Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder
A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthroscopy 2003-12, Vol.19 (10), p.1109-1120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1120 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1109 |
container_title | Arthroscopy |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Kirkley, Alexandra Griffin, Sharon Dainty, Katie |
description | A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71465965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806303009733</els_id><sourcerecordid>71465965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaLZp_0EpvjQ3b8b6sORDAiWkTSGQQ5Kz0MqjrhbbSjV2If--2u5CbjkNvPPMMPMw9qWBdQNNe7Fbuzxvc1pzAFGiNQh4x1aN4m0tuGjesxVo2dUGWnHKPhLtoIDCiA_stJGtFlLJFbt88CnH6XdFLzTjSFVIuZq3WIVl8nNMkxsqR4REI05zlcL_Jm3TMvSYP7GT4AbCz8d6xp5-3Dxe39Z39z9_XX-_q70wZq5bAN9xFQxo5UEY6JSQ2hkJQQoVuACt-971Sjs0mhveIPiNkFJx4Ju2F2fs_LD3Oac_C9Jsx0geh8FNmBayujykulYVUB5AnxNRxmCfcxxdfrEN2L02u7MHbXavbZ8WbWXs63H_shmxfx06eirAtyPgyLshZDf5SK-cEoZz3hXu6sBhsfE3YrbkI04e-5jRz7ZP8e1L_gESTIuf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71465965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kirkley, Alexandra ; Griffin, Sharon ; Dainty, Katie</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Alexandra ; Griffin, Sharon ; Dainty, Katie</creatorcontrib><description>A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14673454</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARTHE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Joint Instability - physiopathology ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteoarthritis - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Outcome development ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotator Cuff - physiopathology ; Rotator Cuff Injuries ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder - physiology ; Shoulder Injuries ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Shoulder outcomes ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2003-12, Vol.19 (10), p.1109-1120</ispartof><rights>2003 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15382229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14673454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dainty, Katie</creatorcontrib><title>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Outcome development</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff Injuries</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Injuries</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulder outcomes</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaLZp_0EpvjQ3b8b6sORDAiWkTSGQQ5Kz0MqjrhbbSjV2If--2u5CbjkNvPPMMPMw9qWBdQNNe7Fbuzxvc1pzAFGiNQh4x1aN4m0tuGjesxVo2dUGWnHKPhLtoIDCiA_stJGtFlLJFbt88CnH6XdFLzTjSFVIuZq3WIVl8nNMkxsqR4REI05zlcL_Jm3TMvSYP7GT4AbCz8d6xp5-3Dxe39Z39z9_XX-_q70wZq5bAN9xFQxo5UEY6JSQ2hkJQQoVuACt-971Sjs0mhveIPiNkFJx4Ju2F2fs_LD3Oac_C9Jsx0geh8FNmBayujykulYVUB5AnxNRxmCfcxxdfrEN2L02u7MHbXavbZ8WbWXs63H_shmxfx06eirAtyPgyLshZDf5SK-cEoZz3hXu6sBhsfE3YrbkI04e-5jRz7ZP8e1L_gESTIuf</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Kirkley, Alexandra</creator><creator>Griffin, Sharon</creator><creator>Dainty, Katie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</title><author>Kirkley, Alexandra ; Griffin, Sharon ; Dainty, Katie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-600c925f8075c038095347a840f435f23077ddad57ae872821e0cb3445202b6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Outcome development</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff Injuries</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Injuries</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulder outcomes</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirkley, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dainty, Katie</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirkley, Alexandra</au><au>Griffin, Sharon</au><au>Dainty, Katie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1109-1120</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><coden>ARTHE3</coden><abstract>A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14673454</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-8063 |
ispartof | Arthroscopy, 2003-12, Vol.19 (10), p.1109-1120 |
issn | 0749-8063 1526-3231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71465965 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Humans Joint Instability - physiopathology Joint Instability - surgery Medical sciences Orthopedic surgery Osteoarthritis - physiopathology Osteoarthritis - surgery Outcome development Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Rotator Cuff - physiopathology Rotator Cuff Injuries Severity of Illness Index Shoulder - physiology Shoulder Injuries Shoulder Joint - physiology Shoulder Joint - surgery Shoulder outcomes Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome |
title | Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scoring%20systems%20for%20the%20functional%20assessment%20of%20the%20shoulder&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Kirkley,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1109-1120&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.coden=ARTHE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71465965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71465965&rft_id=info:pmid/14673454&rft_els_id=S0749806303009733&rfr_iscdi=true |