outcomes ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2003-12, Vol.19 (10), p.1109-1120</ispartof><rights>2003 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15382229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14673454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dainty, Katie</creatorcontrib><title>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Outcome development</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff Injuries</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Injuries</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulder outcomes</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaLZp_0EpvjQ3b8b6sORDAiWkTSGQQ5Kz0MqjrhbbSjV2If--2u5CbjkNvPPMMPMw9qWBdQNNe7Fbuzxvc1pzAFGiNQh4x1aN4m0tuGjesxVo2dUGWnHKPhLtoIDCiA_stJGtFlLJFbt88CnH6XdFLzTjSFVIuZq3WIVl8nNMkxsqR4REI05zlcL_Jm3TMvSYP7GT4AbCz8d6xp5-3Dxe39Z39z9_XX-_q70wZq5bAN9xFQxo5UEY6JSQ2hkJQQoVuACt-971Sjs0mhveIPiNkFJx4Ju2F2fs_LD3Oac_C9Jsx0geh8FNmBayujykulYVUB5AnxNRxmCfcxxdfrEN2L02u7MHbXavbZ8WbWXs63H_shmxfx06eirAtyPgyLshZDf5SK-cEoZz3hXu6sBhsfE3YrbkI04e-5jRz7ZP8e1L_gESTIuf</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Kirkley, Alexandra</creator><creator>Griffin, Sharon</creator><creator>Dainty, Katie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</title><author>Kirkley, Alexandra ; Griffin, Sharon ; Dainty, Katie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Outcome development</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff Injuries</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Injuries</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulder outcomes</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dainty, Katie</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirkley, Alexandra</au><au>Griffin, Sharon</au><au>Dainty, Katie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1109-1120</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><coden>ARTHE3</coden><abstract>A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14673454</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2003-12, Vol.19 (10), p.1109-1120
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71465965
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Humans
Joint Instability - physiopathology
Joint Instability - surgery
Medical sciences
Orthopedic surgery
Osteoarthritis - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Outcome development
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Rotator Cuff - physiopathology
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Severity of Illness Index
Shoulder - physiology
Shoulder Injuries
Shoulder Joint - physiology
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Shoulder outcomes
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
title Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scoring%20systems%20for%20the%20functional%20assessment%20of%20the%20shoulder&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Kirkley,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1109-1120&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.coden=ARTHE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71465965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71465965&rft_id=info:pmid/14673454&rft_els_id=S0749806303009733&rfr_iscdi=true