Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy

The current theory of image formation in electron microscopy has been semi-quantitatively successful in describing data. The theory involves parameters due to the transfer function of the microscope (defocus, spherical aberration constant, and amplitude constant ratio) as well as parameters used to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of structural biology 2003-10, Vol.144 (1), p.79-94
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Zhong, Baldwin, Philip R, Mullapudi, Srinivas, Penczek, Pawel A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Journal of structural biology
container_volume 144
creator Huang, Zhong
Baldwin, Philip R
Mullapudi, Srinivas
Penczek, Pawel A
description The current theory of image formation in electron microscopy has been semi-quantitatively successful in describing data. The theory involves parameters due to the transfer function of the microscope (defocus, spherical aberration constant, and amplitude constant ratio) as well as parameters used to describe the background and attenuation of the signal. We present empirical evidence that at least one of the features of this model has not been well characterized. Namely the spectrum of the noise background is not accurately described by a Gaussian and associated “ B-factor;” this becomes apparent when one studies high-quality far-from focus data. In order to have both our analysis and conclusions free from any innate bias, we have approached the questions by developing an automated fitting algorithm. The most important features of this routine, not currently found in the literature, are (i) a process for determining the cutoff for those frequencies below which observations and the currently adopted model are not in accord, (ii) a method for determining the resolution at which no more signal is expected to exist, and (iii) a parameter—with units of spatial frequency—that characterizes which frequencies mainly contribute to the signal. Whereas no general relation is seen to exist between either of these two quantities and the defocus, a simple empirical relationship approximately relates all three.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71431847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1047847703002247</els_id><sourcerecordid>71431847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89dfbd26bc2b08c56fb9b48abaed2f6fc8a0c71994feafa14950b9e9f227a1ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAVhQJrYUX-ImsZiqin9SJRaYLds5F0dNHOwU1G-PQyuxMZ3v3rsn34-Qa6BzoFDcNfMmqHlGaR77OQU4IVOgfJFWxaI8Hd-sTCtWlhNyEUJDKWWQwTmZACtYngFMSbPcDa6VA9ZJjQP61nZysK5LnEl66WU7DkPUgvZW2W6T9O4bfRJ61IOXo6212ruNl_1HYlu5wZDYLsHtqMecXzVo1-8vyZmR24BXxzoj748Pb6vndP369LJarlOdMz6kFa-NqrNC6UzRSi8Ko7hilVQS68wURleS6hI4ZwalkcD4giqO3GRZKUFiPiO3h9zeu88dhkG0NmjcbmWHbhdECSyHSCUa4WAcfxg8GtH7eIHfC6BiBCwaEQGLEfA4ioDjzs0xfKdarP82jkSj4f5gwHjil0UvgrbYaaytj0hE7ew_8T-_7o9C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71431847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Huang, Zhong ; Baldwin, Philip R ; Mullapudi, Srinivas ; Penczek, Pawel A</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhong ; Baldwin, Philip R ; Mullapudi, Srinivas ; Penczek, Pawel A</creatorcontrib><description>The current theory of image formation in electron microscopy has been semi-quantitatively successful in describing data. The theory involves parameters due to the transfer function of the microscope (defocus, spherical aberration constant, and amplitude constant ratio) as well as parameters used to describe the background and attenuation of the signal. We present empirical evidence that at least one of the features of this model has not been well characterized. Namely the spectrum of the noise background is not accurately described by a Gaussian and associated “ B-factor;” this becomes apparent when one studies high-quality far-from focus data. In order to have both our analysis and conclusions free from any innate bias, we have approached the questions by developing an automated fitting algorithm. The most important features of this routine, not currently found in the literature, are (i) a process for determining the cutoff for those frequencies below which observations and the currently adopted model are not in accord, (ii) a method for determining the resolution at which no more signal is expected to exist, and (iii) a parameter—with units of spatial frequency—that characterizes which frequencies mainly contribute to the signal. Whereas no general relation is seen to exist between either of these two quantities and the defocus, a simple empirical relationship approximately relates all three.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-8477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14643211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biophysics - methods ; Chaperonin 60 - chemistry ; Electron microscopy ; Fourier Analysis ; Hemocyanins - chemistry ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Microscopy, Electron - methods ; Models, Statistical ; Normal Distribution ; Power spectrum ; Ribosomes - ultrastructure</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural biology, 2003-10, Vol.144 (1), p.79-94</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89dfbd26bc2b08c56fb9b48abaed2f6fc8a0c71994feafa14950b9e9f227a1ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89dfbd26bc2b08c56fb9b48abaed2f6fc8a0c71994feafa14950b9e9f227a1ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847703002247$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14643211$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Philip R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullapudi, Srinivas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penczek, Pawel A</creatorcontrib><title>Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy</title><title>Journal of structural biology</title><addtitle>J Struct Biol</addtitle><description>The current theory of image formation in electron microscopy has been semi-quantitatively successful in describing data. The theory involves parameters due to the transfer function of the microscope (defocus, spherical aberration constant, and amplitude constant ratio) as well as parameters used to describe the background and attenuation of the signal. We present empirical evidence that at least one of the features of this model has not been well characterized. Namely the spectrum of the noise background is not accurately described by a Gaussian and associated “ B-factor;” this becomes apparent when one studies high-quality far-from focus data. In order to have both our analysis and conclusions free from any innate bias, we have approached the questions by developing an automated fitting algorithm. The most important features of this routine, not currently found in the literature, are (i) a process for determining the cutoff for those frequencies below which observations and the currently adopted model are not in accord, (ii) a method for determining the resolution at which no more signal is expected to exist, and (iii) a parameter—with units of spatial frequency—that characterizes which frequencies mainly contribute to the signal. Whereas no general relation is seen to exist between either of these two quantities and the defocus, a simple empirical relationship approximately relates all three.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biophysics - methods</subject><subject>Chaperonin 60 - chemistry</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Hemocyanins - chemistry</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron - methods</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Normal Distribution</subject><subject>Power spectrum</subject><subject>Ribosomes - ultrastructure</subject><issn>1047-8477</issn><issn>1095-8657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAVhQJrYUX-ImsZiqin9SJRaYLds5F0dNHOwU1G-PQyuxMZ3v3rsn34-Qa6BzoFDcNfMmqHlGaR77OQU4IVOgfJFWxaI8Hd-sTCtWlhNyEUJDKWWQwTmZACtYngFMSbPcDa6VA9ZJjQP61nZysK5LnEl66WU7DkPUgvZW2W6T9O4bfRJ61IOXo6212ruNl_1HYlu5wZDYLsHtqMecXzVo1-8vyZmR24BXxzoj748Pb6vndP369LJarlOdMz6kFa-NqrNC6UzRSi8Ko7hilVQS68wURleS6hI4ZwalkcD4giqO3GRZKUFiPiO3h9zeu88dhkG0NmjcbmWHbhdECSyHSCUa4WAcfxg8GtH7eIHfC6BiBCwaEQGLEfA4ioDjzs0xfKdarP82jkSj4f5gwHjil0UvgrbYaaytj0hE7ew_8T-_7o9C</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Huang, Zhong</creator><creator>Baldwin, Philip R</creator><creator>Mullapudi, Srinivas</creator><creator>Penczek, Pawel A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy</title><author>Huang, Zhong ; Baldwin, Philip R ; Mullapudi, Srinivas ; Penczek, Pawel A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89dfbd26bc2b08c56fb9b48abaed2f6fc8a0c71994feafa14950b9e9f227a1ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biophysics - methods</topic><topic>Chaperonin 60 - chemistry</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Hemocyanins - chemistry</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron - methods</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Normal Distribution</topic><topic>Power spectrum</topic><topic>Ribosomes - ultrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Philip R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullapudi, Srinivas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penczek, Pawel A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Zhong</au><au>Baldwin, Philip R</au><au>Mullapudi, Srinivas</au><au>Penczek, Pawel A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Struct Biol</addtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>79-94</pages><issn>1047-8477</issn><eissn>1095-8657</eissn><abstract>The current theory of image formation in electron microscopy has been semi-quantitatively successful in describing data. The theory involves parameters due to the transfer function of the microscope (defocus, spherical aberration constant, and amplitude constant ratio) as well as parameters used to describe the background and attenuation of the signal. We present empirical evidence that at least one of the features of this model has not been well characterized. Namely the spectrum of the noise background is not accurately described by a Gaussian and associated “ B-factor;” this becomes apparent when one studies high-quality far-from focus data. In order to have both our analysis and conclusions free from any innate bias, we have approached the questions by developing an automated fitting algorithm. The most important features of this routine, not currently found in the literature, are (i) a process for determining the cutoff for those frequencies below which observations and the currently adopted model are not in accord, (ii) a method for determining the resolution at which no more signal is expected to exist, and (iii) a parameter—with units of spatial frequency—that characterizes which frequencies mainly contribute to the signal. Whereas no general relation is seen to exist between either of these two quantities and the defocus, a simple empirical relationship approximately relates all three.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14643211</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.011</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-8477
ispartof Journal of structural biology, 2003-10, Vol.144 (1), p.79-94
issn 1047-8477
1095-8657
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71431847
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Biophysics - methods
Chaperonin 60 - chemistry
Electron microscopy
Fourier Analysis
Hemocyanins - chemistry
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Microscopy, Electron - methods
Models, Statistical
Normal Distribution
Power spectrum
Ribosomes - ultrastructure
title Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20determination%20of%20parameters%20describing%20power%20spectra%20of%20micrograph%20images%20in%20electron%20microscopy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20biology&rft.au=Huang,%20Zhong&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=79-94&rft.issn=1047-8477&rft.eissn=1095-8657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71431847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71431847&rft_id=info:pmid/14643211&rft_els_id=S1047847703002247&rfr_iscdi=true