Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies
The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial‐centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical materials research 2002-04, Vol.60 (1), p.206-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 206 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Poelstra, Kornelis A. Barekzi, Nazir A. Rediske, Andrea M. Felts, Adrian G. Slunt, Jeffrey B. Grainger, David W. |
description | The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial‐centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We describe the direct local delivery of polyclonal human antibodies to abdominal surgical implant sites to reduce infection severity and mortality in a lethal murine model of surgical implant‐centered peritoneal infection. Surgical implant‐centered peritonitis was produced in 180 female CF‐1 mice by the direct inoculation of surgical‐grade polypropylene mesh disks placed in the peritoneal cavity with lethal doses of either methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mice randomly received a resorbable antibody delivery vehicle at the implant site: either a blank carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) aqueous gel or the same CMC gel containing 10 mg of pooled polyclonal human immunoglobulin G locally on the implant after infection, either alone or in combination with systemic doses of cefazolin or vancomycin antibiotics. Human antibodies were rapidly released (first‐order kinetics) from the gel carrier to both peritoneal fluids and serum in both infection scenarios. Inocula required for lethal infection were substantially reduced by surgery and the presence of the implant versus a closed lethal peritonitis model. Survival to 10 days with two different gram‐negative P. aeruginosa strains was significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) by the direct application of CMC gel containing antibodies alone to the surgical implant site. Human‐equivalent doses of systemic vancomycin provided a significantly improved benefit (p < 0.01) against lethal, implant‐centered, gram‐positive MRSA infection. However, locally delivered polyclonal human antibodies in combination with a range of systemic vancomycin doses against MRSA failed to improve host survival. Successful antibody therapy against gram‐negative, implant‐centered infections complements the clinically routine use of systemic antibiotics, providing a mechanism of protection independent of antibiotic resistance. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 60: 206–215, 2002 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.10069 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71447860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71447860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-162b3e658790a63b017f553644698807cb467c6f6747305f252a33345d9601bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1O3DAUha2qVRloF32ByhuQWATs-C9eUsRP0dAitVWXluM4g8GJUzsDZN8Hr4dMy6orW_b3nXt1APiA0RFGqDy-q7vNhctXYIGRFAXlhL8Gi_yHC0kQ3QG7Kd0hhKQk-C3YwbgiDAuxAL9vYhhuJ6_N6Awco9VjZ_sRhhauou6KISQ3ugcLdd_ML71d6fmlbkLneu2h6wavs-T61uac0Ce4Tq5fQR-M9n6CjfXZiLaBQ_CT8WFjZcPVoXE2vQNvWu2Tfb8998CP87Pvp5fF8uvF59OTZWFoSWWBeVkTy1klJNKc1AiLljHCKeWyqpAwNeXC8JYLKghibclKTQihrJEc4dqQPXAw5w4x_FrbNKrOJWN9Xt6GdVICUyoqjjJ4OIMmhpSibdUQXafjpDBSm8pVrlw9V57Zj9vQdd3Z5oXcdpyB_S2gU66jjbo3Lr1whObtnoOOZ-7ReTv9f6K6-nT9d3QxGy6N9umfoeO94oIIpn5-uVDX_Bu7weWlWpI_szKoLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71447860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Poelstra, Kornelis A. ; Barekzi, Nazir A. ; Rediske, Andrea M. ; Felts, Adrian G. ; Slunt, Jeffrey B. ; Grainger, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poelstra, Kornelis A. ; Barekzi, Nazir A. ; Rediske, Andrea M. ; Felts, Adrian G. ; Slunt, Jeffrey B. ; Grainger, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial‐centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We describe the direct local delivery of polyclonal human antibodies to abdominal surgical implant sites to reduce infection severity and mortality in a lethal murine model of surgical implant‐centered peritoneal infection. Surgical implant‐centered peritonitis was produced in 180 female CF‐1 mice by the direct inoculation of surgical‐grade polypropylene mesh disks placed in the peritoneal cavity with lethal doses of either methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mice randomly received a resorbable antibody delivery vehicle at the implant site: either a blank carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) aqueous gel or the same CMC gel containing 10 mg of pooled polyclonal human immunoglobulin G locally on the implant after infection, either alone or in combination with systemic doses of cefazolin or vancomycin antibiotics. Human antibodies were rapidly released (first‐order kinetics) from the gel carrier to both peritoneal fluids and serum in both infection scenarios. Inocula required for lethal infection were substantially reduced by surgery and the presence of the implant versus a closed lethal peritonitis model. Survival to 10 days with two different gram‐negative P. aeruginosa strains was significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) by the direct application of CMC gel containing antibodies alone to the surgical implant site. Human‐equivalent doses of systemic vancomycin provided a significantly improved benefit (p < 0.01) against lethal, implant‐centered, gram‐positive MRSA infection. However, locally delivered polyclonal human antibodies in combination with a range of systemic vancomycin doses against MRSA failed to improve host survival. Successful antibody therapy against gram‐negative, implant‐centered infections complements the clinically routine use of systemic antibiotics, providing a mechanism of protection independent of antibiotic resistance. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 60: 206–215, 2002</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11835177</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMRBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Abdomen - microbiology ; Abdomen - physiology ; abdominal surgery ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibodies - administration & dosage ; Antibodies - therapeutic use ; antibody ; Biocompatible Materials ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomaterials ; Drug Implants ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; gram-positive ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - administration & dosage ; Immunoglobulin G - immunology ; Immunomodulators ; implant ; infection ; local delivery ; Medical sciences ; Methicillin Resistance ; Mice ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control ; Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology ; Pseudomonas Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research, 2002-04, Vol.60 (1), p.206-215</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 60: 206-215, 2002</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-162b3e658790a63b017f553644698807cb467c6f6747305f252a33345d9601bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-162b3e658790a63b017f553644698807cb467c6f6747305f252a33345d9601bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.10069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.10069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13460169$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11835177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poelstra, Kornelis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barekzi, Nazir A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rediske, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felts, Adrian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slunt, Jeffrey B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grainger, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial‐centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We describe the direct local delivery of polyclonal human antibodies to abdominal surgical implant sites to reduce infection severity and mortality in a lethal murine model of surgical implant‐centered peritoneal infection. Surgical implant‐centered peritonitis was produced in 180 female CF‐1 mice by the direct inoculation of surgical‐grade polypropylene mesh disks placed in the peritoneal cavity with lethal doses of either methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mice randomly received a resorbable antibody delivery vehicle at the implant site: either a blank carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) aqueous gel or the same CMC gel containing 10 mg of pooled polyclonal human immunoglobulin G locally on the implant after infection, either alone or in combination with systemic doses of cefazolin or vancomycin antibiotics. Human antibodies were rapidly released (first‐order kinetics) from the gel carrier to both peritoneal fluids and serum in both infection scenarios. Inocula required for lethal infection were substantially reduced by surgery and the presence of the implant versus a closed lethal peritonitis model. Survival to 10 days with two different gram‐negative P. aeruginosa strains was significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) by the direct application of CMC gel containing antibodies alone to the surgical implant site. Human‐equivalent doses of systemic vancomycin provided a significantly improved benefit (p < 0.01) against lethal, implant‐centered, gram‐positive MRSA infection. However, locally delivered polyclonal human antibodies in combination with a range of systemic vancomycin doses against MRSA failed to improve host survival. Successful antibody therapy against gram‐negative, implant‐centered infections complements the clinically routine use of systemic antibiotics, providing a mechanism of protection independent of antibiotic resistance. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 60: 206–215, 2002</description><subject>Abdomen - microbiology</subject><subject>Abdomen - physiology</subject><subject>abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibodies - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies - therapeutic use</subject><subject>antibody</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomaterials</subject><subject>Drug Implants</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>gram-positive</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</subject><subject>Immunomodulators</subject><subject>implant</subject><subject>infection</subject><subject>local delivery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1O3DAUha2qVRloF32ByhuQWATs-C9eUsRP0dAitVWXluM4g8GJUzsDZN8Hr4dMy6orW_b3nXt1APiA0RFGqDy-q7vNhctXYIGRFAXlhL8Gi_yHC0kQ3QG7Kd0hhKQk-C3YwbgiDAuxAL9vYhhuJ6_N6Awco9VjZ_sRhhauou6KISQ3ugcLdd_ML71d6fmlbkLneu2h6wavs-T61uac0Ce4Tq5fQR-M9n6CjfXZiLaBQ_CT8WFjZcPVoXE2vQNvWu2Tfb8998CP87Pvp5fF8uvF59OTZWFoSWWBeVkTy1klJNKc1AiLljHCKeWyqpAwNeXC8JYLKghibclKTQihrJEc4dqQPXAw5w4x_FrbNKrOJWN9Xt6GdVICUyoqjjJ4OIMmhpSibdUQXafjpDBSm8pVrlw9V57Zj9vQdd3Z5oXcdpyB_S2gU66jjbo3Lr1whObtnoOOZ-7ReTv9f6K6-nT9d3QxGy6N9umfoeO94oIIpn5-uVDX_Bu7weWlWpI_szKoLg</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>Poelstra, Kornelis A.</creator><creator>Barekzi, Nazir A.</creator><creator>Rediske, Andrea M.</creator><creator>Felts, Adrian G.</creator><creator>Slunt, Jeffrey B.</creator><creator>Grainger, David W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies</title><author>Poelstra, Kornelis A. ; Barekzi, Nazir A. ; Rediske, Andrea M. ; Felts, Adrian G. ; Slunt, Jeffrey B. ; Grainger, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-162b3e658790a63b017f553644698807cb467c6f6747305f252a33345d9601bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - microbiology</topic><topic>Abdomen - physiology</topic><topic>abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibodies - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies - therapeutic use</topic><topic>antibody</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomaterials</topic><topic>Drug Implants</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>gram-positive</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</topic><topic>Immunomodulators</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>infection</topic><topic>local delivery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poelstra, Kornelis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barekzi, Nazir A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rediske, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felts, Adrian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slunt, Jeffrey B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grainger, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poelstra, Kornelis A.</au><au>Barekzi, Nazir A.</au><au>Rediske, Andrea M.</au><au>Felts, Adrian G.</au><au>Slunt, Jeffrey B.</au><au>Grainger, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>206-215</pages><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1097-4636</eissn><coden>JBMRBG</coden><abstract>The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial‐centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We describe the direct local delivery of polyclonal human antibodies to abdominal surgical implant sites to reduce infection severity and mortality in a lethal murine model of surgical implant‐centered peritoneal infection. Surgical implant‐centered peritonitis was produced in 180 female CF‐1 mice by the direct inoculation of surgical‐grade polypropylene mesh disks placed in the peritoneal cavity with lethal doses of either methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mice randomly received a resorbable antibody delivery vehicle at the implant site: either a blank carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) aqueous gel or the same CMC gel containing 10 mg of pooled polyclonal human immunoglobulin G locally on the implant after infection, either alone or in combination with systemic doses of cefazolin or vancomycin antibiotics. Human antibodies were rapidly released (first‐order kinetics) from the gel carrier to both peritoneal fluids and serum in both infection scenarios. Inocula required for lethal infection were substantially reduced by surgery and the presence of the implant versus a closed lethal peritonitis model. Survival to 10 days with two different gram‐negative P. aeruginosa strains was significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) by the direct application of CMC gel containing antibodies alone to the surgical implant site. Human‐equivalent doses of systemic vancomycin provided a significantly improved benefit (p < 0.01) against lethal, implant‐centered, gram‐positive MRSA infection. However, locally delivered polyclonal human antibodies in combination with a range of systemic vancomycin doses against MRSA failed to improve host survival. Successful antibody therapy against gram‐negative, implant‐centered infections complements the clinically routine use of systemic antibiotics, providing a mechanism of protection independent of antibiotic resistance. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 60: 206–215, 2002</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>11835177</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.10069</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9304 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research, 2002-04, Vol.60 (1), p.206-215 |
issn | 0021-9304 1097-4636 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71447860 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Abdomen - microbiology Abdomen - physiology abdominal surgery Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibodies - administration & dosage Antibodies - therapeutic use antibody Biocompatible Materials Biological and medical sciences biomaterials Drug Implants Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Female Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - prevention & control gram-positive Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Humans Immunoglobulin G - administration & dosage Immunoglobulin G - immunology Immunomodulators implant infection local delivery Medical sciences Methicillin Resistance Mice Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology Pseudomonas Infections - prevention & control Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments |
title | Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A22%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prophylactic%20treatment%20of%20gram-positive%20and%20gram-negative%20abdominal%20implant%20infections%20using%20locally%20delivered%20polyclonal%20antibodies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research&rft.au=Poelstra,%20Kornelis%20A.&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=206-215&rft.issn=0021-9304&rft.eissn=1097-4636&rft.coden=JBMRBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.10069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71447860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71447860&rft_id=info:pmid/11835177&rfr_iscdi=true |