Clinical aspects for the use of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder cancer: a valuable tool?

The employment of DNA flow or image cytometry for oncological diagnostic procedures is favored because of its high correlation to tumor biological behavior. Prognostic statements and therapeutic strategies therefore are based on the high validity of DNA cytometric measurements. Using 151 bladder was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:DNA and cell biology 2003-11, Vol.22 (11), p.721-725
Hauptverfasser: Krause, F Steffen, Feil, Gerhard, Bichler, Karl-H, Schrott, Karl M, Akcetin, Ziya Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 725
container_issue 11
container_start_page 721
container_title DNA and cell biology
container_volume 22
creator Krause, F Steffen
Feil, Gerhard
Bichler, Karl-H
Schrott, Karl M
Akcetin, Ziya Y
description The employment of DNA flow or image cytometry for oncological diagnostic procedures is favored because of its high correlation to tumor biological behavior. Prognostic statements and therapeutic strategies therefore are based on the high validity of DNA cytometric measurements. Using 151 bladder washings from patients suspected of bladder cancer for this study, we examined the clinical value of various common methods of DNA single cell (SCI) and stemline interpretations (SLI). Comparing the specificity and sensitivity of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder tumors, we found 81 and 52%, respectively, for SCI of Boecking, 84 and 45% for SLI of Boecking, 61 and 58% for SLI of Fu, and 82 and 40% for conventional stemline interpretation. To improve diagnostic and prognostic validity of DNA image cytometry, we designed our own method of interpretation. In consequence, we identified six single DNA parameters out of all recorded measurements that correlated most to histopathological grading (G1-G3). Creating reference values at random and rating by points, we used a cytometric grading system for ranking. In detection of bladder cancer specificity and sensitivity ultimately arrived at almost 70% in application of our method. Thus, by this study, we were able to show that sensitivity of DNA examination can be increased by combining various DNA parameters. Apart from our own scheme, the discrepancy in interpretation of DNA image cytometry does not allow us to recommend this procedure as the only diagnostic in detection of bladder cancer. However, in regard to prognostic statements, particularly tumor biological behavior, DNA image cytometry appears to be useful.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/104454903770946692
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71433219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71433219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a073e8f3b7b744b6f10b100d8c08a6061e362a351be625badd9affd2f971abb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qqFDoF-ih8olb2hnbiWMuCC39JyG4cI9sZ9ym8saLnSDtt8eIlThw6GlGmt97I73H2GeErwi9-YagVKsMSK3BqK4z4h07wbbVjVYS3te9Ak0l-mP2sZR_ANAKhA_sGFXXmno8YeMmTvPkbeS27MgvhYeU-fKX-FqIp8Cvb6_4tLV_iPv9kra05D2fZj7SUukpzc-Mi3YcKXNvZ0_5glv-aONqXSS-pBQvz9hRsLHQp8M8Zfc_vt9vfjU3dz9_b65uGi8lLI0FLakP0mmnlXJdQHAIMPYeettBhyQ7YWWLjjrRuvrT2BBGEYxG65w8ZecvtrucHlYqy7CdiqcY7UxpLYNGJaVA818QjRBSIVZQvIA-p1IyhWGXaxh5PyAMzx0Mbzuooi8H99VtaXyVHEKXT9SfgRI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19223411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical aspects for the use of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder cancer: a valuable tool?</title><source>Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Krause, F Steffen ; Feil, Gerhard ; Bichler, Karl-H ; Schrott, Karl M ; Akcetin, Ziya Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Krause, F Steffen ; Feil, Gerhard ; Bichler, Karl-H ; Schrott, Karl M ; Akcetin, Ziya Y</creatorcontrib><description>The employment of DNA flow or image cytometry for oncological diagnostic procedures is favored because of its high correlation to tumor biological behavior. Prognostic statements and therapeutic strategies therefore are based on the high validity of DNA cytometric measurements. Using 151 bladder washings from patients suspected of bladder cancer for this study, we examined the clinical value of various common methods of DNA single cell (SCI) and stemline interpretations (SLI). Comparing the specificity and sensitivity of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder tumors, we found 81 and 52%, respectively, for SCI of Boecking, 84 and 45% for SLI of Boecking, 61 and 58% for SLI of Fu, and 82 and 40% for conventional stemline interpretation. To improve diagnostic and prognostic validity of DNA image cytometry, we designed our own method of interpretation. In consequence, we identified six single DNA parameters out of all recorded measurements that correlated most to histopathological grading (G1-G3). Creating reference values at random and rating by points, we used a cytometric grading system for ranking. In detection of bladder cancer specificity and sensitivity ultimately arrived at almost 70% in application of our method. Thus, by this study, we were able to show that sensitivity of DNA examination can be increased by combining various DNA parameters. Apart from our own scheme, the discrepancy in interpretation of DNA image cytometry does not allow us to recommend this procedure as the only diagnostic in detection of bladder cancer. However, in regard to prognostic statements, particularly tumor biological behavior, DNA image cytometry appears to be useful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-5498</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/104454903770946692</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14659044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aneuploidy ; Case-Control Studies ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics ; Flow Cytometry - methods ; Flow Cytometry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Ploidies ; Prognosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</subject><ispartof>DNA and cell biology, 2003-11, Vol.22 (11), p.721-725</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a073e8f3b7b744b6f10b100d8c08a6061e362a351be625badd9affd2f971abb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a073e8f3b7b744b6f10b100d8c08a6061e362a351be625badd9affd2f971abb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3029,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14659044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krause, F Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feil, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bichler, Karl-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrott, Karl M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akcetin, Ziya Y</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical aspects for the use of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder cancer: a valuable tool?</title><title>DNA and cell biology</title><addtitle>DNA Cell Biol</addtitle><description>The employment of DNA flow or image cytometry for oncological diagnostic procedures is favored because of its high correlation to tumor biological behavior. Prognostic statements and therapeutic strategies therefore are based on the high validity of DNA cytometric measurements. Using 151 bladder washings from patients suspected of bladder cancer for this study, we examined the clinical value of various common methods of DNA single cell (SCI) and stemline interpretations (SLI). Comparing the specificity and sensitivity of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder tumors, we found 81 and 52%, respectively, for SCI of Boecking, 84 and 45% for SLI of Boecking, 61 and 58% for SLI of Fu, and 82 and 40% for conventional stemline interpretation. To improve diagnostic and prognostic validity of DNA image cytometry, we designed our own method of interpretation. In consequence, we identified six single DNA parameters out of all recorded measurements that correlated most to histopathological grading (G1-G3). Creating reference values at random and rating by points, we used a cytometric grading system for ranking. In detection of bladder cancer specificity and sensitivity ultimately arrived at almost 70% in application of our method. Thus, by this study, we were able to show that sensitivity of DNA examination can be increased by combining various DNA parameters. Apart from our own scheme, the discrepancy in interpretation of DNA image cytometry does not allow us to recommend this procedure as the only diagnostic in detection of bladder cancer. However, in regard to prognostic statements, particularly tumor biological behavior, DNA image cytometry appears to be useful.</description><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - methods</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</subject><issn>1044-5498</issn><issn>1557-7430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qqFDoF-ih8olb2hnbiWMuCC39JyG4cI9sZ9ym8saLnSDtt8eIlThw6GlGmt97I73H2GeErwi9-YagVKsMSK3BqK4z4h07wbbVjVYS3te9Ak0l-mP2sZR_ANAKhA_sGFXXmno8YeMmTvPkbeS27MgvhYeU-fKX-FqIp8Cvb6_4tLV_iPv9kra05D2fZj7SUukpzc-Mi3YcKXNvZ0_5glv-aONqXSS-pBQvz9hRsLHQp8M8Zfc_vt9vfjU3dz9_b65uGi8lLI0FLakP0mmnlXJdQHAIMPYeettBhyQ7YWWLjjrRuvrT2BBGEYxG65w8ZecvtrucHlYqy7CdiqcY7UxpLYNGJaVA818QjRBSIVZQvIA-p1IyhWGXaxh5PyAMzx0Mbzuooi8H99VtaXyVHEKXT9SfgRI</recordid><startdate>200311</startdate><enddate>200311</enddate><creator>Krause, F Steffen</creator><creator>Feil, Gerhard</creator><creator>Bichler, Karl-H</creator><creator>Schrott, Karl M</creator><creator>Akcetin, Ziya Y</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200311</creationdate><title>Clinical aspects for the use of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder cancer: a valuable tool?</title><author>Krause, F Steffen ; Feil, Gerhard ; Bichler, Karl-H ; Schrott, Karl M ; Akcetin, Ziya Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a073e8f3b7b744b6f10b100d8c08a6061e362a351be625badd9affd2f971abb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - methods</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krause, F Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feil, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bichler, Karl-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrott, Karl M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akcetin, Ziya Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>DNA and cell biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krause, F Steffen</au><au>Feil, Gerhard</au><au>Bichler, Karl-H</au><au>Schrott, Karl M</au><au>Akcetin, Ziya Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical aspects for the use of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder cancer: a valuable tool?</atitle><jtitle>DNA and cell biology</jtitle><addtitle>DNA Cell Biol</addtitle><date>2003-11</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>721-725</pages><issn>1044-5498</issn><eissn>1557-7430</eissn><abstract>The employment of DNA flow or image cytometry for oncological diagnostic procedures is favored because of its high correlation to tumor biological behavior. Prognostic statements and therapeutic strategies therefore are based on the high validity of DNA cytometric measurements. Using 151 bladder washings from patients suspected of bladder cancer for this study, we examined the clinical value of various common methods of DNA single cell (SCI) and stemline interpretations (SLI). Comparing the specificity and sensitivity of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder tumors, we found 81 and 52%, respectively, for SCI of Boecking, 84 and 45% for SLI of Boecking, 61 and 58% for SLI of Fu, and 82 and 40% for conventional stemline interpretation. To improve diagnostic and prognostic validity of DNA image cytometry, we designed our own method of interpretation. In consequence, we identified six single DNA parameters out of all recorded measurements that correlated most to histopathological grading (G1-G3). Creating reference values at random and rating by points, we used a cytometric grading system for ranking. In detection of bladder cancer specificity and sensitivity ultimately arrived at almost 70% in application of our method. Thus, by this study, we were able to show that sensitivity of DNA examination can be increased by combining various DNA parameters. Apart from our own scheme, the discrepancy in interpretation of DNA image cytometry does not allow us to recommend this procedure as the only diagnostic in detection of bladder cancer. However, in regard to prognostic statements, particularly tumor biological behavior, DNA image cytometry appears to be useful.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>14659044</pmid><doi>10.1089/104454903770946692</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-5498
ispartof DNA and cell biology, 2003-11, Vol.22 (11), p.721-725
issn 1044-5498
1557-7430
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71433219
source Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription; MEDLINE
subjects Aneuploidy
Case-Control Studies
DNA, Neoplasm - analysis
DNA, Neoplasm - genetics
Flow Cytometry - methods
Flow Cytometry - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Ploidies
Prognosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics
title Clinical aspects for the use of DNA image cytometry in detection of bladder cancer: a valuable tool?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A27%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20aspects%20for%20the%20use%20of%20DNA%20image%20cytometry%20in%20detection%20of%20bladder%20cancer:%20a%20valuable%20tool?&rft.jtitle=DNA%20and%20cell%20biology&rft.au=Krause,%20F%20Steffen&rft.date=2003-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=721-725&rft.issn=1044-5498&rft.eissn=1557-7430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/104454903770946692&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71433219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19223411&rft_id=info:pmid/14659044&rfr_iscdi=true