Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology

Background/Purpose: The diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) can be a vexing clinical problem. This study aims at determining the ideal therapeutic strategy for the management of CES. Methods: Medical records of patients with CES were reviewed retrospectively with regard t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric surgery 2002-02, Vol.37 (2), p.197-201
Hauptverfasser: Takamizawa, Shigeru, Tsugawa, Chikara, Mouri, Naruaki, Satoh, Shiiki, Kanegawa, Kimio, Nishijima, Eiji, Muraji, Toshihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 201
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title Journal of pediatric surgery
container_volume 37
creator Takamizawa, Shigeru
Tsugawa, Chikara
Mouri, Naruaki
Satoh, Shiiki
Kanegawa, Kimio
Nishijima, Eiji
Muraji, Toshihiro
description Background/Purpose: The diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) can be a vexing clinical problem. This study aims at determining the ideal therapeutic strategy for the management of CES. Methods: Medical records of patients with CES were reviewed retrospectively with regard to diagnostic method, therapy, and outcome. Results: During the last 29 years, 36 patients, aged 1 month to 9 years, were found to have CES. Diagnosis was made by fluoroscopy, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and pathologic examination. Of the 36 patients, 15 had tracheobronchial remnants (TBR), 13 had fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), 5 had membranous stenosis (MS), and 3 had multiple stenoses (MPS). EUS was diagnostic in distinguishing TBR from FMS. All patients with TBR underwent operative repair in which 13 patients had resection and anastomosis with or without preoperative dilation. The 14th patient had enucleation and the 15th underwent myotomy. Postoperative dilation was needed 2.2 times for 2.1 months on average in this group of patients. Ten patients with FMS were treated by dilation only (a mean of 4.7 dilations was required for a duration of 2.6 years), whereas 3 patients underwent open surgical intervention. Most patients with MS or MPS were treated by dilation (with or without endoscopic resection of the membranes), whereas 2 patients had surgical intervention. All patients in this study are doing well after a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years (range, 0.5 to 25 years) without any further operative interventions. Conclusions: If the etiologic diagnosis of CES is unclear, EUS is useful in distinguishing TBR from FMS. This distinction is critical, because patients with TBR should undergo surgical resection, whereas most cases of FMS, MS, and MPS can be treated with esophageal dilation alone. J Pediatr Surg 37:197-201. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71420504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022346802094769</els_id><sourcerecordid>71420504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-806ec80286a388dc33e4c68a7716f3c22973ad09cf3c4f24c639d5e370bbbdbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1PwyAYh4nRuDk9ezM9eevGRz-oN7M4NVniZZ4JhbcdS1cqUJP99zK3xJMn4MfDLy8PQvcEzwnO2WI3-HFOMaZzhmmeXaApyRlJc8zKSzSNOU1ZVvAJuvF-h3GMMblGE0I4qUjFp2i1tH0LvQmyS8DbYStbiFsfoLfe-KdkswUnBxiDUTF1MkB7SGrpQSe2TyAY29n2cIuuGtl5uDuvM_S5etks39L1x-v78nmdKpaxkHJcgOKY8kIyzrViDDJVcFmWpGiYorQqmdS4UvGQNTTesUrnEKeu61rXNZuhx1Pv4OzXCD6IvfEKuk72YEcvSpJRnOMsgosTqJz13kEjBmf20h0EweKoThzViaM68asuvng4V4_1HvQff3YVgeoEQPzgtwEnvDLQK9DGgQpCW_Nv-Q8jKX5q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71420504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Takamizawa, Shigeru ; Tsugawa, Chikara ; Mouri, Naruaki ; Satoh, Shiiki ; Kanegawa, Kimio ; Nishijima, Eiji ; Muraji, Toshihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Takamizawa, Shigeru ; Tsugawa, Chikara ; Mouri, Naruaki ; Satoh, Shiiki ; Kanegawa, Kimio ; Nishijima, Eiji ; Muraji, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Purpose: The diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) can be a vexing clinical problem. This study aims at determining the ideal therapeutic strategy for the management of CES. Methods: Medical records of patients with CES were reviewed retrospectively with regard to diagnostic method, therapy, and outcome. Results: During the last 29 years, 36 patients, aged 1 month to 9 years, were found to have CES. Diagnosis was made by fluoroscopy, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and pathologic examination. Of the 36 patients, 15 had tracheobronchial remnants (TBR), 13 had fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), 5 had membranous stenosis (MS), and 3 had multiple stenoses (MPS). EUS was diagnostic in distinguishing TBR from FMS. All patients with TBR underwent operative repair in which 13 patients had resection and anastomosis with or without preoperative dilation. The 14th patient had enucleation and the 15th underwent myotomy. Postoperative dilation was needed 2.2 times for 2.1 months on average in this group of patients. Ten patients with FMS were treated by dilation only (a mean of 4.7 dilations was required for a duration of 2.6 years), whereas 3 patients underwent open surgical intervention. Most patients with MS or MPS were treated by dilation (with or without endoscopic resection of the membranes), whereas 2 patients had surgical intervention. All patients in this study are doing well after a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years (range, 0.5 to 25 years) without any further operative interventions. Conclusions: If the etiologic diagnosis of CES is unclear, EUS is useful in distinguishing TBR from FMS. This distinction is critical, because patients with TBR should undergo surgical resection, whereas most cases of FMS, MS, and MPS can be treated with esophageal dilation alone. J Pediatr Surg 37:197-201. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11819198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; congenital ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Dilatation - methods ; Endosonography - methods ; Esophageal stenosis ; Esophageal Stenosis - congenital ; Esophageal Stenosis - diagnosis ; Esophageal Stenosis - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; therapeutic strategy</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric surgery, 2002-02, Vol.37 (2), p.197-201</ispartof><rights>2002 W.B. Saunders Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-806ec80286a388dc33e4c68a7716f3c22973ad09cf3c4f24c639d5e370bbbdbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-806ec80286a388dc33e4c68a7716f3c22973ad09cf3c4f24c639d5e370bbbdbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346802094769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11819198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takamizawa, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsugawa, Chikara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouri, Naruaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satoh, Shiiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanegawa, Kimio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishijima, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraji, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology</title><title>Journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Background/Purpose: The diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) can be a vexing clinical problem. This study aims at determining the ideal therapeutic strategy for the management of CES. Methods: Medical records of patients with CES were reviewed retrospectively with regard to diagnostic method, therapy, and outcome. Results: During the last 29 years, 36 patients, aged 1 month to 9 years, were found to have CES. Diagnosis was made by fluoroscopy, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and pathologic examination. Of the 36 patients, 15 had tracheobronchial remnants (TBR), 13 had fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), 5 had membranous stenosis (MS), and 3 had multiple stenoses (MPS). EUS was diagnostic in distinguishing TBR from FMS. All patients with TBR underwent operative repair in which 13 patients had resection and anastomosis with or without preoperative dilation. The 14th patient had enucleation and the 15th underwent myotomy. Postoperative dilation was needed 2.2 times for 2.1 months on average in this group of patients. Ten patients with FMS were treated by dilation only (a mean of 4.7 dilations was required for a duration of 2.6 years), whereas 3 patients underwent open surgical intervention. Most patients with MS or MPS were treated by dilation (with or without endoscopic resection of the membranes), whereas 2 patients had surgical intervention. All patients in this study are doing well after a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years (range, 0.5 to 25 years) without any further operative interventions. Conclusions: If the etiologic diagnosis of CES is unclear, EUS is useful in distinguishing TBR from FMS. This distinction is critical, because patients with TBR should undergo surgical resection, whereas most cases of FMS, MS, and MPS can be treated with esophageal dilation alone. J Pediatr Surg 37:197-201. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>congenital</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Dilatation - methods</subject><subject>Endosonography - methods</subject><subject>Esophageal stenosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Stenosis - congenital</subject><subject>Esophageal Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>therapeutic strategy</subject><issn>0022-3468</issn><issn>1531-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1PwyAYh4nRuDk9ezM9eevGRz-oN7M4NVniZZ4JhbcdS1cqUJP99zK3xJMn4MfDLy8PQvcEzwnO2WI3-HFOMaZzhmmeXaApyRlJc8zKSzSNOU1ZVvAJuvF-h3GMMblGE0I4qUjFp2i1tH0LvQmyS8DbYStbiFsfoLfe-KdkswUnBxiDUTF1MkB7SGrpQSe2TyAY29n2cIuuGtl5uDuvM_S5etks39L1x-v78nmdKpaxkHJcgOKY8kIyzrViDDJVcFmWpGiYorQqmdS4UvGQNTTesUrnEKeu61rXNZuhx1Pv4OzXCD6IvfEKuk72YEcvSpJRnOMsgosTqJz13kEjBmf20h0EweKoThzViaM68asuvng4V4_1HvQff3YVgeoEQPzgtwEnvDLQK9DGgQpCW_Nv-Q8jKX5q</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>Takamizawa, Shigeru</creator><creator>Tsugawa, Chikara</creator><creator>Mouri, Naruaki</creator><creator>Satoh, Shiiki</creator><creator>Kanegawa, Kimio</creator><creator>Nishijima, Eiji</creator><creator>Muraji, Toshihiro</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology</title><author>Takamizawa, Shigeru ; Tsugawa, Chikara ; Mouri, Naruaki ; Satoh, Shiiki ; Kanegawa, Kimio ; Nishijima, Eiji ; Muraji, Toshihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-806ec80286a388dc33e4c68a7716f3c22973ad09cf3c4f24c639d5e370bbbdbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>congenital</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Dilatation - methods</topic><topic>Endosonography - methods</topic><topic>Esophageal stenosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Stenosis - congenital</topic><topic>Esophageal Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>therapeutic strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takamizawa, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsugawa, Chikara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouri, Naruaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satoh, Shiiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanegawa, Kimio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishijima, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraji, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takamizawa, Shigeru</au><au>Tsugawa, Chikara</au><au>Mouri, Naruaki</au><au>Satoh, Shiiki</au><au>Kanegawa, Kimio</au><au>Nishijima, Eiji</au><au>Muraji, Toshihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>197-201</pages><issn>0022-3468</issn><eissn>1531-5037</eissn><abstract>Background/Purpose: The diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) can be a vexing clinical problem. This study aims at determining the ideal therapeutic strategy for the management of CES. Methods: Medical records of patients with CES were reviewed retrospectively with regard to diagnostic method, therapy, and outcome. Results: During the last 29 years, 36 patients, aged 1 month to 9 years, were found to have CES. Diagnosis was made by fluoroscopy, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and pathologic examination. Of the 36 patients, 15 had tracheobronchial remnants (TBR), 13 had fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), 5 had membranous stenosis (MS), and 3 had multiple stenoses (MPS). EUS was diagnostic in distinguishing TBR from FMS. All patients with TBR underwent operative repair in which 13 patients had resection and anastomosis with or without preoperative dilation. The 14th patient had enucleation and the 15th underwent myotomy. Postoperative dilation was needed 2.2 times for 2.1 months on average in this group of patients. Ten patients with FMS were treated by dilation only (a mean of 4.7 dilations was required for a duration of 2.6 years), whereas 3 patients underwent open surgical intervention. Most patients with MS or MPS were treated by dilation (with or without endoscopic resection of the membranes), whereas 2 patients had surgical intervention. All patients in this study are doing well after a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years (range, 0.5 to 25 years) without any further operative interventions. Conclusions: If the etiologic diagnosis of CES is unclear, EUS is useful in distinguishing TBR from FMS. This distinction is critical, because patients with TBR should undergo surgical resection, whereas most cases of FMS, MS, and MPS can be treated with esophageal dilation alone. J Pediatr Surg 37:197-201. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11819198</pmid><doi>10.1053/jpsu.2002.30254</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3468
ispartof Journal of pediatric surgery, 2002-02, Vol.37 (2), p.197-201
issn 0022-3468
1531-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71420504
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
congenital
Diagnosis, Differential
Dilatation - methods
Endosonography - methods
Esophageal stenosis
Esophageal Stenosis - congenital
Esophageal Stenosis - diagnosis
Esophageal Stenosis - therapy
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Retrospective Studies
therapeutic strategy
title Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Congenital%20esophageal%20stenosis:%20Therapeutic%20strategy%20based%20on%20etiology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Takamizawa,%20Shigeru&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=197-201&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/jpsu.2002.30254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71420504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71420504&rft_id=info:pmid/11819198&rft_els_id=S0022346802094769&rfr_iscdi=true