Comparative genotyping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains S288C and CEN.PK113-7D using oligonucleotide microarrays
To analyse the reliability and accuracy of genotype analysis with high-density oligonucleotide microarrays, this method and other experimental approaches were used to analyse genomic DNA of two popular Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains. S288C was used for systematic sequencing of ‘the’ S....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | FEMS yeast research 2003-12, Vol.4 (3), p.259-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 269 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | FEMS yeast research |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Daran-Lapujade, Pascale Daran, Jean-Marc Kötter, Peter Petit, Thomas Piper, Matthew D.W Pronk, Jack T |
description | To analyse the reliability and accuracy of genotype analysis with high-density oligonucleotide microarrays, this method and other experimental approaches were used to analyse genomic DNA of two popular
Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains. S288C was used for systematic sequencing of ‘the’
S. cerevisiae genome; CEN.PK113-7D is a popular strain for physiological studies and functional genomics. Random amplified polymorphic DNA, electrophoretic karyotyping and microarray analysis all indicated a high level of sequence similarity between the two strains. In the microarray analysis, as few as 288 (4.5%) of the ca. 6300 represented yeast genes were identified that yielded significantly different hybridisation intensities between the two strains. These could be classified as amplified, absent, or with sequence polymorphism in CEN.PK113-7D compared to S288C. A detailed analysis focused on the subset of 25 genes called absent in CEN.PK113-7D. Among these absent genes, 17 were clustered together on five chromosomes, mainly in subtelomeric regions. Thorough analysis of these regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism confirmed the absence of these genes in CEN.PK113-7D. Surprisingly, three of these regions were not smaller in CEN.PK113-7D chromosomes, indicating that they may harbour unidentified and potentially new sequences. In addition, eight genes called absent by the microarrays were scattered over the chromosomes. Using diagnostic PCR most of these genes were actually found to be present in CEN.PK113-7D, but after sequencing were found to differ significantly at the DNA level from S288C, explaining the poor hybridisation to the arrays. Our results indicate that DNA microarrays are a powerful tool for determining genotypic similarity between different yeast strains. However, to obtain meaningful information at the individual gene level, this method should be backed up by additional techniques. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00156-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71433865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00156-9</oup_id><els_id>S1567135603001569</els_id><sourcerecordid>71433865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e4139-e19e7407030f77fe5f099bfa0be0e8fa4fd2f670a68243fb4ea750a6df8673283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhosozof-BCUgiC46njRp0qxE6oyKg4pXF65C2p7cydA2NWnv0K2_3N4PFUV0lZzkec4heZPkAYUzClQ8W9FcyJSyXDwB9hRgKVN1Kzk-HAt---c-F0fJSYzXCyQBirvJEeUi55zBcfKt9N1gghndBskaez_Og-vXxFsyXiFZmbq-MsF3c42R1Bhw46IzSFpT-cXyYSZxDMb1kayyoiiJ6RtSnr87-_CWUpbKl2SKu36tW_t-qlv0o2uQdK4O3oRg5ngvuWNNG_H-YT1NPl-cfypfp5fvX70pX1ymyClTKVKFkoMEBlZKi7kFpSproELAwhpum8wKCUYUGWe24mhkvlSNLYRkWcFOk8f7vkPwXyeMo-5crLFtTY9-ilpSzlgh8v-CGYCiSm3BR3-A134K_fIInTGhuCqgyBbq4YGaqg4bPQTXmTDrHyEsgNoDN67F-dc96G3Sepe03saogeld0lrpiy8fs1wtLuxdPw1_N9PfzHSrPN8ruHz2xmHQsXbY19i4gPWoG-_-PZt9Bx2OvHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369498082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative genotyping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains S288C and CEN.PK113-7D using oligonucleotide microarrays</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale ; Daran, Jean-Marc ; Kötter, Peter ; Petit, Thomas ; Piper, Matthew D.W ; Pronk, Jack T</creator><creatorcontrib>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale ; Daran, Jean-Marc ; Kötter, Peter ; Petit, Thomas ; Piper, Matthew D.W ; Pronk, Jack T</creatorcontrib><description>To analyse the reliability and accuracy of genotype analysis with high-density oligonucleotide microarrays, this method and other experimental approaches were used to analyse genomic DNA of two popular
Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains. S288C was used for systematic sequencing of ‘the’
S. cerevisiae genome; CEN.PK113-7D is a popular strain for physiological studies and functional genomics. Random amplified polymorphic DNA, electrophoretic karyotyping and microarray analysis all indicated a high level of sequence similarity between the two strains. In the microarray analysis, as few as 288 (4.5%) of the ca. 6300 represented yeast genes were identified that yielded significantly different hybridisation intensities between the two strains. These could be classified as amplified, absent, or with sequence polymorphism in CEN.PK113-7D compared to S288C. A detailed analysis focused on the subset of 25 genes called absent in CEN.PK113-7D. Among these absent genes, 17 were clustered together on five chromosomes, mainly in subtelomeric regions. Thorough analysis of these regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism confirmed the absence of these genes in CEN.PK113-7D. Surprisingly, three of these regions were not smaller in CEN.PK113-7D chromosomes, indicating that they may harbour unidentified and potentially new sequences. In addition, eight genes called absent by the microarrays were scattered over the chromosomes. Using diagnostic PCR most of these genes were actually found to be present in CEN.PK113-7D, but after sequencing were found to differ significantly at the DNA level from S288C, explaining the poor hybridisation to the arrays. Our results indicate that DNA microarrays are a powerful tool for determining genotypic similarity between different yeast strains. However, to obtain meaningful information at the individual gene level, this method should be backed up by additional techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-1356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1567-1364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00156-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14654430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>CEN.PK ; Chromosomes ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA microarrays ; DNA Probes ; DNA sequencing ; DNA, Fungal - analysis ; Gene polymorphism ; Genes, Fungal ; Genomics ; Genotype ; Genotyping ; Hybridization ; Laboratories ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods ; Oligonucleotide microarray ; Oligonucleotides ; Open Reading Frames ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymorphism ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Random amplified polymorphic DNA ; Restriction fragment length polymorphism ; S288C ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth & development ; Strains (organisms) ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>FEMS yeast research, 2003-12, Vol.4 (3), p.259-269</ispartof><rights>2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies</rights><rights>2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2003</rights><rights>2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS1567-1356%2803%2900156-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2FS1567-1356%2803%2900156-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14654430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daran, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kötter, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Matthew D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pronk, Jack T</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative genotyping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains S288C and CEN.PK113-7D using oligonucleotide microarrays</title><title>FEMS yeast research</title><addtitle>FEMS Yeast Res</addtitle><description>To analyse the reliability and accuracy of genotype analysis with high-density oligonucleotide microarrays, this method and other experimental approaches were used to analyse genomic DNA of two popular
Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains. S288C was used for systematic sequencing of ‘the’
S. cerevisiae genome; CEN.PK113-7D is a popular strain for physiological studies and functional genomics. Random amplified polymorphic DNA, electrophoretic karyotyping and microarray analysis all indicated a high level of sequence similarity between the two strains. In the microarray analysis, as few as 288 (4.5%) of the ca. 6300 represented yeast genes were identified that yielded significantly different hybridisation intensities between the two strains. These could be classified as amplified, absent, or with sequence polymorphism in CEN.PK113-7D compared to S288C. A detailed analysis focused on the subset of 25 genes called absent in CEN.PK113-7D. Among these absent genes, 17 were clustered together on five chromosomes, mainly in subtelomeric regions. Thorough analysis of these regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism confirmed the absence of these genes in CEN.PK113-7D. Surprisingly, three of these regions were not smaller in CEN.PK113-7D chromosomes, indicating that they may harbour unidentified and potentially new sequences. In addition, eight genes called absent by the microarrays were scattered over the chromosomes. Using diagnostic PCR most of these genes were actually found to be present in CEN.PK113-7D, but after sequencing were found to differ significantly at the DNA level from S288C, explaining the poor hybridisation to the arrays. Our results indicate that DNA microarrays are a powerful tool for determining genotypic similarity between different yeast strains. However, to obtain meaningful information at the individual gene level, this method should be backed up by additional techniques.</description><subject>CEN.PK</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA microarrays</subject><subject>DNA Probes</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - analysis</subject><subject>Gene polymorphism</subject><subject>Genes, Fungal</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide microarray</subject><subject>Oligonucleotides</subject><subject>Open Reading Frames</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Random amplified polymorphic DNA</subject><subject>Restriction fragment length polymorphism</subject><subject>S288C</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth & development</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>1567-1356</issn><issn>1567-1364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhosozof-BCUgiC46njRp0qxE6oyKg4pXF65C2p7cydA2NWnv0K2_3N4PFUV0lZzkec4heZPkAYUzClQ8W9FcyJSyXDwB9hRgKVN1Kzk-HAt---c-F0fJSYzXCyQBirvJEeUi55zBcfKt9N1gghndBskaez_Og-vXxFsyXiFZmbq-MsF3c42R1Bhw46IzSFpT-cXyYSZxDMb1kayyoiiJ6RtSnr87-_CWUpbKl2SKu36tW_t-qlv0o2uQdK4O3oRg5ngvuWNNG_H-YT1NPl-cfypfp5fvX70pX1ymyClTKVKFkoMEBlZKi7kFpSproELAwhpum8wKCUYUGWe24mhkvlSNLYRkWcFOk8f7vkPwXyeMo-5crLFtTY9-ilpSzlgh8v-CGYCiSm3BR3-A134K_fIInTGhuCqgyBbq4YGaqg4bPQTXmTDrHyEsgNoDN67F-dc96G3Sepe03saogeld0lrpiy8fs1wtLuxdPw1_N9PfzHSrPN8ruHz2xmHQsXbY19i4gPWoG-_-PZt9Bx2OvHg</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale</creator><creator>Daran, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Kötter, Peter</creator><creator>Petit, Thomas</creator><creator>Piper, Matthew D.W</creator><creator>Pronk, Jack T</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Comparative genotyping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains S288C and CEN.PK113-7D using oligonucleotide microarrays</title><author>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale ; Daran, Jean-Marc ; Kötter, Peter ; Petit, Thomas ; Piper, Matthew D.W ; Pronk, Jack T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e4139-e19e7407030f77fe5f099bfa0be0e8fa4fd2f670a68243fb4ea750a6df8673283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>CEN.PK</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA microarrays</topic><topic>DNA Probes</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - analysis</topic><topic>Gene polymorphism</topic><topic>Genes, Fungal</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide microarray</topic><topic>Oligonucleotides</topic><topic>Open Reading Frames</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Random amplified polymorphic DNA</topic><topic>Restriction fragment length polymorphism</topic><topic>S288C</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth & development</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daran, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kötter, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Matthew D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pronk, Jack T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>FEMS yeast research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daran-Lapujade, Pascale</au><au>Daran, Jean-Marc</au><au>Kötter, Peter</au><au>Petit, Thomas</au><au>Piper, Matthew D.W</au><au>Pronk, Jack T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative genotyping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains S288C and CEN.PK113-7D using oligonucleotide microarrays</atitle><jtitle>FEMS yeast research</jtitle><addtitle>FEMS Yeast Res</addtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>259-269</pages><issn>1567-1356</issn><eissn>1567-1364</eissn><abstract>To analyse the reliability and accuracy of genotype analysis with high-density oligonucleotide microarrays, this method and other experimental approaches were used to analyse genomic DNA of two popular
Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains. S288C was used for systematic sequencing of ‘the’
S. cerevisiae genome; CEN.PK113-7D is a popular strain for physiological studies and functional genomics. Random amplified polymorphic DNA, electrophoretic karyotyping and microarray analysis all indicated a high level of sequence similarity between the two strains. In the microarray analysis, as few as 288 (4.5%) of the ca. 6300 represented yeast genes were identified that yielded significantly different hybridisation intensities between the two strains. These could be classified as amplified, absent, or with sequence polymorphism in CEN.PK113-7D compared to S288C. A detailed analysis focused on the subset of 25 genes called absent in CEN.PK113-7D. Among these absent genes, 17 were clustered together on five chromosomes, mainly in subtelomeric regions. Thorough analysis of these regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism confirmed the absence of these genes in CEN.PK113-7D. Surprisingly, three of these regions were not smaller in CEN.PK113-7D chromosomes, indicating that they may harbour unidentified and potentially new sequences. In addition, eight genes called absent by the microarrays were scattered over the chromosomes. Using diagnostic PCR most of these genes were actually found to be present in CEN.PK113-7D, but after sequencing were found to differ significantly at the DNA level from S288C, explaining the poor hybridisation to the arrays. Our results indicate that DNA microarrays are a powerful tool for determining genotypic similarity between different yeast strains. However, to obtain meaningful information at the individual gene level, this method should be backed up by additional techniques.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>14654430</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00156-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1567-1356 |
ispartof | FEMS yeast research, 2003-12, Vol.4 (3), p.259-269 |
issn | 1567-1356 1567-1364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71433865 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | CEN.PK Chromosomes Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA microarrays DNA Probes DNA sequencing DNA, Fungal - analysis Gene polymorphism Genes, Fungal Genomics Genotype Genotyping Hybridization Laboratories Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods Oligonucleotide microarray Oligonucleotides Open Reading Frames Polymerase chain reaction Polymorphism Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length Random amplified polymorphic DNA Restriction fragment length polymorphism S288C Saccharomyces cerevisiae Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth & development Strains (organisms) Yeast |
title | Comparative genotyping of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains S288C and CEN.PK113-7D using oligonucleotide microarrays |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A08%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20genotyping%20of%20the%20Saccharomyces%20cerevisiae%20laboratory%20strains%20S288C%20and%20CEN.PK113-7D%20using%20oligonucleotide%20microarrays&rft.jtitle=FEMS%20yeast%20research&rft.au=Daran-Lapujade,%20Pascale&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=259-269&rft.issn=1567-1356&rft.eissn=1567-1364&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00156-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71433865%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369498082&rft_id=info:pmid/14654430&rft_oup_id=10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00156-9&rft_els_id=S1567135603001569&rfr_iscdi=true |